🚀[ANN] [WIKI] [ICO] WIKIBITS The First Blockchain-based Solution-driven Wiki 🚀

[rabotacoin]

If this project will be like Wikipedia, then I just do not understand the fact that we have almost the same site? What is their difference? What will distinguish them from each other?

most likely, that it will be so. Only this project will be similar to Wikipedia, only it will be connected with cryptography.

[1715137287]

1715137287

[1715137287]

1715137287

[1715137287]

1715137287

[SlimShadyMmp]

The presale has a minimum contribution of 1 ETH (too rich for me at the moment).  Will the general sale (which now starts on 3/15?) have a lower minimum?  What will that be?

I hope that the command of designers of it token more indulgent they will relate in this question and will really lower up to 0.1 minimum contribution. Such step will help to involve lot of investors and as a rule will speed up achievement of minimum purpose.

I think, that they want to focus on just a few big investors rather than a lot of small ones.
On the other hand, it might induce not reach soft cap fast.

What you are trying to impose is seems not a good idea because it will only create a conflict to small investors. I think you misunderstand the concept presale. Pre-sale is anyone can join so that it will be reached within a short period of time. It is not fair to say that it is only for big investors because there are a lot of small investors which can somehow help the target to achieved.

When I thought about it again, I realized you are right. 1ETH is really too much for a presale. I hope the team will get interested about it, as it would allow them to collect some amount earlier and to build a strong community.

If 1 ETH is the minimum contribution will WIKIBITS really gain the investors is the question and how come it can manage to reach the targets ? it might require a better advertising.

I guess forum, blog, social medias, youtube is the best way to earn more interest for the people, especially Wikipedia users.

it will take just few time before this project start to explore different areas as am sure it will just be a matter of timing i guess people in few months after ico will definitely be using wikibits

[Prk_7]

If this project will be like Wikipedia, then I just do not understand the fact that we have almost the same site? What is their difference? What will distinguish them from each other?

Yeah, it'll be similar to  Wikipedia. But I somewhere read that it'll have features of Google Yahoo and Wikipedia combined which really raises up the bar for Wikibits to perform. And Wikibits will be the first Blockchain-Based Solution-driven Wiki. Tis project will require time to compete on such a huge level so we must give it time before judging it.

[kyxap]

The presale has a minimum contribution of 1 ETH (too rich for me at the moment).  Will the general sale (which now starts on 3/15?) have a lower minimum?  What will that be?

I hope that the command of designers of it token more indulgent they will relate in this question and will really lower up to 0.1 minimum contribution. Such step will help to involve lot of investors and as a rule will speed up achievement of minimum purpose.

I think, that they want to focus on just a few big investors rather than a lot of small ones.
On the other hand, it might induce not reach soft cap fast.

What you are trying to impose is seems not a good idea because it will only create a conflict to small investors. I think you misunderstand the concept presale. Pre-sale is anyone can join so that it will be reached within a short period of time. It is not fair to say that it is only for big investors because there are a lot of small investors which can somehow help the target to achieved.

When I thought about it again, I realized you are right. 1ETH is really too much for a presale. I hope the team will get interested about it, as it would allow them to collect some amount earlier and to build a strong community.

If 1 ETH is the minimum contribution will WIKIBITS really gain the investors is the question and how come it can manage to reach the targets ? it might require a better advertising.

I guess forum, blog, social medias, youtube is the best way to earn more interest for the people, especially Wikipedia users.

The most powerful among it I consider various forums, exactly cвязaныe by the crypto-topics, as project exactly about it. Will be in him all, about this crypto-world, so, that any youtube will help not too in run-up and popularisation.

[joeperry]

The presale has a minimum contribution of 1 ETH (too rich for me at the moment).  Will the general sale (which now starts on 3/15?) have a lower minimum?  What will that be?

I hope that the command of designers of it token more indulgent they will relate in this question and will really lower up to 0.1 minimum contribution. Such step will help to involve lot of investors and as a rule will speed up achievement of minimum purpose.

I think, that they want to focus on just a few big investors rather than a lot of small ones.
On the other hand, it might induce not reach soft cap fast.

What you are trying to impose is seems not a good idea because it will only create a conflict to small investors. I think you misunderstand the concept presale. Pre-sale is anyone can join so that it will be reached within a short period of time. It is not fair to say that it is only for big investors because there are a lot of small investors which can somehow help the target to achieved.

When I thought about it again, I realized you are right. 1ETH is really too much for a presale. I hope the team will get interested about it, as it would allow them to collect some amount earlier and to build a strong community.

If 1 ETH is the minimum contribution will WIKIBITS really gain the investors is the question and how come it can manage to reach the targets ? it might require a better advertising.

I guess forum, blog, social medias, youtube is the best way to earn more interest for the people, especially Wikipedia users.

The most powerful among it I consider various forums, exactly cвязaныe by the crypto-topics, as project exactly about it. Will be in him all, about this crypto-world, so, that any youtube will help not too in run-up and popularisation.

Yes, various forums are one of the most effective methods for marketing of the project and this promotion also attracts many investors as we can find great peoples on the forums. This forum is also a great opportunity for people to promote the project and get good investors.

[MikesLeo]

The presale has a minimum contribution of 1 ETH (too rich for me at the moment).  Will the general sale (which now starts on 3/15?) have a lower minimum?  What will that be?

I hope that the command of designers of it token more indulgent they will relate in this question and will really lower up to 0.1 minimum contribution. Such step will help to involve lot of investors and as a rule will speed up achievement of minimum purpose.

I think, that they want to focus on just a few big investors rather than a lot of small ones.
On the other hand, it might induce not reach soft cap fast.

What you are trying to impose is seems not a good idea because it will only create a conflict to small investors. I think you misunderstand the concept presale. Pre-sale is anyone can join so that it will be reached within a short period of time. It is not fair to say that it is only for big investors because there are a lot of small investors which can somehow help the target to achieved.

When I thought about it again, I realized you are right. 1ETH is really too much for a presale. I hope the team will get interested about it, as it would allow them to collect some amount earlier and to build a strong community.

If 1 ETH is the minimum contribution will WIKIBITS really gain the investors is the question and how come it can manage to reach the targets ? it might require a better advertising.

I guess forum, blog, social medias, youtube is the best way to earn more interest for the people, especially Wikipedia users.

The most powerful among it I consider various forums, exactly cвязaныe by the crypto-topics, as project exactly about it. Will be in him all, about this crypto-world, so, that any youtube will help not too in run-up and popularisation.

Yes, various forums are one of the most effective methods for marketing of the project and this promotion also attracts many investors as we can find great peoples on the forums. This forum is also a great opportunity for people to promote the project and get good investors.

There are loads of investors for WIKIBITS already availing the opportunity and supporters are very eagerly participating to spread the word WIKIBITS as it deserve the potential in the crypto platform.

[Maingtoled1958]

The presale has a minimum contribution of 1 ETH (too rich for me at the moment).  Will the general sale (which now starts on 3/15?) have a lower minimum?  What will that be?

I hope that the command of designers of it token more indulgent they will relate in this question and will really lower up to 0.1 minimum contribution. Such step will help to involve lot of investors and as a rule will speed up achievement of minimum purpose.

I think, that they want to focus on just a few big investors rather than a lot of small ones.
On the other hand, it might induce not reach soft cap fast.

What you are trying to impose is seems not a good idea because it will only create a conflict to small investors. I think you misunderstand the concept presale. Pre-sale is anyone can join so that it will be reached within a short period of time. It is not fair to say that it is only for big investors because there are a lot of small investors which can somehow help the target to achieved.

When I thought about it again, I realized you are right. 1ETH is really too much for a presale. I hope the team will get interested about it, as it would allow them to collect some amount earlier and to build a strong community.

If 1 ETH is the minimum contribution will WIKIBITS really gain the investors is the question and how come it can manage to reach the targets ? it might require a better advertising.

I guess forum, blog, social medias, youtube is the best way to earn more interest for the people, especially Wikipedia users.

The most powerful among it I consider various forums, exactly cвязaныe by the crypto-topics, as project exactly about it. Will be in him all, about this crypto-world, so, that any youtube will help not too in run-up and popularisation.

Yes, various forums are one of the most effective methods for marketing of the project and this promotion also attracts many investors as we can find great peoples on the forums. This forum is also a great opportunity for people to promote the project and get good investors.

There are loads of investors for WIKIBITS already availing the opportunity and supporters are very eagerly participating to spread the word WIKIBITS as it deserve the potential in the crypto platform.

You are correct. I was just scrolling down some ICO projets some days before and found wikibits. This project really seems great and really can have a good future ahead. Also several investors are paying attention towards this project.

[Theizestooke]

Hey guys!

This looks very interesting and promising!
Can't wait for the launch. Definitely will follow this project.

It really does, if this will be launched successfully, it's one of the best option in the web in finding informations about a certain thing or etc. It's fast, reliable, secure, and legit information are some things it can provide for its users.

You are right, but even if users can provide some things or details wikibits still need to check if all details are legit. Anyway, I am following this project and hoping to see more developments.

Yeah that's very necessery ,because there are so many trolls on the internet and they might start abusing it and provide false informations . Wikipedia for example sometimes it could be very fked up as anyone could edit it .

They can always make some strict securities for their site if its successful launch to the public and I think the team are professional and will handle this kind of kinds of stuff.

Yes surely they will implement that, so that the platform won't be marked as a source of not-trusted-information. Wikibits team will really and must assure its users to have a reliable platform at all.

Wikibits team must do their work properly to avoid major problems that may cause delay and everyone don't want that to happen. What you are trying to pointed out about this not trusted information will be somehow discussed by the team on how they will solve that.

Well, for sure they do there best as much as they can. As time goes by many projects looks the same advocacy as well as features on this project that can create a competition. I hope this project will continue to strive what ever it takes on this great and tremendous project.

With that, they must really hire a lot of people in their employ. Verification and credibility of information are huge tasks for this platform since the scope of topics here in this platform is very wide. Hopefully they can pull this out when they finally launch it.

wikibits is first ever blockchain based solution driven wiki. wikibits vision is to make a community of the knowledge base and directly they link the users to relevant product and services. they can give value to your knowledge. they can reward wiki tokens directly to users. it will be  more popular in upcoming days.

[Sam67]

You got it just right and that really got my attention pretty fast. They actually have a lot of plus factors for the project and if the team gets to pull this out, man oh man! We are in for a good innovative ride. It is a very lovely and great idea and I am pretty sure it would fly greatly.

[Mikwik]

All investors really require profits and WIKIBITS aims mainly on the quality and maintaining its potential and developers do consider this, they should make the project look profitable by offering some good marketing skills.

[negancoin]

I'm wondering if not all tokens will be sold? The remaining tokens will be burned? And on which exchange does the developer plan to list?

In Wikibits case, I don't think this question matter, because only 250 million of it is offering for ICO and assuming that they burned unsold token of 250 million, still 1 billion will be distributed to contributors across 50 years and 250 for the team. they will issue 1.5 million of WIKI token which is very big.

[cammie16]

This for sure will be a long term project and needs a lot of development to gurantee its success. I joined your twitter account to get more updates soon.

If devs are serious with this project then we can be sure that wikibits will stay for a long time and might beat those popular sites in the future. For now we need to help to increase wikibits popularity.

You are right, we really hope that this project will be staying for a long time, I see that devs are really serious with the project. Let's hope that many people will support this project.

[Arvilaine]

This for sure will be a long term project and needs a lot of development to gurantee its success. I joined your twitter account to get more updates soon.

If devs are serious with this project then we can be sure that wikibits will stay for a long time and might beat those popular sites in the future. For now we need to help to increase wikibits popularity.

Since it is proud and confident to compete with big companies like google and yahoo, I think it can build it's own name since it is also back now by the IBM.

[LoverlyRomeos]

This for sure will be a long term project and needs a lot of development to gurantee its success. I joined your twitter account to get more updates soon.

If devs are serious with this project then we can be sure that wikibits will stay for a long time and might beat those popular sites in the future. For now we need to help to increase wikibits popularity.

You are right, we really hope that this project will be staying for a long time, I see that devs are really serious with the project. Let's hope that many people will support this project.

Yeah, which can gain enough knowledge about this project by having devs on our side hoping to announce soon the development on this project because as I noticed there is a huge chance to be success but we need some guidance as we support this great project

WIKIBITS team behind is really maintaining constant efforts and we could see lot of opportunities, am glad that Wikibits started to be extra active in their Twitter official page and i'm expecting the same way too with their FB official page as we keep supporting Wikibits.

[steampunkz]

If this project will be like Wikipedia, then I just do not understand the fact that we have almost the same site? What is their difference? What will distinguish them from each other?

most likely, that it will be so. Only this project will be similar to Wikipedia, only it will be connected with cryptography.

That's right mate. I am thinking that wiki bits focus on the cryptocurrency history or knowledge? correct me if I'm wrong.

[IpPrograff]

This for sure will be a long term project and needs a lot of development to gurantee its success. I joined your twitter account to get more updates soon.

If devs are serious with this project then we can be sure that wikibits will stay for a long time and might beat those popular sites in the future. For now we need to help to increase wikibits popularity.

You are right, we really hope that this project will be staying for a long time, I see that devs are really serious with the project. Let's hope that many people will support this project.

Yeah, which can gain enough knowledge about this project by having devs on our side hoping to announce soon the development on this project because as I noticed there is a huge chance to be success but we need some guidance as we support this great project

WIKIBITS team behind is really maintaining constant efforts and we could see lot of opportunities, am glad that Wikibits started to be extra active in their Twitter official page and i'm expecting the same way too with their FB official page as we keep supporting Wikibits.

When we see the activity of the team, it becomes sure that the developers are not just collecting money, but really on purpose to start their project, so that it is as functional as possible. Therefore, the activity in the Tweeter is one of the indicators of the team's work

[Inskchen]

This for sure will be a long term project and needs a lot of development to gurantee its success. I joined your twitter account to get more updates soon.

If devs are serious with this project then we can be sure that wikibits will stay for a long time and might beat those popular sites in the future. For now we need to help to increase wikibits popularity.

You are right, we really hope that this project will be staying for a long time, I see that devs are really serious with the project. Let's hope that many people will support this project.

Yeah, which can gain enough knowledge about this project by having devs on our side hoping to announce soon the development on this project because as I noticed there is a huge chance to be success but we need some guidance as we support this great project

WIKIBITS team behind is really maintaining constant efforts and we could see lot of opportunities, am glad that Wikibits started to be extra active in their Twitter official page and i'm expecting the same way too with their FB official page as we keep supporting Wikibits.

I also joined the project on Twitter, but I do not understand why only 643 followers? I think we need to be more active in advertising.

[wledgewil]

This for sure will be a long term project and needs a lot of development to gurantee its success. I joined your twitter account to get more updates soon.

If devs are serious with this project then we can be sure that wikibits will stay for a long time and might beat those popular sites in the future. For now we need to help to increase wikibits popularity.

You are right, we really hope that this project will be staying for a long time, I see that devs are really serious with the project. Let's hope that many people will support this project.

Yeah, which can gain enough knowledge about this project by having devs on our side hoping to announce soon the development on this project because as I noticed there is a huge chance to be success but we need some guidance as we support this great project

WIKIBITS team behind is really maintaining constant efforts and we could see lot of opportunities, am glad that Wikibits started to be extra active in their Twitter official page and i'm expecting the same way too with their FB official page as we keep supporting Wikibits.

I also joined the project on Twitter, but I do not understand why only 643 followers? I think we need to be more active in advertising.

I can sense that this project, which is the Wikibits will eventually boost in the community of crypto currency, may sooner or later, but of course the team should keep up their better performance and great kicking on here in the world of crypto currency. We all know that competitors will not also let a single project to just do what they want. So strive better to reach the success Team Wikibits!

[Doctor-Coin]

If this project will be like Wikipedia, then I just do not understand the fact that we have almost the same site? What is their difference? What will distinguish them from each other?

most likely, that it will be so. Only this project will be similar to Wikipedia, only it will be connected with cryptography.

is it not good that all your hard work is being paid with cryptocurrency which will also gain more value if so many people support the platform and also trade it in exchanges ?

[coinbitcoin91]

If this project will be like Wikipedia, then I just do not understand the fact that we have almost the same site? What is their difference? What will distinguish them from each other?

most likely, that it will be so. Only this project will be similar to Wikipedia, only it will be connected with cryptography.

That's right mate. I am thinking that wiki bits focus on the cryptocurrency history or knowledge? correct me if I'm wrong.

It is almost the same function as wikipedia but i think since users are able to contribute then therefore it is more accurate? Well let's find out and see what the devs can say about this.

It seems to be not. It will be exactly the same project as Wikipedia. Only based on the block chain. Vrodeby so. And what kind of information will be there, no one wrote about it.