[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[tr8kr]

http://xctalk.com/index.php?/topic/71-xnode-and-the-incentive-to-run-it/

Adapting reserve balance vs profit that was a post that i made some time ago about the incentive to run a xnode

[sugarboy321]

it's like a slow connection with 550XC is better for serving CDN than a superfast connection with only 5Xc's

why can't we make the possible revenue depended on the speed of your connection instead of a 550XC min requirement.

If that is the case you would lock out many parts of the world and make it uneven. Heck, 60 mb down just hit my area, where as much of Europe is 100+mb...this is something out of everyones control.

Hahaha, I think I have a 56k dialup.

[braxx]

Any updates on TOR stick shipments?

Final adjustments to both the XC_OS and REV2 are being completed, once that is done I will have a date for shipping.


If the delay is a concern, its possible to get I could ship sooner with the current code.

Dan

The upcoming release also brings back the minimum requirements for running as an XNode.

Running an XNode will generate profit through trustless mixing transactions as well as serving content for the CDN and future technologies.

Back to 550 XC for the Xnode? Or another figure?

hopefully lower
do we want to lose the decentralised part?
it is back centralised if only the rich can have Xnodes

I believe that EVERY WALLET online is an XNODE. Amount does not matter.

This is true to a point, but to enable the startup option "-xmixer" and collect fee's from trustless transactions you will need at least 550 XC's in the wallet.

I believe everybody thought that no requirements were needed for the xnodes and the anon transfers.
everybody is screaming from the rooftops that every wallet is an xnode => the thing needed for anon transfers...

[atcsecure]

Any updates on TOR stick shipments?

Final adjustments to both the XC_OS and REV2 are being completed, once that is done I will have a date for shipping.


If the delay is a concern, its possible to get I could ship sooner with the current code.

Dan

The upcoming release also brings back the minimum requirements for running as an XNode.

Running an XNode will generate profit through trustless mixing transactions as well as serving content for the CDN and future technologies.

Back to 550 XC for the Xnode? Or another figure?

hopefully lower
do we want to lose the decentralised part?
it is back centralised if only the rich can have Xnodes

I believe that EVERY WALLET online is an XNODE. Amount does not matter.

This is true to a point, but to enable the startup option "-xmixer" and collect fee's from trustless transactions you will need at least 550 XC's in the wallet.

I believe everybody thought that no requirements were needed for the xnodes and the anon transfers.
everybody is screaming from the rooftops that every wallet is an xnode => the thing needed for anon transfers...

I should have been more clear - This requirement is only for xmixer's


every wallet is an xnode, and you can use the anon transfers with out having 550xc's

[braxx]

Any updates on TOR stick shipments?

Final adjustments to both the XC_OS and REV2 are being completed, once that is done I will have a date for shipping.


If the delay is a concern, its possible to get I could ship sooner with the current code.

Dan

The upcoming release also brings back the minimum requirements for running as an XNode.

Running an XNode will generate profit through trustless mixing transactions as well as serving content for the CDN and future technologies.

Back to 550 XC for the Xnode? Or another figure?

hopefully lower
do we want to lose the decentralised part?
it is back centralised if only the rich can have Xnodes

I believe that EVERY WALLET online is an XNODE. Amount does not matter.

This is true to a point, but to enable the startup option "-xmixer" and collect fee's from trustless transactions you will need at least 550 XC's in the wallet.

I believe everybody thought that no requirements were needed for the xnodes and the anon transfers.
everybody is screaming from the rooftops that every wallet is an xnode => the thing needed for anon transfers...

I should have been more clear - This requirement is only for xmixer's


every wallet is an xnode, and you can use the anon transfers with out having 550xc's

thank you for clearing that out  ;-)

[ForReal]

probably a stupid question but: I just installed the XC app (windows) and it keeps saying 0 active connections?? What am I doing wrong? Do I have to configure anything else? Have tried to disable my firewall but still no connections... thx

Add below to xcurrency.conf file and save it.

Code:

server=1
listen=1
rpcuser=username
rpcpassword=password
rpcport=32347

addnode=east01.xcnode.xc-official.com
addnode=west01.xcnode.xc-official.com
addnode=west02.xcnode.xc-official.com

Still doesnt work... Any other suggestion?

I had this problem before. Make sure your Norton 360 or similar anti-virus program is turn ON. They wont let you conncect if it's not on for some reason. As soon as i turn it on , my wallet can connect.
Let me know if this works.

[ForReal]

Any updates on TOR stick shipments?

Final adjustments to both the XC_OS and REV2 are being completed, once that is done I will have a date for shipping.


If the delay is a concern, its possible to get I could ship sooner with the current code.

Dan

The upcoming release also brings back the minimum requirements for running as an XNode.

Running an XNode will generate profit through trustless mixing transactions as well as serving content for the CDN and future technologies.

Back to 550 XC for the Xnode? Or another figure?

hopefully lower
do we want to lose the decentralised part?
it is back centralised if only the rich can have Xnodes

I believe that EVERY WALLET online is an XNODE. Amount does not matter.

This is true to a point, but to enable the startup option "-xmixer" and collect fee's from trustless transactions you will need at least 550 XC's in the wallet.

I believe everybody thought that no requirements were needed for the xnodes and the anon transfers.
everybody is screaming from the rooftops that every wallet is an xnode => the thing needed for anon transfers...

I should have been more clear - This requirement is only for xmixer's


every wallet is an xnode, and you can use the anon transfers with out having 550xc's

Can we have lower it to 500 XC ?

Many of us have many many many address staking at 500 XC
if the requirement is 550, then we will have to increase the amount and therefore reset the timer for staking......
Thanks

[Artoodeetoo]

I don't think increasing the amount affects staking? Would that not mean every tome you staked you would reset?!

Ps nice to see you buzzing around Dan.. Sounds like things are about to get exciting.

[MemoryShock]

Some pretty cool news...on a short side note, I had a support issue with Cryptsy and took the opportunity to raise the X11coin name issue when I was communicating with them directly.  Hopefully this will lead to resolution soon...

Hello Memoryshock,

Regarding the XC name update, I escalated this ticket to our 2nd level of tech support.
Please give some time as our tech support team will respond in order of tickets received.


Sincerely,

Elen
Customer Service Manager
Cryptsy.com

[georgehosterguy]

So it still just rewards % of xc owned? 

[atcsecure]

So it still just rewards % of xc owned? 

XMixers get a fee from from each transaction they process, separate from staking interest

[CryptoGretzky]

So it still just rewards % of xc owned? 

XMixers get a fee from from each transaction they process, separate from staking interest

Can the 550 XC being used for mixing still be staked?

[Driv3n]

Pretty damn excited about the opportunities for Xnode profit independent of price in the near future.

Also excited to see all the future tech come to fruition.

[holyprofit]

So it still just rewards % of xc owned? 

XMixers get a fee from from each transaction they process, separate from staking interest

I'm really happy to see a minimum requirement back. It's a reward for investing so it's a draw for newcomers
and supports the coin.
 

[Mountaingoat]

The volume of today is complete shit, that is a shame.

[Aaronm555]

Anyone able to help with this:

"A fatal error has occurred. XCurrency can no longer continue safely and will quit.

EXCEPTION: St13runtime_error
CDB() : can't open database file blkindex.dat, error 22
I:\XCurrency\XCurrency-qt.exe in Runaway exception"

It is the latest release and was working fine yesterday, any help would be much appreciated.

Aaron

[CryptoGretzky]

Wow... that's the #2 rich list address staking 82% of the last 100 blocks cause it hasn't been touched for 28 days+ and it finally staked.

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/address.dws?XPmGJhoziauLbSDYML6ekJ4QQDALcr4eBm.htm

[IMJim]

Anyone able to help with this:

"A fatal error has occurred. XCurrency can no longer continue safely and will quit.

EXCEPTION: St13runtime_error
CDB() : can't open database file blkindex.dat, error 22
I:\XCurrency\XCurrency-qt.exe in Runaway exception"

It is the latest release and was working fine yesterday, any help would be much appreciated.

Aaron

I'm no expert here but if I saw that error, I would first try to re-download the blockchain.

[Aaronm555]

XCurrency closes as soon as i launch it so i can't figure it out, i have tried reinstalling it also with no luck.

[IMJim]

XCurrency closes as soon as i launch it so i can't figure it out, i have tried reinstalling it also with no luck.

When you say to tried to install what does that mean exactly?  What steps did you take?