Arux
|
|
July 24, 2015, 07:28:12 AM |
|
i make the same request, AEON will not be amd gpu mineable after the hard fork without modification of your miner Claymore. here the official announce of the hard fork: Release PhoenixI'm pleased to announce Release Phoenix of AEON (0.9.0.0). This release brings the following changes since the last official version: Hard fork at block height 592000 changing PoW to Cryptnight-Lite and block target to 4 minutes ... ... Source code can be downloaded from https://github.com/aeonix/aeon/releases, with binaries to be added soon. This update is mandatory for all users prior to block 592000 (approximately August 4, 2015) thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
imihal44
Member
Offline
Activity: 99
Merit: 10
|
|
July 24, 2015, 03:56:27 PM |
|
Well...same request as above,about AEON ..to be possible to mine it after hard fork with Claymore miner...thx:)
|
|
|
|
muchoman
|
|
July 24, 2015, 04:27:47 PM |
|
And one more time about AEON, I wish the same
|
|
|
|
myagui
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1154
Merit: 1001
|
|
July 24, 2015, 04:41:43 PM |
|
Is it ok that I post here wishing the opposite? For once let me hoard some coins with my nvidias
|
|
|
|
Eliovp
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1293
Huh?
|
|
July 24, 2015, 07:14:08 PM Last edit: July 24, 2015, 07:26:21 PM by Eliovp |
|
anyone tried a fury card yet?
I would like to test on my Fury's, but as there is no recent Linux version, i'm unable to. older version doesn't work. Greetings Edit: tested on the latest Linux version. here are some results. 19:20:12:151 23fff700 GPU 1: HashCnt = 1024, time = 792 ms, hashrate = 1292 h/s 19:20:12:164 237fe700 GPU 2: HashCnt = 1024, time = 795 ms, hashrate = 1288 h/s 19:20:12:167 23fff700 Round 19:20:12:174 237fe700 Round 19:20:12:217 29ea5700 GPU 0: HashCnt = 1024, time = 815 ms, hashrate = 1256 h/s 19:20:12:235 29ea5700 Round 19:20:12:960 28ea3700 GPU 1: HashCnt = 1024, time = 791 ms, hashrate = 1294 h/s 19:20:12:978 22ffd700 GPU 2: HashCnt = 1024, time = 795 ms, hashrate = 1288 h/s 19:20:12:978 28ea3700 Round 19:20:12:990 22ffd700 Round 19:20:13:051 296a4700 GPU 0: HashCnt = 1024, time = 816 ms, hashrate = 1254 h/s 19:20:13:067 296a4700 Round 19:20:13:770 23fff700 GPU 1: HashCnt = 1024, time = 792 ms, hashrate = 1292 h/s 19:20:13:787 23fff700 Round 19:20:13:793 237fe700 GPU 2: HashCnt = 1024, time = 796 ms, hashrate = 1286 h/s 19:20:13:804 237fe700 round found 3 shares 19:20:13:804 237fe700 Round 19:20:13:804 227fc700 07/24/15-19:20:13 - SHARE FOUND (target 2500) - (GPU 2 of 3) 19:20:13:805 227fc700 07/24/15-19:20:13 - SHARE FOUND (target 2500) - (GPU 2 of 3) So i guess around 1300 h/s on 1 Fury, complete rig was doing around 490 Watt, That's nothing..
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
July 24, 2015, 07:49:59 PM |
|
anyone tried a fury card yet?
I would like to test on my Fury's, but as there is no recent Linux version, i'm unable to. older version doesn't work. Greetings Edit: tested on the latest Linux version. here are some results. 19:20:12:151 23fff700 GPU 1: HashCnt = 1024, time = 792 ms, hashrate = 1292 h/s 19:20:12:164 237fe700 GPU 2: HashCnt = 1024, time = 795 ms, hashrate = 1288 h/s 19:20:12:167 23fff700 Round 19:20:12:174 237fe700 Round 19:20:12:217 29ea5700 GPU 0: HashCnt = 1024, time = 815 ms, hashrate = 1256 h/s 19:20:12:235 29ea5700 Round 19:20:12:960 28ea3700 GPU 1: HashCnt = 1024, time = 791 ms, hashrate = 1294 h/s 19:20:12:978 22ffd700 GPU 2: HashCnt = 1024, time = 795 ms, hashrate = 1288 h/s 19:20:12:978 28ea3700 Round 19:20:12:990 22ffd700 Round 19:20:13:051 296a4700 GPU 0: HashCnt = 1024, time = 816 ms, hashrate = 1254 h/s 19:20:13:067 296a4700 Round 19:20:13:770 23fff700 GPU 1: HashCnt = 1024, time = 792 ms, hashrate = 1292 h/s 19:20:13:787 23fff700 Round 19:20:13:793 237fe700 GPU 2: HashCnt = 1024, time = 796 ms, hashrate = 1286 h/s 19:20:13:804 237fe700 round found 3 shares 19:20:13:804 237fe700 Round 19:20:13:804 227fc700 07/24/15-19:20:13 - SHARE FOUND (target 2500) - (GPU 2 of 3) 19:20:13:805 227fc700 07/24/15-19:20:13 - SHARE FOUND (target 2500) - (GPU 2 of 3) So i guess around 1300 h/s on 1 Fury, complete rig was doing around 490 Watt, That's nothing.. In "Fury X mining performance" thread on your screenshot I see "lowdifficult" error, so it is not real speed. For example, 290X shows 1400h/s if you use miner for Catalyst 13.12 on Catalyst 15.x, but you will get "lowdifficult" errors for all shares. So the only way to test Fury X right now is to use miner for Catalyst 15.x on Windows. Moreover, for Fury X it is necessary to change HashCnt parameter to find best speed.
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
July 24, 2015, 07:52:53 PM |
|
Probably yes, but not right now because I don't have any free time currently BTW, as far as I understand, this coin has no exchange market even, right?
|
|
|
|
BoscoMurray
|
|
July 24, 2015, 10:50:40 PM |
|
Probably yes, but not right now because I don't have any free time currently BTW, as far as I understand, this coin has no exchange market even, right? Whenever you can manage, it will be greatly appreciated. It has been on exchanges in the past, but was removed and long forgotten. I believe discussions have recently taken place with some exchanges, and I expect it to reappear on them soon after the hard fork around the 4th August. Edit: It has an OTC thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1068691.msg11450051#msg11450051
|
|
|
|
Eliovp
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1293
Huh?
|
|
July 25, 2015, 11:24:25 AM |
|
anyone tried a fury card yet?
I would like to test on my Fury's, but as there is no recent Linux version, i'm unable to. older version doesn't work. Greetings Edit: tested on the latest Linux version. here are some results. 19:20:12:151 23fff700 GPU 1: HashCnt = 1024, time = 792 ms, hashrate = 1292 h/s 19:20:12:164 237fe700 GPU 2: HashCnt = 1024, time = 795 ms, hashrate = 1288 h/s 19:20:12:167 23fff700 Round 19:20:12:174 237fe700 Round 19:20:12:217 29ea5700 GPU 0: HashCnt = 1024, time = 815 ms, hashrate = 1256 h/s 19:20:12:235 29ea5700 Round 19:20:12:960 28ea3700 GPU 1: HashCnt = 1024, time = 791 ms, hashrate = 1294 h/s 19:20:12:978 22ffd700 GPU 2: HashCnt = 1024, time = 795 ms, hashrate = 1288 h/s 19:20:12:978 28ea3700 Round 19:20:12:990 22ffd700 Round 19:20:13:051 296a4700 GPU 0: HashCnt = 1024, time = 816 ms, hashrate = 1254 h/s 19:20:13:067 296a4700 Round 19:20:13:770 23fff700 GPU 1: HashCnt = 1024, time = 792 ms, hashrate = 1292 h/s 19:20:13:787 23fff700 Round 19:20:13:793 237fe700 GPU 2: HashCnt = 1024, time = 796 ms, hashrate = 1286 h/s 19:20:13:804 237fe700 round found 3 shares 19:20:13:804 237fe700 Round 19:20:13:804 227fc700 07/24/15-19:20:13 - SHARE FOUND (target 2500) - (GPU 2 of 3) 19:20:13:805 227fc700 07/24/15-19:20:13 - SHARE FOUND (target 2500) - (GPU 2 of 3) So i guess around 1300 h/s on 1 Fury, complete rig was doing around 490 Watt, That's nothing.. In "Fury X mining performance" thread on your screenshot I see "lowdifficult" error, so it is not real speed. For example, 290X shows 1400h/s if you use miner for Catalyst 13.12 on Catalyst 15.x, but you will get "lowdifficult" errors for all shares. So the only way to test Fury X right now is to use miner for Catalyst 15.x on Windows. Moreover, for Fury X it is necessary to change HashCnt parameter to find best speed. Ok, thank you for that information. I'm personally not a big fan of Windows, but i'll swap hard drives later this day and i'll test again. Greetings
|
|
|
|
Eliovp
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1293
Huh?
|
|
July 26, 2015, 03:35:42 PM |
|
In "Fury X mining performance" thread on your screenshot I see "lowdifficult" error, so it is not real speed. For example, 290X shows 1400h/s if you use miner for Catalyst 13.12 on Catalyst 15.x, but you will get "lowdifficult" errors for all shares. So the only way to test Fury X right now is to use miner for Catalyst 15.x on Windows. Moreover, for Fury X it is necessary to change HashCnt parameter to find best speed.
Ok, installed Windows with Cat. 15.x and the results can be found in the fury X performance thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1116027.msg11975615#msg11975615I did play with the HashCnt parameter, best result is what you can see in the screenshot. Greetings!
|
|
|
|
mookid
|
|
July 26, 2015, 10:01:17 PM |
|
Im currently mining Monero, getting 390 H/s on a R9 270 overclocked at 1050 GPU core. But my GPU usage is only 64%. I'm on Catalyst 15.7. I don't know how to set GPU MAX alloc. Can anyone help me?
|
|
|
|
muchoman
|
|
July 27, 2015, 06:40:58 AM |
|
Im currently mining Monero, getting 390 H/s on a R9 270 overclocked at 1050 GPU core. But my GPU usage is only 64%. I'm on Catalyst 15.7. I don't know how to set GPU MAX alloc. Can anyone help me?
GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
|
|
|
|
mookid
|
|
July 30, 2015, 06:13:23 AM |
|
Yeah, where do i put that?
|
|
|
|
capler
Member
Offline
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
|
|
July 31, 2015, 08:02:45 PM Last edit: August 01, 2015, 06:14:57 AM by capler |
|
How to GPU's mine Tavosbtc (XTV) at claymore
|
|
|
|
mookid
|
|
August 02, 2015, 02:52:07 AM |
|
I think my problem solved itself, Catalyst now showing me that i'm using 100% of my GPU, im getting 410 H/s with the R9 270 @ 1050Mhz. Also, im using Win 10 and 15.7.1 Drivers
|
|
|
|
BoscoMurray
|
|
August 04, 2015, 05:49:51 PM |
|
Claymore,
Any news on an update to include CryptoNight-Lite algo?
Cheers Bosco
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
August 05, 2015, 09:47:23 AM |
|
Claymore,
Any news on an update to include CryptoNight-Lite algo?
Cheers Bosco
I think I'll have some time this weekend to add it.
|
|
|
|
gnmmarechal
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
August 05, 2015, 10:23:26 PM |
|
Hello there! Thanks for your miner! I'm going to make a GUI for this miner, just like I did for CPU Miner ( http://sourceforge.net/projects/cpuminergui/). Can I upload the package (the GUI + the miner) to a Sourceforge project I'll create for the GUI?
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
August 06, 2015, 02:37:10 PM |
|
Hello there! Thanks for your miner! I'm going to make a GUI for this miner, just like I did for CPU Miner ( http://sourceforge.net/projects/cpuminergui/). Can I upload the package (the GUI + the miner) to a Sourceforge project I'll create for the GUI? No problem, do it
|
|
|
|
gnmmarechal
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
August 06, 2015, 04:35:45 PM |
|
Hello there! Thanks for your miner! I'm going to make a GUI for this miner, just like I did for CPU Miner ( http://sourceforge.net/projects/cpuminergui/). Can I upload the package (the GUI + the miner) to a Sourceforge project I'll create for the GUI? No problem, do it Ok, thanks! By the way, I use this miner on an AMD R9 M265X. Do I have to install anything else to improve performance? I use the latest drivers available on W8.1.
|
|
|
|
|