Entrax
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
September 05, 2016, 02:11:03 PM |
|
Hi, i read (i guess it was in this thread) that the memory latency is the important factor by mining XMR. Sorry if this was written before but my question is: Is there a indicator on graphics cards to estimate the mem.-latency or the hash rate? Anything with what you can say how a GC performs?
thx in advance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
citronick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
|
|
September 05, 2016, 02:25:27 PM |
|
Hi Claymore,
In your FAQ: 2MB per hash is the guide for the -h switch.
So for MSI R9 390 8GB GPU, would it be correct to set the -h as follows:
8GB=8000MB (8192MB to be exact)
h = 8192 / 2 = 4096 hash/s
so -h 4096 ?
Also what is the difference of -a 1 and -a 4 ?
The 390 seems to like -a 4 better than 1
Currently I set the miner to drive the 390 at -h 1376 (same settings for 290x 4GB)
but I am tempted to use 1376 x 2 = 2752 since 390 has twice the amount of memory than 290/290x
Your advise?
Thanks
|
If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
September 05, 2016, 02:31:45 PM |
|
Hi Claymore,
In your FAQ: 2MB per hash is the guide for the -h switch.
So for MSI R9 390 8GB GPU, would it be correct to set the -h as follows: 8GB=8000MB (8192MB to be exact) h = 8192 / 2 = 4096 hash/s so -h 4096 ? Also what is the difference of -a 1 and -a 4 ? The 390 seems to like -a 4 better than 1 Currently I set the miner to drive the 390 at -h 1376 (same settings for 290x 4GB) but I am tempted to use 1376 x 2 = 2752 since 390 has twice the amount of memory than 290/290x Your advise? Thanks
If GPU has 8GB memory it does not mean that the fastest mode is to use all its memory. It will stuck with memory access. For 290x/390x use "-h 1376", for 290/390 use "-h 1280". Miner does it automatically if you don't specify "-h" option. Select best "-a" by checking hashrates and power consumption (if you necessary) for every "-a" value.
|
|
|
|
citronick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
|
|
September 05, 2016, 03:08:50 PM |
|
Hi Claymore,
In your FAQ: 2MB per hash is the guide for the -h switch.
So for MSI R9 390 8GB GPU, would it be correct to set the -h as follows: 8GB=8000MB (8192MB to be exact) h = 8192 / 2 = 4096 hash/s so -h 4096 ? Also what is the difference of -a 1 and -a 4 ? The 390 seems to like -a 4 better than 1 Currently I set the miner to drive the 390 at -h 1376 (same settings for 290x 4GB) but I am tempted to use 1376 x 2 = 2752 since 390 has twice the amount of memory than 290/290x Your advise? Thanks
If GPU has 8GB memory it does not mean that the fastest mode is to use all its memory. It will stuck with memory access. For 290x/390x use "-h 1376", for 290/390 use "-h 1280". Miner does it automatically if you don't specify "-h" option. Select best "-a" by checking hashrates and power consumption (if you necessary) for every "-a" value. thanks - will follow this rule. btw, will you be adding XMR miner under monitoring utility just like in your ETH dual miner? understand that ETH and XMR are memory intensive coins, so they may not make a good pair, however.... given profitability of the two coins is good currently, perhaps XMR + 2nd coin will make sense, just like in CDM. Your thoughts? Thanks
|
If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
|
|
|
xalen
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
September 05, 2016, 04:02:44 PM Last edit: September 05, 2016, 04:46:47 PM by xalen |
|
Hello. When I mine at Nicehash I got this error time to time:
18:52:30:073 10a0 Error in server response : {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"error":{"code":24,"message":"Unauthorizedworker"}}
Haven't this error when mining with -nofee option or at dwarfpool
And is it possible to make switching between pools from pool.txt without restarting miner?
|
|
|
|
Tbone5660
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
|
|
September 05, 2016, 06:50:50 PM |
|
ASUS RX 470 underclocked 1100 core 1800 mem
540 H/s
140W from wall with EVGA 1000W G2, Celeron Dual core, ASrock H97 Mobo. ETH + SC uses about 180W.
Does Monero like fast memory? High core clocks?
Does anyone have some good Wattman settings for RX 480 mining XMR? I am making around 720 hs with memory over clocked to 2200 but its not stable.
|
|
|
|
ps_jb
|
|
September 05, 2016, 10:32:08 PM |
|
Does anyone have some good Wattman settings for RX 480 mining XMR? I am making around 720 hs with memory over clocked to 2200 but its not stable.
Looks like very high number for rx 480. Check the temperature of card - it may throttle and cause instability
|
|
|
|
hawkfish007
|
|
September 06, 2016, 01:01:51 AM |
|
Has anyone been able to run CrytoNote stable overnight? I had no success, CryptoNote will hang after 2-4 hours. The same rigs have been dual mining for months without any issue.
|
|
|
|
someone307
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
September 06, 2016, 01:25:29 AM |
|
Could you remove printf buffering for this miner (and for the CPU version too)? At the moment, it's nearly impossible to redirect stdout to file, and some folks (there were such requests previously, according to google results) really need this for automation. Using auto-generated logs is not an option for some reasons. It's only an one-line fix: setvbuf(stdout, NULL, _IONBF, 0); Thanks!
|
|
|
|
citronick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
|
|
September 06, 2016, 09:42:18 AM |
|
Has anyone been able to run CrytoNote stable overnight? I had no success, CryptoNote will hang after 2-4 hours. The same rigs have been dual mining for months without any issue.
I have converted my MSI R9-390s (my old ETH rigs) -- running stable 2 days now. -tt 80 -a 4 -h 1372 mining at Dwarfpool my Nanos and RX480s are still mining ETH though.
|
If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
|
|
|
ps_jb
|
|
September 06, 2016, 12:15:31 PM |
|
-tt 80 -a 4 -h 1372 mining at Dwarfpool
Do you think -h 1372 can be used for RX 480?
|
|
|
|
citronick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
|
|
September 06, 2016, 01:05:59 PM |
|
-tt 80 -a 4 -h 1372 mining at Dwarfpool
Do you think -h 1372 can be used for RX 480? I tried it but didnt seems to have any difference. So for Nanos and 480s, I just default and let miner do its thing. Using default -a 1 and -h 1024 seems to be stable - its running the whole day. Looks like mining at XMR.Nicehash, I get lower payout.... so back to Dwarfpool.
|
If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
|
|
|
ultimatum82
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
September 06, 2016, 03:39:35 PM |
|
Hello dear. I am a beginner and Mining at me to you have 2 questions. I have the video card Sapphire HD 6970 dual x. 384h acceleration and speed without intervention, 15.7 driver, miner Claymore 9.5. 1.5 days namaynil 0.16 .... Monroe. instructions to the programe Claymore stated that there is a fee for the use of 2.5%. My questions to the understanding and knowing forumcham
1) in the programe is necessary to register the value,, Dev ..? or the program itself takes 2.5% of the Committees? 2) my speed heshreyt 384, but a lot of errors and unsubstantiated blocks. as it should be, or there is a reason and explanation? following the report of my miners----
:59:21:744 8a4 parse packet: 63 17:59:21:744 8a4 Share accepted 17:59:21:744 8a4 new buf size: 0 17:59:23:728 dcc GPU 0: HashCnt = 768, time = 2013 ms, hashrate = 381 h/s 17:59:23:774 dcc Round 17:59:25:803 610 GPU 0: HashCnt = 768, time = 1999 ms, hashrate = 384 h/s 17:59:25:819 610 Round 17:59:25:913 8a4 got 291 bytes 17:59:25:913 8a4 buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"job","params":{"blob":"0203cb90b6be059e792e55328abfc8fc4da2bd707d4efb39a8c55a5b3c1afcd6a3344cfb4639c90 0000000bb17333c2e195db31d2c8774b3eea47678f0ff913f5f6bac867c82bf62f6df6d05","target":"afe01000","job_id":"f8c1679f-13a6-4ea4-9373-0548846746d9","time_to_live":5}}
17:59:25:913 8a4 parse packet: 291 17:59:25:913 8a4 new buf size: 0 17:59:25:913 8a4 df has same pool, skip 17:59:25:913 8a4 09/05/16-17:59:25 - New job received from xmr.pool.minergate.com:45560 17:59:25:913 8a4 Speed: 339 h/s, TotalHashes: 54K, DevHashes: 0K Mining time: 17:59:25:913 8a4 00:02 17:59:26:817 dcc Job changed, drop current round 17:59:26:817 dcc Round 17:59:26:817 610 Job changed, drop current round 17:59:26:833 610 Round 17:59:28:878 dcc GPU 0: HashCnt = 768, time = 1999 ms, hashrate = 384 h/s 17:59:28:878 dcc Round 17:59:30:913 610 GPU 0: HashCnt = 768, time = 1999 ms, hashrate = 384 h/s 17:59:30:928 610 Round 17:59:32:958 dcc GPU 0: HashCnt = 768, time = 1999 ms, hashrate = 384 h/s 17:59:32:989 dcc Round 17:59:35:023 610 GPU 0: HashCnt = 768, time = 2013 ms, hashrate = 381 h/s 17:59:35:031 610 Round 17:59:37:066 dcc GPU 0: HashCnt = 768, time = 2000 ms, hashrate = 384 h/s 17:59:37:066 dcc Round 17:59:38:737 8a4 got 291 bytes 17:59:38:737 8a4 buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"job","params":{"blob":"0203d790b6be05410cb45ce724dec5fb348400b842e71a225ea8d272277257d38264b454c8ddf00 0000000a62ad9b3248eb0688d7405a5bae29bff7efa79fc69d1a3a106a50859a92d85e405","target":"c0311200","job_id":"d21775f4-69da-4404-a9cd-5772e289cd1b","time_to_live":5}}
17:59:38:737 8a4 parse packet: 291 17:59:38:737 8a4 new buf size: 0 17:59:38:737 8a4 df has same pool, skip 17:59:38:737 8a4 09/05/16-17:59:38 - New job received from xmr.pool.minergate.com:45560 17:59:38:737 8a4 Speed: 338 h/s, TotalHashes: 58K, DevHashes: 0K Mining time: 17:59:38:737 8a4 00:02 17:59:39:004 610 Job changed, drop current round 17:59:39:004 610 Round 17:59:39:004 dcc Job changed, drop current round 17:59:39:004 dcc Round 17:59:41:064 610 GPU 0: HashCnt = 768, time = 2018 ms, hashrate = 380 h/s 17:59:41:079 610 round found 1 shares 17:59:41:079 610 Round 17:59:41:095 8a4 09/05/16-17:59:41 - SHARE FOUND (target 3602) - (GPU 0 of 1) 17:59:41:142 8a4 got 63 bytes 17:59:41:142 8a4 buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":{"status":"OK"},"id":1,"error":null}
17:59:41:142 8a4 parse packet: 63 17:59:41:142 8a4 Share accepted 17:59:41:142 8a4 new buf size: 0 17:59:42:187 11f4 watchdog - thread 0, hb time 3183 17:59:42:187 11f4 watchdog - thread 1, hb time 1108 17:59:43:107 dcc GPU 0: HashCnt = 768, time = 1999 ms, hashrate = 384 h/s 17:59:43:123 dcc Round 17:59:45:158 610 GPU 0: HashCnt = 768, time = 2000 ms, hashrate = 384 h/s 17:59:45:172 610 Round 17:59:47:197 dcc GPU 0: HashCnt = 768, time = 1998 ms, hashrate = 384 h/s 17:59:47:197 dcc round found 2 shares 17:59:47:197 dcc Round 17:59:47:212 8a4 09/05/16-17:59:47 - SHARE FOUND (target 3602) - (GPU 0 of 1) 17:59:47:212 8a4 09/05/16-17:59:47 - SHARE FOUND (target 3602) - (GPU 0 of 1) 17:59:47:341 8a4 got 63 bytes 17:59:47:341 8a4 buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":{"status":"OK"},"id":1,"error":null}
17:59:47:341 8a4 parse packet: 63 17:59:47:342 8a4 Share accepted 17:59:47:342 8a4 new buf size: 0 17:59:47:572 8a4 got 63 bytes 17:59:47:572 8a4 buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":{"status":"OK"},"id":1,"error":null}
17:59:47:572 8a4 parse packet: 63 17:59:47:572 8a4 Share accepted 17:59:47:572 8a4 new buf size: 0 17:59:49:228 610 GPU 0: HashCnt = 768, time = 2001 ms, hashrate = 383 h/s 17:59:49:248 610 Round 17:59:51:310 dcc GPU 0: HashCnt = 768, time = 2024 ms, hashrate = 379 h/s 17:59:51:327 dcc round found 1 shares 17:59:51:327 dcc Round 17:59:51:328 8a4 09/05/16-17:59:51 - SHARE FOUND (target 3602) - (GPU 0 of 1) 17:59:51:370 8a4 got 63 bytes 17:59:51:370 8a4 buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":{"status":"OK"},"id":1,"error":null}
17:59:51:370 8a4 parse packet: 63 17:59:51:370 8a4 Share accepted 17:59:51:370 8a4 new buf size: 0 17:59:53:343 610 GPU 0: HashCnt = 768, time = 1999 ms, hashrate = 384 h/s 17:59:53:358 610 round found 1 shares 17:59:53:358 610 Round 17:59:53:374 8a4 09/05/16-17:59:53 - SHARE FOUND (target 3602) - (GPU 0 of 1) 17:59:53:421 8a4 got 63 bytes 17:59:53:421 8a4 buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":{"status":"OK"},"id":1,"error":null}
17:59:53:421 8a4 parse packet: 63 17:59:53:421 8a4 Share accepted 17:59:53:421 8a4 new buf size: 0 17:59:55:386 dcc GPU 0: HashCnt = 768, time = 2002 ms, hashrate = 383 h/s 17:59:55:402 dcc Dev round 17:59:57:447 610 GPU 0: HashCnt = 768, time = 2000 ms, hashrate = 384 h/s 17:59:57:463 610 Round 17:59:59:479 dcc GPU 0: HashCnt = 768, time = 1999 ms, hashrate = 384 h/s 17:59:59:494 dcc dev round found 2 shares 17:59:59:494 dcc Round 17:59:59:510 127c DevFee: 09/05/16-17:59:59 - SHARE FOUND (target 1063) - (GPU 0 of 1) 17:59:59:510 127c DevFee: 09/05/16-17:59:59 - SHARE FOUND (target 1063) - (GPU 0 of 1)
|
|
|
|
ivcelmik
|
|
September 06, 2016, 04:56:08 PM |
|
Hi can u someone help me with a bat file for Fury.Thx in advance
|
|
|
|
Lucide
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
September 06, 2016, 05:01:28 PM |
|
what is this error ? GPU 0, GpuMiner k1a failed -55 ? thanks
|
|
|
|
Lafu
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 3043
|
|
September 06, 2016, 06:22:29 PM |
|
what is this error ? GPU 0, GpuMiner k1a failed -55 ? thanks
Show me your bat file or config you use than we can help!!!! GPU 0 = you use one Card right ? Try to set at least 16 GB of Virtual Memory
|
|
|
|
citronick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
|
|
September 06, 2016, 07:36:20 PM |
|
what is this error ? GPU 0, GpuMiner k1a failed -55 ? thanks
Show me your bat file or config you use than we can help!!!! GPU 0 = you use one Card right ? Try to set at least 16 GB of Virtual Memory see OP FAQ: Catalyst 13.12 is required for best performance and compatibility. Catalyst 14.x and 15.x are supported as well (usually 14.x/15.x are about 1% slower than 13.12), use appropriate version. Set "GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT" environment variable as "100". For multi-GPU systems, set Virtual Memory size in Windows at least 16 GB: "Computer Properties / Advanced System Settings / Performance / Advanced / Virtual Memory".
|
If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
|
|
|
Lucide
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
September 06, 2016, 09:31:06 PM |
|
what is this error ? GPU 0, GpuMiner k1a failed -55 ? thanks
Show me your bat file or config you use than we can help!!!! GPU 0 = you use one Card right ? Try to set at least 16 GB of Virtual Memory see OP FAQ: Catalyst 13.12 is required for best performance and compatibility. Catalyst 14.x and 15.x are supported as well (usually 14.x/15.x are about 1% slower than 13.12), use appropriate version. Set "GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT" environment variable as "100". For multi-GPU systems, set Virtual Memory size in Windows at least 16 GB: "Computer Properties / Advanced System Settings / Performance / Advanced / Virtual Memory". I use one gup unit HD5450/2Gb virtual memory on windows 8.1 set to 20000MB Catalyst 14.10 was selected by AMD as bet fit and of course i did set GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT to 100 my command line is NsGpuCNMiner -o stratum+tcp://xmr.pool.minergate.com:45560 -u muemail -p x -a 3
|
|
|
|
EvilC0P
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
|
|
September 07, 2016, 03:39:53 AM |
|
Just got 2 MSI Radeon RX 480 8GB ddr5. Core Clock @ 1305 , Memory clock @ 2000
currently running drivers version 16.20 ( what came on the MSI DVD )
also i got banned from a pool , minexmr.com, while doing testing ( stopping the miner, starting it again,... ) ; is that normal?
using -a 1 or 2 ; i get ~634h/s per card at dwarfpool, so technically that's 1.2k/s right. but dwarfpool estimates ~1k/s .is it the pool that doesn't know how to count or i'm losing some power on the way lol using -a 3 ; i get ~620h/s. went down slightly
and this setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 , do i have to run it everytime in my .bat file before mining?
|
|
|
|
Lafu
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 3043
|
|
September 07, 2016, 05:28:36 AM |
|
what is this error ? GPU 0, GpuMiner k1a failed -55 ? thanks
Show me your bat file or config you use than we can help!!!! GPU 0 = you use one Card right ? Try to set at least 16 GB of Virtual Memory see OP FAQ: Catalyst 13.12 is required for best performance and compatibility. Catalyst 14.x and 15.x are supported as well (usually 14.x/15.x are about 1% slower than 13.12), use appropriate version. Set "GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT" environment variable as "100". For multi-GPU systems, set Virtual Memory size in Windows at least 16 GB: "Computer Properties / Advanced System Settings / Performance / Advanced / Virtual Memory". I use one gup unit HD5450/2Gb virtual memory on windows 8.1 set to 20000MB Catalyst 14.10 was selected by AMD as bet fit and of course i did set GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT to 100 my command line is NsGpuCNMiner -o stratum+tcp://xmr.pool.minergate.com:45560 -u muemail -p x -a 3 Use this in your command line NsGpuCNMiner -o stratum+tcp://xmr.pool.minergate.com:45560 -u muemail -p x -li 1 --add-priority-node this is a old card or ?
|
|
|
|
|