[POOL][Scrypt][Scrypt-N][X11] Profit switching pool - wafflepool.com

[fcmatt]

looks like doge is going to get a lot less friendlier http://www.reddit.com/r/dogecoin/comments/207hfb/ann_dogecoin16_its_ready_all_you_need_to_know/

Just turns into a regular coin, rather than one that we can selectively mine.

how exactly are multipools selectively mining doge? It sounds like they are suggesting that there is a way to only mine when you are going to hit an above average block, is that true?

yes. the block reward is not random at all. miners know the next block reward. end of story.

[1714294074]

1714294074

[poolwaffle]

looks like doge is going to get a lot less friendlier http://www.reddit.com/r/dogecoin/comments/207hfb/ann_dogecoin16_its_ready_all_you_need_to_know/

Just turns into a regular coin, rather than one that we can selectively mine.

how exactly are multipools selectively mining doge? It sounds like they are suggesting that there is a way to only mine when you are going to hit an above average block, is that true?

yes. the block reward is not random at all. miners know the next block reward. end of story.

Exactly what this guy says.  Look at our recently found blocks list (dogecoin) and tell me if you see a pattern

[fcmatt]

based on my calcs, 10 mhash/sec can make 34.65 USD a day mining litecoin straight. 10mash/sec at waffle can make 41.83 USD a day.
still worth it but unless things change soon one might as well just mine litecoin soon.

since this pool has a very reasonable fee... i imagine i will just stick here.

[dogechode]

looks like doge is going to get a lot less friendlier http://www.reddit.com/r/dogecoin/comments/207hfb/ann_dogecoin16_its_ready_all_you_need_to_know/

Just turns into a regular coin, rather than one that we can selectively mine.

how exactly are multipools selectively mining doge? It sounds like they are suggesting that there is a way to only mine when you are going to hit an above average block, is that true?

yes. the block reward is not random at all. miners know the next block reward. end of story.

Exactly what this guy says.  Look at our recently found blocks list (dogecoin) and tell me if you see a pattern

So the doge devs think they can change it to be truly random?

[scryptographer]

looks like doge is going to get a lot less friendlier http://www.reddit.com/r/dogecoin/comments/207hfb/ann_dogecoin16_its_ready_all_you_need_to_know/

Just turns into a regular coin, rather than one that we can selectively mine.

how exactly are multipools selectively mining doge? It sounds like they are suggesting that there is a way to only mine when you are going to hit an above average block, is that true?

yes. the block reward is not random at all. miners know the next block reward. end of story.

Exactly what this guy says.  Look at our recently found blocks list (dogecoin) and tell me if you see a pattern

So the doge devs think they can change it to be truly random?

No, they are changing it to be a fixed block reward (currently 250k DOGE/block)

[ungaro59]

DogeCoin is about to go to moon and you are mining Litecoin. Why ?

[fcmatt]

DogeCoin is about to go to moon and you are mining Litecoin. Why ?

litecoin is being added to chinese exchanges. bullish to many. why are you mining dogecoin that will be dead in a year or two when it is not
worth mining and a 51% attack will be done for the lulz.

[msarro]

DogeCoin is about to go to moon and you are mining Litecoin. Why ?

litecoin is being added to chinese exchanges. bullish to many. why are you mining dogecoin that will be dead in a year or two when it is not
worth mining and a 51% attack will be done for the lulz.

Honestly, I'm not so sure you're right. If only because the dogecoin community is so fervant compared to the litecoin community. It's also been far more welcoming (heck, I've been attacked as a "stupid liberal" for talking about the OSX wallet with litecoin folks - really poor show towards the fastest growing desktop OS market). I think both will be around for a good long while. The rest of the altcoins? I'm not so sure.

I mine both, and use waffle (hooray for load balancing).

[GalacticMiningCorp]

DogeCoin is about to go to moon and you are mining Litecoin. Why ?

I think Doge is going to be raped and pillaged by the multipools for the next 5 days until 1.6 is released and then it goes back to a normal coin. Doge's price is going to be hammered in the meantime but will probably make a strong recovery over the  next few weeks. Keep in mind, I quite often have no idea what I'm talking about, and this is most likely one of those times.

[poolwaffle]

DogeCoin is about to go to moon and you are mining Litecoin. Why ?

Because we mine based on actual data, and not random predictions...

[msarro]

DogeCoin is about to go to moon and you are mining Litecoin. Why ?

Because we mine based on actual data, and not random predictions...

Pretty much this. Not to be offensive or anything, but waffle is running a business. He can't stake all of his clients (the miners) on a gamble that dogecoin goes up, even if we're 90% sure of it happening. He's got to run based on concrete data. That's how the algorithm works.

If you're looking for a manually determined multipool, check out wemineall. All of their switching is done by hand right now, per their devs.

[flatline]

DogeCoin is about to go to moon and you are mining Litecoin. Why ?

Because we mine based on actual data, and not random predictions...

Plus the auto-exchange happens in more-or-less real-time: mine a block, sell it on the exchange.  AFAIK there is no forecasting aside from depth analysis of market buy orders.  If you want more doge, just mine on wafflepool, buy doge with btc, and hold.  At least over the last couple weeks, that would have gotten you more doge than mining doge directly.

[Daltonganger]

Dear Poolwaffle,

Nice of the Hashrate per worker! Love it. Only thing is, you forgot to put "" around the hashrate in the new API.
Can't fetch the data now. Can you please put them back around the first Hash_rate too .

Many many thx.

Greets,

Daltonganger

[luthan]

Lots of people on dogecoin reddit are complaining about Cryptsy.  With your recent "issues" with them, are they still our main exchange?

[poolwaffle]

Dear Poolwaffle,

Nice of the Hashrate per worker! Love it. Only thing is, you forgot to put "" around the hashrate in the new API.
Can't fetch the data now. Can you please put them back around the first Hash_rate too .

Many many thx.

Greets,

Daltonganger

Looks like an oddity from how I was pulling the new worker stats.

hashrates across the board should now be integers (no quotes), as they should have been originally

[MisterWil]

Dear Poolwaffle,

Nice of the Hashrate per worker! Love it. Only thing is, you forgot to put "" around the hashrate in the new API.
Can't fetch the data now. Can you please put them back around the first Hash_rate too .

Many many thx.

Greets,

Daltonganger

Looks like an oddity from how I was pulling the new worker stats.

hashrates across the board should now be integers (no quotes), as they should have been originally

One balance value is a float value (unconverted, no quotes, not a string), whereas the other two (sent, confirmed) are still string values. I would prefer them to be float values as the string values were being formatted ("1,xxx.xxxxxxxx") and it broke my API for the big dogs that have received that much. :-P

[poolwaffle]

Dear Poolwaffle,

Nice of the Hashrate per worker! Love it. Only thing is, you forgot to put "" around the hashrate in the new API.
Can't fetch the data now. Can you please put them back around the first Hash_rate too .

Many many thx.

Greets,

Daltonganger

Looks like an oddity from how I was pulling the new worker stats.

hashrates across the board should now be integers (no quotes), as they should have been originally

One balance value is a float value (unconverted, no quotes, not a string), whereas the other two (sent, confirmed) are still string values. I would prefer them to be float values as the string values were being formatted ("1,xxx.xxxxxxxx") and it broke my API for the big dogs that have received that much. :-P

Sorry about that.  This is what I get for changing things =P

All 3 should be floats now   The original reason for formatting was just to lock to 8 digits (instead of float representation), but the format function I've got here is just for display (adds commas, etc).  They should all be float values now

[HumbleMiner]

Well, it finally happened. My daily payout is officially lower than my electricity costs (at $0.35 kWh). I understand the variance, the market slump, but ... I'll give it another week. If the trend continues this will be power-off for me. Pity, it's been a lot of fun.

[msarro]

Dear Poolwaffle,

Nice of the Hashrate per worker! Love it. Only thing is, you forgot to put "" around the hashrate in the new API.
Can't fetch the data now. Can you please put them back around the first Hash_rate too .

Many many thx.

Greets,

Daltonganger

Looks like an oddity from how I was pulling the new worker stats.

hashrates across the board should now be integers (no quotes), as they should have been originally

One balance value is a float value (unconverted, no quotes, not a string), whereas the other two (sent, confirmed) are still string values. I would prefer them to be float values as the string values were being formatted ("1,xxx.xxxxxxxx") and it broke my API for the big dogs that have received that much. :-P

Sorry about that.  This is what I get for changing things =P

All 3 should be floats now   The original reason for formatting was just to lock to 8 digits (instead of float representation), but the format function I've got here is just for display (adds commas, etc).  They should all be float values now

What, not doubles?

[moon.raker]

[19:18:26] Pool 0 stale share detected, submitting as user requested
[19:18:26] Accepted 0d9645cb Diff 4.82K/512 GPU 1 at Pool 0
[19:19:03] Pool 0 stale share detected, submitting as user requested
[19:19:03] Accepted 154e58fc Diff 3.08K/512 GPU 1 at Pool 0
[19:19:08] Accepted 56cf95dd Diff 755/512 GPU 1 at Pool 0
[19:19:12] Pool 0 stale share detected, submitting as user requested
[19:19:13] Accepted 61d29406 Diff 670/512 GPU 1 at Pool 0
[19:19:19] Pool 0 stale share detected, submitting as user requested
[19:19:19] Accepted 64cd7c57 Diff 650/512 GPU 1 at Pool 0
[19:19:27] Pool 0 stale share detected, submitting as user requested
[19:19:27] Accepted 29ee1cd4 Diff 1.56K/512 GPU 1 at Pool 0
[19:21:17] Pool 0 stale share detected, submitting as user requested


is it actually normal ?

also 3-4 % rejects on eu , last 20+ hours wu is 90% + still tho