|
CryptoGretzky
|
 |
August 28, 2014, 09:32:07 PM |
|
Nice, tho I assume that it will be hosted(?) I dig that it can be offline to. It's not hosted. It's just a single html file with all the scripts embedded that you run offline. |
|
|
|
|
Dungor
|
|
August 28, 2014, 09:33:49 PM |
|
Nice, tho I assume that it will be hosted(?) I dig that it can be offline to. It's not hosted. It's just a single html file with all the scripts embedded that you run offline. I can tell that it is not hosted  My assumption or rather question, is that it also will be hosted on the webpage later? edit: Maybe even embedded into a later version of the wallet? |
XChat XZFT9YxW9Uhv4R5yoWgUmYhAzqP5qVuZp8
Public Key 288p7Jom8LvQ1UNVgc7H7wzpZoQkqLdtqfR7Ls4Bgo3Mz
|
|
|
|
Teka (OP)
|
|
August 28, 2014, 09:38:26 PM |
|
Nice, tho I assume that it will be hosted(?) I dig that it can be offline to. It's not hosted. It's just a single html file with all the scripts embedded that you run offline. I can tell that it is not hosted My assumption or rather question, is that it also will be hosted on the webpage later? edit: Maybe even embedded into a later version of the wallet?I ain't saying anything but.... backup |
|
|
|
|
|
CryptoGretzky
|
|
August 28, 2014, 09:39:15 PM |
|
Would be nice to be able to BIP38 encrypt existing address so that major coin days don't get destroyed by the needs to move from old address to the new address.  |
|
|
|
|
Dungor
|
|
August 28, 2014, 09:52:03 PM |
|
Nice, tho I assume that it will be hosted(?) I dig that it can be offline to. It's not hosted. It's just a single html file with all the scripts embedded that you run offline. I can tell that it is not hosted My assumption or rather question, is that it also will be hosted on the webpage later? edit: Maybe even embedded into a later version of the wallet?I ain't saying anything but.... backupThat's pretty cool |
XChat XZFT9YxW9Uhv4R5yoWgUmYhAzqP5qVuZp8
Public Key 288p7Jom8LvQ1UNVgc7H7wzpZoQkqLdtqfR7Ls4Bgo3Mz
|
|
|
|
sugarboy321
|
|
August 28, 2014, 09:56:36 PM |
|
Any updates on TOR stick shipments?
Final adjustments to both the XC_OS and REV2 are being completed, once that is done I will have a date for shipping. If the delay is a concern, its possible to get I could ship sooner with the current code. Dan The upcoming release also brings back the minimum requirements for running as an XNode. Running an XNode will generate profit through trustless mixing transactions as well as serving content for the CDN and future technologies. Back to 550 XC for the Xnode? Or another figure? |
|
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
August 28, 2014, 10:05:49 PM |
|
Any updates on TOR stick shipments?
Final adjustments to both the XC_OS and REV2 are being completed, once that is done I will have a date for shipping. If the delay is a concern, its possible to get I could ship sooner with the current code. Dan The upcoming release also brings back the minimum requirements for running as an XNode. Running an XNode will generate profit through trustless mixing transactions as well as serving content for the CDN and future technologies. Back to 550 XC for the Xnode? Or another figure? Yes 550 XC |
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
|
georgehosterguy
|
|
August 28, 2014, 10:07:06 PM |
|
How much will it generate? This is a good idea ... better than PoS as it's rewarding those providing the anonymity .... n
|
|
|
|
|
braxx
|
|
August 28, 2014, 10:08:46 PM |
|
Any updates on TOR stick shipments?
Final adjustments to both the XC_OS and REV2 are being completed, once that is done I will have a date for shipping. If the delay is a concern, its possible to get I could ship sooner with the current code. Dan The upcoming release also brings back the minimum requirements for running as an XNode. Running an XNode will generate profit through trustless mixing transactions as well as serving content for the CDN and future technologies. Back to 550 XC for the Xnode? Or another figure? hopefully lower do we want to lose the decentralised part? it is back centralised if only the rich can have Xnodes |
|
|
|
|
|
cryptico
|
|
August 28, 2014, 10:08:54 PM |
|
If someone has an xnode with more than 550 xcs will it generate more revenue?
|
|
|
|
|
BrewCrewFan
|
|
August 28, 2014, 10:09:05 PM |
|
How much will it generate? This is a good idea ... better than PoS as it's rewarding those providing the anonymity .... n
3.3% annually. |
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
August 28, 2014, 10:10:32 PM |
|
Any updates on TOR stick shipments?
Final adjustments to both the XC_OS and REV2 are being completed, once that is done I will have a date for shipping. If the delay is a concern, its possible to get I could ship sooner with the current code. Dan The upcoming release also brings back the minimum requirements for running as an XNode. Running an XNode will generate profit through trustless mixing transactions as well as serving content for the CDN and future technologies. Back to 550 XC for the Xnode? Or another figure? hopefully lower do we want to lose the decentralised part? it is back centralised if only the rich can have Xnodes For the decentralized trustless mixing to work w/ an XNode, you need to have coins available to support that. |
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
|
BrewCrewFan
|
|
August 28, 2014, 10:11:18 PM |
|
Any updates on TOR stick shipments?
Final adjustments to both the XC_OS and REV2 are being completed, once that is done I will have a date for shipping. If the delay is a concern, its possible to get I could ship sooner with the current code. Dan The upcoming release also brings back the minimum requirements for running as an XNode. Running an XNode will generate profit through trustless mixing transactions as well as serving content for the CDN and future technologies. Back to 550 XC for the Xnode? Or another figure? hopefully lower do we want to lose the decentralised part? it is back centralised if only the rich can have Xnodes I believe that EVERY WALLET online is an XNODE. Amount does not matter. |
|
|
|
|
braxx
|
|
August 28, 2014, 10:16:37 PM |
|
it's like a slow connection with 550XC is better for serving CDN than a superfast connection with only 5Xc's
why can't we make the possible revenue depended on the speed of your connection instead of a 550XC min requirement.
|
|
|
|
|
policymaker
Full Member
 Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Crypto Currency Supporter
|
|
August 28, 2014, 10:17:32 PM |
|
Any updates on TOR stick shipments?
Final adjustments to both the XC_OS and REV2 are being completed, once that is done I will have a date for shipping. If the delay is a concern, its possible to get I could ship sooner with the current code. Dan The upcoming release also brings back the minimum requirements for running as an XNode. Running an XNode will generate profit through trustless mixing transactions as well as serving content for the CDN and future technologies. As an early adopter albeit small one, Im really hyped for the requirements brought back. It d be a real incentive to know I can generate some profit even though I don't have tens of thousands coins to do so through PoS, and there are so many people that know of XC now that they still can buy in at bargain prices. It will also provide as incentive for more people or bigger funds to invest in the currency, knowing that they can mathematically expect a higher ROI, not to mention sooner. All this contributes to the price going up because of deeper causes rather than pure speculation. |
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
August 28, 2014, 10:17:38 PM |
|
Any updates on TOR stick shipments?
Final adjustments to both the XC_OS and REV2 are being completed, once that is done I will have a date for shipping. If the delay is a concern, its possible to get I could ship sooner with the current code. Dan The upcoming release also brings back the minimum requirements for running as an XNode. Running an XNode will generate profit through trustless mixing transactions as well as serving content for the CDN and future technologies. Back to 550 XC for the Xnode? Or another figure? hopefully lower do we want to lose the decentralised part? it is back centralised if only the rich can have Xnodes I believe that EVERY WALLET online is an XNODE. Amount does not matter. This is true to a point, but to enable the startup option "-xmixer" and collect fee's from trustless transactions you will need at least 550 XC's in the wallet. |
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
|
BrewCrewFan
|
|
August 28, 2014, 10:20:03 PM |
|
it's like a slow connection with 550XC is better for serving CDN than a superfast connection with only 5Xc's
why can't we make the possible revenue depended on the speed of your connection instead of a 550XC min requirement.
If that is the case you would lock out many parts of the world and make it uneven. Heck, 60 mb down just hit my area, where as much of Europe is 100+mb...this is something out of everyones control. |
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
August 28, 2014, 10:20:59 PM |
|
it's like a slow connection with 550XC is better for serving CDN than a superfast connection with only 5Xc's
why can't we make the possible revenue depended on the speed of your connection instead of a 550XC min requirement.
For the CDN, yes you will need to serve content without latency to receive the payments. So its possible that for CDN use only (no xmixer) the amount could be lowered |
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
|
sugarboy321
|
|
August 28, 2014, 10:21:28 PM |
|
Any updates on TOR stick shipments?
Final adjustments to both the XC_OS and REV2 are being completed, once that is done I will have a date for shipping. If the delay is a concern, its possible to get I could ship sooner with the current code. Dan The upcoming release also brings back the minimum requirements for running as an XNode. Running an XNode will generate profit through trustless mixing transactions as well as serving content for the CDN and future technologies. Back to 550 XC for the Xnode? Or another figure? hopefully lower do we want to lose the decentralised part? it is back centralised if only the rich can have Xnodes Even if the price goes up it is still decentralized, just fewer nodes. |
|
|
|
|
|
braxx
|
|
August 28, 2014, 10:23:29 PM |
|
it's like a slow connection with 550XC is better for serving CDN than a superfast connection with only 5Xc's
why can't we make the possible revenue depended on the speed of your connection instead of a 550XC min requirement.
For the CDN, yes you will need to serve content without latency to receive the payments. So its possible that for CDN use only (no xmixer) the amount could be lowered interresting  |
|
|
|
|
|
