UdjinM6
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1318
Merit: 1040
|
 |
August 30, 2016, 08:16:19 PM |
|
> dash-cli masternode winners 4000 | grep Xw2XWEPLZvRo58YLiwe25S2nwaZ3UBULbD
"526268": "Xr27pbhzrstHiZoBTKiS5GtqnzLJnEJaPt:8, Xw2XWEPLZvRo58YLiwe25S2nwaZ3UBULbD:2",
This means that it had 2 votes to be payed at block 526268 but the winner was the other node. This happens sometimes because we have low threshold on votes for masternode to be counted as paid to help consensus because in 0.12.0.x we had no easy (cpu/hdd wise) way to confirm which node was actually paid or if any node was paid at all. We are working to make this much more robust and yet not too cpu/hdd heavy in 0.12.1.x (hopefully). Other than that you node is ok imo, keep it running and it should get paid soon. PS. My node missed a payment few days ago too... |
DASH: XsV4GHVKGTjQFvwB7c6mYsGV3Mxf7iser6
|
|
|
|
|
crowning
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 212
Merit: 100
Activity: -42
|
|
August 30, 2016, 09:15:37 PM |
|
Unfortunate, but happens. My personal record is 20076 blocks (almost 35 days). |
|
|
|
|
gerhard
Member
Offline
Activity: 78
Merit: 10
|
|
August 30, 2016, 09:45:44 PM |
|
Enforcement was shut off due to the fork, and during that time one or more miners hijacked MN payments. Enforcement is back on, so it should not happen again. |
|
|
|
|
splawik21
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1005
DASH is the future of crypto payments!
|
|
August 30, 2016, 10:09:07 PM |
|
Unfortunate, but happens. My personal record is 20076 blocks (almost 35 days). LOL, I thought mine was quite unlucky 21 days but crowning, you have beated all of us! |
BE SMART, USE DASH ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) |
|
|
MasterMined710
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1182
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 31, 2016, 01:17:56 AM |
|
Unfortunate, but happens. My personal record is 20076 blocks (almost 35 days). wow that's a long time. thanks to flare my nodes have been rock solid since i fired up some new ones back in december 2015. i think i missed one payment and had a few late payments (8-11 days) but also had a few early payments (5-6 days). in the end they ended up pretty even right now but someone with a larger node count would know better. i'm happy and it will only get better.  |
|
|
|
|
gusterdd
|
|
August 31, 2016, 08:55:16 AM |
|
Dash demand/supply is 1.49 It is very good status.  Because of monero pumpping, Monoro score is higher than ETH. Dash score is also high. I am waiting dash ride over monero again. |
Interest : Mining Rig, Bitcoin, Litecoin, Ethereum, Monero, Dash, Bitshare
|
|
|
|
dark-sailor
|
|
August 31, 2016, 09:16:16 AM |
|
Hi all
One of my masternode keeps getting errors from dashcentral email notification not sure if it's dashcentral buggy or it is my masternode playing up has anyone had this trouble before ?. .
|
|
|
|
|
|
anders lokka
|
|
August 31, 2016, 09:25:34 AM |
|
nice x2 on dash. unfortunatelly, didn't hold nothing
|
I have performed the most faster yobit ico sold out in 29 Minutes.
NEW PROJECT SOON!!!
|
|
|
|
docker
|
|
August 31, 2016, 10:19:44 AM |
|
Any predictions for DASH in 3-6 months terms?
I think it's quite obvious if you look at the historical chart. It will likely be the usual way unless something unexpected happens. Fundamentals are important but not always have an effect. Well if I look back I am in good profit mate  |
|
|
|
|
splawik21
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1005
DASH is the future of crypto payments!
|
|
August 31, 2016, 10:30:30 AM |
|
Hi all
One of my masternode keeps getting errors from dashcentral email notification not sure if it's dashcentral buggy or it is my masternode playing up has anyone had this trouble before ?. .
Are you on 12.0.0.58 version? |
BE SMART, USE DASH ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) |
|
|
|
Riseman
|
|
August 31, 2016, 10:31:36 AM |
|
Any predictions for DASH in 3-6 months terms?
I think it's quite obvious if you look at the historical chart. It will likely be the usual way unless something unexpected happens. Fundamentals are important but not always have an effect. Well if I look back I am in good profit mate But, if I think of it, isn't this too easy? I mean, buy below 0,01 then sell above 0,02, repeat every year or so. You can make decent profits, especially with leverage. Maybe it's time for this pattern to break since I've noticed it, lol. |
|
|
|
|
igatcha
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
|
|
August 31, 2016, 10:47:30 AM |
|
DASH is having an erection!
|
|
|
|
|
SweFinnish
Member
Offline
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
|
|
August 31, 2016, 10:52:57 AM |
|
DASH is having an erection!
LOL. A little 3% erection, we can shout erection for a 10% jump. |
|
|
|
|
|
dark-sailor
|
|
August 31, 2016, 12:30:33 PM
Last edit: August 31, 2016, 08:41:45 PM by dark-sailor |
|
Hi all
One of my masternode keeps getting errors from dashcentral email notification not sure if it's dashcentral buggy or it is my masternode playing up has anyone had this trouble before ?. .
Are you on 12.0.0.58 version? Hi Yes I am on version .58 I update as soon as a new update comes available . I have been running masternode for a good 16-18 months and have noticed a few errors in the past but all seemed OK and I have been paid OK since. This time I recieved like 15 emails from dashcentral through the night last night but when I check all seems OK then another email come through saying I have errors again. Thinking of starting fresh as I also noticed I am still on the wrong wallet version 60001 on my local wallet. |
|
|
|
|
ddink7
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 31, 2016, 02:54:06 PM |
|
I would like to encourage people to consider that if this proposal doesn't pass, that's $28,000 worth of Dash that will never be created and never be able to further the ecosystem in any way. The value of all Dash in existence will appreciate by an infinitesimal amount if this proposal fails: one half cent per Dash. What do we have to lose by passing it? If even one decent-sized investment gets made because we've reduced the legal ambiguities, then it's a win. I've seen many people complain about Poloniex being our primary exchange, and what a danger it is to have a single-point-of-failure. Why do you think the major, reputable exchanges won't list us? We can pay for any integration costs with budget funds, so it would be absolutely free for Kraken or Coinbase or Circle to add us. Why don't they do it? Could it be because they're just a little frightened of our privacy-centric "Darkcoin" past? A little reassurance about the legality of Dash could go a long way toward getting us on another exchange and reducing our dependence on Poloniex. Finally, some people are making it sound like a vote for "Legal (Sept)" is a vote against "Wall of Coins." This is untrue. Wall of Coins will not fund, regardless of whether Legal (Sept) will fund. In order for WoC to pass, it would have to bump the following already unapproved proposals: Legal (this one) with 393 net votes Community Outreach with 406 net votes It would also have to bump the following APPROVED proposals: Dash to Adoption with 420 net votes Slack Tipbot with 534 net votes Evolution Development Subcontractors with 541 net votes PR Fall Campaign with 641 net votes That means Wall of Coins would have to achieve 641 net votes to pass, in only three days. |
|
|
|
|
spatula
|
|
August 31, 2016, 03:17:06 PM |
|
I would like to encourage people to consider that if this proposal doesn't pass, that's $28,000 worth of Dash that will never be created and never be able to further the ecosystem in any way. The value of all Dash in existence will appreciate by an infinitesimal amount if this proposal fails: one half cent per Dash. What do we have to lose by passing it? If even one decent-sized investment gets made because we've reduced the legal ambiguities, then it's a win. I've seen many people complain about Poloniex being our primary exchange, and what a danger it is to have a single-point-of-failure. Why do you think the major, reputable exchanges won't list us? We can pay for any integration costs with budget funds, so it would be absolutely free for Kraken or Coinbase or Circle to add us. Why don't they do it? Could it be because they're just a little frightened of our privacy-centric "Darkcoin" past? A little reassurance about the legality of Dash could go a long way toward getting us on another exchange and reducing our dependence on Poloniex. Finally, some people are making it sound like a vote for "Legal (Sept)" is a vote against "Wall of Coins." This is untrue. Wall of Coins will not fund, regardless of whether Legal (Sept) will fund. In order for WoC to pass, it would have to bump the following already unapproved proposals: Legal (this one) with 393 net votes Community Outreach with 406 net votes It would also have to bump the following APPROVED proposals: Dash to Adoption with 420 net votes Slack Tipbot with 534 net votes Evolution Development Subcontractors with 541 net votes PR Fall Campaign with 641 net votes That means Wall of Coins would have to achieve 641 net votes to pass, in only three days. Agreed. Getting a (hopefully positive) legal opinion on these questions is important to the future of DASH. |
|
|
|
|
|
kointrend
|
|
August 31, 2016, 04:30:54 PM |
|
I would like to encourage people to consider that if this proposal doesn't pass, that's $28,000 worth of Dash that will never be created and never be able to further the ecosystem in any way. The value of all Dash in existence will appreciate by an infinitesimal amount if this proposal fails: one half cent per Dash. What do we have to lose by passing it? If even one decent-sized investment gets made because we've reduced the legal ambiguities, then it's a win. I've seen many people complain about Poloniex being our primary exchange, and what a danger it is to have a single-point-of-failure. Why do you think the major, reputable exchanges won't list us? We can pay for any integration costs with budget funds, so it would be absolutely free for Kraken or Coinbase or Circle to add us. Why don't they do it? Could it be because they're just a little frightened of our privacy-centric "Darkcoin" past? A little reassurance about the legality of Dash could go a long way toward getting us on another exchange and reducing our dependence on Poloniex. Finally, some people are making it sound like a vote for "Legal (Sept)" is a vote against "Wall of Coins." This is untrue. Wall of Coins will not fund, regardless of whether Legal (Sept) will fund. In order for WoC to pass, it would have to bump the following already unapproved proposals: Legal (this one) with 393 net votes Community Outreach with 406 net votes It would also have to bump the following APPROVED proposals: Dash to Adoption with 420 net votes Slack Tipbot with 534 net votes Evolution Development Subcontractors with 541 net votes PR Fall Campaign with 641 net votes That means Wall of Coins would have to achieve 641 net votes to pass, in only three days. Agreed. Getting a (hopefully positive) legal opinion on these questions is important to the future of DASH. I suppose that's pertinent (Apple afraid of Dash?). |
|
|
|
|
|
Kienbui
|
|
August 31, 2016, 04:33:23 PM |
|
I would like to encourage people to consider that if this proposal doesn't pass, that's $28,000 worth of Dash that will never be created and never be able to further the ecosystem in any way. The value of all Dash in existence will appreciate by an infinitesimal amount if this proposal fails: one half cent per Dash. What do we have to lose by passing it? If even one decent-sized investment gets made because we've reduced the legal ambiguities, then it's a win. I've seen many people complain about Poloniex being our primary exchange, and what a danger it is to have a single-point-of-failure. Why do you think the major, reputable exchanges won't list us? We can pay for any integration costs with budget funds, so it would be absolutely free for Kraken or Coinbase or Circle to add us. Why don't they do it? Could it be because they're just a little frightened of our privacy-centric "Darkcoin" past? A little reassurance about the legality of Dash could go a long way toward getting us on another exchange and reducing our dependence on Poloniex. Finally, some people are making it sound like a vote for "Legal (Sept)" is a vote against "Wall of Coins." This is untrue. Wall of Coins will not fund, regardless of whether Legal (Sept) will fund. In order for WoC to pass, it would have to bump the following already unapproved proposals: Legal (this one) with 393 net votes Community Outreach with 406 net votes important. It would also have to bump the following APPROVED proposals: Dash to Adoption with 420 net votes Slack Tipbot with 534 net votes Evolution Development Subcontractors with 541 net votes PR Fall Campaign with 641 net votes That means Wall of Coins would have to achieve 641 net votes to pass, in only three days. Agreed. Getting a (hopefully positive) legal opinion on these questions is important to the future of DASH. I suppose that's pertinent (Apple afraid of Dash?). That means voting for the new legal proposal is very important. |
|
|
|
|
ddink7
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 31, 2016, 04:37:38 PM
Last edit: August 31, 2016, 04:55:39 PM by ddink7 |
|
I would like to encourage people to consider that if this proposal doesn't pass, that's $28,000 worth of Dash that will never be created and never be able to further the ecosystem in any way. The value of all Dash in existence will appreciate by an infinitesimal amount if this proposal fails: one half cent per Dash. What do we have to lose by passing it? If even one decent-sized investment gets made because we've reduced the legal ambiguities, then it's a win. I've seen many people complain about Poloniex being our primary exchange, and what a danger it is to have a single-point-of-failure. Why do you think the major, reputable exchanges won't list us? We can pay for any integration costs with budget funds, so it would be absolutely free for Kraken or Coinbase or Circle to add us. Why don't they do it? Could it be because they're just a little frightened of our privacy-centric "Darkcoin" past? A little reassurance about the legality of Dash could go a long way toward getting us on another exchange and reducing our dependence on Poloniex. Finally, some people are making it sound like a vote for "Legal (Sept)" is a vote against "Wall of Coins." This is untrue. Wall of Coins will not fund, regardless of whether Legal (Sept) will fund. In order for WoC to pass, it would have to bump the following already unapproved proposals: Legal (this one) with 393 net votes Community Outreach with 406 net votes important. It would also have to bump the following APPROVED proposals: Dash to Adoption with 420 net votes Slack Tipbot with 534 net votes Evolution Development Subcontractors with 541 net votes PR Fall Campaign with 641 net votes That means Wall of Coins would have to achieve 641 net votes to pass, in only three days. Agreed. Getting a (hopefully positive) legal opinion on these questions is important to the future of DASH. I suppose that's pertinent (Apple afraid of Dash?). That means voting for the new legal proposal is very important. If Jaxx complies and removes Dash from their wallet, would they have to pay back the Dash network the money they were given for integrating us in the first place? The whole thing opens a can of worms... For what it's worth, the good news is Apple is about to be $15 billion lighter, thanks to the EU =) |
|
|
|
|
