NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information

[notsoshifty]

sure of course but when blocks are buried under a months worth of new blocks you can trust that you are on the right chain. thus you can just store the transactions and the block payload hash separately. And even though you couldn't calculate the hash out of the blocks you had, it would be such old news after a month that this wouldn't really matter.

Shrinking works similar way. Nothing stops us from doing it each month.

Is there a period of time that an AM is guaranteed to be visible in the current blockchain and not be shrunk away? (Even if e.g. the AM was sent a few minutes before a shrink run)

[1714195902]

1714195902

[1714195902]

1714195902

[Come-from-Beyond]

Is there a period of time that an AM is guaranteed to be visible in the current blockchain and not be shrunk away? (Even if e.g. the AM was sent a few minutes before a shrink run)

Shrinking will be done at height = CurrentHeight - 1440.

[BCFrex]

lophie would you mind to split your sell order up in 4,5 pieces, thank you

[gs02xzz]

Someone created a small "wall" on Bter @0.00015000    584,474.470    87.67117043

2 years of watching MtGox trades make me to suspect that this wall will suddenly disappear and all orders up to 0.16-0.18 will be bought.

What is your opinion on Doge? Will it go big?

[notsoshifty]

Are you against the ID of a special alias with @ in the front meaning it's bound to a the account id?

Hm, u shouldn't ask me, decide urself.

Well, I am for it.. But it's you guys (devs) that have to implement it :-)

A single alias per account that is guaranteed to be writable only by that account seems to be a good idea.

But something tells me the '@' symbol isn't the best one to use to identify it: it doesn't properly fit the normal usage of "something@somewhere". Maybe '=123456' (arbitrary choice of character there, sorry)?

[gbeirn]

NEWS FLASH: Stolen NXT On The Move

To catch a thief, follow the money NXT

Huh, nothing like a big price rise to make a thief break cover.

I just got a PM from plasticAiredale, who has been looking longingly at his lost/stolen NXT in its bandit/darkNXT/who-knows-what account.  

What an amazing coincidence, the price of NXT skyrockets and that NXT has now apparently been transferred into Dgex.  

Guess that wasn't darkNXT after all - SOMEBODY had a code to move it around...

For the record, where we left the EpicThomas saga in our last chapter:

13643712185318669838  contains 100088 NXT taken from Framewood's   697109629372813510  
15182566201738727933  contains 18665 NXT taken from plasticAiredale's    8439060069775407509      
9793828175536096502   contains 18197 NXT taken from newcn's   16886318053889080545    
12152013998194592943  contains  147690 NXT  taken from sparta_cuss's  11794318797680953099
  
16204974692852323982  contains 7808  NXT taken from PaulyC's  16821029889165561706  

...with 16204974692852323982 containing transfers in of an additional 1155NXT from four other transfers on 29.12.2013 08:19:00 thru 08:21:32, and EpicThomas claiming he never touched any of these accounts and the transfers just sort of happened on their own as part of some software bug or piggy-back hacker, and me showing a little mercy...

Now, the saga continues:


13643712185318669838 has transferred Framewood's 100,087 NXT to 2647797480528736696 at timestamp 20.01.2014 00:12:24
15182566201738727933 has transferred plasticAiredale's 18,663 NXT to 2647797480528736696 at timestamp 20.01.2014 00:13:55
9793828175536096502 has transferred newcn's 18,196 NXT to 2647797480528736696 at timestamp 20.01.2014 00:14:24
12152013998194592943 has transferred sparta_cuss's 147,690 NXT to 2647797480528736696 at timestamp 20.01.2014 00:14:59

16204974692852323982 has transferred PaulyC's 8,962 NXT to 7434018619814562489 at timestamp 19.01.2014 23:44:52

7434018619814562489 has transferred 61,372 NXT total to 12407220479703463755 at timestamp 19.01.2014 23:44:52

Note:

7434018619814562489 has previously received 9,527 NXT from 6164081464868000542 at timestamp 19.01.2014 23:44:05 ; is this stolen NXT from a previous heist?
7434018619814562489 has previously received 9,194 NXT from 16143592223796100493 at timestamp 19.01.2014 23:42:11 ; is this stolen NXT from a previous heist ?
7434018619814562489 has previously received 24,648 NXT from 17670462608804215164 at timestamp 19.01.2014 23:41:31 ; is this stolen NXT from a previous heist?
7434018619814562489 has previously received 9,042 NXT from 14527793117125736279 at timestamp 19.01.2014 23:40:35 ; is this stolen NXT from a previous heist?

2647797480528736696 has previously received 1,226 NXT from 11093204588975801957 at timestamp 20.01.2014 00:15:50 ; is this stolen NXT from a previous heist?

So... known stolen NXT from five known heists plus possible stolen NXT from five other possible heists are now in two brand-new "CLEAN NUMBER" accounts:

12407220479703463755 containing 61,372 NXT currently worth approximately $6,500 USD (PaulyC)
2647797480528736696 containing 285,859 NXT currently worth approximately $30,000 USD (Framewood, plasticAiredale, newcn, sparta_cuss)


Now the NXT is in "clean" new NXT accounts, time for the thief to send it to exchanges for BTC:


12407220479703463755 has transferred 61,371 NXT total to 10715382765594435905 at timestamp 19.01.2014 00:18:44

10715382765594435905 is a huge trading account, 1,340+ transfers, currently with 21M NXT ; salsacz thinks this is Bter?

2647797480528736696 has transferred 284,634 NXT to 6635869272840226493 at timestamp 20.01.2014 00:18:44

6635869272840226493 is definitely DGex

I have sent numerous emails and PMs to Graviton asking him to freeze trading on 2647797480528736696 and ID the user

I will send the same to Bter about 12407220479703463755.

EpicThomas, if I find out this is you and that you have played me for a fool, I am going to take vacation days from work and come to visit my sister in Florida and do a ride-along with the Orlando FBI when they come to put handcuffs on you.

Thanks! You are the best!

[landomata]

Is there a period of time that an AM is guaranteed to be visible in the current blockchain and not be shrunk away? (Even if e.g. the AM was sent a few minutes before a shrink run)

Shrinking will be done at height = CurrentHeight - 1440.

so why is everyone so worried about blockchain bloat....we can even do quarterly shrinking.

[landomata]

A single alias per account that is guaranteed to be writable only by that account seems to be a good idea.

But something tells me the '@' symbol isn't the best one to use to identify it: it doesn't properly fit the normal usage of "something@somewhere". Maybe '=123456' (arbitrary choice of character there, sorry)?

well people are already familiar with "@" connecting things so it might carry over.

[S3MKi]

rickyjames, did u see that video http://vk.com/wall-64086699_42 ?? He told about u

[NxtChg]

But something tells me the '@' symbol isn't the best one to use to identify it: it doesn't properly fit the normal usage of "something@somewhere". Maybe '=123456' (arbitrary choice of character there, sorry)?

I think it's perfect. It means "at 12342342" and shows what exactly "at" that address.

It's also somewhat similar to twitter.

And then we can use tags like this:

avatar@12312039
website@2342349

etc.

[Come-from-Beyond]

Someone created a small "wall" on Bter @0.00015000    584,474.470    87.67117043

2 years of watching MtGox trades make me to suspect that this wall will suddenly disappear and all orders up to 0.16-0.18 will be bought.

What is your opinion on Doge? Will it go big?

No clue.

[Come-from-Beyond]

so why is everyone so worried about blockchain bloat....we can even do quarterly shrinking.

We can do also Parallel Chains.

[salsacz]

yes, this one transfered to dgex and bter

here are other hackers:

twin's 100k
http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=3000&acc=696356957947686421

reanimation's 500k:
http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=3000&acc=6122084737303019172

giveaway cheater:
http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=3000&acc=17558386905419453557
+ already sold to dgex: http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=3000&acc=4885957642146709487
+ http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=3000&acc=6510198331066588689
(1 transaction to me - I can see you he says )

[opticalcarrier]

I dont seem to see any APIs (at least not listed in the wiki) regarding queries on which assets an account owns, or how many of them your account owns.  Have these just not been documented yet, or are they not in the software?

[landomata]

so why is everyone so worried about blockchain bloat....we can even do quarterly shrinking.

We can do also Parallel Chains.

I think you have a soft spot for service providers

[rickyjames]

rickyjames, did u see that video http://vk.com/wall-64086699_42 ?? He told about u

LOL!  LOL! LOL!

I guess I am doing my own brand of advertising for NXT!  We all contribute what we can.

[hyunsookmom]

Will USD and other fiat be tradable in the wallet? And will we be able to send USD etc through the NXT system or only NXT?

[TwinWinNerD]

here are other hackers:

twin's 100k
http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=3000&acc=696356957947686421

[landomata]

@ CfB

Botwall

http://qz.com/168264/this-start-up-turned-hackers-greatest-trick-around-on-the-to-make-botnets-obsolete/

[salsacz]

rickyjames, did u see that video http://vk.com/wall-64086699_42 ?? He told about u

LOL!  LOL! LOL!

I guess I am doing my own brand of advertising for NXT!  We all contribute what we can.

and still you haven't caught 1 thief or thief's Bitcointalk account or didn't find any new theft except of those who were found by others