O-Coin
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 61
Merit: 2
|
|
April 20, 2018, 05:51:16 PM |
|
Looking to use Bittrex Wallet For Miningpoolhub. Anyone do this please advise. I want to send my XMR directly to Bittrex and im not sure about Payment ID and Base Address.
Thanks
On MiningPoolHub, you set a threshold, and wallet address for you Bittrex XMR wallet in the wallet section of that pool on MPH. Thanks that part i understand the question is do i need to put [walletid.paymentid] in MPH wallet field or just the [wallet id] alone. Bittrex generates a payment id with the wallet id. Thanks
|
|
|
|
moppidoo
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 348
Merit: 5
|
|
April 21, 2018, 12:38:50 AM |
|
Looking to use Bittrex Wallet For Miningpoolhub. Anyone do this please advise. I want to send my XMR directly to Bittrex and im not sure about Payment ID and Base Address.
Thanks
On MiningPoolHub, you set a threshold, and wallet address for you Bittrex XMR wallet in the wallet section of that pool on MPH. Thanks that part i understand the question is do i need to put [walletid.paymentid] in MPH wallet field or just the [wallet id] alone. Bittrex generates a payment id with the wallet id. Thanks From MPH's website Check before you start. paymentID: There are two cases. First, when exchange site asks your paymentID : Put your "address.paymentID" in a line. Your coins would not be confirmed from your exchange site otherwise.
Second, local wallet or you don't need to put any paymentid. : Just input your wallet address only.
-Monero network transaction fee is quite big by coin spec. Mine more and withdraw once or use auto exchange feature.
Since on Bittrex you must include payment ID for any monero deposit, you can try depositing them if you have any spare changes around and make sure that works, otherwise, the first case should be where your case fits in. or MPH's minimum payout is 0.062 (0.05 amount + 0.012 fee)
|
|
|
|
moppidoo
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 348
Merit: 5
|
|
April 21, 2018, 03:19:14 PM |
|
Hi Patrike, Please kindly verify XMRig setting for CryptonightV7, should the default commandline parameter be of the sort cryptonight --donate-level=1 --variant 1 for assurance? I just started mining some CNv7 coins at CryptoKnight.cc (ITNS) and without explicitly specify --variant 1, I got temporary IP banned for producing rejected shares (low diff share), I guess it must be mining on the original CN algo and auto detection didn't work on all pools. Cheers,
|
|
|
|
Seanklei10
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 74
Merit: 0
|
|
April 21, 2018, 03:31:36 PM |
|
The sort-by-balance feature in the balance tab of AM does not sort correctly. It is sorting based on the 1st number, rather than looking at the entire number. For example, if you have three coins with balances of $105, $90 and $46 it will put the order $90, $46, $105 (9>4>1).
Any update on correcting this?
|
|
|
|
Seanklei10
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 74
Merit: 0
|
|
April 21, 2018, 03:33:10 PM |
|
Would it be possible to add intensity changes to the benchmarking process? So for example, you could select an option to also benchmark intensity where it would also iterate from like -i 18 to -i 28 and see where a rig becomes unstable?
|
|
|
|
devilrub
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
April 21, 2018, 04:24:40 PM |
|
I agree intensity is a important factor. If anything could be done to improve it during benchmark it would be great
|
|
|
|
|
moppidoo
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 348
Merit: 5
|
|
April 22, 2018, 02:07:21 AM |
|
If the pool you are mining on is like NiceHash or zPool, it won't show the coin you're mining, or else, you can right click on the miner(s) and select "Define Pool Coin..." if you know which coin you're mining with the pool its working on.
|
|
|
|
Wilder wealths
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
April 22, 2018, 03:17:27 AM |
|
It's doesn't work with my new rig with 7 rx560 The sgminer is detecting the intel hd, my rig is already modded with eth bios claymore is running normally, i wonder how to fix this
my old 2 gtx 1060 previously runs well with this gui miner
|
|
|
|
omshree
|
|
April 22, 2018, 10:15:11 AM |
|
Wouldn't it be better to have 30m, 1h, 3h time intervals in coin profitability, current and 24h is rough for switching imo. Also the dashboard dark tables section needs some work, only shows 5 different coins, the rest is not included, and the bottom of the screen is choped, display adjustment not working.
|
Donate if you like 1ANALSEXXGMd6HaN6CzQXtURLC5H9TjKoo
|
|
|
GoRdiE
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 162
Merit: 0
|
|
April 22, 2018, 11:00:37 AM |
|
@patrike When I create two or more different pools on Used defined Online Service with the same Algorithm (all custom (yiimp compatible)) . AM confuse them. It mix the pools, taking the most profitable of them but mining on one with the profit of other
|
|
|
|
moppidoo
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 348
Merit: 5
|
|
April 22, 2018, 11:43:05 AM |
|
@patrike When I create two or more different pools on Used defined Online Service with the same Algorithm (all custom (yiimp compatible)) . AM confuse them. It mix the pools, taking the most profitable of them but mining on one with the profit of other Is it on pools with shared port and not dedicated? That's kind of normal behaviour for AM right now, Yiimp profit/hashrate stat from API takes precedence over coin spec as I have detailed the scenarios before few pages back. Only way I have been avoiding that kind of scenario now till current mechanism changes is to stay away from (Yiimp) Online Services and pools that uses shared port, something such as BSOD, pickaxe, and new one, quantummining..., meaning slower block times, less consistent income but more flexibility for ppl who want to manage their coins.
|
|
|
|
GoRdiE
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 162
Merit: 0
|
|
April 22, 2018, 12:37:34 PM Last edit: April 22, 2018, 04:26:16 PM by GoRdiE |
|
@patrike When I create two or more different pools on Used defined Online Service with the same Algorithm (all custom (yiimp compatible)) . AM confuse them. It mix the pools, taking the most profitable of them but mining on one with the profit of other Is it on pools with shared port and not dedicated? That's kind of normal behaviour for AM right now, Yiimp profit/hashrate stat from API takes precedence over coin spec as I have detailed the scenarios before few pages back. Only way I have been avoiding that kind of scenario now till current mechanism changes is to stay away from (Yiimp) Online Services and pools that uses shared port, something such as BSOD, pickaxe, and new one, quantummining..., meaning slower block times, less consistent income but more flexibility for ppl who want to manage their coins. No, it´s on dedicated ports. Example: I created a phi yiimp.eu:8333. All is ok. Then I created a pool.bsod.pw:6667 same phi algorithm. https://imgur.com/XmrqL7JNow in User defined I have the two pools. And in online service the two pools appear right with different profit. https://imgur.com/Omzzf1FAnd now is when it´s a bug: Profit yiimp>BSOD. I enable profit miner and It begins mining in yiimp. https://imgur.com/HA4lnHWBut I seems two yiimp.eu pools... Then, I Exclude yiimp.eu in Managed Profit Switcher and leave the BSOD on. https://imgur.com/ezTDY3fThen I start the miner and it´s mining on yiipm.eu??? https://imgur.com/iv3ExFXNote that there is only one Phi Pool (yiimp and not BSOD). But it takes the profit on yiimp and not te BSOD´s profit. I enable BSOD and disable yiimp but AM is wrong there EDIT: it seems that the problem is when we have several pools with the same algorithm, AM takes the most valuable one without taking into account if we disconnect any of them and mixing them all Excuse my english
|
|
|
|
moppidoo
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 348
Merit: 5
|
|
April 22, 2018, 02:34:52 PM |
|
@patrike When I create two or more different pools on Used defined Online Service with the same Algorithm (all custom (yiimp compatible)) . AM confuse them. It mix the pools, taking the most profitable of them but mining on one with the profit of other Is it on pools with shared port and not dedicated? That's kind of normal behaviour for AM right now, Yiimp profit/hashrate stat from API takes precedence over coin spec as I have detailed the scenarios before few pages back. Only way I have been avoiding that kind of scenario now till current mechanism changes is to stay away from (Yiimp) Online Services and pools that uses shared port, something such as BSOD, pickaxe, and new one, quantummining..., meaning slower block times, less consistent income but more flexibility for ppl who want to manage their coins. No, it´s on dedicated ports. Example: I created a phi yiimp.eu:8333. All is ok. Then I created a pool.bsod.pw:6667 same phi algorithm. https://imgur.com/XmrqL7JNow in User defined I have the two pools. And in online service the two pools appear right with different profit. https://imgur.com/Omzzf1FAnd now is when it´s a bug: Profit yiimp>BSOD. I enable profit miner and It begins mining in yiimp. https://imgur.com/HA4lnHWBut I seems two yiimp.eu pools... Then, I Exclude yiimp.eu in Managed Profit Switcher and leave the BSOD on. https://imgur.com/ezTDY3fThen I start the miner and it´s mining on yiipm.eu??? https://imgur.com/iv3ExFXNote that there is only one Phi Pool (yiimp and not BSOD). But it takes the profit on yiimp and not te BSOD´s profit. I enable BSOD and disable yiimp but AM is wrong there EDIT: it seems that the problem is when we have several pools with the same algorithm, AM takes the most valuable one without taking into account if we disconnect any of them and mixing them all Excuse my english That's clearly a bug and fairly similar to my situation, in a different way. And that's whyI have everything in online services turned off except nicehash... If I don't turn it off, for example, neoscrypt @ say zpool, then any custom neoscrypt pools i setup individually (i think even non yiimp pools) gets profit info overridden by zPool, and I'll have machines mining random neoscrypt coins all over the place at the same time and in details tab, they all show the same profitability. Hopefully this gets addressed
|
|
|
|
devilrub
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
April 22, 2018, 05:38:37 PM |
|
For the moment i find awesome miner just useful for monitoring my rigs. The curve to getvan advanced users is long . However i would like the gpu overcloking feature but should upgrade again . The thing before ugrading : how you guys manage to make work afterburner on amd rigs ? I either use command line with claymore or wattman settings. For nvidia rigs i dont have issues. By reading the faq the feature is managed by afterburner but if afterburner not working on my amd rigs it will be useless for them? Just the nvidia rigs?
|
|
|
|
zergbitcore
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
April 22, 2018, 11:43:26 PM |
|
Suggestions for AM
The function "Ignore pools with no accepted shares in (minutes)" can be set to maximum of 10 minutes. It is not enough for CPU mining (cryptonight, cryptonightv7, yescrypt, yescryptr16). Please, increase the maximum value to at least 15-20 minutes or make this option different for every miner.
Another suggestion. Please, learn AM to catch the problems from the miner window and switch to next online pool according to online services tab profit value. If change the pool after "connection refused" or any other error messages it can help to save the time and money.
Please, add average bitrate calculation since the beginning of mining process, it will help to see the correct average hashrate for the variable hashrate algorhytms like x16 and similar.
|
|
|
|
cmanmatt
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 11
|
|
April 22, 2018, 11:47:10 PM |
|
Can anyone confirm if Awesome Miner can schedule stopping and starting of Antminers (including recent S9s)? I want to be able schedule the stopping and starting of my Antminers (S9, L3+, A3, D3) based on time to take advantage of time of day power prices.
|
|
|
|
patrike (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3360
Merit: 1094
|
|
April 23, 2018, 08:33:17 AM |
|
patrike: is it by design that appearance -> miner view -> list is not saved when miner is in Performance mode?
Yes. When running with a large number of miners, the Compact List mode is using less CPU power.
|
Awesome Miner - Complete solution to manage and monitor mining operations of ASIC, GPU and CPU miners Optimized Antminer firmware - Increased hashrate, improved power efficiency and more features. For S9, S9i, S9j, T9+, L3+, S17, S17 Pro, S17+, T17, T17+, S19, S19 Pro, S19j, S19j Pro, T19 Up to 200,000 miners | Notifications | Native overclocking | Profit switching | Customizable rules | API | Windows application | Mobile web
|
|
|
patrike (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3360
Merit: 1094
|
|
April 23, 2018, 08:34:13 AM |
|
Just wanted to toss another request in, I asked a few days ago but it looks like it might have gotten buried.
Can an option in the 'detect pool' rule be added to only check the 'current pool' rather than 'all pools'?
Can we also get a detect (current) algorithm rule?
Thanks!
Thanks for your suggestions. They have been noted.
|
Awesome Miner - Complete solution to manage and monitor mining operations of ASIC, GPU and CPU miners Optimized Antminer firmware - Increased hashrate, improved power efficiency and more features. For S9, S9i, S9j, T9+, L3+, S17, S17 Pro, S17+, T17, T17+, S19, S19 Pro, S19j, S19j Pro, T19 Up to 200,000 miners | Notifications | Native overclocking | Profit switching | Customizable rules | API | Windows application | Mobile web
|
|
|
patrike (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3360
Merit: 1094
|
|
April 23, 2018, 08:44:50 AM |
|
Found one more bug.
It happens at benchmarking ehen you have AfterBurner remote support installed and configured.
When benchmarking AM sendd to AB remote server "last used algo" setings for all algos you benchmark.
This is not ok. because SW then gives wrong benchmark results or crashes cards.
You must remove the AB remote server info, then benchmark, then add it again.
I will investigate this scenario. Preferably Awesome Miner should be changed to pick the clocking profile according to the Profit Profile configuration.
|
Awesome Miner - Complete solution to manage and monitor mining operations of ASIC, GPU and CPU miners Optimized Antminer firmware - Increased hashrate, improved power efficiency and more features. For S9, S9i, S9j, T9+, L3+, S17, S17 Pro, S17+, T17, T17+, S19, S19 Pro, S19j, S19j Pro, T19 Up to 200,000 miners | Notifications | Native overclocking | Profit switching | Customizable rules | API | Windows application | Mobile web
|
|
|
|