Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[lmodric]

I personally believe with a rating like icobench as a filter and a tool to convince myself before investing, but we still have to do a thorough research and rating ico only as a survey agency

[Pendularin]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

SometimesI do believe in ICO ratings because it tells the exact rate of it but sometimes I am not convinced to believe Ico rating because it is far from the exact .

[bartolomeo]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

for me ICO rating is a good and a great information you can get if you are conducting a research base on the the project performance and upcoming update for the project, you can search for other ico rating website just to make sure all of the information is true about the ratings of the other project.

[philad220]

Many people base their believe on ratings of ICOs on various website, but i personally don't believe in it, because ratings this days has nothing to do with it success, so I make my research at somewhere else.

[JCO05]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

I certainly not. The reason is the same as OP have stated. There are some ICOs which are just overrated but when it comes on long term performance in the market, success is absent. while on the other hand, there are those ICOs that despits of the low rating, is making a name in the market. So we have to face the reality that things will happen as expected.

[Fourgh]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

It depends on who's doing the review and the rating. A friend of line told me not to trust ratings immiediately because it may not be true at all. So it's better to research and read more on the trusted companies that provide reviews for ICO's.

[CryptoLifeP]

I prefer chatting with quite experienced crypto fans here https://discord.gg/hP7KEy7

No spam, no bullshit. We discuss only awesome ICO projects and how to earn money in this crazy croyptomarket. 

[dollurs]

Don't depend only on this websites. Those are just references and we have to do our own researches before selecting an ICO. We can get an idea by looking at the ratings of these sites. But I've seen some project fails although they have high ratings on these sites.

[kudryas]

ico rating is for reference only. I do not completely trust it. It can only be partially based on theory. But the reality is quite different. The sale of other ico will depend on the intent of the investor

Yeah, just as a reference only. If you invest in ICOs just because they say so you'll in most cases lose money.

[Tszunami98]

I have seen a ton of projects that got 4.9/5 on ico bench or somewhere around that area and they failed to reach their soft cap. I think even if the rating is good and the project has potential eventually it might not get the necessary funds.

[vyazemskypeter]

I read the rankings from time to time but I am not totally dependent on them and prefer to compare the various sources. It's even better to do your own project analysis, so at least there'll be no one to blame except yourself in case of ICO failure.

I agree that our own analysis is much better than ready-made ratings, which for the most part look as if they were paid for the promotion of a particular project.

[Haytim]

No I do not believe it. I do not think the operations there are objective. Generally, scoring is done for commercial purposes. I think, everybody do your own research.

[masha-1v]

ico rating is for reference only. I do not completely trust it. It can only be partially based on theory. But the reality is quite different. The sale of other ico will depend on the intent of the investor

Agreed. Often I meet such projects that do not even have time to open to receive full funding for a couple of days. Here's how to make a rating... There's people setting there and judging on their own, you can also sit and judge on your own.

[cuteboy2016k]

some ICO's rating websites are good, but some are very bad and rating by paid so we can not believe all ICO rating websites, I think if you are going to invest in any ICO first you should check the project website,read roadmap,white paper, team behind the project, active in social medias and these all are ok then check the rating website if there is good rating then you can invest. I don't believe all rating ICO website,

[pedpedped101]

The best way I see to invest in ICO is by reaching yourself so as to confirm which to invest on, the site can bring you series of ICO to invest in but will never tell you which is the best to invest in.

[juragankambing]

so far i still believe in ico rating sites, whether it's ico bench or other ico rating,their reference is very useful for information and measuring tools ico success,

[Marine8]

Most ICO ratings are not always a true reflection of what is actually on the ground. Most of them are sponsored by the devs of these projects and are paid for. Although there are genuine sites that do ico ratings with external influence, these ones are very few. Ico rating can also be carried out by bounty hunters.

[xcajun21]

As an investor, i don't take these ratings too much into consideration. As a bounty, i look at the whole score con/pro
ICObench is useful if the advisor/ the person who gives the rating, is saying his piece of mind, then one can easily see the flaws, because he points them out for everybody, and these together, would have a higher magnitude in large scale. Then, i look at other sites as well. I seen formidable ICOs with hype, high ratings and all, get on idex, and sadly, remain on idex... Not a pleasant thing in bear markets such as these.

[21millionsbtc]

today we are nt being scammed by most of the icos the only reason is we have capable ico rating which we can trust i mostly follow this website icorating.com

[lynx_]

Yes i believe in ICO ratings sites, maybe there are some bad rating sites also but we can't neglect those who has done rating with genuine method and provide service honestly