The End Of The Bounty.

[Karmakid]

Currently, there are a huge number of ICO projects. Of course, we all understand that half of these projects are either Scam or just very weak projects that nobody needs. But now there are at least such projects. What will be in a year, when the ICO every day will be less and less until it reaches the point that one project per month will be released? It is also worth mentioning that the number of participants in the bounty companies is increasing day by day, and the money allocated to the bounty companies are becoming less.  Conclusion: the bounty of the company will exist for another year, or a maximum of two.
What do you think about this?

This might be possible, more and more ICOs will come which means the profit that each ICO will be spread through out the other ICOs. Some of them might be a good project some might be a scam. And it is true, the number of bounty hunters are increasing, so that means there will be lesser profit.

[1714278950]

1714278950

[1714278950]

1714278950

[cryptolord5]

Currently, there are a huge number of ICO projects. Of course, we all understand that half of these projects are either Scam or just very weak projects that nobody needs. But now there are at least such projects. What will be in a year, when the ICO every day will be less and less until it reaches the point that one project per month will be released? It is also worth mentioning that the number of participants in the bounty companies is increasing day by day, and the money allocated to the bounty companies are becoming less.  Conclusion: the bounty of the company will exist for another year, or a maximum of two.
What do you think about this?

No ending of the ICO's .. every day by day we have series of ICO's coming out. So what we are expected to do is seat down and know the right one to chose and follow. Secondly some ICOs has a limited numbers of participants, once the reaches the maximum they don't accept any longer and the token remains the same as before.
 So what are saying and what is your suggestions?

[Meraki]

I dont see the end of bounty as of now. The only thing that will kill bounty is when there will be no ICO. If the Age of ICO is done then so do the bounty so lets just continue to support legit ICO so that there will also be bounty campaign for you guys.

[nakamura12]

Yeah mostly bounty are shit and some of them are a scam, I saw many projects are a scam even their participants they did not pay in the right amount of token some are missing. Two years is too long for bounty project that exist from the date token launched in the market, most I found out that it only runs 5 to 6 months the price was down and become a shit. That was I have observed in some ICO's project, especially their telegram community was very quiet.

Less money recieved is because there are lots of member as mention but there is another reason that might be the real cause why you recieve less money or token. The project may be weak and with so many participants. Twitter or fb campaigns recieved payment less than signature and other campaigns. Unlike the signature you have more percentage from the company that's why you would recieve more tokens. Scam ICO's, weak ICO's lead to unpaid participants.

[CLywaTeLb]

Obviously, for many residents of developing countries it is a gold mine. Large number of participants, the lack of reports in such aggregators of bonuses as bountyhive, certainly, reduces the reward for participation in social networks.
Any bounty hunter must understand that this activity will not be long for him, and imho, for example, needs to training to be an investor or a trader.

[ovcijisir]

There are also scammers, people who apply on bounty with 100+ accounts and collect a lot of money.

[donadoni212]

agree with you, nowadays almost average ICO in circulation is SCAM and ICO which less desirable by investor or ICO fail. with the number of participants currently making bounty a very small payment because bounty managers do not restrict participants.
I follow ICO for 3 months after their signature, indeed they make payment but after that dev disappear from the community. very annoying when you do the job but the coin has no value in the market like a dead coin.

[felissss500@gmail.com]

Unfortunately the Golden age of the bounty has passed, it is a fact, who participated in the bounty 2 years ago and did not sell coins,today a millionaire.

[btccrusher]

First thing first, I don't think new projects (creating) and tokens will come to an end shortly. So ICO's are not going to end. Now, yes currently we are overserving the highest number of participants in bounties, everyone appreciates it. Most of the managers have a limit to maximum participant in a particular section of bounty. So I don't think we are going share a huge number of stakes. not everyone gets chance to join in the same bounty.

[y3v63n]

Currently, there are a huge number of ICO projects. Of course, we all understand that half of these projects are either Scam or just very weak projects that nobody needs. But now there are at least such projects. What will be in a year, when the ICO every day will be less and less until it reaches the point that one project per month will be released? It is also worth mentioning that the number of participants in the bounty companies is increasing day by day, and the money allocated to the bounty companies are becoming less.  Conclusion: the bounty of the company will exist for another year, or a maximum of two.
What do you think about this?

Totally agree. There are about a dozen new bounties appear on BCT every day and only a tiny fraction is actually worth the effort. And yes, unfortunately most of bounty participants do not give any value to projects they promote. They just keep posting/reposting stuff that noone but their fellow-hunters see. I see that more and more decent projects slowly turn to either not have a bounty at all or impose some kind of limitations on the participants.

[Ascredo]

The bounty will not disappear until the ICO. But recently there are a lot of projects and most of them are paid with tokens, which cost nothing or cost very cheaply.
A lot of participants in bounty companies have made them less profitable. It is necessary to participate in a large number of companies in order to earn something

[Magnum Cryptopus]

The bounties last too long, and with the new rules that prevent you from rising in rank are less and less profitable. We wait for someone to think again. At the moment, everything is blocked.

[platinov_and]

Yes, all correctly wrote the author of this topic, soon the concept of bounty will disappear, but it was and so it is clear that it will not go on forever. Half a year ago we discussed other terms when the Bounty will end. But the technology does not stand still and this market is developing much faster than we expected

I do not agree with you and I think that Bounty will invest a very long time. It seems to me that the campaigns will not disappear, they will just radically change, and the bounty campaign will have a different name.

[ItsEzMkay]

Unfortunately the Golden age of the bounty has passed, it is a fact, who participated in the bounty 2 years ago and did not sell coins,today a millionaire.

You could potentially say the same thing in another two years though, in fact it could even be better we just don't know. I would be weary of regulation though, that and KYC will be the death of the bounty program mark my words.

[Melvin Narag]

I really do not like it when bounty managers do not limit the number of participants. I believe that this is not right and not fair. Now a lot of people want to participate in the bounty. Often the bounty does not have a lot of money. I've had cases when I got less than 5 dollars for 20 weeks of TW&FB bounty. And such things will faster kill the bounty than anything else.

Unlike you I like if social media campaign be restricted when it come to number of participant, for them to earn normal award, like limit the participant on Twitter up to 2000 since more that it will also slow the bounty manager updating for the spreadsheet and after 2000 and still they are accepting then awards will become more lower.

[The Count of MonteCrypto]

I do not know if it's the end of the bounties, but for now, participating is just a waste of time.

[alexandrofff]

LuckyToken is just a start of Bounty

[rainezerr]

Currently, there are a huge number of ICO projects. Of course, we all understand that half of these projects are either Scam or just very weak projects that nobody needs. But now there are at least such projects. What will be in a year, when the ICO every day will be less and less until it reaches the point that one project per month will be released? It is also worth mentioning that the number of participants in the bounty companies is increasing day by day, and the money allocated to the bounty companies are becoming less.  Conclusion: the bounty of the company will exist for another year, or a maximum of two.
What do you think about this?

I think that the payment is getting good enough for those high ranked accounts because low ranked accounts cannot easily join other high paying campaigns since most of the ico's today are only accepting member ranks above.

[AliKooks]

LuckyToken is just a start of Bounty

I think the same about WeLocal Bounty

[Rostock]

Yes, all correctly wrote the author of this topic, soon the concept of bounty will disappear, but it was and so it is clear that it will not go on forever. Half a year ago we discussed other terms when the Bounty will end. But the technology does not stand still and this market is developing much faster than we expected

You're right that I'm right To be honest it seems to me that perhaps the bounty will grow into some new branch, but I can't even imagine what it will be. It would be good if many managers decided to limit the number of participants in the bounty.