McHammer
|
|
October 22, 2014, 10:40:02 AM |
|
wont buy blocknet ... it sucks they make a new product ... do they need money because xc does not get pumped?
|
altcoincasinogulagshoppingshow FUD is good, look @altcoin prices ... pls fud me hard via pm id appriciate that.
|
|
|
policymaker
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Crypto Currency Supporter
|
|
October 22, 2014, 10:42:29 AM |
|
Aha :-). Yes there's a growing popular awareness of the need for privacy tech. We're going to tap into that big time. If i am right in the assumption that XC is the only anon concept that that serves as a continuance of bitcoins philosophy of decentralisation without any of the drawbacks like bloat. on chain anonymity. semi centralisation we should try to put that in an emotional appaeling catchphrase like you did with "internet of blockchains". community brainstorm anyone? people need to understand that if they wanna privatice their finances without giving up on bitcoins principles XC is the place to be. Yes if I'm not mistaken XC is the only privacy tech that is fully distributed and doesn't bloat. Friendly ways of capturing this? Great idea! Let's throw out suggestions folks. Thanx for the link, love reading that. Since we r back on the privacy subject, I do think as well that there should be a HUGE promo on the private and public code reviews/audits. Dan focusing on ironing out any code bugs and then giving the BTC bounty to the public, causing huge commotion in the community and general high tech industry, ending the ANON FUD once and for all. Just expressing your average small holder. Mobile wallets, group chatting, everything col and useful, but in the end I believe that if the main code is proved to be private by experts and mass opinion alike, the sky is the limit. That's what intrigued me in XC from the start anyway: Dan didnt have a fake account, he claimed to work on true privacy for some time now, and last but not least, instead of being in the forums 24/7 like most scam devs, he actually replied like a couple of times each every other day... MEANING HE WAS ACTUALLY WORKING.
|
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
October 22, 2014, 10:47:41 AM |
|
wont buy blocknet ... it sucks they make a new product ... do they need money because xc does not get pumped?
No, the Blocknet's funds are not XC funds. XC does not get to spend the Blocknet's funds. Also XC is not responsible for coding the Blocknet, so we haven't "made a new product." They're separate projects. So you should buy XC and also buy Blocknet tokens.
|
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
cryptico
|
|
October 22, 2014, 10:53:46 AM |
|
Exactly what about the Public code reviews that were announced? can you give us more info on those please?
|
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
October 22, 2014, 10:55:23 AM |
|
Aha :-). Yes there's a growing popular awareness of the need for privacy tech. We're going to tap into that big time. If i am right in the assumption that XC is the only anon concept that that serves as a continuance of bitcoins philosophy of decentralisation without any of the drawbacks like bloat. on chain anonymity. semi centralisation we should try to put that in an emotional appaeling catchphrase like you did with "internet of blockchains". community brainstorm anyone? people need to understand that if they wanna privatice their finances without giving up on bitcoins principles XC is the place to be. Yes if I'm not mistaken XC is the only privacy tech that is fully distributed and doesn't bloat. Friendly ways of capturing this? Great idea! Let's throw out suggestions folks. Hmm... privacy... distributed... on your mobile phone... payments and messaging... - Satoshi, Snowden, WikiLeaks, celebrity phone hacks, data mining, government spying... How about something like "privacy for the people"? "true privacy is here" "privacy is now mobile" "authority-free" payments/chat/cloud/whatever
|
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
Sabretooth
|
|
October 22, 2014, 11:00:02 AM |
|
Aha :-). Yes there's a growing popular awareness of the need for privacy tech. We're going to tap into that big time. If i am right in the assumption that XC is the only anon concept that that serves as a continuance of bitcoins philosophy of decentralisation without any of the drawbacks like bloat. on chain anonymity. semi centralisation we should try to put that in an emotional appaeling catchphrase like you did with "internet of blockchains". community brainstorm anyone? people need to understand that if they wanna privatice their finances without giving up on bitcoins principles XC is the place to be. Yes if I'm not mistaken XC is the only privacy tech that is fully distributed and doesn't bloat. Friendly ways of capturing this? Great idea! Let's throw out suggestions folks. What about a simple table with coin privacy features down the rows, coins (XC, BTC, DRK etc) across the top, and simple ticks for each box ticked by each coin. One of the coins could be the Satoshi dream coin.
|
Uno: uVcEaDQ5MXcYRjSGY1E7FXfrtxGk6QKnBm
|
|
|
cryptico
|
|
October 22, 2014, 11:05:19 AM |
|
What about a public announcement for a code Review proposal to satoshi himself!!!
He might take this into consideration if we can truly say that XC is his dreamed coin realized.
we could launch a paid campaign of articles in all the Crypto related journals about a public announcement for satoshi to review XC maybe after we got REV 3 released and bulletproofed and after main Crypto personalities reviewed already the code.
|
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
October 22, 2014, 11:06:41 AM |
|
What about a public announcement for a code Review proposal to satoshi himself!!!
He might take this into consideration if we can truly say that XC is his dreamed coin realized.
we could launch a paid campaign of articles in all the Crypto related journals about a public announcement for satoshi to review XC maybe after we got REV 3 released and bulletproofed and after main Crypto personalities reviewed already the code.
That's a great idea, especially if he turns up.
|
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
October 22, 2014, 11:07:36 AM |
|
Aha :-). Yes there's a growing popular awareness of the need for privacy tech. We're going to tap into that big time. If i am right in the assumption that XC is the only anon concept that that serves as a continuance of bitcoins philosophy of decentralisation without any of the drawbacks like bloat. on chain anonymity. semi centralisation we should try to put that in an emotional appaeling catchphrase like you did with "internet of blockchains". community brainstorm anyone? people need to understand that if they wanna privatice their finances without giving up on bitcoins principles XC is the place to be. Yes if I'm not mistaken XC is the only privacy tech that is fully distributed and doesn't bloat. Friendly ways of capturing this? Great idea! Let's throw out suggestions folks. What about a simple table with coin privacy features down the rows, coins (XC, BTC, DRK etc) across the top, and simple ticks for each box ticked by each coin. One of the coins could be the Satoshi dream coin. That would be good. I've made a start to this a few times but every time I've had trouble coming up with a table that drew out the necessary subtleties.
|
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
cryptico
|
|
October 22, 2014, 11:08:14 AM |
|
What about a public announcement for a code Review proposal to satoshi himself!!!
He might take this into consideration if we can truly say that XC is his dreamed coin realized.
we could launch a paid campaign of articles in all the Crypto related journals about a public announcement for satoshi to review XC maybe after we got REV 3 released and bulletproofed and after main Crypto personalities reviewed already the code.
That's a great idea, especially if he turns up. If he turns up >>>>HUGE<<<<< if he does not turn up and we already have the code reviewed and established there will be not really a draw back for xc
|
|
|
|
Come-In-Behind
|
|
October 22, 2014, 11:34:13 AM |
|
TBH there needs to be incentive to get XC to buy blocknet shares.. I see that Dan is most likely leading the project
|
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
October 22, 2014, 11:41:45 AM |
|
TBH there needs to be incentive to get XC to buy blocknet shares.. I see that Dan is most likely leading the project
I can think of no greater incentive than it being Dan's vision, and it being an amazing idea with massive resources. But evidently some people seem not to think the same. Boggles my mind how that's possible, but hey. :-)
|
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
Conurtrol
|
|
October 22, 2014, 12:08:21 PM |
|
What about a public announcement for a code Review proposal to satoshi himself!!!
He might take this into consideration if we can truly say that XC is his dreamed coin realized.
we could launch a paid campaign of articles in all the Crypto related journals about a public announcement for satoshi to review XC maybe after we got REV 3 released and bulletproofed and after main Crypto personalities reviewed already the code.
That's a great idea, especially if he turns up. I think Dan said something about making a bitcoin wallet that can access blocknet. Perhaps that will intrigue him, especially if bitcoin holders can access XC privacy tech so easily.
|
|
|
|
McHammer
|
|
October 22, 2014, 12:12:10 PM |
|
MOOLAH DUMPING
|
altcoincasinogulagshoppingshow FUD is good, look @altcoin prices ... pls fud me hard via pm id appriciate that.
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
October 22, 2014, 12:17:03 PM |
|
MOOLAH DUMPING
Nope. Price just went up on Bitttrex.
|
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
prospect
|
|
October 22, 2014, 12:23:38 PM |
|
TBH there needs to be incentive to get XC to buy blocknet shares.. I see that Dan is most likely leading the project
I can think of no greater incentive than it being Dan's vision, and it being an amazing idea with massive resources. But evidently some people seem not to think the same. Boggles my mind how that's possible, but hey. :-) Well there are alot of talent and brilliant minds out there, you seem to think that the xc holders are sheeps and should be following XC-crews every word.. like "we know whats best for you". You will have to listen to investors as well. That is how you reach out. Not some "trust us, we are from the internet, everything is going to be fine." hehe. I will hold my XC, no time to sell anything right now.
|
|
|
|
Come-In-Behind
|
|
October 22, 2014, 12:32:45 PM |
|
TBH there needs to be incentive to get XC to buy blocknet shares.. I see that Dan is most likely leading the project
I can think of no greater incentive than it being Dan's vision, and it being an amazing idea with massive resources. But evidently some people seem not to think the same. Boggles my mind how that's possible, but hey. :-) I mean like offering more than 10%, maybe 12% off when using XC to buy blocknet shares.
|
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
October 22, 2014, 12:34:10 PM |
|
TBH there needs to be incentive to get XC to buy blocknet shares.. I see that Dan is most likely leading the project
I can think of no greater incentive than it being Dan's vision, and it being an amazing idea with massive resources. But evidently some people seem not to think the same. Boggles my mind how that's possible, but hey. :-) Well there are alot of talent and brilliant minds out there, you seem to think that the xc holders are sheeps and should be following XC-crews every word.. like "we know whats best for you". No I don't. I said that it "boggles my mind" how people aren't incentivised to buy XC to get Blocknet tokens. This doesn't mean you should follow me; it just means I don't see any sense in not buying XC to buy Blocknet tokens. You will have to listen to investors as well. That is how you reach out. Not some "trust us, we are from the internet, everything is going to be fine." hehe. I will hold my XC, no time to sell anything right now.
So do you think it's a bad idea to buy XC in order to buy Blocknet tokens? If so, why? Believe me, I'm listening.
|
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
October 22, 2014, 12:35:05 PM |
|
TBH there needs to be incentive to get XC to buy blocknet shares.. I see that Dan is most likely leading the project
I can think of no greater incentive than it being Dan's vision, and it being an amazing idea with massive resources. But evidently some people seem not to think the same. Boggles my mind how that's possible, but hey. :-) I mean like offering more than 10%, maybe 12% when using XC to buy blocknet shares. We can't offer any more incentive than other coins. Imagine the trouble that would unleash. :-)
|
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
Come-In-Behind
|
|
October 22, 2014, 12:37:15 PM |
|
TBH there needs to be incentive to get XC to buy blocknet shares.. I see that Dan is most likely leading the project
I can think of no greater incentive than it being Dan's vision, and it being an amazing idea with massive resources. But evidently some people seem not to think the same. Boggles my mind how that's possible, but hey. :-) I mean like offering more than 10%, maybe 12% when using XC to buy blocknet shares. We can't offer any more incentive than other coins. Imagine the trouble that would unleash. :-) How long will the ITO last? What about switching the 10% off between different coins at different times? EX: during the first 8 hours of the IPO, you get 15% off when using XC to buy shares, then after that 8 hours NHZ gets 15% while XC goes back to 10%, etc. I'm just saying there needs to be incentive to get each coin since unlike supernet this wont have a core(centralized?) network coins.
|
|
|
|
|