The End Of The Bounty.

[hhussain]

Yes I agree with you this can happen because most of the bounty are getting scammed now because of ICO fails or Scam and the number of participants are also increasing in the bounty so funds are getting lower and lower so this can happen in a year or two.

[Mikado$]

Currently, there are a huge number of ICO projects. Of course, we all understand that half of these projects are either Scam or just very weak projects that nobody needs. But now there are at least such projects.

I agree with this. Real bonus campaigns are facing many obstacles with an increasingly open ico trend and increasing volume scam projects. Choosing a bonus manager can limit that. Not sure because it has many issues related to devs and bounty managers or issues from the team or project team.

If anyone agrees with me or if someone wants to do a good deed, then share the merit. I would be very grateful  

I have no merit to share!
I think the ICO is facing many scam projects, but it is still important in the crypto market. ICOs are promoting the development of the altcoin market and the improvements from the blockchain. Rewards will still exist around the crypto market. Because, community and marketing, advertising is still essential to the crypto market.

[Shenrox]

The problem with icos is that there are a lot of scams, maybe if there wouldn't be many scams, icos would be perfect at this moment.
Because of so many scams is the reason that we are seeing less projects than before reaching the hardcap. AND all this means that there are less participants on bounties.

[turkandjaydee]

There will always be many startup projects, its like the generation changes. And also the merit system will burden the low rank accounts. So stay positive sir, and we should remember that this is still the beginning period of crypto, its not widespreaded yet.

[HALLASTERA]

I think bounty will be not worth in next year because private investors will cease from btt or another social media.

[yeniruieni]

Bounty campaign never ends, the prize of the new projects that are always popping up. And participants who join the campaign grew much. Especially on participants social media facebook, twitter, telegram and content creation. Although now to be promoted should have excess naturally become increasingly tight competition efforts.

[JannaJa]

I think ICO will not disappear. There will be more and more of them. At the expense of the bounty - with every day people find out about the bounty. also the bouti will not disappear - there will be many participants and managers will set limits for participants. Advertising in social networks is very important for ICO!

[JannaJa]

I do not like the kyc program. it is not right. Managers should indicate in the beginning of the bounty about the kyc. Many people are unhappy with the fact that it is necessary to pass the kyc. I believe that only those who invest in ICO.

[Spaffin]

I do not think that generosity campaigns can exist for more than a year or two. This statement is based on the opinion that new ideas and areas of application of new tokens will be less and less. I do not think that this is so. Areas of application for the implementation of projects ICO is still very much, folk art is very diverse, like our life. Therefore, tokens will be used in many new areas of our lives. It seems to me that ten years of the ICO program will still exist. In the process, the essence of the crypto currency must change and develop, and this should also influence the change in the ICO process.

[SavageBrother]

I do not think bounties are done yet. It is just harder to find good projects because the amount of projects has increased drastically. That also means that the number of good projects has increased though.

[bucsky]

Bounty will not end because ICO will not end. In order to succeed the project they need bounty hunters to spread the news. Openning of new business is always there day by day, same in cryptoworld. Competition will always be there even in crypto. We will noticed that though there are lots of available crypto exchanges right now there are still wants to put up new exchanges.

[ujinice]

I also think that the bounty campaigns will die because of a large influx of people wishing to receive at least $ 1 for several weeks of work. Too many participants, it is necessary to limit the quantity.

[shinharu10282016]

I really do not like it when bounty managers do not limit the number of participants. I believe that this is not right and not fair. Now a lot of people want to participate in the bounty. Often the bounty does not have a lot of money. I've had cases when I got less than 5 dollars for 20 weeks of TW&FB bounty. And such things will faster kill the bounty than anything else.

Maybe they can also do KYCs. Like selfies and such.

There are too many alt accounts on the forum I say. And thats not fair.

Bounty will not end because ICO will not end. In order to succeed the project they need bounty hunters to spread the news. Openning of new business is always there day by day, same in cryptoworld. Competition will always be there even in crypto. We will noticed that though there are lots of available crypto exchanges right now there are still wants to put up new exchanges.

They will dear. I heard rumors 2019 is the end of ICOs. It will be a battle of holding and trading they say.

[leeroyj]

Social media campaigns will die very soon if there no limits for participants. Also needed to decrease number of scam projects.

[GoodSammy123]

Currently, there are a huge number of ICO projects. Of course, we all understand that half of these projects are either Scam or just very weak projects that nobody needs. But now there are at least such projects. What will be in a year, when the ICO every day will be less and less until it reaches the point that one project per month will be released? It is also worth mentioning that the number of participants in the bounty companies is increasing day by day, and the money allocated to the bounty companies are becoming less.  Conclusion: the bounty of the company will exist for another year, or a maximum of two.
What do you think about this?


If anyone agrees with me or if someone wants to do a good deed, then share the merit. I would be very grateful 

Increasing numbers of participants to me determines to an extent if such projects will be successful or not. For highly successful projects high number of investors ( participants) vividly makes reaching the softcap easier at relatively short time. On the other hand this decreases the percentage of tokens that will be rewarded to bounty hunter at the end of the ICO,  I think if a company has gotten a big success at a trial due to higher participation of investor there isn't any need to repeat such projects in another year.

[bellaayu]

I guess if seen from the bounty of its development is getting much better. Although for systems in this bounty will continue to fluctuate. New projects are always popping up. With the new projects popping up continues to indicate that the bounty will not end.

[Conte_Forni]

I think it's time to put a limit on the participants and it will be right, nobody wants to earn a penny. If so, I think everything will be fine !!!

[pavelkor]

it is not the end, but it will be upgrading soon i think, more services trying to make it more easily, also KYC is needed to avoid multi accounts i think

[AliKooks]

It is not the end for me, for example, I have WeLocal Bounty

[icoprofits]

There is nothing like end of bounty there will be new members coming and old members leaving market so bounty will stay forever and bounty hunter try to find new ico and the hunt goes on