Scientific proof that God exists?

[BADecker]

Most of the things you speak about, you speak from a point of ignorance.

That's a pot calling a kettle black!

Who cares what is calling what what. I speak the truth.    

EDIT: Are you? Black I mean.

[stats]

Most of the things you speak about, you speak from a point of ignorance.

That's a pot calling a kettle black!

Who cares what is calling what what. I speak the truth.    

EDIT: Are you? Black I mean.

You wouldn't know truth if it smacked you in the mouth.

I care....

What does it matter what color I am?

[Horacewoodwood]

Christianity has been a religion of war for a long time. The only way christianity can survive as a religion in our times is peace. It can't afford to be a war religion anymore, it would dissappear. As for men, they go to wars started by governments just as it used to go to wars started by religions. Christianity is a form of dictatorship, regardless of its peace movement that started not so long ago. Any christian state has no conflict between its government and its church, in fact they are protecting each other, in numerous times they are supporting each other because the church likes to pay no taxes, acces huge funds and politicians love to get support in a campaign from a church because that will get a vote from almost all the christians in that country. Christianity is a religion that got spread with the help of the writings, the Old Testament. As time passed by, people managed to see the fails of that book, the errors, the innacuracies, the wrong doings and really immoral teachings. Since then, christianity came up with numerous ways to save its image: saying that people missinterpret the writings, separating themselves to the very basis of their religion and claiming that religion and faith have nothing in common, etc. All of these happen because they are desperate to keep up with the modern man in order to survive as a religion. They are not against science as they used to, they now go along with it and missinterpret it to seem in their favor, although any wise man can quickly disassemble their claims. Christianity has become completely pathetic, desperate to survive by claiming anything that would please the modern man and keep their story up. But this religion, just as many others, will dissappear along with its God and its saints. Not because I want to but because that's how things go. No god is eternal and humanity has had it with childish and primitive things. Humanity is ready to grow up and leave the toys behind.

Christianity has never been a religion of war except against the devil. Search the New Testament in the Bible, the place where Christianity is talked about. The only Christian war in there is against the devil. It is a war against the ignorance in the minds of people... ignorance that keeps them from finding God and salvation.

Modern man still dies. Nothing changes without Christianity except that there is no hope.

Most of the things you speak about, you speak from a point of ignorance.

My dear imbecile friend, the Old Testament is a book. The crusades are a fact, acts of war in the name of christianity, carried by christianity. I'm not talking theory or mysticism, I'm talking about facts. Christianity has been a religion of war. Of course, you will probably say that those crusades were carried by men and did not represent God's will, deus vult, because religion does not necessarily represent faith. And by that you would only be confirming my point stated in the last post. Nothing in this world will save your pathetic world wide cult from dissapearing in the future. Christianity is man made and sooner or later, humanity won't feel the need for their spiritual Santa Claus anymore and we will all come to a common point in admiting it's all bullshit. I am sorry to break your bubble, Middle Ages are long gone.

[BADecker]

Christianity has been a religion of war for a long time. The only way christianity can survive as a religion in our times is peace. It can't afford to be a war religion anymore, it would dissappear. As for men, they go to wars started by governments just as it used to go to wars started by religions. Christianity is a form of dictatorship, regardless of its peace movement that started not so long ago. Any christian state has no conflict between its government and its church, in fact they are protecting each other, in numerous times they are supporting each other because the church likes to pay no taxes, acces huge funds and politicians love to get support in a campaign from a church because that will get a vote from almost all the christians in that country. Christianity is a religion that got spread with the help of the writings, the Old Testament. As time passed by, people managed to see the fails of that book, the errors, the innacuracies, the wrong doings and really immoral teachings. Since then, christianity came up with numerous ways to save its image: saying that people missinterpret the writings, separating themselves to the very basis of their religion and claiming that religion and faith have nothing in common, etc. All of these happen because they are desperate to keep up with the modern man in order to survive as a religion. They are not against science as they used to, they now go along with it and missinterpret it to seem in their favor, although any wise man can quickly disassemble their claims. Christianity has become completely pathetic, desperate to survive by claiming anything that would please the modern man and keep their story up. But this religion, just as many others, will dissappear along with its God and its saints. Not because I want to but because that's how things go. No god is eternal and humanity has had it with childish and primitive things. Humanity is ready to grow up and leave the toys behind.

Christianity has never been a religion of war except against the devil. Search the New Testament in the Bible, the place where Christianity is talked about. The only Christian war in there is against the devil. It is a war against the ignorance in the minds of people... ignorance that keeps them from finding God and salvation.

Modern man still dies. Nothing changes without Christianity except that there is no hope.

Most of the things you speak about, you speak from a point of ignorance.

My dear imbecile friend, the Old Testament is a book. The crusades are a fact, acts of war in the name of christianity, carried by christianity. I'm not talking theory or mysticism, I'm talking about facts. Christianity has been a religion of war. Of course, you will probably say that those crusades were carried by men and did not represent God's will, deus vult, because religion does not necessarily represent faith. And by that you would only be confirming my point stated in the last post. Nothing in this world will save your pathetic world wide cult from dissapearing in the future. Christianity is man made and sooner or later, humanity won't feel the need for their spiritual Santa Claus anymore and we will all come to a common point in admiting it's all bullshit. I am sorry to break your bubble, Middle Ages are long gone.

People who believe in the salvation that God provides through Jesus, are the only true Christians. All people, even Christians, make mistakes. Some people make their mistakes by thinking and saying that they are Christians when they don't really have Jesus salvation.

Christianity has never been a religion of war. Some people calling themselves Christians have gone to war in the name of Christianity. They were ignorant, or liars, or both.

I personally don't know what the will of God was in the crusades. God allows a lot of evil to happen in this world in His attempt to save people for eternal life.

All things against true Christianity (true Christianity is believing in Jesus salvation) are man made. They fail every time a person dies.

Jesus salvation will provide eternal life in the resurrection. Lack of Jesus salvation kin the resurrection will also condemn all those who did not have Christianity at the time of their death on earth.

You are greatly mistaken in the things you believe.

[Creepings]

We both know there's God and this world we live in is just like an investment company. For example this forum has a founder (CEO) and co- founder, isn't it? That's how things in this world will live in God is the founder/CEO and His co- founder which is the Son and the Spirit.

I think I am getting confused from the way you explained it.  A CEO of a company is not cut to be an example of these matter. So you are saying God is the CEO and the co founder is his son, Jesus, then what about the investors, the guys that holds the money, the secretary, the share holder, business partner, ther e are a lot of people you are missing out. You can just use an example of a father and his kids relationship.

[Horacewoodwood]

Christianity has been a religion of war for a long time. The only way christianity can survive as a religion in our times is peace. It can't afford to be a war religion anymore, it would dissappear. As for men, they go to wars started by governments just as it used to go to wars started by religions. Christianity is a form of dictatorship, regardless of its peace movement that started not so long ago. Any christian state has no conflict between its government and its church, in fact they are protecting each other, in numerous times they are supporting each other because the church likes to pay no taxes, acces huge funds and politicians love to get support in a campaign from a church because that will get a vote from almost all the christians in that country. Christianity is a religion that got spread with the help of the writings, the Old Testament. As time passed by, people managed to see the fails of that book, the errors, the innacuracies, the wrong doings and really immoral teachings. Since then, christianity came up with numerous ways to save its image: saying that people missinterpret the writings, separating themselves to the very basis of their religion and claiming that religion and faith have nothing in common, etc. All of these happen because they are desperate to keep up with the modern man in order to survive as a religion. They are not against science as they used to, they now go along with it and missinterpret it to seem in their favor, although any wise man can quickly disassemble their claims. Christianity has become completely pathetic, desperate to survive by claiming anything that would please the modern man and keep their story up. But this religion, just as many others, will dissappear along with its God and its saints. Not because I want to but because that's how things go. No god is eternal and humanity has had it with childish and primitive things. Humanity is ready to grow up and leave the toys behind.

Christianity has never been a religion of war except against the devil. Search the New Testament in the Bible, the place where Christianity is talked about. The only Christian war in there is against the devil. It is a war against the ignorance in the minds of people... ignorance that keeps them from finding God and salvation.

Modern man still dies. Nothing changes without Christianity except that there is no hope.

Most of the things you speak about, you speak from a point of ignorance.

My dear imbecile friend, the Old Testament is a book. The crusades are a fact, acts of war in the name of christianity, carried by christianity. I'm not talking theory or mysticism, I'm talking about facts. Christianity has been a religion of war. Of course, you will probably say that those crusades were carried by men and did not represent God's will, deus vult, because religion does not necessarily represent faith. And by that you would only be confirming my point stated in the last post. Nothing in this world will save your pathetic world wide cult from dissapearing in the future. Christianity is man made and sooner or later, humanity won't feel the need for their spiritual Santa Claus anymore and we will all come to a common point in admiting it's all bullshit. I am sorry to break your bubble, Middle Ages are long gone.

People who believe in the salvation that God provides through Jesus, are the only true Christians. All people, even Christians, make mistakes. Some people make their mistakes by thinking and saying that they are Christians when they don't really have Jesus salvation.

Christianity has never been a religion of war. Some people calling themselves Christians have gone to war in the name of Christianity. They were ignorant, or liars, or both.

I personally don't know what the will of God was in the crusades. God allows a lot of evil to happen in this world in His attempt to save people for eternal life.

All things against true Christianity (true Christianity is believing in Jesus salvation) are man made. They fail every time a person dies.

Jesus salvation will provide eternal life in the resurrection. Lack of Jesus salvation kin the resurrection will also condemn all those who did not have Christianity at the time of their death on earth.

You are greatly mistaken in the things you believe.

So you've done exactly what I said you will do and still feel the necessity to tell me I am greatly mistaken. )))) You, sir, are as dumb as fuck. Let me try and clear it out for you once again: Christianity is man made, that's why 'God' lets some evil things happen. He lets them because his existence is limited to that of a man made story. Christianity does not have one supreme ruler, an all knowing, omnipotent God and that is the reason why it has had different stages, with different people who interpret the writings (the laws) in a way that is suitable to them. Christianity is nothing more than a system created to conquer, to dominate, to opress, to dictate. World has advanced, people are not primitive and as dumb as before anymore and are able to see clearly the entire hoax. They can compare it to other religions and see it's the same bullshit, different story with many similarities, same type of opression but disguised under a cloak of peace. And almost everytime people prove this bullshit, idiots like you (exactly like you, it's a stereotype already) separate themselves from the atrocities and wrong doings of christianity by stating that those were man made, not God's will. Basically, you are the same as the guy who watches football and always supports the winning team. You'll do whatever you have to do just to stay on the winning team because if you don't, you'll be wrong, and your entire life would be wrong because you believed in it. So you choose to close your eyes, being somewhat conscient of the error, and live in the lie you have lived until now. You are a hopeless hypocrite.

[PancherBitCoin]

We both know there's God and this world we live in is just like an investment company. For example this forum has a founder (CEO) and co- founder, isn't it? That's how things in this world will live in God is the founder/CEO and His co- founder which is the Son and the Spirit.

I think I am getting confused from the way you explained it.  A CEO of a company is not cut to be an example of these matter. So you are saying God is the CEO and the co founder is his son, Jesus, then what about the investors, the guys that holds the money, the secretary, the share holder, business partner, ther e are a lot of people you are missing out. You can just use an example of a father and his kids relationship.

I think your reasoning at the same time have a true direction, and are also far from it. God is our creator and he loves us with parental love. But to equate it with business relations, there is no meaning, but father and son, it is very softly said.

[Andre_Goldman]

What do you think?
Please share your opinion about this article.


101 Proofs For God

A growing list of common sense Proofs for God.

Proof for God, #65 Mitochondrial Eve and Y-Chromosome Adam

 Genetic scientists seem to be in general agreement that we are all descendants of one woman and one man. This research was fairly recent, starting about 1978. They, of course, do not believe in the creation story of Adam and Eve in the Bible, but their conclusions are getting closer and closer.

In case you have not heard about this, it makes very interesting reading. But I think it raises a number of profound challenges to the Theory of Evolution.

The scientists base the above conclusions on the known facts of human reproduction, specifically on properties of the sperm and egg. .....
Full article read here: http://101proofsforgod.blogspot.com/2014/07/65-mitochondial-eve-and-y-chromosome.html

Abrahamic religions ... although I'm still a bit atheist (pro science) ...

Religions comes from "the no turn back point" aka 'death', aka 'one way function' 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0JKj2M-170

[BADecker]

What do you think?
Please share your opinion about this article.


101 Proofs For God

A growing list of common sense Proofs for God.

Proof for God, #65 Mitochondrial Eve and Y-Chromosome Adam

 Genetic scientists seem to be in general agreement that we are all descendants of one woman and one man. This research was fairly recent, starting about 1978. They, of course, do not believe in the creation story of Adam and Eve in the Bible, but their conclusions are getting closer and closer.

In case you have not heard about this, it makes very interesting reading. But I think it raises a number of profound challenges to the Theory of Evolution.

The scientists base the above conclusions on the known facts of human reproduction, specifically on properties of the sperm and egg. .....
Full article read here: http://101proofsforgod.blogspot.com/2014/07/65-mitochondial-eve-and-y-chromosome.html

Abrahamic religions ... although I'm still a bit atheist (pro science) ...

Religions comes from "the no turn back point" aka 'death', aka 'one way function'  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0JKj2M-170

It is the media and the universities (for money purposes) that are causing people to think that science is pro-atheism. The media and universities are the ones that are pro-religion (atheism religion). God exists:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

[anks]

god exists same as satan.
its just a philosophical picture of good and bad.
we as humans have the decision to do good or bad things.
the nature law makes that possible. its a part of nature law and our human behavior.
of course there is no guy on the clouds or a guy with horns in a underworld.
its just a way human tried to describe things and these things they are real.
why do we humans have the possibility to do good things?
we could have just live like animals but we dont.
its a wonder of nature that we have the might and
intelligence to make descisions in life and they dont have to be good only for ourselves
we can do good things for the community

[qwik2learn]

What do you think?
Please share your opinion about this article.


101 Proofs For God

A growing list of common sense Proofs for God.

Proof for God, #65 Mitochondrial Eve and Y-Chromosome Adam

 Genetic scientists seem to be in general agreement that we are all descendants of one woman and one man. This research was fairly recent, starting about 1978. They, of course, do not believe in the creation story of Adam and Eve in the Bible, but their conclusions are getting closer and closer.

In case you have not heard about this, it makes very interesting reading. But I think it raises a number of profound challenges to the Theory of Evolution.

The scientists base the above conclusions on the known facts of human reproduction, specifically on properties of the sperm and egg. .....
Full article read here: http://101proofsforgod.blogspot.com/2014/07/65-mitochondial-eve-and-y-chromosome.html

Abrahamic religions ... although I'm still a bit atheist (pro science) ...

Religions comes from "the no turn back point" aka 'death', aka 'one way function' 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0JKj2M-170

It is too simple to say that religions exist to explain death.

Religion came about as a way of explaining evidence that supports survival; this is evidence which comes from many and varying classes of phenomena.

Philosophies and religions were founded on NDEs. The famed Greek philosopher, Plato, described at the conclusion of his legendary work entitled Republic, the NDE account of a soldier named Er which has greatly influenced religious, philosophical, and scientific thought for many centuries.. Plato integrated at least three elements of this NDE into his philosophy: (1)  The departure of the soul from "the cave of shadows" to see the light of truth, (2) The flight of the soul to a vision of pure celestial being, (3) Its subsequent recollection of the vision of light, which is the very purpose of philosophy.

[qwik2learn]

Of course the Pauline teachings are fake and manmade! They are based on the story of Paul, a Pharissee who hated Christians and never met Jesus, yet this one man is supposed to speak for the teachings because some call him "apostle"?

I think it is better to find the truth in the Phoenix Journals since these writings have all the details on what specifically is incorrect in the so-called "Biblical Christianity".

Believing in GOD is supported by many eminent researchers and evidence that supports survival comes from many and varying classes of phenomena. I believe that knowledge revealed in the Phoenix Journals can help to clarify some of the issues of interpreting the evidence; Humanists should seek a robust explanation of all of their assumptions, and the same goes for survivalists.

I am sorry, you are talking complete nonsense and live in your own head. Our discussions ends here since you are indeed delusional and quite possibly mentally ill. Seek proper treatment or live in your fairy world, that is your choice, not ours to make. But facts are facts and you are messed up.

I am sorry if you feel that none of this evidence appeals to you; however, many of the smartest minds were able to comprehend the evidence; you should put forth more effort because knowledge does not come easily:

Below is a list of Nobel prize winning scientists and others among the greatest minds in the world who believed in some type of paranormal phenomenon. They held these beliefs not out of religious faith but because of their own research, the research of others, or their own experiences. Their beliefs, and in many cases, the reasons for their beliefs, are provided and links are included for additional information.

Some atheists and pseudoskeptics will say that science has removed the need for God as an explanation for the existence of the natural world. The quotes here demonstrate that many of the greatest scientific minds believe just the opposite, that the scientific evidence is best explained by the existence of an intelligent designer of the universe.

Some of the Nobel prize winners in the list include: Max Planck the founder of quantum mechanics who believed that matter is derived from consciousness and therefore the mind cannot be produced by the brain. Erwin Schrödinger also held this belief. Wolfgang Pauli believed he had psychokinetic powers that he could not control. Otto Stern banned Pauli from entering his lab to prevent Pauli's powers from damaging his experimental apparatus. Pierre Curie and Marie Curie are also included in the list. Marie Curie was the first woman awarded a Nobel prize and was the first person awarded two Nobel prizes. Arno Penzias believed his research in astronomy showed the the universe was the result of a supernatural plan. Charles Townes believed the fact that science could not explain the origin of the universe implied the existence of God. Albert Einstein believed that natural laws were designed by an intelligence. Charles Darwin (not a Nobel prize winner) also held this belief. Many other great minds although not Nobel prize winners are also on the list including: Kurt Gödel who believed that a human is non-physical spirit connected to a physical body. Alan Turing believed in ESP. Karl Popper believed in dualism the philosophy that the mind is non-material. Robert Boyle the father of modern chemistry and founder of the Royal Society of London believed in spiritual healing based on his own investigations into the phenomenon.

Information on more Nobel prize winning scientists and other great minds can be found below...

[qwik2learn]

The evidence suggesting GOD is plentiful; skeptics should definitely spend more time conducting tests and researching the facts.

One would expect that a trained doctor and surgeon and the creator of the fictional detective Sherlock Holmes would not be taken in by fraudulent mediums and would reach reasonable conclusions from the evidence.

Until his death Doyle remained convinced that life continued after death, because of ongoing communications from deceased family members who assured him that they lived in the spirit world. These communications remained the "definite demonstration" that he had sought since his days at the University of Edinburgh.

In his essay, Does Consciousness depend on the Brain?, [Oxford educated philosopher Chris Carter] justifies this belief by stating that the brain is more likely to transmit consciousness than it is to produce consciousness because the transmission hypothesis explains more facts than the production hypothesis. The transmission hypothesis explains how the brain can influence consciousness without causing consciousness by comparing the brain to a radio. When you listen to music on a radio, the radio seems to produce music, and if you damage the radio it will affect the music, but the music is actually originating from a radio station transmitting the broadcast. This analogy is similar to the filter model of the brain.

In an interview on Subversivethinking.blogspot.com Carter sums up his work on the afterlife:

In my work I present the evidence that provides a prima facie case for survival; demonstrate that alternative explanations, to the extent that they are testable, have been proven false; and then argue that to the extent these alternative explanations are not testable (such as elaborate fraud scenarios, or super-ESP) they are pseudo-scientific excuses for refusing to accept an otherwise straightforward inference from the evidence.

https://sites.google.com/site/chs4o8pt/eminent_researchers

[qwik2learn]

3. The religion of God is to show and know the truth, period. This is done through peace. Without peace, nothing can exist.

OK, BADecker; please support me in spreading this joyful message of peace:
Jesus never said that you would be damned for "not believing in Jesus":
http://christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/15353/did-jesus-actually-ever-say-if-you-dont-believe-in-me-you-go-to-hell

4. The religion of the devil is to follow the devil as one should follow God. The devil doesn't care if people recognize that there is a God or not. All he wants is that people follow him knowingly or ignorantly. His goal is destruction.

The Phoenix Project created a testament to truth; some day the Phoenix Journals, CONTACT and The Word meeting tapes will be more widely recognized for what they are, direct communications from our Heavenly Father, providing His guidance, as promised.
http://phoenixsourcedistributors.com/

[stats]

What do you think?
Please share your opinion about this article.


101 Proofs For God

A growing list of common sense Proofs for God.

Proof for God, #65 Mitochondrial Eve and Y-Chromosome Adam

 Genetic scientists seem to be in general agreement that we are all descendants of one woman and one man. This research was fairly recent, starting about 1978. They, of course, do not believe in the creation story of Adam and Eve in the Bible, but their conclusions are getting closer and closer.

In case you have not heard about this, it makes very interesting reading. But I think it raises a number of profound challenges to the Theory of Evolution.

The scientists base the above conclusions on the known facts of human reproduction, specifically on properties of the sperm and egg. .....
Full article read here: http://101proofsforgod.blogspot.com/2014/07/65-mitochondial-eve-and-y-chromosome.html

Abrahamic religions ... although I'm still a bit atheist (pro science) ...

Religions comes from "the no turn back point" aka 'death', aka 'one way function'  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0JKj2M-170

It is the media and the universities (for money purposes) that are causing people to think that science is pro-atheism. The media and universities are the ones that are pro-religion (atheism religion). God exists:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

BADecker's evidence in a nutshell......

Link 1
Machine like nature of the universe.
Cause and effect
Nations looking for God?
BADecker believes that all machines are ultimately the result of a god.

Link 2
Cause and effect

Link 3
Cause and effect

Link 4
Cause and effect

Cause and effect rebuttal
If cause and effect is proof of a god, then who made god? Was it god's god? And who made god's god? was it god's god's god? This is a cycle of infinity. This is no proof.
BADecker simply applies an assumption that  this a god. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uC7Ttc9g1u8   

Machines like nature of the universe rebuttal
BADecker believes that machines need a maker and that maker has to be a god. The reality of this is that evolution has caused the changes. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v481/n7381/full/nature10724.html   

BADecker then claims that this is only theory. The reality is that science is disproving/proving all theories  we (humans) have believed for years. That is the nature of science. For it to be tested by others. People like BADecker will continually use their same argument of assumptions to state there is no proof that god does not exist. The reality is that history has shown that early Vikings believed  "lightning flashed whenever Thor threw his hammer". Science has proven this incorrect.

Nations looking for god rebuttal
BADecker claims that people are looking for how the universe was made. This is true. However, BADecker then claims that because the answers are still not found, the answer must be a god. WRONG.... this is not proof. This is an assumption again on BADecker's part. Science is unlocking secrets every day. Religion is being disproven daily and BADecker continues to hold on to his mindless views.

[BADecker]

What do you think?
Please share your opinion about this article.


101 Proofs For God

A growing list of common sense Proofs for God.

Proof for God, #65 Mitochondrial Eve and Y-Chromosome Adam

 Genetic scientists seem to be in general agreement that we are all descendants of one woman and one man. This research was fairly recent, starting about 1978. They, of course, do not believe in the creation story of Adam and Eve in the Bible, but their conclusions are getting closer and closer.

In case you have not heard about this, it makes very interesting reading. But I think it raises a number of profound challenges to the Theory of Evolution.

The scientists base the above conclusions on the known facts of human reproduction, specifically on properties of the sperm and egg. .....
Full article read here: http://101proofsforgod.blogspot.com/2014/07/65-mitochondial-eve-and-y-chromosome.html

Abrahamic religions ... although I'm still a bit atheist (pro science) ...

Religions comes from "the no turn back point" aka 'death', aka 'one way function'  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0JKj2M-170

It is the media and the universities (for money purposes) that are causing people to think that science is pro-atheism. The media and universities are the ones that are pro-religion (atheism religion). God exists:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

BADecker's evidence in a nutshell......

Link 1
Machine like nature of the universe.
Cause and effect
Nations looking for God?
BADecker believes that all machines are ultimately the result of a god.

Link 2
Cause and effect

Link 3
Cause and effect

Link 4
Cause and effect

Cause and effect rebuttal
If cause and effect is proof of a god, then who made god? Was it god's god? And who made god's god? was it god's god's god? This is a cycle of infinity. This is no proof.
BADecker simply applies an assumption that  this a god. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uC7Ttc9g1u8   

Machines like nature of the universe rebuttal
BADecker believes that machines need a maker and that maker has to be a god. The reality of this is that evolution has caused the changes. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v481/n7381/full/nature10724.html   

BADecker then claims that this is only theory. The reality is that science is disproving/proving all theories  we (humans) have believed for years. That is the nature of science. For it to be tested by others. People like BADecker will continually use their same argument of assumptions to state there is no proof that god does not exist. The reality is that history has shown that early Vikings believed  "lightning flashed whenever Thor threw his hammer". Science has proven this incorrect.

Nations looking for god rebuttal
BADecker claims that people are looking for how the universe was made. This is true. However, BADecker then claims that because the answers are still not found, the answer must be a god. WRONG.... this is not proof. This is an assumption again on BADecker's part. Science is unlocking secrets every day. Religion is being disproven daily and BADecker continues to hold on to his mindless views.

Thanks, again, for helping me, again, point out the fact that God exists. I kinda like it when you re-post my links, as above, without showing anything to rebut them. It gives folks the incentive to go there and see for themselves that God really does exist.

[stats]

What do you think?
Please share your opinion about this article.


101 Proofs For God

A growing list of common sense Proofs for God.

Proof for God, #65 Mitochondrial Eve and Y-Chromosome Adam

 Genetic scientists seem to be in general agreement that we are all descendants of one woman and one man. This research was fairly recent, starting about 1978. They, of course, do not believe in the creation story of Adam and Eve in the Bible, but their conclusions are getting closer and closer.

In case you have not heard about this, it makes very interesting reading. But I think it raises a number of profound challenges to the Theory of Evolution.

The scientists base the above conclusions on the known facts of human reproduction, specifically on properties of the sperm and egg. .....
Full article read here: http://101proofsforgod.blogspot.com/2014/07/65-mitochondial-eve-and-y-chromosome.html

Abrahamic religions ... although I'm still a bit atheist (pro science) ...

Religions comes from "the no turn back point" aka 'death', aka 'one way function'  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0JKj2M-170

It is the media and the universities (for money purposes) that are causing people to think that science is pro-atheism. The media and universities are the ones that are pro-religion (atheism religion). God exists:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

BADecker's evidence in a nutshell......

Link 1
Machine like nature of the universe.
Cause and effect
Nations looking for God?
BADecker believes that all machines are ultimately the result of a god.

Link 2
Cause and effect

Link 3
Cause and effect

Link 4
Cause and effect

Cause and effect rebuttal
If cause and effect is proof of a god, then who made god? Was it god's god? And who made god's god? was it god's god's god? This is a cycle of infinity. This is no proof.
BADecker simply applies an assumption that  this a god. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uC7Ttc9g1u8   

Machines like nature of the universe rebuttal
BADecker believes that machines need a maker and that maker has to be a god. The reality of this is that evolution has caused the changes. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v481/n7381/full/nature10724.html   

BADecker then claims that this is only theory. The reality is that science is disproving/proving all theories  we (humans) have believed for years. That is the nature of science. For it to be tested by others. People like BADecker will continually use their same argument of assumptions to state there is no proof that god does not exist. The reality is that history has shown that early Vikings believed  "lightning flashed whenever Thor threw his hammer". Science has proven this incorrect.

Nations looking for god rebuttal
BADecker claims that people are looking for how the universe was made. This is true. However, BADecker then claims that because the answers are still not found, the answer must be a god. WRONG.... this is not proof. This is an assumption again on BADecker's part. Science is unlocking secrets every day. Religion is being disproven daily and BADecker continues to hold on to his mindless views.

Thanks, again, for helping me, again, point out the fact that God exists. I kinda like it when you re-post my links, as above, without showing anything to rebut them. It gives folks the incentive to go there and see for themselves that God really does exist.

I love debunking your thoughts about your proof.

I smile when I get to show how deluded you are.

Question for you though.......

Why do other's not use your links as proof?

Is it because only you believe it to be truth?

[qwik2learn]

I love debunking your thoughts about your proof.

I smile when I get to show how deluded you are.

Question for you though.......

Why do other's not use your links as proof?

Is it because only you believe it to be truth?

Why does nobody debunk my links?
The evidence suggesting GOD is plentiful; many of the smartest minds were able to comprehend the evidence; why not you also?

[qwik2learn]

3. The religion of God is to show and know the truth, period. This is done through peace. Without peace, nothing can exist.

OK, BADecker; please support me in spreading this joyful message of peace:
Jesus never said that you would be damned for "not believing in Jesus":
http://christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/15353/did-jesus-actually-ever-say-if-you-dont-believe-in-me-you-go-to-hell

So BADecker, you are refusing to spread a tolerant message of peace? If you look at Matthew 23 I think you will find some important details about who exactly stands to benefit from denying message of peace:

The teachers of the law and the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat. 3 So you must be careful to do everything they tell you. But do not do what they do, for they do not practice what they preach. 4 They tie up heavy, cumbersome loads and put them on other people’s shoulders, but they themselves are not willing to lift a finger to move them.

[BADecker]

3. The religion of God is to show and know the truth, period. This is done through peace. Without peace, nothing can exist.

OK, BADecker; please support me in spreading this joyful message of peace:
Jesus never said that you would be damned for "not believing in Jesus":
http://christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/15353/did-jesus-actually-ever-say-if-you-dont-believe-in-me-you-go-to-hell

So BADecker, you are refusing to spread a tolerant message of peace? If you look at Matthew 23 I think you will find some important details about who exactly stands to benefit from denying message of peace:

The teachers of the law and the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat. 3 So you must be careful to do everything they tell you. But do not do what they do, for they do not practice what they preach. 4 They tie up heavy, cumbersome loads and put them on other people’s shoulders, but they themselves are not willing to lift a finger to move them.

If Jesus was preaching a tolerant message of peace, the Pharisees wouldn't have incited the people of Jerusalem and the Romans to put Him to death.

Now that Jesus died and arose, the message of peace revolves around, Believe in Jesus salvation and be saved. There is no other message of peace.

If you do not accept the message of peace, it is not I who am not proclaiming it.