The End Of The Bounty.

[Rostock]

Currently, there are a huge number of ICO projects. Of course, we all understand that half of these projects are either Scam or just very weak projects that nobody needs. But now there are at least such projects. What will be in a year, when the ICO every day will be less and less until it reaches the point that one project per month will be released? It is also worth mentioning that the number of participants in the bounty companies is increasing day by day, and the money allocated to the bounty companies are becoming less.  Conclusion: the bounty of the company will exist for another year, or a maximum of two.
What do you think about this?


If anyone agrees with me or if someone wants to do a good deed, then share the merit. I would be very grateful 

[Encelad]

I really do not like it when bounty managers do not limit the number of participants. I believe that this is not right and not fair. Now a lot of people want to participate in the bounty. Often the bounty does not have a lot of money. I've had cases when I got less than 5 dollars for 20 weeks of TW&FB bounty. And such things will faster kill the bounty than anything else.

[sheenshane]

Yeah mostly bounty are shit and some of them are a scam, I saw many projects are a scam even their participants they did not pay in the right amount of token some are missing. Two years is too long for bounty project that exist from the date token launched in the market, most I found out that it only runs 5 to 6 months the price was down and become a shit. That was I have observed in some ICO's project, especially their telegram community was very quiet.

[vrabac68]

There will not be an end to ICOs thats for sure.They will be regulated and there will be thousands of them.Some of them will not have bounties and they will be great ICOs and others with bounties less valuable.You need to DYOR before you start bounty

[Rostock]

There will not be an end to ICOs thats for sure.They will be regulated and there will be thousands of them.Some of them will not have bounties and they will be great ICOs and others with bounties less valuable.You need to DYOR before you start bounty

I think it would not make sense to carry out new ICO projects, as they will be repeated. To date, many projects have repeated the previous ones.

[Rostock]

I really do not like it when bounty managers do not limit the number of participants. I believe that this is not right and not fair. Now a lot of people want to participate in the bounty. Often the bounty does not have a lot of money. I've had cases when I got less than 5 dollars for 20 weeks of TW&FB bounty. And such things will faster kill the bounty than anything else.

I agree with you, but it seems to me that bounty bounty will collapse for these two reasons. People will be disappointed in the bounty because of the large flow of willing to participate in the bounty 

[korkyqq]

There will always be bounty, just not a lot of people that will do what it takes.

[abduljacklu]

I dont think so,because theres so many ICOs that are being launched from time to time which is why bounty campaigns arent going to stop as long as theres ICOs there will always be bounty campaigns which is going to be more profitable,as long as you are doing your job to complete the tasks you are going to be rewarded accordingly with your efforts.

[ldah94]

It would be very quick to say that the rewards will cease to exist in the near future because the blockchain technology can be used in different areas and I think there are many ideas to emerge, which if I give the reason is that the demand for participants in bounties It is high and it will be harder to be part of one.

[BADBITCH]

Currently, there are a huge number of ICO projects. Of course, we all understand that half of these projects are either Scam or just very weak projects that nobody needs. But now there are at least such projects. What will be in a year, when the ICO every day will be less and less until it reaches the point that one project per month will be released? It is also worth mentioning that the number of participants in the bounty companies is increasing day by day, and the money allocated to the bounty companies are becoming less.  Conclusion: the bounty of the company will exist for another year, or a maximum of two.
What do you think about this?

There will always be bounty
You just need to make the right decision about which bounty to join
Ignore every bounty with excessive participants

Join bounties with stakes
Join bounties with limits

Then you would have less to complain about

[leezay]

I don't think that Bounty will die so easy. Their so many ICOs and they all need financing. How are they going to advertise themselves? Bounty is the best for them and it is the cheapest, because they pay only part of the money raised.

[Dcoollakky247]

What I think should be done to curb this is regulation. Though I don't see bounties ending in the nearest future but as many ICOs are trooping in, some are real and very strong while many are scam or weak. Just imagine if you have wasted your time doing weak bounties and at the end of the campaign instead of getting your rewards, it's all about stories!

[shursight]

I really do not like it when bounty managers do not limit the number of participants. I believe that this is not right and not fair. Now a lot of people want to participate in the bounty. Often the bounty does not have a lot of money. I've had cases when I got less than 5 dollars for 20 weeks of TW&FB bounty. And such things will faster kill the bounty than anything else.

Last year, i participated in a bounty that paid me $10 for two weeks of Signature Campaign for being posting more than 30 posts weekly, this was something extremely dumb, obviously that this ICO was a failure anyways.

[Nichao]

The bounty will always give you some dollars for hour of your work. If there are only a few bounties on bitcointolk - everybody will try to be part of it ->everyone gets less money -> only part of them will spend their time in the next bounty -> less participants -> more money. The hourly payment will be selfregulated, otherwise this will not work.

[8rch7]

I think the bounty program will still exist, but the possibility of the percentage of allocation for bounty is not based on the total number of token supplies, but based on the number of tokens sold. Thus will be mutually beneficial between the company project and bounty hunter.

[Memminger]

Currently, there are a huge number of ICO projects. Of course, we all understand that half of these projects are either Scam or just very weak projects that nobody needs. But now there are at least such projects. What will be in a year, when the ICO every day will be less and less until it reaches the point that one project per month will be released? It is also worth mentioning that the number of participants in the bounty companies is increasing day by day, and the money allocated to the bounty companies are becoming less.  Conclusion: the bounty of the company will exist for another year, or a maximum of two.
What do you think about this?

Personally I think you are right. And it is really okay if managers would release one or two projects per two months but do not limit the participants. Some projects are really weak because people are divided and there are so many projects floating around, we don't even know which project to choose.

[Memminger]

I really do not like it when bounty managers do not limit the number of participants. I believe that this is not right and not fair. Now a lot of people want to participate in the bounty. Often the bounty does not have a lot of money. I've had cases when I got less than 5 dollars for 20 weeks of TW&FB bounty. And such things will faster kill the bounty than anything else.

Last year, i participated in a bounty that paid me $10 for two weeks of Signature Campaign for being posting more than 30 posts weekly, this was something extremely dumb, obviously that this ICO was a failure anyways.

Wow that's unfair. Maybe the developers are too busy to care anyways. But 30 posts fro 10$, that's as if working and not getting any. I mean it's still 10$ but other campaign could've given you 10x more for posting that much.

[MAUTMALAIKAT]

Bounty will continue to exist, although not ICO-shaped. But bounty more shaped ICO because the paymant is big. In my opinion, if true bounty will be lost definitely in this forum will be quiet. As a bitcointalk user, I am here also looking for a bounty for my additional earnings.

[$$$sparkles$$$]

Currently, there are a huge number of ICO projects. Of course, we all understand that half of these projects are either Scam or just very weak projects that nobody needs. But now there are at least such projects. What will be in a year, when the ICO every day will be less and less until it reaches the point that one project per month will be released? It is also worth mentioning that the number of participants in the bounty companies is increasing day by day, and the money allocated to the bounty companies are becoming less.  Conclusion: the bounty of the company will exist for another year, or a maximum of two.
What do you think about this?

ICO's will keep on coming! For how long? I don't know. But one thing I do know is that if these ICO's do keep coming, then it is a given that bounties will still exist. Not all ICO's have bounties, but almost all of them do. So it is unlikely for us to assume that bounties will seize to exist in the near future. Something that bounty hunters will continue to feast upon for the coming years.

[coinluisa]

Currently, there are a huge number of ICO projects. Of course, we all understand that half of these projects are either Scam or just very weak projects that nobody needs. But now there are at least such projects. What will be in a year, when the ICO every day will be less and less until it reaches the point that one project per month will be released? It is also worth mentioning that the number of participants in the bounty companies is increasing day by day, and the money allocated to the bounty companies are becoming less.  Conclusion: the bounty of the company will exist for another year, or a maximum of two.
What do you think about this?

I think they need a implementation that every bounty have minimum of participants because theres a lot of ICO now limitation is good solution so the reward for every participants will be fair.