Globee07
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 397
Merit: 11
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 14, 2018, 01:52:38 PM |
|
Hello Guys!
Which miner softwares have already been updated to support the new fork? and which one would you recommend for cpu mining? I have been using XMR CGPU before (that was giving the best results) but it's not updated yet :/
|
|
|
|
e-coinomist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1085
Money often costs too much.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 14, 2018, 04:12:08 PM |
|
Hope someone in here can help with this...
I am running several Dell R815 servers to mine Monero.
I have installed UBUNTU Linux 16.04 on these machines.
I have XMR-STAK running no problem at all -- works great... get ~2kH per system.
BUT I have not been able to successfully get XMR-STAK or any program, for that matter, to startup with the OS.
There is a GUI section in UBUNTU that you can add Startup programs... or so it says... but it doesn't work.
Not going to lie -- I am a Linux NOOB and these systems are my first foray into Linux.
Take a look inside /etc/init.d/ for examples of processes launching at boot time. Copy and modify some that contains "sudo" for running the miner as some reserved user. "man renice" might come handy if you want to change the process's priority, as in foreground vs. background tasks.
|
|
|
|
Bigger By The Day
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 641
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 14, 2018, 04:41:16 PM |
|
Green Candles ! Tim Draper very bullish on Bitcoin and predicts 250k monero ? ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) bear market over now
|
|
|
|
visdude
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1081
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 14, 2018, 08:25:32 PM |
|
Hello Guys!
Which miner softwares have already been updated to support the new fork? and which one would you recommend for cpu mining? I have been using XMR CGPU before (that was giving the best results) but it's not updated yet :/
Pools usually have links to recommended miners on their respective site. As always, different hardware/rig/HW config reacts differently with a particular miner. Hence, testing and tweaking them is a must if you care about squeezing out performance and that sort of stuff.
|
|
|
|
Globee07
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 397
Merit: 11
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 14, 2018, 10:54:18 PM |
|
Hello Guys!
Which miner softwares have already been updated to support the new fork? and which one would you recommend for cpu mining? I have been using XMR CGPU before (that was giving the best results) but it's not updated yet :/
Pools usually have links to recommended miners on their respective site. As always, different hardware/rig/HW config reacts differently with a particular miner. Hence, testing and tweaking them is a must if you care about squeezing out performance and that sort of stuff. Went with XMR Stak, works fine, hashrates are the same, as I was able to use my previously config files
|
|
|
|
SQ1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 15, 2018, 12:40:24 AM |
|
Is anyone else having issues downloading a wallet? I've tried the win and linux versions and keep getting network errors when I try to download
|
|
|
|
Hueristic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3906
Merit: 5241
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 15, 2018, 01:38:27 AM |
|
Well, look at the code. There is no plain english write up AFAIk, but it is open source after all.
The innermost loop is changed which is probably what you would want to burn into hardware directly for maximum efficiency, especially if you had no reason to expect such a change to be made.
Going forward there is more risk that ASICs may be built in a more flexible manner.
I wish I still had that ability to read the code but I like most of the people interested in this project have to rely on the Devs answers to our questions if something is not clear to us. Yes I'm sure in the future the asic design will become more flexible, for instanceI would have designed the chips to be removable for easy swapping, IMO that was a foolish design flaw, sockets are cheap. Sometimes engineers do not see the trees for the woods or is that supposed to be the other way around? ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
“Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing.”
|
|
|
MATHReX
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 15, 2018, 04:07:01 AM |
|
Is anyone else having issues downloading a wallet? I've tried the win and linux versions and keep getting network errors when I try to download
The blockchain sync takes loads of time. I tried using an official wallet but ended up with a light version connected to a remote node where I can control the seed and keys of my wallet. (Using cake wallet for iOS)
|
|
|
|
Apprentice
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 15, 2018, 07:24:50 AM |
|
hashrate and diff seems to be stabilizing.
|
|
|
|
Auponef
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 15, 2018, 10:15:32 AM |
|
Hello Guys!
Which miner softwares have already been updated to support the new fork? and which one would you recommend for cpu mining? I have been using XMR CGPU before (that was giving the best results) but it's not updated yet :/
Pools usually have links to recommended miners on their respective site. As always, different hardware/rig/HW config reacts differently with a particular miner. Hence, testing and tweaking them is a must if you care about squeezing out performance and that sort of stuff. Went with XMR Stak, works fine, hashrates are the same, as I was able to use my previously config files Have you tried Claymore? What is the speed difference?
|
|
|
|
|
dEBRUYNE
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1141
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 15, 2018, 12:50:29 PM |
|
Is anyone else having issues downloading a wallet? I've tried the win and linux versions and keep getting network errors when I try to download
The blockchain sync takes loads of time. I tried using an official wallet but ended up with a light version connected to a remote node where I can control the seed and keys of my wallet. (Using cake wallet for iOS) Note that you can use the official wallet with a remote node too: https://getmonero.org/resources/user-guides/remote_node_gui.html
|
|
|
|
ultegra
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 2
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 15, 2018, 02:24:05 PM |
|
Just having a problem trying to open my cli wallet. The daemon is fully synced, but when i open the wallet, enter my wallet name, it gives me the line to enter the password but keyboard is locked so cannot enter any text
2018-04-15 14:12:57.781 10468 INFO msgwriter src/common/scoped_message_writer.h:102 Monero 'Lithium Luna' (v0.12.0.0-master-release) 2018-04-15 14:12:57.781 10468 INFO msgwriter src/common/scoped_message_writer.h:102 Logging to C:\Users\troyc\Downloads\monero-win-x64-v0.12.0.0\monero-v0.12.0.0\monero-wallet-cli.log 2018-04-15 14:13:00.771 10468 INFO msgwriter src/common/scoped_message_writer.h:102 Wallet and key files found, loading... 2018-04-15 14:13:35.940 10468 ERROR default contrib/epee/include/storages/portable_storage.h:161 portable_storage: wrong binary format - signature mismatch 2018-04-15 14:13:35.940 10468 ERROR wallet.wallet2 src/wallet/wallet2.cpp:2818 !r. THROW EXCEPTION: error::invalid_password 2018-04-15 14:13:35.940 10468 WARN net.http src/wallet/wallet_errors.h:794 C:/msys64/DISTRIBUTION-BUILD/src/wallet/wallet2.cpp:2818:N5tools5error16invalid_passwordE: invalid password 2018-04-15 14:13:35.940 10468 ERROR msgwriter src/common/scoped_message_writer.h:102 Error: failed to load wallet: invalid password 2018-04-15 14:13:35.940 10468 ERROR wallet.simplewallet src/simplewallet/simplewallet.cpp:3082 failed to open account 2018-04-15 14:13:35.940 10468 ERROR wallet.simplewallet src/simplewallet/simplewallet.cpp:7478 Failed to initialize wallet 2018-04-15 14:14:27.296 10696 INFO logging contrib/epee/src/mlog.cpp:185 New log categories: *:WARNING,net:FATAL,net.p2p:FATAL,net.cn:FATAL,global:INFO,verify:FATAL,stacktrace:INFO,logging:INFO,msgwriter:INFO 2018-04-15 14:14:27.297 10696 INFO msgwriter src/common/scoped_message_writer.h:102 This is the command line monero wallet. It needs to connect to a monero daemon to work correctly.
|
|
|
|
dEBRUYNE
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1141
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 15, 2018, 05:07:13 PM |
|
Just having a problem trying to open my cli wallet. The daemon is fully synced, but when i open the wallet, enter my wallet name, it gives me the line to enter the password but keyboard is locked so cannot enter any text
2018-04-15 14:12:57.781 10468 INFO msgwriter src/common/scoped_message_writer.h:102 Monero 'Lithium Luna' (v0.12.0.0-master-release) 2018-04-15 14:12:57.781 10468 INFO msgwriter src/common/scoped_message_writer.h:102 Logging to C:\Users\troyc\Downloads\monero-win-x64-v0.12.0.0\monero-v0.12.0.0\monero-wallet-cli.log 2018-04-15 14:13:00.771 10468 INFO msgwriter src/common/scoped_message_writer.h:102 Wallet and key files found, loading... 2018-04-15 14:13:35.940 10468 ERROR default contrib/epee/include/storages/portable_storage.h:161 portable_storage: wrong binary format - signature mismatch 2018-04-15 14:13:35.940 10468 ERROR wallet.wallet2 src/wallet/wallet2.cpp:2818 !r. THROW EXCEPTION: error::invalid_password 2018-04-15 14:13:35.940 10468 WARN net.http src/wallet/wallet_errors.h:794 C:/msys64/DISTRIBUTION-BUILD/src/wallet/wallet2.cpp:2818:N5tools5error16invalid_passwordE: invalid password 2018-04-15 14:13:35.940 10468 ERROR msgwriter src/common/scoped_message_writer.h:102 Error: failed to load wallet: invalid password 2018-04-15 14:13:35.940 10468 ERROR wallet.simplewallet src/simplewallet/simplewallet.cpp:3082 failed to open account 2018-04-15 14:13:35.940 10468 ERROR wallet.simplewallet src/simplewallet/simplewallet.cpp:7478 Failed to initialize wallet 2018-04-15 14:14:27.296 10696 INFO logging contrib/epee/src/mlog.cpp:185 New log categories: *:WARNING,net:FATAL,net.p2p:FATAL,net.cn:FATAL,global:INFO,verify:FATAL,stacktrace:INFO,logging:INFO,msgwriter:INFO 2018-04-15 14:14:27.297 10696 INFO msgwriter src/common/scoped_message_writer.h:102 This is the command line monero wallet. It needs to connect to a monero daemon to work correctly.
See my comment here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg33434822#msg33434822
|
|
|
|
visdude
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1081
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 15, 2018, 09:03:20 PM |
|
Hello Guys!
Which miner softwares have already been updated to support the new fork? and which one would you recommend for cpu mining? I have been using XMR CGPU before (that was giving the best results) but it's not updated yet :/
Pools usually have links to recommended miners on their respective site. As always, different hardware/rig/HW config reacts differently with a particular miner. Hence, testing and tweaking them is a must if you care about squeezing out performance and that sort of stuff. Went with XMR Stak, works fine, hashrates are the same, as I was able to use my previously config files Have you tried Claymore? What is the speed difference? I find that Claymore HR fluctuates wildly at poolside and drops down very low and rarely matches up to the minerside HR. Whereas XMRig is much more consistent poolside and in fact, much higher poolside HR than that of minerside.
|
|
|
|
Marvell2
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 16, 2018, 07:12:56 AM |
|
Hello Guys!
Which miner softwares have already been updated to support the new fork? and which one would you recommend for cpu mining? I have been using XMR CGPU before (that was giving the best results) but it's not updated yet :/
Pools usually have links to recommended miners on their respective site. As always, different hardware/rig/HW config reacts differently with a particular miner. Hence, testing and tweaking them is a must if you care about squeezing out performance and that sort of stuff. Went with XMR Stak, works fine, hashrates are the same, as I was able to use my previously config files Have you tried Claymore? What is the speed difference? I find that Claymore HR fluctuates wildly at poolside and drops down very low and rarely matches up to the minerside HR. Whereas XMRig is much more consistent poolside and in fact, much higher poolside HR than that of minerside. only reason i use claymore is the built in monitoring, anyone recomend better pools than nanapool, they seem to be stealing from me
|
|
|
|
zot57
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 165
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 16, 2018, 07:27:43 AM |
|
Can we get Light version of wallet, this is a must thing to do, first thing to do. It's pain in the butt to use this large wallet and sync it. I can't even open current wallet, I lost over 1 monero coin because of poor functionality of current wallet. So yeah not to happy with the current wallet.
For now I need to use that low graphics wallet because normal version won't load.
Light version wallet priority #1.
|
|
|
|
e-coinomist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1085
Money often costs too much.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 16, 2018, 08:23:04 AM |
|
... for instance I would have designed the chips to be removable for easy swapping, IMO that was a foolish design flaw, sockets are cheap. Sometimes engineers do not see the trees for the woods or is that supposed to be the other way around? ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) no industrial scale equipment available for swapping socketed chips on used (and dusted!) hardware, you would have to ship them to China and employ cheap manual labor to do that seen video footage of moving mining gear out of mongolia, for relocating to a different place. the amount of dust is nearly fatal to fans and anything surrounding
|
|
|
|
Apprentice
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 16, 2018, 09:00:59 AM |
|
Hello Guys!
Which miner softwares have already been updated to support the new fork? and which one would you recommend for cpu mining? I have been using XMR CGPU before (that was giving the best results) but it's not updated yet :/
Pools usually have links to recommended miners on their respective site. As always, different hardware/rig/HW config reacts differently with a particular miner. Hence, testing and tweaking them is a must if you care about squeezing out performance and that sort of stuff. Went with XMR Stak, works fine, hashrates are the same, as I was able to use my previously config files Have you tried Claymore? What is the speed difference? I find that Claymore HR fluctuates wildly at poolside and drops down very low and rarely matches up to the minerside HR. Whereas XMRig is much more consistent poolside and in fact, much higher poolside HR than that of minerside. using claymore for CPU, working fine. XMR stack is working fine for GPU.
|
|
|
|
visdude
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1081
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 16, 2018, 09:10:16 AM |
|
Can we get Light version of wallet, this is a must thing to do, first thing to do. It's pain in the butt to use this large wallet and sync it. I can't even open current wallet, I lost over 1 monero coin because of poor functionality of current wallet. So yeah not to happy with the current wallet.
For now I need to use that low graphics wallet because normal version won't load.
Light version wallet priority #1.
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fs9.postimg.cc%2F81wy3ycpb%2Fremote_node.jpg&t=665&c=eH8ODkWvjBa9AQ)
|
|
|
|
|