[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[SushiChef]

I get back from my bath and see (11) messages... Got me exited, clicked it just to see it were all deleted posts

[BrewCrewFan]

my first post had been following it for about a week before i posted page 23 first xc thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=600706.440 now remember i bought at 10k but i never dumped i held and i'm still not going to dump i just won't be engaging with the community anymore your 2 grumpy for my liking im nice  

LOL I had to go back and find myself... those were the days....


BrewCrewFan
Sr. Member
****


   
Re: [ANN][XC] The X11 Coin Hybrid POW|POS - no IPO| Launchs Today 3pm EST
May 08, 2014, 03:03:16 PM
   
Delete message  #94
Bout ready to jump ship on thecryptopool, either really bad luck or something not one block and over 600% done. Then again its PPNL... who knows but still be nice to see something unconfirmed lol

You were on page 2... you must be loaded!

I'm on page 17.  

Dude , if you only knew. No body cared about the coin mainly because it was not rushed to an exchange. So me and some others stuck with it, mined it when no one else would. Only once it hit Polo I think did the hash go though the roof.... so this was about a 3+ week period on x11 at a sub 50 dif.

[Teka]

I just found my first post:


Re: [ANN][XC] The X11 Coin |3.33% POS - no IPO| Decentralized Anonymous TX Support!
May 17, 2014, 03:51:57 PM
Delete message  #280
Looks like an interesting coin and decent developer

[battbot]

I just found my first post:


Re: [ANN][XC] The X11 Coin |3.33% POS - no IPO| Decentralized Anonymous TX Support!
May 17, 2014, 03:51:57 PM
Delete message  #280
Looks like an interesting coin and decent developer

Haha!  I bet that brought a smile to your face!   

[battbot]

You were on page 2... you must be loaded!

I'm on page 17.  

Dude , if you only knew. No body cared about the coin mainly because it was not rushed to an exchange. So me and some others stuck with it, mined it when no one else would. Only once it hit Polo I think did the hash go though the roof.... so this was about a 3+ week period on x11 at a sub 50 dif.

If I recall correctly (I was around since day 1 launch), there was not 3 weeks at sub 50 diff.  The total mining period was around 3 weeks before PoW was cut short and ended.  Probably around 1.5 weeks of sub 50 diff.  But I could be remembering wrong.

How long was XC's PoW?  Anyone remember?

Edit** I just looked, PoW started on 5/8, and ended on 5/28 I believe.  So, about 20 days of PoW, or almost 3 weeks.

[Teka]

I just found my first post:


Re: [ANN][XC] The X11 Coin |3.33% POS - no IPO| Decentralized Anonymous TX Support!
May 17, 2014, 03:51:57 PM
Delete message  #280
Looks like an interesting coin and decent developer

Haha!  I bet that brought a smile to your face!   

Yup.

[tr8kr]

Re: [ANN][XC] >> Mandatory Update to new Wallet - The first POS X11 anonymous wallet
May 28, 2014, 12:28:53 AM
Delete message  #3997
i have withdraw 1000 XC from poloniex to my wallet (v0.9.1.4x11-coin-1.0) after the start of the POS phase.
That's now 2 hour and they are again immature with 0 confirmation...

I have made the resync with -addnode=162.243.109.24 -connect=162.243.109.24 and i'm on the correct block 21013 with 12 connection but nothing have change 0 confirmation...

What to do ?

Here is my first message was accumulating some week before !

[BrewCrewFan]

Dont look now but BTC is starting to bounce back up... soon other certain coins will follow I am sure.

[dannyspk]

Dont look now but BTC is starting to bounce back up... soon other certain coins will follow I am sure.

Wouldn't be really sure of it if I was you. During the last Nov 13 rally of BTC, all other alts went down while BTC was soaring through new levels. It was only in the last two weeks of November that we saw about 1000% rise in popular alts back then. I suppose this was a tactic to get impatient traders sell their precious alts to catch the BTC train. Be careful guys, this is a heavily manipulated market.

[BrewCrewFan]

Dont look now but BTC is starting to bounce back up... soon other certain coins will follow I am sure.

Wouldn't be really sure of it if I was you. During the last Nov 13 rally of BTC, all other alts went down while BTC was soaring through new levels. It was only in the last two weeks of November that we saw about 1000% rise in popular alts back then. I suppose this was a tactic to get impatient traders sell their precious alts to catch the BTC train. Be careful guys, this is a heavily manipulated market.

Dumping for XC happened long ago. Eventually the money is gonna want to find someplace to invest after the BTC train slows down. This could very well be what happen last time, investment in certain alts.

[dannyspk]

Dont look now but BTC is starting to bounce back up... soon other certain coins will follow I am sure.

Wouldn't be really sure of it if I was you. During the last Nov 13 rally of BTC, all other alts went down while BTC was soaring through new levels. It was only in the last two weeks of November that we saw about 1000% rise in popular alts back then. I suppose this was a tactic to get impatient traders sell their precious alts to catch the BTC train. Be careful guys, this is a heavily manipulated market.

Dumping for XC happened long ago. Eventually the money is gonna want to find someplace to invest after the BTC train slows down. This could very well be what happen last time, investment in certain alts.

I agree. If only we follow our stable rise and move along with BTC, there wouldn't be heavy dumping afterwards. Also, it will gather attention to XC from all market participants. Not saying that won't happen otherwise. I'm pretty confident about it.

[onealfa]

looks good:

[mr_random]

People fed up with the XC FUD topic created by supercoin fudsters may or may not wish to read my topic: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=742246.0

[ssmc2]

looks good:

Cool, but I personally don't feel comfortable linking my bank account to any of these exchanges that have been hacked.

[synechist]

People fed up with the XC FUD topic created by supercoin fudsters may or may not wish to read my topic: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=742246.0

Ha ha. Good work sir!

[BrewCrewFan]

looks good:

O dear.

I guess what kind of securities can you have for not having auto withdraws with something like that. See , I feel safe with coinbase, what I did was link a disposable account where no money outside of what money I want in there, goes in there.... or withdrawn. Does not have my main account... would something like that be wise for this too?

[biskyb33]

looks good:

Cool, but I personally don't feel comfortable linking my bank account to any of these exchanges that have been hacked.

if i recall correctly, my first trade was because of moolah (and two other accounts pumping the same coin) ...i only traded twice and lost before i landed on xc and stuck. just from my own limited personal experience, i'm leary of anything moolah says (does he hack too?) ...when is mintpal going to be implementing xctech? have they switched hands yet?

[dannyspk]

looks good:

Cool, but I personally don't feel comfortable linking my bank account to any of these exchanges that have been hacked.

if i recall correctly, my first trade was because of moolah (and two other accounts pumping the same coin) ...i only traded twice and lost before i landed on xc and stuck. just from my own limited personal experience, i'm leary of anything moolah says (does he hack too?) ...when is mintpal going to be implementing xctech? have they switched hands yet?

what's xctech?

[synechist]

The following posts of mine were deleted by timerland on this FUD thread:

TOR DEPENDED POOR COIN  CERTAINLY NOT TRUSTLESS
They cheated people like they are trustless they dont haven even multisig address

I'm not sure what is less appealing about this post:

- the poor linguistic abilities it portrays

- its factual inaccuracy (because XC does use multisig transactions)

- its deceitfulness.


Poor showing sir.

No, there's only one technology for multisig, there's nothing "different", or it is not multisig. Try to use some other names.

You are incorrect about this.

I repeat: you are not in a position to tell what technology XC has or has not implemented.

XC has technology that you do not know about.

Therefore you are not in a position to make the above statement.

Yes this is the truth from all the above messages.

This is an irresponsibly one-sided remark.

And in what sense can the following deleted posts possibly be taken as inappropriate?

No, there's only one technology for multisig, there's nothing "different", or it is not multisig. Try to use some other names.

You are incorrect about this.

I repeat: you are not in a position to tell what technology XC has or has not implemented.

XC has technology that you do not know about.

Therefore you are not in a position to make the above statement.

Yes this is the truth from all the above messages.

This is an irresponsibly one-sided remark.

What possible reason would you have for deleting these?

because while you are arguing and without knowing what is multisig address and what is multisig transaction!

marseille posted Gavin Andersen's example of multisig transaction, go read it and understand it please, before repeating the same thing here!

I understand multisig quite well thank you, and I object to your patronising remarks on this topic.

Proceed as if I understand, and you'll come across less arrogantly.

because while you are arguing and without knowing what is multisig address and what is multisig transaction!

marseille posted Gavin Andersen's example of multisig transaction, go read it and understand it please, before repeating the same thing here!

I again request you that please on the facts, no fuds, and understand multisig before posting please.

Again here Gavin Andersen showed what is a multisig tx and how to create, sign and spend!
https://gist.github.com/gavinandresen/3966071

Ah, deleting perfectly relevant posts again are you?

Nice ethics you have.

Go ahead, delete this one too. It'll make you look good.

because while you are arguing and without knowing what is multisig address and what is multisig transaction!

marseille posted Gavin Andersen's example of multisig transaction, go read it and understand it please, before repeating the same thing here!

I again request you that please on the facts, no fuds, and understand multisig before posting please.

Again here Gavin Andersen showed what is a multisig tx and how to create, sign and spend!
https://gist.github.com/gavinandresen/3966071

I understand multisig quite well thank you, and I do not enjoy being patronised, so kindly stop.

You are not in a position to tell what I do not understand, so kindly refrain from making assertions you cannot substantiate.

I am tired to argue with you guys, please if you want to show facts:

provide us an XC multisig address that has tx associated with it, in the blockchain, so we can inspect and see what is there. This can prove you actually have the capability of multisig.

what you have provided so far are NOT XC multisig addresses, they are regular XC addresses. What I asked is extremely simple, and can be provided in 30 sec.

I've told you this several times: XC DOES NOT USE WHAT YOU CALL "MULTISIG".

It uses multisig transactions, not multisig addresses.

Can we move on?

It uses regular tx in this case, where you can put software to do anything, but it does not require all party to sign in order to spend! mutisig transaction is the transaction created on multisig address (you understand why? well read what is multisig!).

You do not have sufficient grounds to assert that XC uses regular transactions.

You only have sufficient grounds to assert that XC uses addresses that conform to the regular format (but don't necessarily behave that way in XC by any means.

Again, you're making assumptions that go beyond the evidence you have.

You've deleted multiple relevant posts of mine.

I will post them here so that those who wish to pursue this discussion can participate.

[benthach]

Xcurrentcy - flexible coin

it's bendable