|
mumus
|
 |
November 21, 2014, 02:18:10 PM |
|
Update to Core 1.0.1c, you are still on 1.0.1  btw. the newest wallet (ubuntu version) is not that stable for me in combination with djm's skminer. sometimes it just shut down... at times with the message about a core dump on the miner side. I had similar experiences also with the windows qt version. Time to time it crashes, and probably it's not related to the skminer because I had the problem on another machine used only with the prime-miner. I think I've also saved some debug log files after the crash but I couldn't find anything in it that was related. I wen't back to 1.0.1b for mining and it's stable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The forum strives to allow free discussion of any ideas. All policies are built around this principle. This doesn't mean you can post garbage, though: posts should actually contain ideas, and these ideas should be argued reasonably.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Videlicet
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 868
Merit: 1058
Creator of Nexus http://nexus.io
|
|
November 21, 2014, 07:17:37 PM |
|
You can try 1.0.1d - Beta. I fixed some stability issues in it, the issue is the address selection. I added a mutex, and has been stable ever since [with the pool]. I released this on coinshieldtalk.org a while back, if you want the most up to date [especially beta] binaries, keep your eye on the chat box. This is still Beta, as the Immature options doesn't trigger properly. Keep this in mind when using this binary; otherwise I have run the same wallet for over 2 weeks with no crash.
Ubuntu 1.0.1d - Beta
Windows 1.0.1d - Beta
Sincerely,Viz. |
[ Nexus] Created by Viz. [ Videlicet] : "videre licet - it may be seen; evidently; clearly" |
|
|
hoze
Member
Offline
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
|
|
November 21, 2014, 08:21:39 PM
Last edit: November 21, 2014, 09:01:50 PM by hoze |
|
Ok I have a new build of SKMiner for Win x64! I fixed the slow down issue, mainly caused by memory leaks. My R9 280x ran for 6.5 hours last night and found 5 blocks. It was still running at the same speed this morning, 41 MH/s. I put the new build up on my dropbox here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/h2lcngoudtbuv5w/SKMiner.7z?dl=0I will update the source on my github later tonight. Great! Nice job! Going to test  Edit: Found block after half hour with one r9 280x / 39Mhs . GREAT! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hero18688
|
|
November 22, 2014, 01:02:31 PM |
|
You could use exchange selling your coins...
Did you see the price there ?!? BAD! No serious offers there  So you're expecting someone to PM you with an offer to buy your coins at a higher price than they can pick them up for on the exchange? Now I do understand you have a fair volume to sell, so someone wanting to buy 45k isn't going to be getting them straight away at ~200 sats (current price). But that said there is enough dumping happening to be able to pick that volume up at ~300 sats with a little patience. So I would expect to pay somewhere between the two, maybe 250 sats, if you want a quick sale. I know of a few people who are likely to buy them from you at that price. Why not just put a sell at 250 sats on the exchange so that they can buy them and remain anonymous in the process? Are you guys enjoy mining without profit or losing money? If the author does not open source.Larger exchange won't list it.So no one will buy this coin with easonable price.I've mined csd for 10 days+.And now I regret my decision. |
|
|
|
go6ooo1212
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
quarkchain.io
|
|
November 22, 2014, 01:07:09 PM |
|
You could use exchange selling your coins...
Did you see the price there ?!? BAD! No serious offers there So you're expecting someone to PM you with an offer to buy your coins at a higher price than they can pick them up for on the exchange? Now I do understand you have a fair volume to sell, so someone wanting to buy 45k isn't going to be getting them straight away at ~200 sats (current price). But that said there is enough dumping happening to be able to pick that volume up at ~300 sats with a little patience. So I would expect to pay somewhere between the two, maybe 250 sats, if you want a quick sale. I know of a few people who are likely to buy them from you at that price. Why not just put a sell at 250 sats on the exchange so that they can buy them and remain anonymous in the process? Are you guys enjoy mining without profit or losing money? If the author does not open source.Larger exchange won't list it.So no one will buy this coin with easonable price.I've mined csd for 10 days+.And now I regret my decision. It looks like FUD to me... How many coins did you mine for these 10days+ ? |
|
|
|
|
|
Namsbreh
|
|
November 22, 2014, 02:52:09 PM |
|
Mmmm, I'm loving it!!
|
|
|
|
|
Videlicet
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 868
Merit: 1058
Creator of Nexus http://nexus.io
|
|
November 22, 2014, 05:39:05 PM |
|
I can speak as the Creator of Coinshield, I will release the source code after Update 1.0.2 proves stable. First I am working on the Open Source Pools, then to the Open Source Block Explorer, then to the Last Coinshield Core Update before the Source Code is made public. Until then, get CSD cheap, it's not like we are going anywhere  Viz. |
[ Nexus] Created by Viz. [ Videlicet] : "videre licet - it may be seen; evidently; clearly" |
|
|
KryptoKash (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 511
Merit: 275
Bitcoin Interest.
|
|
November 22, 2014, 06:56:24 PM |
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
mumus
|
|
November 22, 2014, 07:19:59 PM |
|
I would like to suggest for everybody to check their nodes because I think the network was forked. I have 3 main nodes that I'm using for mining and I found all of them on different block height. It looks like just one of them was on the right fork (at the moment of writing on 64030, similar to the pool). One of my wrong node had even 20+ connections.
|
|
|
|
|
Videlicet
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 868
Merit: 1058
Creator of Nexus http://nexus.io
|
|
November 24, 2014, 01:16:29 AM |
|
mumus,I'm looking through the seed nodes and don't see this. It could be an attacker trying to fork your nodes, I haven't seen more than 7 connections on any of my nodes. I have seen some people flooding seed nodes with connections, so this could be a clever attack to try and make their own forked chain. It doesn't cause any harm as the Main Chain is locked with Checkpoints, just annoyances if your nodes gets caught in their fork. Ah I see it, someone is trying to build their own chain from Block 63775 with their own transactions: This chain is currently being rejected. It could also be the user still using Core 1.0.1. Either way: Current Block: 64040---------------------------------------------
1.0.1d - Release: Updates to the UI. Added Immature label. Values of 0 CSD are ommited from the UI. Added Coinbase Rewards to Debug Console, Updated the Difficulty Value to be Current Difficulty. Stability Issues Resolved.
Ubuntu 1.0.1d - Release
Windows 1.0.1d - Release
Thank You,Viz.
|
[ Nexus] Created by Viz. [ Videlicet] : "videre licet - it may be seen; evidently; clearly" |
|
|
antonio8
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 24, 2014, 03:03:30 AM |
|
Is there an exchange for this coin?
|
If you are going to leave your BTC on an exchange please send it to this address instead 1GH3ub3UUHbU5qDJW5u3E9jZ96ZEmzaXtG, I will at least use the money better than someone who steals it from the exchange. Thanks |
|
|
|
|
olajos
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
November 24, 2014, 09:41:23 AM |
|
Ok I have a new build of SKMiner for Win x64! I fixed the slow down issue, mainly caused by memory leaks. My R9 280x ran for 6.5 hours last night and found 5 blocks. It was still running at the same speed this morning, 41 MH/s. I put the new build up on my dropbox here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/h2lcngoudtbuv5w/SKMiner.7z?dl=0I will update the source on my github later tonight. Hello. I am running miners fine 2 days now, but with lower speed. Please some advice what to check. 4x280x running with 120000 kh thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
mumus
|
|
November 24, 2014, 11:05:12 AM |
|
1.0.1d - Release: Updates to the UI. Added Immature label. Values of 0 CSD are ommited from the UI. Added Coinbase Rewards to Debug Console, Updated the Difficulty Value to be Current Difficulty. Stability Issues Resolved.
Ubuntu 1.0.1d - Release
Windows 1.0.1d - Release
Thank You,Viz.Thank you for the update. I upgraded all my nodes. Also the previous 1.0.1d beta version was stable. |
|
|
|
|
|
BitSlapper
|
|
November 24, 2014, 01:03:21 PM |
|
Ok I have a new build of SKMiner for Win x64! I fixed the slow down issue, mainly caused by memory leaks. My R9 280x ran for 6.5 hours last night and found 5 blocks. It was still running at the same speed this morning, 41 MH/s. I put the new build up on my dropbox here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/h2lcngoudtbuv5w/SKMiner.7z?dl=0I will update the source on my github later tonight. Hello. I am running miners fine 2 days now, but with lower speed. Please some advice what to check. 4x280x running with 120000 kh thanks What are your config settings? |
|
|
|
olajos
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
November 24, 2014, 07:05:33 PM |
|
Ok I have a new build of SKMiner for Win x64! I fixed the slow down issue, mainly caused by memory leaks. My R9 280x ran for 6.5 hours last night and found 5 blocks. It was still running at the same speed this morning, 41 MH/s. I put the new build up on my dropbox here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/h2lcngoudtbuv5w/SKMiner.7z?dl=0I will update the source on my github later tonight. Hello. I am running miners fine 2 days now, but with lower speed. Please some advice what to check. 4x280x running with 120000 kh thanks What are your config settings? "algorithm" : "sk1024_djm", "gpu-engine" : "1100", "gpu-memclock" : "1550", "gpu-shaders" : "2048", "gpu-threads" : "1", "gpu-vddc" : "0", "gpu-powertune" : "0", "intensity" : "22", "xintensity" : "0", "rawintensity" : "0", "thread-concurrency" : "8192", "lookup-gap" : "2", "worksize" : "64", "temp-target" : "75", "temp-overheat" : "80", "temp-cutoff" : "95", "auto-engine" : "false", "auto-fan" : "false", "submit-stale" : "false", "vectors" : "1" } Also tried with worksize 256. Same speed. Maybe a lilbit slower |
|
|
|
|
go6ooo1212
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
quarkchain.io
|
|
November 24, 2014, 07:15:24 PM |
|
You could try 14.11.2beta driver , but be careful
|
|
|
|
|
Videlicet
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 868
Merit: 1058
Creator of Nexus http://nexus.io
|
|
November 24, 2014, 08:13:09 PM |
|
Thanks for the feedback mumus Viz. |
[ Nexus] Created by Viz. [ Videlicet] : "videre licet - it may be seen; evidently; clearly" |
|
|
|
BitSlapper
|
|
November 24, 2014, 09:01:18 PM |
|
Ok I have a new build of SKMiner for Win x64! I fixed the slow down issue, mainly caused by memory leaks. My R9 280x ran for 6.5 hours last night and found 5 blocks. It was still running at the same speed this morning, 41 MH/s. I put the new build up on my dropbox here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/h2lcngoudtbuv5w/SKMiner.7z?dl=0I will update the source on my github later tonight. Hello. I am running miners fine 2 days now, but with lower speed. Please some advice what to check. 4x280x running with 120000 kh thanks What are your config settings? "algorithm" : "sk1024_djm", "gpu-engine" : "1100", "gpu-memclock" : "1550", "gpu-shaders" : "2048", "gpu-threads" : "1", "gpu-vddc" : "0", "gpu-powertune" : "0", "intensity" : "22", "xintensity" : "0", "rawintensity" : "0", "thread-concurrency" : "8192", "lookup-gap" : "2", "worksize" : "64", "temp-target" : "75", "temp-overheat" : "80", "temp-cutoff" : "95", "auto-engine" : "false", "auto-fan" : "false", "submit-stale" : "false", "vectors" : "1" } Also tried with worksize 256. Same speed. Maybe a lilbit slower Hmmm... It might just be that you're pushing your cards too hard. try "gpu-engine" : "1050" and "gpu-memclock" : "1500" "worksize" : "256" should be good. Also make sure you have the latest version of the miner. If you are using the one from the download above then you're good. |
|
|
|
|
