Epsylon3 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
|
|
June 25, 2016, 11:21:28 AM |
|
its similar to a 970 OC, between a 970 and a 980 150~200W
|
|
|
|
bensam1231
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1024
|
|
June 25, 2016, 11:36:10 AM |
|
Are you going to look into fixing the NeoS bug on Windows on the 1XXX?
DJM is MIA and SP is pretending he doesn't exist.
|
I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
|
|
|
Epsylon3 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
|
|
June 25, 2016, 11:37:49 AM |
|
nope, i dont work on "hobby" projects
|
|
|
|
bensam1231
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1024
|
|
June 25, 2016, 01:59:06 PM |
|
nope, i dont work on "hobby" projects
Ah, one of the highest earning algos is a 'hobby project'. I see... ~_~
|
I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
|
|
|
antonio8
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 26, 2016, 12:47:11 AM |
|
I replaced just my 970 with a 1080 and the temp in my room has been night and day difference.
The only thing I hate is the price but oh well.
As Epsylon3 said above maybe down the road the cards can be taking advantage of for mining.
antonio What wattage does it draw? Thx Go with what Epsylon3 posted above. I don't have a wattage meter. Never used one to test any rigs.
|
If you are going to leave your BTC on an exchange please send it to this address instead 1GH3ub3UUHbU5qDJW5u3E9jZ96ZEmzaXtG, I will at least use the money better than someone who steals it from the exchange. Thanks
|
|
|
bensam1231
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1024
|
|
June 26, 2016, 07:00:45 AM |
|
Speaking of NeoS performance, someone is talking about improving performance in Windows for memory hard algos with the next WDDM 2.1 update, but will require some tweaking by devs. Yes, devs need to modify the way algo access memory to improve things on memory dependent algos (eth and neoscrypt to my knowledge) Pascal is 4k pte by default in win 7/8 (where maxwell is 128kb) but can be 2m pte (full memory coverage) On win 10 current - pascal and maxwell on new drivers are 64kb but pascal will be 2m by default with next driver AND win 10 insider preview and further win 10 july update (which didnt help neoscrypt for some reason - i think i saw 900khs but couldnt repro it - maybe I missed some build or setting i was using) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1368785.msg15363869#msg15363869
|
I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
|
|
|
|
antho281
|
|
June 26, 2016, 02:01:16 PM |
|
I replaced just my 970 with a 1080 and the temp in my room has been night and day difference.
The only thing I hate is the price but oh well.
As Epsylon3 said above maybe down the road the cards can be taking advantage of for mining.
antonio What wattage does it draw? Thx Go with what Epsylon3 posted above. I don't have a wattage meter. Never used one to test any rigs. This is what we get from nvidia-smi. Not the most precise, but still better than nothing Actually, I'm running them all (6) on a 1300W PSU
|
|
|
|
Epsylon3 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
|
|
June 26, 2016, 06:27:58 PM Last edit: July 04, 2016, 03:59:39 AM by Epsylon3 |
|
yep indeed, it should be /usr/local/cuda its how i select the cuda version on linux, and that shoudnt have been commited
|
|
|
|
skunk
|
|
June 29, 2016, 11:00:38 AM |
|
hi, just to inform that current head (on decred algo and since this commit) only mines on one random card out of 5 installed: $ ./ccminer -n *** ccminer 1.8-dev for nVidia GPUs by tpruvot@github *** Built with the nVidia CUDA Toolkit 7.5
Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project Include some of the work of djm34, sp, tsiv and klausT.
BTC donation address: 1AJdfCpLWPNoAMDfHF1wD5y8VgKSSTHxPo (tpruvot)
GPU #0: SM 5.2 GeForce GTX 950 GPU #1: SM 5.2 GeForce GTX 950 GPU #2: SM 5.2 GeForce GTX 950 GPU #3: SM 5.2 GeForce GTX 950 GPU #4: SM 5.2 GeForce GTX 950
$ ./ccminer -a decred -o stratum+tcp://dcr.pool.mn:4800 -u skunk.the -p 123 -D *** ccminer 1.8-dev for nVidia GPUs by tpruvot@github *** Built with the nVidia CUDA Toolkit 7.5
Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project Include some of the work of djm34, sp, tsiv and klausT.
BTC donation address: 1AJdfCpLWPNoAMDfHF1wD5y8VgKSSTHxPo (tpruvot)
[2016-06-29 12:56:56] POOL 0: dcr.pool.mn:4800 USER skunk.the -s 10 [2016-06-29 12:56:56] Starting on stratum+tcp://dcr.pool.mn:4800 [2016-06-29 12:56:56] restart_threads [2016-06-29 12:56:56] CUDA GPU 0 matches NVML GPU 0 by busId 1 [2016-06-29 12:56:56] CUDA GPU 1 matches NVML GPU 1 by busId 3 [2016-06-29 12:56:56] CUDA GPU 2 matches NVML GPU 2 by busId 5 [2016-06-29 12:56:56] CUDA GPU 3 matches NVML GPU 3 by busId 6 [2016-06-29 12:56:56] CUDA GPU 4 matches NVML GPU 4 by busId 7 [2016-06-29 12:56:56] NVML GPU monitoring enabled. [2016-06-29 12:56:56] 5 miner threads started, using 'decred' algorithm. [2016-06-29 12:56:56] Binding thread 4 to cpu 0 (mask 1) [2016-06-29 12:56:56] Binding thread 2 to cpu 0 (mask 1) [2016-06-29 12:56:56] Binding thread 3 to cpu 1 (mask 2) [2016-06-29 12:56:56] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1 (mask 2) [2016-06-29 12:56:56] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0 (mask 1) [2016-06-29 12:56:56] Stratum difficulty set to 1 [2016-06-29 12:56:56] dcr.pool.mn:4800 decred block 41175 [2016-06-29 12:56:56] restart_threads [2016-06-29 12:56:57] job 773a956 9d54 target change: ffff0000 (1.0) [2016-06-29 12:56:57] GPU #4: start=00000000 end=3fffffff range=3fffffff [2016-06-29 12:56:57] job 773a956 9d54 target change: ffff0000 (1.0) [2016-06-29 12:56:57] GPU #3: start=00000000 end=3fffffff range=3fffffff [2016-06-29 12:56:57] job 773a956 9d54 target change: ffff0000 (1.0) [2016-06-29 12:56:57] GPU #2: start=00000000 end=3fffffff range=3fffffff [2016-06-29 12:56:57] job 773a956 9d54 target change: ffff0000 (1.0) [2016-06-29 12:56:57] GPU #0: start=00000000 end=3fffffff range=3fffffff [2016-06-29 12:56:57] job 773a956 9d54 target change: ffff0000 (1.0) [2016-06-29 12:56:57] GPU #1: start=00000000 end=3fffffff range=3fffffff [2016-06-29 12:56:59] found => f722221b 1b2222f7 [2016-06-29 12:56:59] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 950, 228.06 MH/s [2016-06-29 12:56:59] GPU #3: start=00000000 end=ffffffff range=ffffffff [2016-06-29 12:56:59] restart_threads [2016-06-29 12:56:59] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 228.06 MH/s yes! [2016-06-29 12:57:00] GPU #3: start=00000000 end=ffffffff range=ffffffff [2016-06-29 12:57:05] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 950, 771.25 MH/s [2016-06-29 12:57:05] GPU #3: start=00000000 end=ffffffff range=ffffffff [2016-06-29 12:57:10] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 950, 771.16 MH/s [2016-06-29 12:57:10] GPU #3: start=00000000 end=ffffffff range=ffffffff [2016-06-29 12:57:10] found => 356d1c05 051c6d35 [2016-06-29 12:57:10] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 950, 771.00 MH/s [2016-06-29 12:57:10] GPU #3: start=00000000 end=ffffffff range=ffffffff [2016-06-29 12:57:10] outdated job 9d54, new 253 stales=1 [2016-06-29 12:57:10] stale work detected, discarding [2016-06-29 12:57:11] found => 5a256316 1663255a [2016-06-29 12:57:11] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 950, 770.81 MH/s [2016-06-29 12:57:11] GPU #3: start=00000000 end=ffffffff range=ffffffff [2016-06-29 12:57:11] outdated job 9d54, new 253 stales=2 [2016-06-29 12:57:11] stale work detected, discarding [2016-06-29 12:57:12] dcr.pool.mn:4800 decred block 41176 [2016-06-29 12:57:12] restart_threads [2016-06-29 12:57:12] job 773a988 61d target change: ffff0000 (1.0) [2016-06-29 12:57:12] GPU #3: start=00000000 end=ffffffff range=ffffffff [2016-06-29 12:57:17] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 950, 771.04 MH/s [2016-06-29 12:57:17] GPU #3: start=00000000 end=ffffffff range=ffffffff [2016-06-29 12:57:19] found => 8299a150 50a19982 [2016-06-29 12:57:19] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 950, 770.92 MH/s [2016-06-29 12:57:19] GPU #3: start=00000000 end=ffffffff range=ffffffff [2016-06-29 12:57:19] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 693.46 MH/s yes! [2016-06-29 12:57:24] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 950, 770.89 MH/s [2016-06-29 12:57:24] GPU #3: start=00000000 end=ffffffff range=ffffffff [2016-06-29 12:57:29] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 950, 767.62 MH/s [2016-06-29 12:57:29] GPU #3: start=00000000 end=ffffffff range=ffffffff [2016-06-29 12:57:31] found => 0023a04a 4aa02300 [2016-06-29 12:57:31] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 950, 765.11 MH/s [2016-06-29 12:57:31] GPU #3: start=00000000 end=ffffffff range=ffffffff [2016-06-29 12:57:31] accepted: 3/3 (100.00%), 715.79 MH/s yes! [2016-06-29 12:57:36] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 950, 764.96 MH/s [2016-06-29 12:57:36] GPU #3: start=00000000 end=ffffffff range=ffffffff [2016-06-29 12:57:37] found => 5212630e 0e631252 [2016-06-29 12:57:37] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 950, 764.70 MH/s [2016-06-29 12:57:37] GPU #3: start=00000000 end=ffffffff range=ffffffff [2016-06-29 12:57:37] accepted: 4/4 (100.00%), 723.96 MH/s yes! [2016-06-29 12:57:42] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 950, 764.96 MH/s [2016-06-29 12:57:42] GPU #3: start=00000000 end=ffffffff range=ffffffff [2016-06-29 12:57:45] found => 24a11b7e 7e1ba124 [2016-06-29 12:57:45] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 950, 764.91 MH/s [2016-06-29 12:57:45] GPU #3: start=00000000 end=ffffffff range=ffffffff [2016-06-29 12:57:45] accepted: 5/5 (100.00%), 729.81 MH/s yes! [2016-06-29 12:57:50] found => 4b295cd6 d65c294b [2016-06-29 12:57:50] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 950, 764.69 MH/s [2016-06-29 12:57:50] GPU #3: start=00000000 end=ffffffff range=ffffffff [2016-06-29 12:57:50] accepted: 6/6 (100.00%), 732.14 MH/s yes! [2016-06-29 12:57:54] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 950, 764.38 MH/s [2016-06-29 12:57:54] GPU #3: start=00000000 end=ffffffff range=ffffffff [2016-06-29 12:57:56] SIGINT received, exiting [2016-06-29 12:57:56] restart_threads
|
|
|
|
DragonSlayer
|
|
June 29, 2016, 02:13:32 PM |
|
hi, just to inform that current head (on decred algo and since this commit) only mines on one random card out of 5 installed: I am not seeing this with a pair of 980's. I just did a fresh build 2 days ago. I will say that yiimp site is only seeing 1 card for the benchmarks. It does show total hash correctly.
|
|
|
|
skunk
|
|
July 03, 2016, 11:02:05 AM |
|
hi, just to inform that current head (on decred algo and since this commit) only mines on one random card out of 5 installed: I am not seeing this with a pair of 980's. I just did a fresh build 2 days ago. i can reliably reproduce the issue on a 5x950 and a 6x970 rig, on both rigs only one card starts hashing (even if the cards are specified with the -d flag or if the number of cards are specified with the -t flag) I will say that yiimp site is only seeing 1 card for the benchmarks. It does show total hash correctly.
it has nothing to do with yiimp, i'm not mining there...
|
|
|
|
Epsylon3 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
|
|
July 03, 2016, 04:59:45 PM |
|
never seen a problem like that... else playing with leds... (windows only) https://youtu.be/xFso96j7y1M
|
|
|
|
bathrobehero
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051
ICO? Not even once.
|
|
July 04, 2016, 03:16:39 AM |
|
|
Not your keys, not your coins!
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
|
July 04, 2016, 07:39:54 AM |
|
looks like you're having fun with leds :-) do you think it may work on linux as well?
|
|
|
|
Epsylon3 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
|
|
July 04, 2016, 07:47:15 AM |
|
it require the nvapi which is only on windows... but maybe i could trace what is doing the nvapi dll
|
|
|
|
skunk
|
|
July 04, 2016, 08:01:02 AM |
|
never seen a problem like that...
maybe it happens just on linux? i don't have windows rigs to try...
|
|
|
|
Epsylon3 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
|
|
July 04, 2016, 08:25:26 AM |
|
i only have one pc on windows most are on linux so...
|
|
|
|
skunk
|
|
July 04, 2016, 11:06:35 AM |
|
strange, i can reproduce it with "-a blake", "-a blakecoin" beside "-a decred" (even with --benchmark) blake2s, vanilla and other algos are fine well, i'll stick with alexis78's ccminer for decred...
|
|
|
|
Epsylon3 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
|
|
July 04, 2016, 02:42:47 PM Last edit: July 04, 2016, 02:55:01 PM by Epsylon3 |
|
should be the same with alexis one [2016-07-04 21:59:16] GPU #2: MSI GTX 960, 982.33 MH/s [2016-07-04 21:59:17] decred block 42664, diff 831049.304 [2016-07-04 21:59:20] GPU #0: ASUS GTX 970, 1557.27 MH/s [2016-07-04 21:59:21] GPU #2: MSI GTX 960, 982.29 MH/s [2016-07-04 21:59:22] GPU #1: EVGA GT 740, 103.48 MH/s [2016-07-04 21:59:22] accepted: 29/29 (diff 7.369), 2627.27 MH/s yes! [2016-07-04 21:59:22] GPU #0: ASUS GTX 970, 1554.41 MH/s
this is on linux if you really don't believe me
|
|
|
|
|