Russian Invasion of Ukraine[In Progress]

[BADecker]

~

Now Zelensky wants to meet with Putin. Does that make him a grandfather? Lol. Or a leader? Â
[...]

Makes him a good negotiator. You probably do not even know it, but Putin does not want to talk to Zelensky and is only negotiating with the United States. Putin is not willing recognise Zelensky as an equal (in the sense of being a leader) because that would make him loose face before the herd of stupids that believe the official propaganda.

Zelensky is just making this more evident with his request.

Why should Putin talk? He wants total surrender from Zelensky. The Zelensky benefit from Putin talks is that the talks might get Putin to hedge his position by clever hot air. There is nothing beneficial for Putin to meet Zelensky since the way things are going now, Russia will take Ukraine anyway.

If Zelensky surrendered right now, he might save a few lives. Other than that, Russia wins Ukraine with a whole lot more loss of life.

No need or want to talk to Zelensky. Total success for Russia with or without Ukraine total surrender.

[paxmao]

Ukraine has received a few Mirage 2000 from France, multirole jets.
There has been a successful offensive by Ukraine in Kursk, taking a few kilometers.
There seems to be confirmation of a failed ICBM test in Ruzziam or  maybe it was a real attack failed, who knows.

~

Now Zelensky wants to meet with Putin. Does that make him a grandfather? Lol. Or a leader? Â
[...]

Makes him a good negotiator. You probably do not even know it, but Putin does not want to talk to Zelensky and is only negotiating with the United States. Putin is not willing recognise Zelensky as an equal (in the sense of being a leader) because that would make him loose face before the herd of stupids that believe the official propaganda.

Zelensky is just making this more evident with his request.

Why should Putin talk? He wants total surrender from Zelensky. [...]

Yes, and I would like the private keys of Satoshi's accounts, but I cannot get them.

Despite some interesting comments in The Telegraph about a plan misteriously "filtrated" Â Ruzzia may want whatever and Putin may consider himself the Queen of the Seas if he wants. However, he is now in worse position than a year ago, and will be even in a worse one next year if it comes to that.

[BADecker]

Ukraine has received a few Mirage 2000 from France, multirole jets.
There has been a successful offensive by Ukraine in Kursk, taking a few kilometers.
There seems to be confirmation of a failed ICBM test in Ruzziam or  maybe it was a real attack failed, who knows.

~

Now Zelensky wants to meet with Putin. Does that make him a grandfather? Lol. Or a leader? Â
[...]

Makes him a good negotiator. You probably do not even know it, but Putin does not want to talk to Zelensky and is only negotiating with the United States. Putin is not willing recognise Zelensky as an equal (in the sense of being a leader) because that would make him loose face before the herd of stupids that believe the official propaganda.

Zelensky is just making this more evident with his request.

Why should Putin talk? He wants total surrender from Zelensky. [...]

Yes, and I would like the private keys of Satoshi's accounts, but I cannot get them.

Despite some interesting comments in The Telegraph about a plan misteriously "filtrated" Â Ruzzia may want whatever and Putin may consider himself the Queen of the Seas if he wants. However, he is now in worse position than a year ago, and will be even in a worse one next year if it comes to that.

I agree with you that Putin is again in the straights. But it's not because of war weakness. It's because Russia is too strong. Take out Ukraine and fight some strong countries of the world for doing it. Which way will world trade go?

Leave Ukraine sit and more killing will happen until Ukraine simply dies on the vine. Putin does not want this death and neither do the big traders of the world. Maybe he has a way out. The Globalists are fed up with the way Zelensky has been handling the war for them.


Russian Leader Viktor Bout Warns Globalists Are Going To Kill Ukrainian Dictator Volodymyr Zelensky


https://banned.video/watch?id=67a404622a23988368a5241e
In This In-Depth Must-Watch Interview With The Former Political Prisoner Viktor Bout, The Russian Perspective On The Revolutionary Developments In America Is Discussed As Well As Frontline Battles That Bout Has Personally Witnessed In Ukraine In The Last Few Weeks

Jones Agrees With Viktor's Assessment That The World Has Never Been Closer To Nuclear War & That Donald Trump Must Avoid The Looming Threat Of More Assassination Attempts If His Agenda To Stop WWIII Is To Be Successful.
...

[Mariannalik]

What do you think about the donkeys that were put into service by the Russian army?

[BADecker]

At this stage - https://liveuamap.com/?ll=48.11679266819489;37.739980468749984&zoom=8#google_vignette - I don;t think anybody cares. Say, you weren't one of them, were you?

The below article was always there... surrender. No way for Ukraine to sign a peace treaty. Nobody to sign it since Zelensky's term as president expired months ago.


Kyiv says 'we are very near to really ending this war by a just and lasting peace' as Ukrainians react with horror to 'leaked report' on pro-Russian website claiming to reveal Trump's plan for a ceasefire by Easter


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14371607/Ukraine-leaked-report-Trump-ceasefire-Easter.html
A top Ukrainian official has claimed that the country is 'very near to really ending this war by a just and lasting peace', after Ukrainians were left horrified by a report on a pro-Russian site claiming that Trump might force Kyiv into a unfavourable ceasefire by Easter.

Andriy Yermak, the Ukrainian president's chief of staff who is due to attend the Munich Security Conference next week where Trump is expected to officially unveil his plan for peace in Ukraine, made the comments to the Associated Press.

He said: 'It's necessary that the leaders and the experts in politics who will be in Munich realise that this is momentum.

'That we are very near to really ending this war by a just and lasting peace, but (it's) necessary to be together- Not to give Russia an opportunity to divide the world, to divide partners.'

Yermak added that it was imperative that Ukraine was front and centre of any ceasefire plans: 'I think it's important that we go through these consultations and negotiations before the (Trump) administration has any plans.

'Our position is that it's impossible to have, and will be a big mistake to have, any plans without participation by Ukraine in preparing this plan.'

It comes amid growing horror at reports of a leaked plan for Ukraine that would see Trump try to force Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky to agree to a ceasefire with Russia by Easter.

The unconfirmed plans, reported by Ukrainian outlet Strana, which has been described as pro-Russian, are said to have been doing the rounds in 'political and diplomatic circles' in Ukraine, and will include a ceasefire by April 20 that would freeze Russia's steady advance, a ban on Ukraine from joining NATO, and a demand for Kyiv to accept Russian sovereignty on annexed land.

On top of this, Ukrainian troops will be made to leave Russia's Kursk region, where it launched a counteroffensive in August, while a contingent of European soldiers, which could include British troops, would be asked to police a demilitarised zone. American troops will not be involved in this contingent.

The EU will reportedly be asked to assist Ukraine in its reconstruction efforts, which may cost as much as $486billion (£392billion) over the next decade according to the German Marshall Fund thinktank.
...

[paxmao]

The plan from Trump is always the same - getting money and commercial benefits from anyone that crosses his path. To be honest, it is no differenr from what any government would want from Ukraine ... we protect, we invest, we take a share of the product. Putin could have avoided this but... he miscalculated as he is miscalculating in the negotiations.

What do you think about the donkeys that were put into service by the Russian army?

They are probably better than the rest of the equipment. Donkeys are absolutely fine, they can take supplies here and there as much as a vehicle... they just have that "this is ridiculous" element to them, otherwise perfect and less costly than vehicles.

[tvbcof]

Here's another note from the guy who was pointing out the mineral resource element of the conflict, and rare-earths in particular, well before it was on anyone's radar.  I swear that if I were an analyst (AI or otherwise) I'd be deeply suspicious that I had some sort of insider info or was someone's operative or something.  I'm don't and I am not just for the record.

Anyway, so now Trump is trying to work a deal where the U.S. gets ownership rights to 'Ukraines' minerals (and he cannot help but say the words 'rare earth' on a regular basis.)  Never mind that even what's left under nominal Ukrainian control was already promised away long ago.  Mostly to the Blackrock types I suspect.

There are some very rich areas in the Pokrovsk area, and especially between that town and the bordering oblast (Dnieproprovosk or whatever).  The Russians streamed into that area with seemingly little resistance early on.  Now the resistance has stiffened significantly and the Ukrainians(+) are even regaining some of the losses.  At the very least they were directed to maintain control over these resource no matter what it takes, and I think it likely that they are getting unusually high levels of special forces help there as of late.

Obviously Russia will flush the Ukrainians(+) out, and I suspect that this is driving the high priority to get these 'paper' resources into U.S. hands before it happens.  This would allow Trump to argue that U.S. military/para-military help is a matter of protecting 'American' resources and putting 'America First.'  Even after Russia has taken over the actual land.  At the very least, barganing-chip-minter Trump will try to use these in various negotiations.

It is also the case that the movement toward registering asset ownership on a 'blockchain' (aka, tokenizing) is something which is almost inevitable.  The race to develop such a thing is on.  You can be sure that at least the registries which come out of the Collective West will have former-Ukrainian rare-earth resources registered to Trump's friends/sponsors.  How much that means in the real world is something which remains to be seen because tokenization itself is only as strong as the relevant enforcement.

[BADecker]

Here's another note from the guy who was pointing out the mineral resource element of the conflict, and rare-earths in particular, well before it was on anyone's radar.  I swear that if I were an analyst (AI or otherwise) I'd be deeply suspicious that I had some sort of insider info or was someone's operative or something.  I'm don't and I am not just for the record.

Anyway, so now Trump is trying to work a deal where the U.S. gets ownership rights to 'Ukraines' minerals (and he cannot help but say the words 'rare earth' on a regular basis.)  Never mind that even what's left under nominal Ukrainian control was already promised away long ago.  Mostly to the Blackrock types I suspect.

There are some very rich areas in the Pokrovsk area, and especially between that town and the bordering oblast (Dnieproprovosk or whatever).  The Russians streamed into that area with seemingly little resistance early on.  Now the resistance has stiffened significantly and the Ukrainians(+) are even regaining some of the losses.  At the very least they were directed to maintain control over these resource no matter what it takes, and I think it likely that they are getting unusually high levels of special forces help there as of late.

Obviously Russia will flush the Ukrainians(+) out, and I suspect that this is driving the high priority to get these 'paper' resources into U.S. hands before it happens.  This would allow Trump to argue that U.S. military/para-military help is a matter of protecting 'American' resources and putting 'America First.'  Even after Russia has taken over the actual land.  At the very least, barganing-chip-minter Trump will try to use these in various negotiations.

It is also the case that the movement toward registering asset ownership on a 'blockchain' (aka, tokenizing) is something which is almost inevitable.  The race to develop such a thing is on.  You can be sure that at least the registries which come out of the Collective West will have former-Ukrainian rare-earth resources registered to Trump's friends/sponsors.  How much that means in the real world is something which remains to be seen because tokenization itself is only as strong as the relevant enforcement.

The interesting thing is, who owns what in Ukraine is based mostly on 'before war' contracts. Zelensky's term as president has expired, so they don't have him to sign contracts for the nation, and they don't have anybody else who can sign contracts. How does it work?

[paxmao]

Bah, all is the same as it was before except that Trump may actually increase the aid to Ukraine to make the deal more urgent to Ruzzia. There is no doubt the Biden administration would have requested a similar deal for US companies. Trump is noisier, but he is not inventing anything.

As I see it, the Democrats were allowing Ruzzia to waste their army for relatively poor gains, despite the mineral and such which are called "rare" but you got mines of these all over the world .. Brazil, India, Australia...

If anything there is of value, it may be the gas deposits which Ukraine may or may not recover.

What is a cause of concer is the future. It seems that Trump does not want to deploy US forces for peace keeping and the troops deployed may not be NATO covered. This calls for a Ruzzia attack on whoever is there at any time of their choosing. That is a perfect example of how NOT to carry out diplomacy.

[Shova]

Demilitarization of Ukraine and Ukraine not in NATO could have been a bargaining point but Trump gave it as a gift to Putin. Though I highly doubt Putin would have accepted anything less than that after all the lives lost.
 
The only bargain left is of size of land. The deal could be Donbass and Kherson east of Dnieper river given under Russian control and the region of Kursk occupied by Ukraine and Kharkhiv occupied by Russia exchanged.

Regarding the use of natural resources in Ukraine territory post war, Zelensky could get a better deal if he talked straight to Putin but there's very low chances of it.

[be.open]

Demilitarization of Ukraine and Ukraine not in NATO could have been a bargaining point but Trump gave it as a gift to Putin. Though I highly doubt Putin would have accepted anything less than that after all the lives lost.
 
The only bargain left is of size of land. The deal could be Donbass and Kherson east of Dnieper river given under Russian control and the region of Kursk occupied by Ukraine and Kharkhiv occupied by Russia exchanged.

Regarding the use of natural resources in Ukraine territory post war, Zelensky could get a better deal if he talked straight to Putin but there's very low chances of it.

It seems that Ukraine may become the first country in history that lost a war that will pay reparations not to the winner, but to an ally.

[MysteryMiner]

I wonder why the russian pidors badecker and his colleagues in dead dikhead prigozhin troll farms are not banned on this forum. What surrender? What talks with putin? Only complete destruction of russia as a state will bring some guarantees of peace in europe. Any other scenarios are deadly danger to everyone bordering russian state of evil and long-term existential threat to whole of europe.

[Fullbear2222]

Demilitarization of Ukraine and Ukraine not in NATO could have been a bargaining point but Trump gave it as a gift to Putin. Though I highly doubt Putin would have accepted anything less than that after all the lives lost.
 
The only bargain left is of size of land. The deal could be Donbass and Kherson east of Dnieper river given under Russian control and the region of Kursk occupied by Ukraine and Kharkhiv occupied by Russia exchanged.

Regarding the use of natural resources in Ukraine territory post war, Zelensky could get a better deal if he talked straight to Putin but there's very low chances of it.

It seems that Ukraine may become the first country in history that lost a war that will pay reparations not to the winner, but to an ally.

The fact that usa russia don't even discuss with eu or ukraine show's that they don't respect eu.
Trump and hegseth seems like strong guys who don't listen people who got no real life experince and knowledge of anything.
The way they talk it's tough....you got to talk with confidence not just blahhh.... zelensky don't talk the way he can receive respect he need to be on more point and should wear suit nice tailored suit not walking around with some not nice clothes.
So respect is anything

I wonder why the russian pidors badecker and his colleagues in dead dikhead prigozhin troll farms are not banned on this forum. What surrender? What talks with putin? Only complete destruction of russia as a state will bring some guarantees of peace in europe. Any other scenarios are deadly danger to everyone bordering russian state of evil and long-term existential threat to whole of europe.

Why you do bring hate between same people ?
Eastern europeans why they fight ? Who made them fight?
Its like new york will invade florida lol.
Are you one of those elite rulers who want to make fight the lower people and then take advanched of situation ?

I don't think anyone should fight for rotchlids and wef zoros countries should get away from the elite rotchilds biden zoros wef and other evil.
Zelensky should meet with Putin to Settle and talk face to face why he hiding ? Why zelensky using eu to talk ? Why he man up and go moscow face to face meet and talk right to way maybe drink vodka together and talk things out openly with Putin? Why not ?

[BADecker]

I wonder why the russian pidors badecker and his colleagues in dead dikhead prigozhin troll farms are not banned on this forum. What surrender? What talks with putin? Only complete destruction of russia as a state will bring some guarantees of peace in europe. Any other scenarios are deadly danger to everyone bordering russian state of evil and long-term existential threat to whole of europe.

Why you do bring hate between same people ?
Eastern europeans why they fight ? Who made them fight?
Its like new york will invade florida lol.
Are you one of those elite rulers who want to make fight the lower people and then take advanched of situation ?

I don't think anyone should fight for rotchlids and wef zoros countries should get away from the elite rotchilds biden zoros wef and other evil.
Zelensky should meet with Putin to Settle and talk face to face why he hiding ? Why zelensky using eu to talk ? Why he man up and go moscow face to face meet and talk right to way maybe drink vodka together and talk things out openly with Putin? Why not ?

Your idea is right. The thing that is missing is that Zelensky lost his authority to 'talk' for Ukraine when his presidential term was up a few months ago. He can't make deals or treaties for Ukraine any longer. This means that any talk with Putin that he might do is informal. Putin doesn't want informal talk because he might accidentally say something that gives some credibility to Zelensky.

The whole thing rests on Ukraine simply surrendering, or dying to the last man... since no agreements can be made between Putin and Zelensky.

Remember November 21 last year. Putin showed that he was able to crush Ukraine using the Oreshnik ICBM. He hasn't done it because that is not his goal.

[be.open]

Zelensky should meet with Putin to Settle and talk face to face why he hiding ? Why zelensky using eu to talk ? Why he man up and go moscow face to face meet and talk right to way maybe drink vodka together and talk things out openly with Putin? Why not ?

I think the favorable moment for separate negotiations between Zelensky and Putin has already passed, if it ever existed. For a number of reasons, including Zelensky's illegitimate status. It seems that Ukraine will have to make a choice between a lousy peace and a hopeless war, guided mainly by humanitarian motives.

[paxmao]

Demilitarization of Ukraine and Ukraine not in NATO could have been a bargaining point but Trump gave it as a gift to Putin. Though I highly doubt Putin would have accepted anything less than that after all the lives lost.
 
The only bargain left is of size of land. The deal could be Donbass and Kherson east of Dnieper river given under Russian control and the region of Kursk occupied by Ukraine and Kharkhiv occupied by Russia exchanged.

Regarding the use of natural resources in Ukraine territory post war, Zelensky could get a better deal if he talked straight to Putin but there's very low chances of it.

It seems that Ukraine may become the first country in history that lost a war that will pay reparations not to the winner, but to an ally.

Lost? This has not finished yet but Ukraine still there, there is viable country called Ukraine, most of its territory intact... there is still the same government, they have an even stronger military, Sweeden  Finland are now NATO, Ruzzia has lost around 800.000 people and 10.000 tanks...., interest rates are at 21%, inflation is rampant... who is still considering the Ruzzian army as "the second in the world" after not even being able to take a country 1/10th of the size....a Ruzzian win you say?? Well, I hope many many more "wins" will follow this one.

Look at your own argument and you will see who is the only winner. To make it more clear: the one getting paid is the winner.

For the 10th time in this thread I am going to repeat this:"There is a winner of this war, but it is not Ruzzia, it is not Ukraine and it is not Europe".

I wonder why the russian pidors badecker and his colleagues in dead dikhead prigozhin troll farms are not banned on this forum. What surrender? What talks with putin? Only complete destruction of russia as a state will bring some guarantees of peace in europe. Any other scenarios are deadly danger to everyone bordering russian state of evil and long-term existential threat to whole of europe.

I personally consider them for the humour section of the forum. I do not think anyone takes them seriously.

The buzz in Europe and Ukraine is that Trump is holding talks directly with Putin and then "informing" the rest. The problem with Trump is that he tends to be convinced by the last person he speaks with.

However people should make no mistake on this: his own leadership and the stance of the US in the world is at stake. If he cannot get a good deal for Europe and Ukraine, there is no reason for Europe to keep being and ally. For example, if China invades Taiwan, the US may not be able to press the allies into siding if he mistreats everyone.

Apart, a bad deal will forever be linked with Trumps name. He will be the scorn of History for centuries.

I think that some people in his team are actually able to see second level consequences, but I am not sure he will listen.

Now, there are two options for Trump:

a) You keep gas and mineral deposits, but you need to push Ruzzia back.
b) You give Ruzzia part of the gas and mineral deposits, but then you cannot have them.

Also...

a) You tell Europe to deploy forces in Ukraine, but then Ukraine will have to cover the costs or...
b) You give security guarantees (e.g. NATO) and then you can have beneficial deals in Ukraine.

If you try both, Ukraine will eventually break the deal - what is the point of paying for no protection? I can already tell you that Europe is already thinking along this line if the deal is not good enough.

[BADecker]

Demilitarization of Ukraine and Ukraine not in NATO could have been a bargaining point but Trump gave it as a gift to Putin. Though I highly doubt Putin would have accepted anything less than that after all the lives lost.
 
The only bargain left is of size of land. The deal could be Donbass and Kherson east of Dnieper river given under Russian control and the region of Kursk occupied by Ukraine and Kharkhiv occupied by Russia exchanged.

Regarding the use of natural resources in Ukraine territory post war, Zelensky could get a better deal if he talked straight to Putin but there's very low chances of it.

It seems that Ukraine may become the first country in history that lost a war that will pay reparations not to the winner, but to an ally.

Lost? This has not finished yet but Ukraine still there, there is viable country called Ukraine, most of its territory intact... there is still the same government, they have an even stronger military, Sweeden  Finland are now NATO, Ruzzia has lost around 800.000 people and 10.000 tanks...., interest rates are at 21%, inflation is rampant... who is still considering the Ruzzian army as "the second in the world" after not even being able to take a country 1/10th of the size....a Ruzzian win you say?? Well, I hope many many more "wins" will follow this one.

Look at your own argument and you will see who is the only winner. To make it more clear: the one getting paid is the winner.

For the 10th time in this thread I am going to repeat this:"There is a winner of this war, but it is not Ruzzia, it is not Ukraine and it is not Europe".

I wonder why the russian pidors badecker and his colleagues in dead dikhead prigozhin troll farms are not banned on this forum. What surrender? What talks with putin? Only complete destruction of russia as a state will bring some guarantees of peace in europe. Any other scenarios are deadly danger to everyone bordering russian state of evil and long-term existential threat to whole of europe.

I personally consider them for the humour section of the forum. I do not think anyone takes them seriously.

The buzz in Europe and Ukraine is that Trump is holding talks directly with Putin and then "informing" the rest. The problem with Trump is that he tends to be convinced by the last person he speaks with.

However people should make no mistake on this: his own leadership and the stance of the US in the world is at stake. If he cannot get a good deal for Europe and Ukraine, there is no reason for Europe to keep being and ally. For example, if China invades Taiwan, the US may not be able to press the allies into siding if he mistreats everyone.

Apart, a bad deal will forever be linked with Trumps name. He will be the scorn of History for centuries.

I think that some people in his team are actually able to see second level consequences, but I am not sure he will listen.

Now, there are two options for Trump:

a) You keep gas and mineral deposits, but you need to push Ruzzia back.
b) You give Ruzzia part of the gas and mineral deposits, but then you cannot have them.

Also...

a) You tell Europe to deploy forces in Ukraine, but then Ukraine will have to cover the costs or...
b) You give security guarantees (e.g. NATO) and then you can have beneficial deals in Ukraine.

If you try both, Ukraine will eventually break the deal - what is the point of paying for no protection? I can already tell you that Europe is already thinking along this line if the deal is not good enough.

It's finished. Ukraine can't take beck the Black Sea Corridor. And with Zelensky not the real president, they don't have anybody to sign treaties for them.

[PatrikStar]

I couldn't capture Kiev in 3 days, well, I'm a disgrace, but they said that the second army of the world

[BADecker]

I couldn't capture Kiev in 3 days, well, I'm a disgrace, but they said that the second army of the world

Who in the world wants stupid Kiev? Zelensky is there, and he couldn't take back the Black Sea Corridor. Besides, he got over half a million of his people killed for nothing. All Russia has to do is wait a little longer and the rest of the Ukrainians will be dead. Then Russia can just go in and take Kiev, but still won't. Who wants it?


The Beginning Of The End Of The War In Ukraine


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WtDrb41D3tQ
Trump's read-out of the call makes it clear that his pro-Ukraine "Special Envoy" Kellogg is out of the picture. Is peace on the horizon? What will it take? Also today, the mis-named National Endowment for Democracy is defunded.
...

[paxmao]

Apparently a Ruzzia drone has hit Chernobyl. Denials in 3...2...1...

I couldn't capture Kiev in 3 days, well, I'm a disgrace, but they said that the second army of the world

Who in the world wants stupid Kiev? Zelensky is there, and he couldn't take back the Black Sea Corridor. Besides, he got over half a million of his people killed for nothing. All Russia has to do is wait a little longer and the rest of the Ukrainians will be dead. Then Russia can just go in and take Kiev, but still won't. Who wants it?

That is FALSE INFORMATION, the Black Sea corridor has been in continous use by Ukraine. The grain exports have continued, while Ruzzia had to move nearly all the Black sea fleet out of Sebastopol and is under threat even in the further away ports in the Balck sea.
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukraine-attacks-forced-black-sea-fleet-move-warships-sevastopol-russian-official-2024-10-20/

Ukraine took and holds "snake island" and has been systematically attacking the Ruzzian navy with sea drones. Ruzzia has clearly lost the Black Sea battle.

It has been proven that despite Ruzzia having Crimea, Ukraine and NATO is perfectly able to reder it useless as and when required.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-61759692

How much grain is Ukraine exporting and how is it leaving the country?

Few cargo ships dared to go to Ukrainian ports, and monthly grain exports fell to just over 2 million tonnes in July, August and September 2023.

Ukraine has since established new export routes.

Between the end of the grain deal in July 2023 and the end of February 2024, it shipped about 20 million tonnes of grain to 42 countries, according to the country's vice prime minister Oleksandr Kubrakov.