|
Mountaingoat
|
 |
August 16, 2014, 06:34:13 PM |
|
These are the very people who do everything to convince you the sky is not blue.
It isn't?!?!  Not if you live in Hong Kong. I bet you 10 bucks once you get above all the pollution it still is blue. Yeah it is, but for the people on the ground it isn't. I deleted my message because I wasn't sure if it was Hong Kong that was that polluted or another city. |
|
|
|
|
|
SushiChef
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:36:23 PM |
|
HAHA they closed the thread
OMG
|
|
|
|
|
|
BrewCrewFan
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:37:18 PM |
|
These are the very people who do everything to convince you the sky is not blue.
It isn't?!?! Not if you live in Hong Kong. I bet you 10 bucks once you get above all the pollution it still is blue. Yeah it is, but for the people on the ground it isn't. I deleted my message because I wasn't sure if it was Hong Kong that was that polluted or another city. Simple science on how the light is filtered lol. Blue is the color that more or less gets scattered while the rest of the colors get down to us pretty much untouched. With pollution added into the mix... well you can figure out why the sky would not be blue then. |
|
|
|
|
BrewCrewFan
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:38:43 PM |
|
HAHA they closed the thread
OMG
Ya well now it wont matter what is said because the dolt will just delete everything that does not fit into the circle jerk there so now you know the true intentions... its not about fact or anything else, just more fud ass slapping by whatever coin supporter this person is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
braxx
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:40:48 PM |
|
deleted ? and original still open for me? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SushiChef
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:44:36 PM |
|
he re-opened it and made a new one
|
|
|
|
|
|
G-Bert
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:45:45 PM |
|
Ok, to anyone who understands the tech and is saying "I could make a transaction myself and show you, but why dont you do it yourself." While a agree they should, can one of us just make a transaction to shut them up? Or tell me how to do it and ill do it myself. ta. |
XChat XJkVnYD4N4oSjNStgbAUD6UyWuBTWuMRgv
public key fuYPYmK4Sj57PkU2NKg1gKW91euMKkstQPeeexUcxnb8
|
|
|
|
BrewCrewFan
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:46:01 PM |
|
he re-opened it and made a new one
Took no time either for him to delete your post. I stand by my fist thought that it wont matter if it is proven because he will just delete whatever posts that would otherwise be posted there proving otherwise. |
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:47:23 PM |
|
lol, XC supporters, you try to use my example of XC multisig addresses to support your argument?? I created them to SHOW YOU what is a XC multisig address, since you never saw them before  Now please show me in your **blockchain** a multisig address with transactions associated with it, so people can see how it worked. You don't create a multisig address for fun, you use it for some transactions. They are mixing apples and oranges, XC is trustless based on the signatures of all parties during the private transaction. Its not using MULTI_SIG N OF M Address's. The transactions are SIGNED BY ALL PARTIES, if any of the outputs are missing, then it is not signed by all parties. Here is an example of a private decentralized distributed multi-path transaction consisting of 4 parties. >>> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?229236.htm |
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
|
braxx
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:49:18 PM |
|
28 seconds it took to delete my post there lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
BrewCrewFan
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:49:29 PM |
|
lol, XC supporters, you try to use my example of XC multisig addresses to support your argument?? I created them to SHOW YOU what is a XC multisig address, since you never saw them before Now please show me in your **blockchain** a multisig address with transactions associated with it, so people can see how it worked. You don't create a multisig address for fun, you use it for some transactions. They are mixing apples and oranges, XC is trustless based on the signatures of all parties during the private transaction. Its not using MULTI_SIG N OF M Address's. The transactions are SIGNED BY ALL PARTIES, if any of the outputs are missing, then it is not signed by all parties. Here is an example of a private decentralized distributed multi-path transaction consisting of 4 parties. >>> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?229236.htmSo in other words it is indeed working as intended but the fools can not wrap their heads around understanding it, or just do not want to. |
|
|
|
cyberhacker
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:51:32 PM |
|
lol, XC supporters, you try to use my example of XC multisig addresses to support your argument?? I created them to SHOW YOU what is a XC multisig address, since you never saw them before Now please show me in your **blockchain** a multisig address with transactions associated with it, so people can see how it worked. You don't create a multisig address for fun, you use it for some transactions. They are mixing apples and oranges, XC is trustless based on the signatures of all parties during the private transaction. Its not using MULTI_SIG N OF M Address's. The transactions are SIGNED BY ALL PARTIES, if any of the outputs are missing, then it is not signed by all parties. Here is an example of a private decentralized distributed multi-path transaction consisting of 4 parties. >>> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?229236.htmSo in other words it is indeed working as intended but the fools can not wrap their heads around understanding it, or just do not want to. I am thinking. these dumbass do not understand and will bite again. |
|
|
|
|
|
braxx
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:52:55 PM |
|
ATC... is my thought correct? I think they don't read the entire transaction detail...
a multisig is set up between Xnodes (just to verify Xnode ok) (I guess off-blockchain)... just like Xchat (how they find each other)
as you know... every wallet is an Xnode
does it say it does a multisig transaction?
I think they are mixing that up...
I don't see their problem
|
|
|
|
|
|
G-Bert
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:54:30 PM |
|
lol, XC supporters, you try to use my example of XC multisig addresses to support your argument?? I created them to SHOW YOU what is a XC multisig address, since you never saw them before Now please show me in your **blockchain** a multisig address with transactions associated with it, so people can see how it worked. You don't create a multisig address for fun, you use it for some transactions. They are mixing apples and oranges, XC is trustless based on the signatures of all parties during the private transaction. Its not using MULTI_SIG N OF M Address's. The transactions are SIGNED BY ALL PARTIES, if any of the outputs are missing, then it is not signed by all parties. Here is an example of a private decentralized distributed multi-path transaction consisting of 4 parties. >>> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?229236.htmcheers Dan. |
XChat XJkVnYD4N4oSjNStgbAUD6UyWuBTWuMRgv
public key fuYPYmK4Sj57PkU2NKg1gKW91euMKkstQPeeexUcxnb8
|
|
|
dadon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002
Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:57:27 PM |
|
someone should post that on the thread now or Alt Secure should just go explain it to him if he has the time ofc i know your busy and this stuff is beneath you but someone needs to put these fools in there place.
|
|
|
|
|
The-C-Word
Member
Offline
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:58:01 PM |
|
What added benefit do multisig addresses provide?
|
|
|
|
|
|
biskyb33
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:58:22 PM |
|
lol, XC supporters, you try to use my example of XC multisig addresses to support your argument?? I created them to SHOW YOU what is a XC multisig address, since you never saw them before Now please show me in your **blockchain** a multisig address with transactions associated with it, so people can see how it worked. You don't create a multisig address for fun, you use it for some transactions. They are mixing apples and oranges, XC is trustless based on the signatures of all parties during the private transaction. Its not using MULTI_SIG N OF M Address's. The transactions are SIGNED BY ALL PARTIES, if any of the outputs are missing, then it is not signed by all parties. Here is an example of a private decentralized distributed multi-path transaction consisting of 4 parties. >>> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?229236.htm ^^^this explanation and link should be posted on the website (if it isn't already) as we will most likely be referring people to it continuously. |
XChat XLo9fHrgmhwzUJxQwkvTq1oWAoMqXHwCVi
PubKey 2
|
|
|
|
BrewCrewFan
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:59:13 PM
Last edit: August 16, 2014, 07:09:19 PM by BrewCrewFan |
|
someone should post that on the thread now or Alt Secure should just go explain it to him if he has the time ofc i know your busy and this stuff is beneath you but someone needs to put these fools in there place.
It was and then got deleted. So that means they have no interests except fud. Case closed. Edit, guess he kept one part of it. They still deny that it is really what it is. |
|
|
|
|
