[POOL][Scrypt][Scrypt-N][X11] Profit switching pool - wafflepool.com

[oktay50000]

I THINK new coins with new algo will be born for gpu miners
or they will be milions of gpus for nothing? it cant be...i mean it the only way..asics cant kill gpu miners...

[1714277780]

1714277780

[1714277780]

1714277780

[1714277780]

1714277780

[1714277780]

1714277780

[1714277780]

1714277780

[wobbzz]

I THINK new coins with new algo will be born for gpu miners
or they will be milions of gpus for nothing? it cant be...i mean it the only way..asics cant kill gpu miners...

There are already coins like that. Vertcoin, Darkcoin, etc.

[phrozenspite]

I THINK new coins with new algo will be born for gpu miners
or they will be milions of gpus for nothing? it cant be...i mean it the only way..asics cant kill gpu miners...

There are already coins like that. Vertcoin, Darkcoin, etc.

here's the thing with those though, when sha-256 became too difficult for GPU miners we had scrypt but litecoin was already established and scrypt coins had been around for a while.  Vert, darkcoin, max etc have only been around for several weeks and haven't established a foothold. 

[dogechode]

is anyone else getting just stratum detected new block over and over with the occasional work restart message right now?

[LostSavage]

is anyone else getting just stratum detected new block over and over with the occasional work restart message right now?

It's normal.  Likely mining Flappycoin (lower difficulty).

[dogechode]

its normal for it to happen a little its not normal for it to happen with no accepted's in between for like 20-30 min straight....

[LostSavage]

its normal for it to happen a little its not normal for it to happen with no accepted's in between for like 20-30 min straight....

Post your recent shifts and what you are using to mine.  Below is what a single R9 290 looks like.

Code:

Recent Shifts
ID	Ended			Shares (yours / total)	Blocks Found
10512	OPEN			4096 / 139229687	9
10511	2014-03-09 05:12:12	2048 / 152319482	5
10510	2014-03-09 05:06:17	3584 / 151316988	4
10509	2014-03-09 05:00:27	6144 / 153913843	9
10508	2014-03-09 04:54:12	4096 / 151040502	7
10507	2014-03-09 04:48:17	5632 / 152060915	9
10506	2014-03-09 04:42:22	6144 / 150095861	12
10505	2014-03-09 04:36:27	4096 / 151059961	5
10504	2014-03-09 04:30:32	2560 / 153342460	4
10503	2014-03-09 04:24:32	3584 / 151335418	6

[vals]

People are looking into dogecoin average block rewards:

https://i.imgur.com/Jg0dVEQ.png

The data is a few days old. The number on the left in brackets is the amount of blocks the data was based off. Wafflepool is the third one down the list (DHL9gFwZNDQp7QeRGHKZamgGwkN5EkYkxU), and the other 300k+ averages are most of the other multipools/selective miners (not multipool.us interestingly). You can see the drop off for actual pure doge miner pools. They might look to change dogecoin rewards sometime in the future if the developers have a clue.

Any word on the SEA server yet?

[poolwaffle]

People are looking into dogecoin average block rewards:

... img snipped ...

The data is a few days old. The number on the left in brackets is the amount of blocks the data was based off. Wafflepool is the third one down the list (DHL9gFwZNDQp7QeRGHKZamgGwkN5EkYkxU), and the other 300k+ averages are most of the other multipools/selective miners (not multipool.us interestingly). You can see the drop off for actual pure doge miner pools. They might look to change dogecoin rewards sometime in the future if the developers have a clue.

Any word on the SEA server yet?

Thats a really interesting graph, and batently shows we're doing it right, which I love.  It also matches up almost perfectly with my internal stats.  I see avg block value at: 355654.21902317565

As for SEA, its up and running, I'll add to DNS right now (sorry it took so long, had to bring it down to grab a launch backup - didn't want to do with the others since they were urgently needed).  Will be available at sea.wafflepool.com, please let me know your pings to sea/eu/uswest if you start using it (and county/city of where you're coming from if possible, so I can gauge usefulness).

[poolwaffle]

Just as a separate post with caps and bold (people seem drawn to these things)

The SEA server is UP in BETA!
If you think SEA (singapore) would be the best connection for you, try pinging it and see.  If you start mining on it, just make sure that you see shares coming through (shouldn't be a problem, its been tested), but its good to make sure.

Stratum: stratum+tcp://sea.wafflepool.com:3333
Enjoy

[aclass]

Any issues with the payouts table?
All my payouts are missing from the stats page... even the one from today... it did go through, just not on the stats page

[poolwaffle]

Any issues with the payouts table?
All my payouts are missing from the stats page... even the one from today... it did go through, just not on the stats page

Not that I know of.  Can you send me the address you're seeing it on? (email is best)

[poolwaffle]

Hey guys,

I'd like to re-enabled Auroracoin, as its decently profitable at times.  However, since it is _such_ a long maturation time (from mined block to exchanged of about 17-18 hours), we expose ourselves to a decent bit of risk when mining it.

The easy solution is to allow it to be mined, but to limit exposure by only allowing a percent of our outstanding coins to be auroracoin.  Looking for input on what that percent should be? 5%? 10%?

The way it would be handled is mining AUR would be enabled if AUR unexchanged balance was less than X% of our total unexchanged.  If we picked 10%, and had 30btc (estimated) unexchanged, we would allow mining up to 3btc of AUR before disabling it.  As those blocks matured/exchanged, it would open up mining again automatically.

Thoughts?

[vals]

Damn that's disappointing.

Code:

user@moonbaseone:~$ ping uswest.wafflepool.com
PING uswest.wafflepool.com (192.241.211.125) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.241.211.125: icmp_req=1 ttl=52 time=199 ms
64 bytes from 192.241.211.125: icmp_req=2 ttl=52 time=205 ms
64 bytes from 192.241.211.125: icmp_req=3 ttl=51 time=198 ms
64 bytes from 192.241.211.125: icmp_req=4 ttl=51 time=208 ms
64 bytes from 192.241.211.125: icmp_req=5 ttl=51 time=198 ms
64 bytes from 192.241.211.125: icmp_req=6 ttl=52 time=270 ms
64 bytes from 192.241.211.125: icmp_req=7 ttl=52 time=197 ms
64 bytes from 192.241.211.125: icmp_req=8 ttl=51 time=205 ms
^C64 bytes from 192.241.211.125: icmp_req=9 ttl=52 time=196 ms

--- uswest.wafflepool.com ping statistics ---
9 packets transmitted, 9 received, 0% packet loss, time 41991ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 196.668/208.878/270.110/22.031 ms

user@moonbaseone:~$ ping sea.wafflepool.com
PING sea.wafflepool.com (128.199.217.67) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 128.199.217.67: icmp_req=1 ttl=43 time=221 ms
64 bytes from 128.199.217.67: icmp_req=2 ttl=43 time=231 ms
64 bytes from 128.199.217.67: icmp_req=3 ttl=43 time=243 ms
64 bytes from 128.199.217.67: icmp_req=4 ttl=43 time=220 ms
64 bytes from 128.199.217.67: icmp_req=5 ttl=43 time=312 ms
64 bytes from 128.199.217.67: icmp_req=6 ttl=43 time=225 ms
64 bytes from 128.199.217.67: icmp_req=7 ttl=43 time=245 ms
^C64 bytes from 128.199.217.67: icmp_req=8 ttl=43 time=222 ms

--- sea.wafflepool.com ping statistics ---
8 packets transmitted, 8 received, 0% packet loss, time 36748ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 220.787/240.355/312.767/28.810 ms

From home I get 70 ping to sea.wafflepool.com (Melbourne AU), but the ISP we're using where the rigs are located has bad routing it looks like (its going from Melbourne AU, to Sydney AU, to Tokyo JP, to Singapore SG). I'll use it as a backup pool for the moment until I can figure out how to fix it on my end. I'm guessing sfire's ping would be good to it which should reduce lag on the other pools anyways. Thanks!

Edit:

...
The way it would be handled is mining AUR would be enabled if AUR unexchanged balance was less than X% of our total unexchanged.  If we picked 10%, and had 30btc (estimated) unexchanged, we would allow mining up to 3btc of AUR before disabling it.  As those blocks matured/exchanged, it would open up mining again automatically.

Thoughts?

10% should be fine I think. It's price shouldn't fall too much too quickly right now I imagine after the bubble.

[Norpps]

Hey guys,

I'd like to re-enabled Auroracoin, as its decently profitable at times.  However, since it is _such_ a long maturation time (from mined block to exchanged of about 17-18 hours), we expose ourselves to a decent bit of risk when mining it.

The easy solution is to allow it to be mined, but to limit exposure by only allowing a percent of our outstanding coins to be auroracoin.  Looking for input on what that percent should be? 5%? 10%?

The way it would be handled is mining AUR would be enabled if AUR unexchanged balance was less than X% of our total unexchanged.  If we picked 10%, and had 30btc (estimated) unexchanged, we would allow mining up to 3btc of AUR before disabling it.  As those blocks matured/exchanged, it would open up mining again automatically.

Thoughts?

Yes sounds good, 10% at least maybe 15%

[gtraah]

Does this pool mine Litecoin 50 -70% of the day?  And is this a good thing? Just Curious

 

Average payout per MHs Days   Middlecoin   CleverMining   WafflePool   HashCows 1   0.00341617   0.006663   0.00690541   0 3   0.00410674   0.00729767   0.00693113   0.00466667 7   0.00710164   0.00760286   0.00741527   0.00692857 14   0.00754542   0.009142   0.00842025   0.00937143 21   0.00737436   0.00988181   0.00923206   0.00917619 28   0.0085929   0.01006386   0.00955423   0.00930357

Im thinking of  throwing 10-14MHs at clevermining to test it out for a few days, seems even with all the rejects the average still beats this pool. I wonder how it will go with no regects

[ak111in]

Hi,
I would like to introduce Wafflepool Monitor Android app. An easy way to monitor your miner stats from Wafflepool.

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.watcron.wafflepoolmonitor

The main features of the app include:

Low downloads and fast refresh.
Alerts supported.
Auto refresh supported.
Multi address supported.
Widgets supported.
Notifications supported.
Easy way to enter your address.
All times converted to the user time zone.
User as well as pool statistics.
Support for balance display in mBTC or BTC.
Support for following currencies:
"USD", CNY","JPY","SGD","HKD","CAD","AUD","NZD","GBP","DKK","SEK","BRL","CHF","EUR","RUB","SLL","PLN", "THB"
QR code supported to enter address.

Issues
If the app is not working properly the most probable cause is the internet connection. At times the phone might show connected to network however data transfer may not be available leading to unexpected behavior. In such a scenario please check your internet connection and restart the app. For any other issue just reply below and it will be addressed in the next update.

Hope the app meets all your requirements.

In case you would like to donate to support the app please send to 1MrEdZWv5HqE7kJf2jAnYLF9LYGBDM11Zv

Please post your app related posts on the app thread : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=508017.0

Regards

[wobbzz]

Hey guys,

I'd like to re-enabled Auroracoin, as its decently profitable at times.  However, since it is _such_ a long maturation time (from mined block to exchanged of about 17-18 hours), we expose ourselves to a decent bit of risk when mining it.

The easy solution is to allow it to be mined, but to limit exposure by only allowing a percent of our outstanding coins to be auroracoin.  Looking for input on what that percent should be? 5%? 10%?

The way it would be handled is mining AUR would be enabled if AUR unexchanged balance was less than X% of our total unexchanged.  If we picked 10%, and had 30btc (estimated) unexchanged, we would allow mining up to 3btc of AUR before disabling it.  As those blocks matured/exchanged, it would open up mining again automatically.

Thoughts?

Yes sounds good, 10% at least maybe 15%

What about 10% while price is less than X? I haven't been following this thread or the stats closely (aside from btc/mh) but it seems like we've been doing better on average since we stopped mining AUR? The reason I say < price X is to limit our exposure to mining during the bubble peak and watch our immature coins wither in value again. Not sure what we would agree on price X to be though. Ideas?

Edit: Maybe X could be 70% of last bubble?

[ElMariachi]

Hi,
I would like to introduce Wafflepool Monitor Android app. An easy way to monitor your miner stats from Wafflepool.

Pretty cool, I like. Thanks a bunch!

[Norpps]

Hey guys,

I'd like to re-enabled Auroracoin, as its decently profitable at times.  However, since it is _such_ a long maturation time (from mined block to exchanged of about 17-18 hours), we expose ourselves to a decent bit of risk when mining it.

The easy solution is to allow it to be mined, but to limit exposure by only allowing a percent of our outstanding coins to be auroracoin.  Looking for input on what that percent should be? 5%? 10%?

The way it would be handled is mining AUR would be enabled if AUR unexchanged balance was less than X% of our total unexchanged.  If we picked 10%, and had 30btc (estimated) unexchanged, we would allow mining up to 3btc of AUR before disabling it.  As those blocks matured/exchanged, it would open up mining again automatically.

Thoughts?

Yes sounds good, 10% at least maybe 15%

What about 10% while price is less than X? I haven't been following this thread or the stats closely (aside from btc/mh) but it seems like we've been doing better on average since we stopped mining AUR? The reason I say < price X is to limit our exposure to mining during the bubble peak and watch our immature coins wither in value again. Not sure what we would agree on price X to be though. Ideas?

Edit: Maybe X could be 70% of last bubble?

Hey guys,

I'd like to re-enabled Auroracoin, as its decently profitable at times.  However, since it is _such_ a long maturation time (from mined block to exchanged of about 17-18 hours), we expose ourselves to a decent bit of risk when mining it.

The easy solution is to allow it to be mined, but to limit exposure by only allowing a percent of our outstanding coins to be auroracoin.  Looking for input on what that percent should be? 5%? 10%?

The way it would be handled is mining AUR would be enabled if AUR unexchanged balance was less than X% of our total unexchanged.  If we picked 10%, and had 30btc (estimated) unexchanged, we would allow mining up to 3btc of AUR before disabling it.  As those blocks matured/exchanged, it would open up mining again automatically.

Thoughts?

Yes sounds good, 10% at least maybe 15%

What about 10% while price is less than X? I haven't been following this thread or the stats closely (aside from btc/mh) but it seems like we've been doing better on average since we stopped mining AUR? The reason I say < price X is to limit our exposure to mining during the bubble peak and watch our immature coins wither in value again. Not sure what we would agree on price X to be though. Ideas?

Edit: Maybe X could be 70% of last bubble?

I second to that we seem to do better without AUR.
What about those 50% premined coins that will be distributed march 25th?
Is that long maturation time built in or is it just temporary stuff?