[DEAD] DeepBit.net PPS+Prop,instant payouts, we pay for INVALID BLOCKS too

[[Tycho]]

I am having trouble understanding the payment system. I have my automatic payment set to 10 BTC. Wouldn't that make it to where I get my reward when my balance reaches 10 BTC? Currently, my balance is at ~17 BTC. Why hasn't the automatic payment been sent?

As i said some times here, in main post and on main page of site - during beta stage payments are processed daily because of additional checks :)
And one other reason: MANY people set their threshold to 0.01 BTC and tried even smaller numbers, so if i would pay every hour, it will flood the network with lots of low-priority transactions, which is not nice.

Just forced one payment for someone with ~17 BTC.

[[Tycho]]

Looks like people are still confused with two existing reward distributhing modes, so now i'm working on third one.
Hope you'll like it.

[Neereus]

Suppose more options are better. Interested in what this one will be. lol

[purpleeggguy]

Looks like people are still confused with two existing reward distributhing modes, so now i'm working on third one.
Hope you'll like it.

I kind of wish it would automatically select the option with the greatest payout based on your hash speed, although I suppose that would be less than ideal for the pool.

[dingus]

I am having trouble understanding the payment system. I have my automatic payment set to 10 BTC. Wouldn't that make it to where I get my reward when my balance reaches 10 BTC? Currently, my balance is at ~17 BTC. Why hasn't the automatic payment been sent?

As i said some times here, in main post and on main page of site - during beta stage payments are processed daily because of additional checks
And one other reason: MANY people set their threshold to 0.01 BTC and tried even smaller numbers, so if i would pay every hour, it will flood the network with lots of low-priority transactions, which is not nice.

Just forced one payment for someone with ~17 BTC.

Oops! Sorry for being stupid, I should've read more carefully.

[Neereus]

Looks like people are still confused with two existing reward distributhing modes, so now i'm working on third one.
Hope you'll like it.

I kind of wish it would automatically select the option with the greatest payout based on your hash speed, although I suppose that would be less than ideal for the pool.

My guess is that while if you are on the extremes of the speed it is easy enough to figure that out, but for those around the middle, it can be difficult to say which is better.

[BitLex]

Looks like people are still confused with two existing reward distributhing modes, so now i'm working on third one.
Hope you'll like it.

I kind of wish it would automatically select the option with the greatest payout based on your hash speed, although I suppose that would be less than ideal for the pool.

My guess is that while if you are on the extremes of the speed it is easy enough to figure that out, but for those around the middle, it can be difficult to say which is better.

there is no way, no matter what hashrate you have, to automagically switch to option with the greatest payout,
except maybe if you own a time-machine, but i guess then you would have better stuff todo with it anyway.

[Neereus]

Looks like people are still confused with two existing reward distributhing modes, so now i'm working on third one.
Hope you'll like it.

I kind of wish it would automatically select the option with the greatest payout based on your hash speed, although I suppose that would be less than ideal for the pool.

My guess is that while if you are on the extremes of the speed it is easy enough to figure that out, but for those around the middle, it can be difficult to say which is better.

there is no way, no matter what hashrate you have, to automagically switch to option with the greatest payout,
except maybe if you own a time-machine, but i guess then you would have better stuff todo with it anyway.

It is (in theory) possible to take an average hashrate (and from extension, average amount of shares of some time) and figure out how much you can expect to make in the long run using the different payouts.

[Neereus]

Would it be possible to get the payouts listed in descending order? (Newest on top)

[BitLex]

It is (in theory) possible to take an average hashrate (and from extension, average amount of shares of some time) and figure out how much you can expect to make in the long run using the different payouts.

well, in the long run you'll get <7% more from proportional, that's what you can expect.
no need to take your hashrate or any imaginary numbers into account.

[Neereus]

It is (in theory) possible to take an average hashrate (and from extension, average amount of shares of some time) and figure out how much you can expect to make in the long run using the different payouts.

well, in the long run you'll get <7% more from proportional, that's what you can expect.
no need to take your hashrate or any imaginary numbers into account.

I would say not true for those with lower hashrates, but could be wrong.

any imaginary numbers into account.

No need to be snide.

[[Tycho]]

It is (in theory) possible to take an average hashrate (and from extension, average amount of shares of some time) and figure out how much you can expect to make in the long run using the different payouts.

well, in the long run you'll get <7% more from proportional, that's what you can expect.
no need to take your hashrate or any imaginary numbers into account.

I would say not true for those with lower hashrates, but could be wrong.

Should be true for anyone.

[[Tycho]]

Would it be possible to get the payouts listed in descending order? (Newest on top)

It's possible, but what is your reason for that ?

[Neereus]

It is (in theory) possible to take an average hashrate (and from extension, average amount of shares of some time) and figure out how much you can expect to make in the long run using the different payouts.

well, in the long run you'll get <7% more from proportional, that's what you can expect.
no need to take your hashrate or any imaginary numbers into account.

I would say not true for those with lower hashrates, but could be wrong.

Should be true for anyone.

Then I stand corrected.
Was thinking the chance to miss blocks with lower hash rates might make a difference.

[Neereus]

Would it be possible to get the payouts listed in descending order? (Newest on top)

It's possible, but what is your reason for that ?

Well, it's not a problem right now. But once there is quite a few transfers, it would be nice to just see the latest one sent without having to scroll to the bottom.

[[Tycho]]

well, in the long run you'll get <7% more from proportional, that's what you can expect.
no need to take your hashrate or any imaginary numbers into account.

I would say not true for those with lower hashrates, but could be wrong.

Should be true for anyone.

Then I stand corrected.
Was thinking the chance to miss blocks with lower hash rates might make a difference.

If you miss each one of two rounds, then you need ~twice more hashrate. Then you will have, possibly, one share in each round, which gives you twice the reward, just proportional to your speed.

[Neereus]

well, in the long run you'll get <7% more from proportional, that's what you can expect.
no need to take your hashrate or any imaginary numbers into account.

I would say not true for those with lower hashrates, but could be wrong.

Should be true for anyone.

Then I stand corrected.
Was thinking the chance to miss blocks with lower hash rates might make a difference.

If you miss each one of two rounds, then you need ~twice more hashrate. Then you will have, possibly, one share in each round, which gives you twice the reward, just proportional to your speed.

Makes sense, thanks.

[TurdHurdur]

I made 0.19246032 in no time at all:

Code:

07.03.2011 00:19:21	0h 00m 	252	0.19246032

[sc8nt4u]

I made 0.19246032 in no time at all:

Code:

07.03.2011 00:19:21	0h 00m 	252	0.19246032

22 seconds.

06.03.2011 21:19:21   0h 00m   252    1.53968254
06.03.2011 21:18:59   0h 18m   12021    1.44035438

[[Tycho]]

Geezus proportional is profitable again.

It's always the same on average, as i said earlier.