[ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency

[chaeplin]

Ugh, I'm having the age old syncing problem.  my windows 7 wallet is on beta 6 and doing fine.  My Ubuntu wallet is on beta 6 and not syncing.  I took the same info from my windows wallet and put it in my Ubuntu wallet, so it was then synced up until that point.  at this time, it's like an hour behind, doesn't show any errors but does say I have 0 active connections and when I do a "getmininginfo" I'm behind in the block numbers.

I can't figure out why it won't sync when both wallets have the same internet connection, same nodes in their config files and I even brought over the peers.dat file from the functioning wallet.

Is there something wrong with the Ubuntu beta 6 wallet?  Has anyone tried it yet?  Please let me know, thanks !!

What do you have in darkcoin.conf for connection ?
(example : addnode, connect, seednode )
 

[naxin]

Ugh, I'm having the age old syncing problem.  my windows 7 wallet is on beta 6 and doing fine.  My Ubuntu wallet is on beta 6 and not syncing.  I took the same info from my windows wallet and put it in my Ubuntu wallet, so it was then synced up until that point.  at this time, it's like an hour behind, doesn't show any errors but does say I have 0 active connections and when I do a "getmininginfo" I'm behind in the block numbers.

I can't figure out why it won't sync when both wallets have the same internet connection, same nodes in their config files and I even brought over the peers.dat file from the functioning wallet.

Is there something wrong with the Ubuntu beta 6 wallet?  Has anyone tried it yet?  Please let me know, thanks !!

I'm running the ubuntu wallet fine.

Trying running it as: ./darkcoind --reindex

I have had it freeze up for no discernable reason before and that always fixes it. That data should be the same between the windows and linux version, but computers are weird sometimes and do crazy things.

[TanteStefana]

Ugh, I'm having the age old syncing problem.  my windows 7 wallet is on beta 6 and doing fine.  My Ubuntu wallet is on beta 6 and not syncing.  I took the same info from my windows wallet and put it in my Ubuntu wallet, so it was then synced up until that point.  at this time, it's like an hour behind, doesn't show any errors but does say I have 0 active connections and when I do a "getmininginfo" I'm behind in the block numbers.

I can't figure out why it won't sync when both wallets have the same internet connection, same nodes in their config files and I even brought over the peers.dat file from the functioning wallet.

Is there something wrong with the Ubuntu beta 6 wallet?  Has anyone tried it yet?  Please let me know, thanks !!

What do you have in darkcoin.conf for connection ?
(example : addnode, connect, seednode )
 

This is what I have in both config files:

^{rpcuser=Me
rpcpassword=CrazyPassword
server=1
addnode=54.80.16.112
addnode=23.23.186.131
addnode=50.16.206.102
addnode=50.19.116.123
addnode=98.165.130.67
addnode=54.242.50.205
addnode=50.17.98.53
addnode=54.225.43.37}

[TanteStefana]

Ugh, I'm having the age old syncing problem.  my windows 7 wallet is on beta 6 and doing fine.  My Ubuntu wallet is on beta 6 and not syncing.  I took the same info from my windows wallet and put it in my Ubuntu wallet, so it was then synced up until that point.  at this time, it's like an hour behind, doesn't show any errors but does say I have 0 active connections and when I do a "getmininginfo" I'm behind in the block numbers.

I can't figure out why it won't sync when both wallets have the same internet connection, same nodes in their config files and I even brought over the peers.dat file from the functioning wallet.

Is there something wrong with the Ubuntu beta 6 wallet?  Has anyone tried it yet?  Please let me know, thanks !!

I'm running the ubuntu wallet fine.

Trying running it as: ./darkcoind --reindex

I have had it freeze up for no discernable reason before and that always fixes it. That data should be the same between the windows and linux version, but computers are weird sometimes and do crazy things.

Are you running the Beta 6 with darksend?  I assume this takes a while?  It's just sitting there

[sippsnapp]

Ugh, I'm having the age old syncing problem.  my windows 7 wallet is on beta 6 and doing fine.  My Ubuntu wallet is on beta 6 and not syncing.  I took the same info from my windows wallet and put it in my Ubuntu wallet, so it was then synced up until that point.  at this time, it's like an hour behind, doesn't show any errors but does say I have 0 active connections and when I do a "getmininginfo" I'm behind in the block numbers.

I can't figure out why it won't sync when both wallets have the same internet connection, same nodes in their config files and I even brought over the peers.dat file from the functioning wallet.

Is there something wrong with the Ubuntu beta 6 wallet?  Has anyone tried it yet?  Please let me know, thanks !!

What do you have in darkcoin.conf for connection ?
(example : addnode, connect, seednode )
 

This is what I have in both config files:

^{rpcuser=Me
rpcpassword=CrazyPassword
server=1
addnode=54.80.16.112
addnode=23.23.186.131
addnode=50.16.206.102
addnode=50.19.116.123
addnode=98.165.130.67
addnode=54.242.50.205
addnode=50.17.98.53
addnode=54.225.43.37}

http://pastebin.com/Lgt8wVX5

try this, no idea why but the connect function together with addnode and this list solved any connection probs for me.

additionally you can try to change the port with "port=9999" in the conf file, got a vpn that blocks port 9999 by default.

[naxin]

Ugh, I'm having the age old syncing problem.  my windows 7 wallet is on beta 6 and doing fine.  My Ubuntu wallet is on beta 6 and not syncing.  I took the same info from my windows wallet and put it in my Ubuntu wallet, so it was then synced up until that point.  at this time, it's like an hour behind, doesn't show any errors but does say I have 0 active connections and when I do a "getmininginfo" I'm behind in the block numbers.

I can't figure out why it won't sync when both wallets have the same internet connection, same nodes in their config files and I even brought over the peers.dat file from the functioning wallet.

Is there something wrong with the Ubuntu beta 6 wallet?  Has anyone tried it yet?  Please let me know, thanks !!

I'm running the ubuntu wallet fine.

Trying running it as: ./darkcoind --reindex

I have had it freeze up for no discernable reason before and that always fixes it. That data should be the same between the windows and linux version, but computers are weird sometimes and do crazy things.

Are you running the Beta 6 with darksend?  I assume this takes a while?  It's just sitting there

Yep!
https://i.imgur.com/gOLw6fi.png

[eduffield]

WTB DRK
http://www.reddit.com/r/darkcoinmarket/comments/22hph6/bd_want_to_buy_600_drk/

How the best to do direct trade by paypal  ?

nobody will sell you any coins for paypal

Once I sold [I don't even remember how many] BAT coins for 1$ (my Ebay auction started from there).

DarkSend Beta v6 is out!

https://www.darkcointalk.org/threads/darksend-beta-v6.226/

I have setup a Masternode.
- Ubuntu 64bit
- wallet encrypted
- with p2pool

Code:

./darkcoind --help
DarkCoin version v0.10.3.0-4-gb091e63-beta

2014-04-07 23:09:00 RegisterAsMasterNode
2014-04-07 23:09:00 Found unspent output equal to nValue
2014-04-07 23:09:00 Is capable master node!

I wasn't this lucky.

Code:

Got NEW masternode entry
!coins.IsAvailable COutPoint(517b323b43cdb93fb254d40fafb105d2b9527d917d0046139823eb6a928a565a, 1) 
false5
ERROR: CTxMemPool::acceptableInputs() : inputs already spent

Looks to me like only 989 of the DRK you sent made it to your destination node.

Your output posted: http://explorer.darkcoin.io/tx/517b323b43cdb93fb254d40fafb105d2b9527d917d0046139823eb6a928a565a

But it was already sent off, and the large final output is 989: http://explorer.darkcoin.io/tx/3f2e6bf24bf82023c3f9ff51c9bd82c1032977caa39e34ce92c4199ade70777d#i0

I though it might won't be as easy that I simply withdraw 1000 DRK from Cryptsy.

Wait... This is my DRK address and it seemed to receive 1 input of 1000 DRK: http://explorer.darkcoin.io/address/XueD9FWPpkzV3JGpGAjZDuYYtme41C1Ton

That is very strange, because the output your client is looking at to see if you are able to be a master node isn't related to that address at all.

Or it refuses to connect to the "SuperMasterNode" (the one I explicitly set with it's IP) because it thinks that is not qualified to be a masternode anymore.

Code:

2014-04-08 06:55:00 Searching existing masternodes : 23.23.186.131:9999 - CTxIn(COutPoint(517b323b43cdb93fb254d40fafb105d2b9527d917d0046139823eb6a928a565a, 1), scriptSig=)
2014-04-08 06:55:00  -- CTxIn(COutPoint(8c67d5253830efae237cbb31b1e0e05fe811bb0ef38fc9470b6fce44689a751e, 0), scriptSig=)

That's my master node, I sent money out of my node yesterday and I guess I broke it somehow? I was getting really weird problems. I'll check into it in the morning

[chaeplin]

Ugh, I'm having the age old syncing problem.  my windows 7 wallet is on beta 6 and doing fine.  My Ubuntu wallet is on beta 6 and not syncing.  I took the same info from my windows wallet and put it in my Ubuntu wallet, so it was then synced up until that point.  at this time, it's like an hour behind, doesn't show any errors but does say I have 0 active connections and when I do a "getmininginfo" I'm behind in the block numbers.

I can't figure out why it won't sync when both wallets have the same internet connection, same nodes in their config files and I even brought over the peers.dat file from the functioning wallet.

Is there something wrong with the Ubuntu beta 6 wallet?  Has anyone tried it yet?  Please let me know, thanks !!

What do you have in darkcoin.conf for connection ?
(example : addnode, connect, seednode )
 

This is what I have in both config files:

^{rpcuser=Me
rpcpassword=CrazyPassword
server=1
addnode=54.80.16.112
addnode=23.23.186.131
addnode=50.16.206.102
addnode=50.19.116.123
addnode=98.165.130.67
addnode=54.242.50.205
addnode=50.17.98.53
addnode=54.225.43.37}

Can't see any reason.

I have a suggestion.
Close wallet, rename peers.dat, run wallet.

[TanteStefana]

http://pastebin.com/Lgt8wVX5

try this, no idea why but the connect function together with addnode and this list solved any connection probs for me.

additionally you can try to change the port with "port=9999" in the conf file, got a vpn that blocks port 9999 by default.

Thank you, I'll give that a try once the other thingy finishes, LOL

Thank you chaeplin, I'll give that a try  in the morning as well.  I think the ./darkcoind --reindex is going to take some time...

I'm going to make a note of those suggestions and do them in the morning

[sippsnapp]

http://pastebin.com/Lgt8wVX5

try this, no idea why but the connect function together with addnode and this list solved any connection probs for me.

additionally you can try to change the port with "port=9999" in the conf file, got a vpn that blocks port 9999 by default.

Thank you, I'll give that a try once the other thingy finishes, LOL

62.141.39.175 is my node ,  online 24/7.

[TanteStefana]

http://pastebin.com/Lgt8wVX5

try this, no idea why but the connect function together with addnode and this list solved any connection probs for me.

additionally you can try to change the port with "port=9999" in the conf file, got a vpn that blocks port 9999 by default.

Thank you, I'll give that a try once the other thingy finishes, LOL

62.141.39.175 is my node ,  online 24/7.

Thank you, I'll add it

Edit, it's the first one on the list, LOL

[sippsnapp]

http://pastebin.com/Lgt8wVX5

try this, no idea why but the connect function together with addnode and this list solved any connection probs for me.

additionally you can try to change the port with "port=9999" in the conf file, got a vpn that blocks port 9999 by default.

Thank you, I'll give that a try once the other thingy finishes, LOL

62.141.39.175 is my node ,  online 24/7.

Thank you, I'll add it

Edit, it's the first one on the list, LOL

yep, list is from my local wallet xD

[coins101]

Litecoin developer, Mr Lee, asks if DogeCoin and Litecoin can be merged mined to reduce the impact of ASICs.

http://www.reddit.com/r/dogecoin/comments/22dzwq/censorship_on_rdogecoin_mods_why_do_you_keep/cgm2ytt

What a great way to kill Litecoin. Expect even more miners to DRK.

Or the opposite (less miners / less network safety). I'm not entirely sure how merged mining operates, but if its simply one mining client doing the same hashing and applying it to multiple coins/pools, then DRK could benefit from merged mining with other X11 coins.

DRK can secure its network far better in this way because the inverse rewards with the increased diff create an artificial barrier for network hashrate that will probably not exceed the 20ghash rate for quite a while. But merged mining with other X11 will bypass this issue and secure DRK well.

DRK miners would probably love to increase their profitability by mining DRK + getting all the extra revenue from DRK clones. If several scrypt coins go the merged mining route, profitability for X11 could come under threat without a merged miner of our own that can be provided as an alternative. I mean if someone can mine, say, 15 scrypt coins with one miner, why would he mine DRK? It wouldn't make sense unless he has a CPU.

What I'm saying should be valid unless there is some kind of technical obstacle that I am unaware off. Perhaps those with Bitcoin merged-mining experience can shed some light.

That sounds logical.

I was referring to some of the LTC people and a couple of the developers that would probably die first before mining Doge.

[bloxton]

Sapereaude:

Suggest you get the latest wallet.

I'm on a Mac, and I'm running v0.9.1.0-g30ca909-beta.

Latest wallet can be found here: http://www.darkcoin.io

[Sapereaude]

Sapereaude:

Suggest you get the latest wallet.

I'm on a Mac, and I'm running v0.9.1.0-g30ca909-beta.

Latest wallet can be found here: http://www.darkcoin.io

Cheers! That fixed it

[naxin]

Litecoin developer, Mr Lee, asks if DogeCoin and Litecoin can be merged mined to reduce the impact of ASICs.

http://www.reddit.com/r/dogecoin/comments/22dzwq/censorship_on_rdogecoin_mods_why_do_you_keep/cgm2ytt

What a great way to kill Litecoin. Expect even more miners to DRK.

Or the opposite (less miners / less network safety). I'm not entirely sure how merged mining operates, but if its simply one mining client doing the same hashing and applying it to multiple coins/pools, then DRK could benefit from merged mining with other X11 coins.

DRK can secure its network far better in this way because the inverse rewards with the increased diff create an artificial barrier for network hashrate that will probably not exceed the 20ghash rate for quite a while. But merged mining with other X11 will bypass this issue and secure DRK well.

DRK miners would probably love to increase their profitability by mining DRK + getting all the extra revenue from DRK clones. If several scrypt coins go the merged mining route, profitability for X11 could come under threat without a merged miner of our own that can be provided as an alternative. I mean if someone can mine, say, 15 scrypt coins with one miner, why would he mine DRK? It wouldn't make sense unless he has a CPU.

What I'm saying should be valid unless there is some kind of technical obstacle that I am unaware off. Perhaps those with Bitcoin merged-mining experience can shed some light.

I don't necessarily agree or disagree with anything you just said, but it is important to keep in mind in things tend to be in some sort of equilibrium, whereby if the profitability of scrypt went up by that much, darkcoin miners would switch, difficulty level would fall, darkcoin profitability would rise again.
However the same equilibrium would be reached with less miners, less hash rate, and a less secure network. So while in the end it wouldn't be profitability that would suffer, it would be network hash rate and security.

[bestsponsor]

Darkcoin today is the best coin!

[daGrumpf]

why it's the best coin ?

[chaeplin]

[PSA] ALERTA SECURITATE! Bug major in openssl 1.0.0 -> 1.0.0f
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=561162.0

http://heartbleed.com/
http://filippo.io/Heartbleed/



https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/4021

luke-jr commented 5 hours ago
This shouldn't affect Bitcoin Core at all. The only risk is on the server end of the payment protocol (which BCCore does not implement).

laanwj commented 42 minutes ago
The vulnerability does not affect the bitcoin protocol or wallet. It may affect auxilary usage of TLS in RPC-over-SSL and when fetching payment requests over HTTPS.

Not a big deal, but we are going to release a 0.9.1 that updates OpenSSL (see pull #4023 if you want to test) and fixes some other minor issues from 0.9.0.

[sangoku]

Now you can buy darkcoin by iDeal, Bancontact/MisterCash, Sofort Banking and Giropay ;-)

https://www.litebit.eu/coin/drk/en/