Mashugina71
Member
Offline
Activity: 103
Merit: 10
|
|
March 30, 2016, 02:23:46 PM |
|
awesome pic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
Jumbley
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1003
|
|
March 30, 2016, 02:33:42 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Mashugina71
Member
Offline
Activity: 103
Merit: 10
|
|
March 30, 2016, 02:37:01 PM |
|
About to go boom on poloniex
|
|
|
|
Th3P
|
|
March 30, 2016, 02:45:49 PM |
|
If only the typo had been resolved in Word!
|
|
|
|
Sharkzz1
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 880
Merit: 251
Think differently
|
|
March 30, 2016, 02:54:56 PM |
|
Jared looking like a BOSS on that pic!
|
|
|
|
Moxymore
|
|
March 30, 2016, 03:09:30 PM |
|
Hi guys,
A friend have actually a really strange problem with his desktop DGB wallet : he's limited by a max amount of DGB to sent. Moreover, his fees are huge compared of mine.
Eg : Yesterday, I have transfered 336 000 DGB for a total fees of 42 DGB. My friend need to pay 96 DGB for a transfer of 38 000 DGB only. Have I missed something? Is there a rule that increase the fees to be paid the more you make transaction? This doesn't sound logic at all, and I've never read anything related to this.
We are both on the 4.0.3 wallet, 64 bits... on Windows.
|
♥ Digibyte ♥ "THE" Digital currency of the future ♥
|
|
|
Mystogan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
|
|
March 30, 2016, 03:11:18 PM |
|
Hi guys,
A friend have actually a really strange problem with his desktop DGB wallet : he's limited by a max amount of DGB to sent. Moreover, his fees are huge compared of mine.
Eg : Yesterday, I have transfered 336 000 DGB for a total fees of 42 DGB. My friend need to pay 96 DGB for a transfer of 38 000 DGB only. Have I missed something? Is there a rule that increase the fees to be paid the more you make transaction? This doesn't sound logic at all, and I've never read anything related to this.
We are both on the 4.0.3 wallet, 64 bits... on Windows.
I'm actually in the process of transferring my DGB from poloneix to DGB windows wallet I will let you know how much fees when I do.
|
|
|
|
Moxymore
|
|
March 30, 2016, 03:17:53 PM |
|
Hi guys,
A friend have actually a really strange problem with his desktop DGB wallet : he's limited by a max amount of DGB to sent. Moreover, his fees are huge compared of mine.
Eg : Yesterday, I have transfered 336 000 DGB for a total fees of 42 DGB. My friend need to pay 96 DGB for a transfer of 38 000 DGB only. Have I missed something? Is there a rule that increase the fees to be paid the more you make transaction? This doesn't sound logic at all, and I've never read anything related to this.
We are both on the 4.0.3 wallet, 64 bits... on Windows.
I'm actually in the process of transferring my DGB from poloneix to DGB windows wallet I will let you know how much fees when I do. You'll probably have no problem, like me. I'm just asking to see if experts think the same thing than me : a spyware (or equivalent) which take some control in the blockchain process via the wallet.
|
♥ Digibyte ♥ "THE" Digital currency of the future ♥
|
|
|
Sjacmur
|
|
March 30, 2016, 03:39:19 PM |
|
Conferention is over or just started ? Whats news ?
|
|
|
|
TamiLee
|
|
March 30, 2016, 03:48:08 PM |
|
Hi guys,
A friend have actually a really strange problem with his desktop DGB wallet : he's limited by a max amount of DGB to sent. Moreover, his fees are huge compared of mine.
Eg : Yesterday, I have transfered 336 000 DGB for a total fees of 42 DGB. My friend need to pay 96 DGB for a transfer of 38 000 DGB only. Have I missed something? Is there a rule that increase the fees to be paid the more you make transaction? This doesn't sound logic at all, and I've never read anything related to this.
We are both on the 4.0.3 wallet, 64 bits... on Windows.
Does your friend mine to one of the addresses? I had a similar problem when receiving lots of mining transactions. It's important to switch to a different wallet and address when receiving a lot of mining inputs.
|
|
|
|
bitkapp
|
|
March 30, 2016, 03:50:37 PM |
|
Hi guys,
A friend have actually a really strange problem with his desktop DGB wallet : he's limited by a max amount of DGB to sent. Moreover, his fees are huge compared of mine.
Eg : Yesterday, I have transfered 336 000 DGB for a total fees of 42 DGB. My friend need to pay 96 DGB for a transfer of 38 000 DGB only. Have I missed something? Is there a rule that increase the fees to be paid the more you make transaction? This doesn't sound logic at all, and I've never read anything related to this.
We are both on the 4.0.3 wallet, 64 bits... on Windows.
This is completely normal, the fees are a function of the amount of inputs or the "dust" that your transaction requires. Is your friend a miner because this usually causes this (unless you mine using a pool which pays out less frequently).
|
|
|
|
Telenong
|
|
March 30, 2016, 03:52:43 PM |
|
Conferention is over or just started ? Whats news ?
you can join with telegram, more activity there than here
|
Digibyte donate : DGHhJ4r6QqW2GMXL9FcsHpteFLZV3V3VgN
|
|
|
Sjacmur
|
|
March 30, 2016, 03:57:25 PM |
|
what the heck is "telegram" ?
|
|
|
|
ReSl
|
|
March 30, 2016, 04:04:53 PM |
|
Hi guys,
A friend have actually a really strange problem with his desktop DGB wallet : he's limited by a max amount of DGB to sent. Moreover, his fees are huge compared of mine.
Eg : Yesterday, I have transfered 336 000 DGB for a total fees of 42 DGB. My friend need to pay 96 DGB for a transfer of 38 000 DGB only. Have I missed something? Is there a rule that increase the fees to be paid the more you make transaction? This doesn't sound logic at all, and I've never read anything related to this.
We are both on the 4.0.3 wallet, 64 bits... on Windows.
You can set in your wallet! Maybe you changed it or he changed something!?Note that getting a transaction relayed across the network does NOT guarantee that the transaction will be accepted by a miner; by default, miners fill their blocks with 50 kilobytes of high-priority transactions, and then with 700 kilobytes of the highest-fee-per-kilobyte transactions. The minimum relay/mining fee-per-kilobyte may be changed with the minrelaytxfee option. Note that previous releases incorrectly used the mintxfee setting to determine which low-priority transactions should be considered for inclusion in blocks. The wallet code still uses a default fee for low-priority transactions of 0.1mBTC per kilobyte. During periods of heavy transaction volume, even this fee may not be enough to get transactions confirmed quickly; the mintxfee option may be used to override the default. These are the options in the wallet:-paytxfee=<amt> Fee per kB to add to transactions you send -mintxfee=<amt> Fees smaller than this are considered zero fee (for transaction creation) (default: 1.00) -minrelaytxfee=<amt> Fees smaller than this are considered zero fee (for relaying) (default: 1.00) -blockprioritysize=<n> Set maximum size of high-priority/low-fee transactions in bytes (default: 50000) Maybe he changed this setting in his wallet!
|
|
|
|
Sjacmur
|
|
March 30, 2016, 04:10:00 PM |
|
conferention is over or still not finished ?
|
|
|
|
Moxymore
|
|
March 30, 2016, 04:14:27 PM |
|
Hi guys,
A friend have actually a really strange problem with his desktop DGB wallet : he's limited by a max amount of DGB to sent. Moreover, his fees are huge compared of mine.
Eg : Yesterday, I have transfered 336 000 DGB for a total fees of 42 DGB. My friend need to pay 96 DGB for a transfer of 38 000 DGB only. Have I missed something? Is there a rule that increase the fees to be paid the more you make transaction? This doesn't sound logic at all, and I've never read anything related to this.
We are both on the 4.0.3 wallet, 64 bits... on Windows.
You can set in your wallet! Maybe you changed it or he changed something!?Note that getting a transaction relayed across the network does NOT guarantee that the transaction will be accepted by a miner; by default, miners fill their blocks with 50 kilobytes of high-priority transactions, and then with 700 kilobytes of the highest-fee-per-kilobyte transactions. The minimum relay/mining fee-per-kilobyte may be changed with the minrelaytxfee option. Note that previous releases incorrectly used the mintxfee setting to determine which low-priority transactions should be considered for inclusion in blocks. The wallet code still uses a default fee for low-priority transactions of 0.1mBTC per kilobyte. During periods of heavy transaction volume, even this fee may not be enough to get transactions confirmed quickly; the mintxfee option may be used to override the default. These are the options in the wallet:-paytxfee=<amt> Gebühr pro kB, die gesendeten Transaktionen hinzugefügt wird -mintxfee=<amt> Niedrigere Gebühren als diese werden als gebührenfrei angesehen (bei der Transaktionserstellung) (Standard: 1.00) -minrelaytxfee=<amt> Niedrigere Gebühren als diese werden als gebührenfrei angesehen (bei der Vermittlung) (Standard: 1.00) -blockprioritysize=<n> Maximale Größe in Byte von Transaktionen hoher Priorität/mit niedrigen Gebühren festlegen (Standard: 50000) Maybe he changed this setting in his wallet!Thank you for all the replies guys. He's a miner and I already told him to decrease the withdraw request from his pool. I'm discussing with him in order to see if something is wrong with his wallet. I have well red everything that concerns fees... but what about this limitation of a max amount of DGB to send? By decreasing the amount of request related to his adress, do you think this will increase the maximum amount of DGB per transfer?
|
♥ Digibyte ♥ "THE" Digital currency of the future ♥
|
|
|
bitkapp
|
|
March 30, 2016, 04:18:28 PM |
|
Hi guys,
A friend have actually a really strange problem with his desktop DGB wallet : he's limited by a max amount of DGB to sent. Moreover, his fees are huge compared of mine.
Eg : Yesterday, I have transfered 336 000 DGB for a total fees of 42 DGB. My friend need to pay 96 DGB for a transfer of 38 000 DGB only. Have I missed something? Is there a rule that increase the fees to be paid the more you make transaction? This doesn't sound logic at all, and I've never read anything related to this.
We are both on the 4.0.3 wallet, 64 bits... on Windows.
You can set in your wallet! Maybe you changed it or he changed something!?Note that getting a transaction relayed across the network does NOT guarantee that the transaction will be accepted by a miner; by default, miners fill their blocks with 50 kilobytes of high-priority transactions, and then with 700 kilobytes of the highest-fee-per-kilobyte transactions. The minimum relay/mining fee-per-kilobyte may be changed with the minrelaytxfee option. Note that previous releases incorrectly used the mintxfee setting to determine which low-priority transactions should be considered for inclusion in blocks. The wallet code still uses a default fee for low-priority transactions of 0.1mBTC per kilobyte. During periods of heavy transaction volume, even this fee may not be enough to get transactions confirmed quickly; the mintxfee option may be used to override the default. These are the options in the wallet:-paytxfee=<amt> Gebühr pro kB, die gesendeten Transaktionen hinzugefügt wird -mintxfee=<amt> Niedrigere Gebühren als diese werden als gebührenfrei angesehen (bei der Transaktionserstellung) (Standard: 1.00) -minrelaytxfee=<amt> Niedrigere Gebühren als diese werden als gebührenfrei angesehen (bei der Vermittlung) (Standard: 1.00) -blockprioritysize=<n> Maximale Größe in Byte von Transaktionen hoher Priorität/mit niedrigen Gebühren festlegen (Standard: 50000) Maybe he changed this setting in his wallet!Thank you for all the replies guys. He's a miner and I already told him to decrease the withdraw request from his pool. I'm discussing with him in order to see if something is wrong with his wallet. I have well red everything that concerns fees... but what about this limitation of a max amount of DGB to send? By decreasing the amount of request related to his adress, do you think this will increase the maximum amount of DGB per transfer? Yup it sure will, it will basically reduce the size of the transaction allowing it to be included in a block.
|
|
|
|
ReSl
|
|
March 30, 2016, 04:20:55 PM |
|
Yup it sure will, it will basically reduce the size of the transaction allowing it to be included in a block.
Yep,
|
|
|
|
Roderxpol
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
March 30, 2016, 04:21:45 PM |
|
Can someone please assist, I haven't opened my digibyte wallet for about a year and it's not syncing after leaving it open over night.
Have you updated your wallet to the latest 4.0.3 version? I am using the iOS wallet but can't find the link to update. http://digibyte.co/choose_walletThanks, is there any problems sending from iOS to poloniex? I am only selling because I desperately need the funds and the price is good. I am unable to get the iOS wallet to sync still. Does anyone else have this problem?
|
|
|
|
ReSl
|
|
March 30, 2016, 04:24:03 PM |
|
I am unable to get the iOS wallet to sync still. Does anyone else have this problem?
sorry no ios only VM but would take a while till setup. Guess you are on mobile, which ios version?
|
|
|
|
|