smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
October 02, 2014, 08:39:17 PM |
|
If any of this has any relevance to Monero, I can't find it. Why are you posting about darknote here? Probably because jwinterm brought it up and subjected the topic to extensive criticism: My mistake. I thought the comment of mine to which dNote replied was on the dNote thread. However, it was indeed here, in reply to jwinterm.
|
|
|
|
onetwentyfive
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
October 02, 2014, 10:16:44 PM |
|
Hi, quick question..
I had 17.771058420000 XMR in my wallet, and I transferred 17.67 to Polo. Immediately after I transferred it said:
balance: 0.001058420000, unlocked balance: 0.000000000000
which is correct. When I refreshed and saw the transfer go through (purple text) it then said:
balance: 0.000000000000, unlocked balance: 0.000000000000
What happened to the 0.001058420000? Believe me, I'm not sweating 0.001058420000 XMR. I'm just curious, is a tiny balance like that just zeroed out? If so, I will be much more precise in the future with my transfer amounts to make sure that nothing is lost.
Thank you, and continue to kick ass!
|
|
|
|
jwinterm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1116
|
|
October 02, 2014, 10:41:58 PM |
|
Hi, quick question..
I had 17.771058420000 XMR in my wallet, and I transferred 17.67 to Polo. Immediately after I transferred it said:
balance: 0.001058420000, unlocked balance: 0.000000000000
which is correct. When I refreshed and saw the transfer go through (purple text) it then said:
balance: 0.000000000000, unlocked balance: 0.000000000000
What happened to the 0.001058420000? Believe me, I'm not sweating 0.001058420000 XMR. I'm just curious, is a tiny balance like that just zeroed out? If so, I will be much more precise in the future with my transfer amounts to make sure that nothing is lost.
Thank you, and continue to kick ass!
I think it got added to your tx fee, since it would be unspendable with current fee structure anyway. It is kinda weird that it showed up as locked balance, but then disappeared, I agree...
|
|
|
|
pandacoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 02, 2014, 11:06:12 PM |
|
Monero is number 2 with 13578 votes on Cryptsy voting list.
|
|
|
|
onetwentyfive
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
October 03, 2014, 02:11:05 AM |
|
Hi, quick question..
I had 17.771058420000 XMR in my wallet, and I transferred 17.67 to Polo. Immediately after I transferred it said:
balance: 0.001058420000, unlocked balance: 0.000000000000
which is correct. When I refreshed and saw the transfer go through (purple text) it then said:
balance: 0.000000000000, unlocked balance: 0.000000000000
What happened to the 0.001058420000? Believe me, I'm not sweating 0.001058420000 XMR. I'm just curious, is a tiny balance like that just zeroed out? If so, I will be much more precise in the future with my transfer amounts to make sure that nothing is lost.
Thank you, and continue to kick ass!
I think it got added to your tx fee, since it would be unspendable with current fee structure anyway. It is kinda weird that it showed up as locked balance, but then disappeared, I agree... Aha, yes.. I looked up the transaction ID and the fee was 0.101058420000. It did take a hella long time to go through too, like over 24 hours. I thought maybe because there was a lot of transactions in the transfer. The pool I'm on pays in odd numbers, not like most pools where it's a static .3 or .5. It pays like .39441698 and that comes through as 2 transactions: .30000000 and .09441698. I just counted, it was 46 transactions. Would that make it take a long time? Should I break it down into smaller amounts?
|
|
|
|
jwinterm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1116
|
|
October 03, 2014, 02:27:46 AM |
|
Aha, yes.. I looked up the transaction ID and the fee was 0.101058420000. It did take a hella long time to go through too, like over 24 hours. I thought maybe because there was a lot of transactions in the transfer. The pool I'm on pays in odd numbers, not like most pools where it's a static .3 or .5. It pays like .39441698 and that comes through as 2 transactions: .30000000 and .09441698. I just counted, it was 46 transactions. Would that make it take a long time? Should I break it down into smaller amounts?
Nah, probably want to send in as large of tx as possible, to minimize impact of 0.1 fee and additional dust fee. Might want to try mining at a different pool that pays out in slightly larger and more regular amounts though (like 0.5 every time).
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
October 03, 2014, 03:14:31 AM |
|
Aha, yes.. I looked up the transaction ID and the fee was 0.101058420000. It did take a hella long time to go through too, like over 24 hours. I thought maybe because there was a lot of transactions in the transfer. The pool I'm on pays in odd numbers, not like most pools where it's a static .3 or .5. It pays like .39441698 and that comes through as 2 transactions: .30000000 and .09441698. I just counted, it was 46 transactions. Would that make it take a long time? Should I break it down into smaller amounts?
Nah, probably want to send in as large of tx as possible, to minimize impact of 0.1 fee and additional dust fee. Might want to try mining at a different pool that pays out in slightly larger and more regular amounts though (like 0.5 every time). Agree however in answer to the original question, you don't want your pool to do that. You want the minimum number of transactions sent to you since that will make it easiest for you to spend at the lowest cost. So you should request that your pool improve their payouts or switch.
|
|
|
|
iCEBREAKER
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
|
|
October 03, 2014, 04:07:31 AM |
|
Monero is number 2 with 13578 votes on Cryptsy voting list. It almost looks bad for them not adding Monero now " Welcome to Craptsy - Where we support all manner of Shitcoins but not a major coin like Monero unless you bribe us!"
|
██████████ ██████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████ ██████████████ ██████████████ ████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████████ ██████████ Monero
|
| "The difference between bad and well-developed digital cash will determine whether we have a dictatorship or a real democracy." David Chaum 1996 "Fungibility provides privacy as a side effect." Adam Back 2014
|
| | |
|
|
|
OrientA
|
|
October 03, 2014, 06:11:58 AM |
|
Monero is number 2 with 13578 votes on Cryptsy voting list. It almost looks bad for them not adding Monero now " Welcome to Craptsy - Where we support all manner of Shitcoins but not a major coin like Monero unless you bribe us!" That is the spirit of Craptsy.
|
|
|
|
|
onetwentyfive
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
October 03, 2014, 07:39:31 AM |
|
Aha, yes.. I looked up the transaction ID and the fee was 0.101058420000. It did take a hella long time to go through too, like over 24 hours. I thought maybe because there was a lot of transactions in the transfer. The pool I'm on pays in odd numbers, not like most pools where it's a static .3 or .5. It pays like .39441698 and that comes through as 2 transactions: .30000000 and .09441698. I just counted, it was 46 transactions. Would that make it take a long time? Should I break it down into smaller amounts?
Nah, probably want to send in as large of tx as possible, to minimize impact of 0.1 fee and additional dust fee. Might want to try mining at a different pool that pays out in slightly larger and more regular amounts though (like 0.5 every time). Agree however in answer to the original question, you don't want your pool to do that. You want the minimum number of transactions sent to you since that will make it easiest for you to spend at the lowest cost. So you should request that your pool improve their payouts or switch. Agreed, I did think it was unusual. I've reached out to them with the suggestion. Thanks for the prompt replies. The one question remains: Will a high # of transactions (in my case 46 to transfer 17.6XMR) cause the transfer to take longer? Or was it just a glitch on Polo's side that made it take 24 hours to arrive?
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
October 03, 2014, 07:56:07 AM Last edit: October 03, 2014, 10:29:45 AM by smooth |
|
Aha, yes.. I looked up the transaction ID and the fee was 0.101058420000. It did take a hella long time to go through too, like over 24 hours. I thought maybe because there was a lot of transactions in the transfer. The pool I'm on pays in odd numbers, not like most pools where it's a static .3 or .5. It pays like .39441698 and that comes through as 2 transactions: .30000000 and .09441698. I just counted, it was 46 transactions. Would that make it take a long time? Should I break it down into smaller amounts?
Nah, probably want to send in as large of tx as possible, to minimize impact of 0.1 fee and additional dust fee. Might want to try mining at a different pool that pays out in slightly larger and more regular amounts though (like 0.5 every time). Agree however in answer to the original question, you don't want your pool to do that. You want the minimum number of transactions sent to you since that will make it easiest for you to spend at the lowest cost. So you should request that your pool improve their payouts or switch. Agreed, I did think it was unusual. I've reached out to them with the suggestion. Thanks for the prompt replies. The one question remains: Will a high # of transactions (in my case 46 to transfer 17.6XMR) cause the transfer to take longer? Or was it just a glitch on Polo's side that made it take 24 hours to arrive? It can take somewhat longer (since the transaction is larger, so might take a while to fit into a block -- normally this happens within a few minutes), but 24 hours is extreme. That does indeed sound like a glitch on their side.
|
|
|
|
novag
|
|
October 03, 2014, 10:22:55 AM |
|
Monero will grow price and difficult!
|
Donate for the support of a new Martial arts Style - Aikivindo = Aikido + Wing-Chun (in Ukraine) 5168757318423326 PrivatBank. http://aikivindo.com.uaBTC:1DpRaQjdVmrkSopRV8p9RdwvBMWNA9faCS
|
|
|
bigj
|
|
October 03, 2014, 11:26:01 AM |
|
This is a great time to BUY Monero :-) It won't get much cheaper.
|
|
|
|
superresistant
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1131
|
|
October 03, 2014, 11:42:20 AM |
|
This is a great time to BUY Monero :-) It won't get much cheaper.
You may be right, it doesn't seems to go lower. I've been waiting for a long time with my buy orders but no dump is happening. Time to buy then.
|
|
|
|
|
Techone
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
October 03, 2014, 04:31:07 PM |
|
This is a great time to BUY Monero :-) It won't get much cheaper.
The time and price seems right to buy. Indeed. When the GUI wallet hits the shelf and Craptsy lists the coin, many wait-for-good-opportunity folks will be sorry Just think of the guy who spent 10000 BTC to buy a pizza back in 2010... If you already got some BTC, you can sit on it while heading for two figure numbers in value or you can invest in an altcoin of your trust. Not long until one XMR has a higher value than one LTC or DRK.
|
|
|
|
Nekomata
Member
Offline
Activity: 99
Merit: 10
|
|
October 03, 2014, 05:12:30 PM Last edit: April 19, 2015, 05:40:36 AM by Nekomata |
|
XMR is the future.
|
|
|
|
TheUniporn
Member
Offline
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
|
|
October 03, 2014, 06:14:27 PM |
|
ccedk opened the monero markets
|
|
|
|
NewLiberty
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
Gresham's Lawyer
|
|
October 03, 2014, 06:32:31 PM |
|
ccedk opened the monero markets
That was pretty fast, good for them.
|
|
|
|
|