|
cryptico
|
 |
October 22, 2014, 06:25:29 AM |
|
we had an initial pump that was big enough from 0.00001 to 0.005 in a week I think... that is when XC got known. Then back to 0.00075 then another Pump to 0.003 then back to 0.0014 and stable there till now.
I see pumps happened here too. Crypto-alt=market manipulation on steroids and this is what happened and what is happening right now. Stupid morons unfortunately have control on large amounts of BTCs from the early stages and can control the market at will plus they form P&D groups.
Xc will break their game that is why has been always and still is suppressed.
|
|
|
|
rdnkjdi
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1256
Merit: 1009
|
|
October 22, 2014, 06:27:08 AM |
|
we had an initial pump that was big enough from 0.00001 to 0.005 in a week I think... that is when XC got known. Then back to 0.00075 then another Pump to 0.003 then back to 0.0014 and stable there till now.
I see pumps happened here too. Crypto-alt=market manipulation on steroids and this is what happened and what is happening right now. Stupid morons unfortunately have control on large amounts of BTCs from the early stages and can control the market at will plus they form P&D groups.
Xc will break their game that is why has been always and still is suppressed.
Edit: Just remembered I was threadbanned. Carry on. |
|
|
|
|
|
cryptico
|
|
October 22, 2014, 06:28:34 AM |
|
75k.. im fucking stupid that i bought yesterday at 104k ~2btc worth of xc  (( i just remerber that synechist said on monday "stupid who are selling before huge news" , price was ~100k.. so they wasnt stupid, i dont believe that we will see price jump on 29th of OCtober.. Can you tell me what is the point of this post? |
|
|
|
|
jibble
|
|
October 22, 2014, 06:29:28 AM |
|
we had an initial pump that was big enough from 0.00001 to 0.005 in a week I think... that is when XC got known. Then back to 0.00075 then another Pump to 0.003 then back to 0.0014 and stable there till now.
I see pumps happened here too. Crypto-alt=market manipulation on steroids and this is what happened and what is happening right now. Stupid morons unfortunately have control on large amounts of BTCs from the early stages and can control the market at will plus they form P&D groups.
Xc will break their game that is why has been always and still is suppressed.
It could simply be that the market for closes sourced coins with anon claims has dried up. That implication would indicate that there would be a huge rise in open source anon coins? It could be 1 of 1000 different reasons |
|
|
|
|
|
reebokasss
|
|
October 22, 2014, 06:31:21 AM |
|
75k.. im fucking stupid that i bought yesterday at 104k ~2btc worth of xc (( i just remerber that synechist said on monday "stupid who are selling before huge news" , price was ~100k.. so they wasnt stupid, i dont believe that we will see price jump on 29th of OCtober.. Can you tell me what is the point of this post? point that i could get 30% more coins than i bought yesterday and i very sad because of that  and its a little be funny when after every news everyone says that we will be huge, but the result shows that after every news we are going lower and lower. |
|
|
|
|
cryptico
|
|
October 22, 2014, 06:37:26 AM |
|
75k.. im fucking stupid that i bought yesterday at 104k ~2btc worth of xc (( i just remerber that synechist said on monday "stupid who are selling before huge news" , price was ~100k.. so they wasnt stupid, i dont believe that we will see price jump on 29th of OCtober.. Can you tell me what is the point of this post? point that i could get 30% more coins than i bought yesterday and i very sad because of that and its a little be funny when after every news everyone says that we will be huge, but the result shows that after every news we are going lower and lower. I could have gotten 80 per cent more or so as I bought in at 0.0013 are you happy now? Can we stop whining and stating the obvious? thank you. Looking forward to Dan reply for the ANDROID MOBILE WALLET TESTING WITH FREAKING MULTIPATH MESH NETWORK ON IT. |
|
|
|
|
burner2014
|
|
October 22, 2014, 06:37:48 AM |
|
Looking forward to work with you guys together at Blocknet! Really excited about this project.
Even if we (Fibrecoin) have already your anon mixing from Dan in Revision 2 included into the coin.
Hope you have a good week!
Cheers!
|
|
|
|
|
|
cryptico
|
|
October 22, 2014, 06:41:13 AM
Last edit: October 22, 2014, 06:56:29 AM by cryptico |
|
Looking forward to work with you guys together at Blocknet! Really excited about this project.
Even if we (Fibrecoin) have already your anon mixing from Dan in Revision 2 included into the coin.
Hope you have a good week!
Cheers!
SORRY?? Can Anyone from the Team Clarify on this statement ASAP please? |
|
|
|
|
reebokasss
|
|
October 22, 2014, 06:44:17 AM |
|
we just fall from top20..  |
|
|
|
|
cryptico
|
|
October 22, 2014, 06:46:39 AM |
|
we just fall from top20.. Dude go for a walk and get off the Keyboard.... |
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
October 22, 2014, 07:00:20 AM |
|
Looking forward to work with you guys together at Blocknet! Really excited about this project.
Even if we (Fibrecoin) have already your anon mixing from Dan in Revision 2 included into the coin.
Hope you have a good week!
Cheers!
SORRY?? Can Anyone from the Team Clarify on this statement ASAP please? He meant Rev1, obviously. |
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
|
cryptico
|
|
October 22, 2014, 07:18:48 AM |
|
Looking forward to work with you guys together at Blocknet! Really excited about this project.
Even if we (Fibrecoin) have already your anon mixing from Dan in Revision 2 included into the coin.
Hope you have a good week!
Cheers!
SORRY?? Can Anyone from the Team Clarify on this statement ASAP please? He meant Rev1, obviously. I thought so people should weight their words carefully in this thread before posting. |
|
|
|
|
burner2014
|
|
October 22, 2014, 07:19:28 AM |
|
Looking forward to work with you guys together at Blocknet! Really excited about this project.
Even if we (Fibrecoin) have already your anon mixing from Dan in Revision 2 included into the coin.
Hope you have a good week!
Cheers!
SORRY?? Can Anyone from the Team Clarify on this statement ASAP please? He meant Rev1, obviously. Yeah Yeah , Revision 1 XC in Revision 2 Fibre But nice anyway. |
|
|
|
|
hashxtag
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
October 22, 2014, 07:39:49 AM |
|
It does work, and its not open source for several reasons, including the fact it is the most advanced mixer technology on the marketplace and would be cloned immediately...
Please dont call it the "most advanced mixer technology" when its closed source. If you want that title, open source it, have it scrutinized and present your case to the community. Its claims like this that make investors run away. +1 i think so too. and it really sucks to see the price falling like a stone. maybe the blocknet idea wasn't the best idea at all? i think publishing this idea after REV3 was released would be much better as we lost 30% in just a few days. even most of the coins that joined the blocknet train are nearly worthless Coin - Marketcap - Price change last 7 days APEX - $ 62,861 +225.72 % SSD - $ 126,504 +15.98 % SWIFT - $ 491,164 +13.32 % XST - $ 369,854 +1.69 % NHZ - $ 188,442 -13.81 % UTIL - $ 150,427 +31.07 % FIBRE - $ 190,156 -11.86 % XC - $ 1,942,676 -28.71 % Why were only coins added that are nearly worthless? Why didn't you try to get at least one coin that has a market cap > 1M$? And as it seems nearly all of them increased in price only XC lost dramatically. I think a blocknet would make sense when coins that already have a high marketcap join forces to build something big but this somehow feels like XC is used to bring more value to some useless coins. This is exactly my doubt - XC, top 20 coin associated itself with note know coins, so that unknown coins associated themselves with well known XC. Result I expect is "psychological value" flow from XC to those less known coins. |
|
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
October 22, 2014, 07:43:21 AM |
|
Anyone who interprets the Blocknet as some kind of association - and thus equivalence of value - between coins has no idea what the Blocknet is.
If two companies are on the internet, does their value thereby become somewhat equal? No.
Let's remember that the Blocknet is an open framework, an internet of blockchains.
|
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
|
MemoryShock
|
|
October 22, 2014, 07:44:53 AM |
|
This is exactly my doubt - XC, top 20 coin associated itself with note know coins, so that unknown coins associated themselves with well known XC. Result I expect is "psychological value" flow from XC to those less known coins.
Have you researched the dev prominence behind those coins or just the Marketcap? |
|
|
|
|
cryptico
|
|
October 22, 2014, 07:53:59 AM |
|
Anyone who interprets the Blocknet as some kind of association - and thus equivalence of value - between coins has no idea what the Blocknet is.
If two companies are on the internet, does their value thereby become somewhat equal? No.
Let's remember that the Blocknet is an open framework, an internet of blockchains.
Can you clarify the difference between the Blocknet and Web 3.0 please as I am confused I was thinking that the new Internet would have been web 3.0 on top of XC mesh Network now. If you can clarify the difference. Thank you. |
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
October 22, 2014, 08:12:06 AM |
|
Anyone who interprets the Blocknet as some kind of association - and thus equivalence of value - between coins has no idea what the Blocknet is.
If two companies are on the internet, does their value thereby become somewhat equal? No.
Let's remember that the Blocknet is an open framework, an internet of blockchains.
Can you clarify the difference between the Blocknet and Web 3.0 please as I am confused I was thinking that the new Internet would have been web 3.0 on top of XC mesh Network now. If you can clarify the difference. Thank you. The Blocknet is a way of enabling nodes on different blockchains to communicate. Web 3.0 is distributed, secure internet. The internet in general is not the same as an internet of blockchains. |
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
October 22, 2014, 08:31:53 AM |
|
Hey, let's take a moment to get some perspective. Sometimes fudders can make it seem like XC is somehow lacking or in trouble, but that's a pure illusion. - XC's private payments and (non-group) XChat are working beautifully. - Nothing even remotely compares to XC's anon tech. - We're on the verge of XC Mobile! |
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
|
prospect
|
|
October 22, 2014, 08:40:58 AM |
|
Hey, let's take a moment to get some perspective. Sometimes fudders can make it seem like XC is somehow lacking or in trouble, but that's a pure illusion. - XC's private payments and (non-group) XChat are working beautifully. - Nothing even remotely compares to XC's anon tech. - We're on the verge of XC Mobile! I hold 1900 XC.. lost like 1 BTC already on this. Most people can not see the reason for this blockchain of internet shit, BECAUSE no one belives that the number of currencys that exists today will last. Its several hundred currencys. People do not see the reason to even "connect" with those proposed now.. |
|
|
|
|
|
