[ANN] ccminer 2.3 - opensource - GPL (tpruvot)

[Epsylon3]

384.x and more recent will handle the future CUDA 9. But hard to say if they are better or not, try and see

oh i forgot: dont trust sp and other trolls in its thread

[1714794998]

1714794998

[1714794998]

1714794998

[kopija]

384.x and more recent will handle the future CUDA 9. But hard to say if they are better or not, try and see

oh i forgot: dont trust sp and other trolls in its thread

Thanks.
What do YOU use?
There is also this elephant in the room:
https://nvidia.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/4525

[tpd09]

hey Epsylon3 - thanks for the miners btw.

may I check with you on DNR- I tried using 2.1 version, as the majority do on yiimp but I get low 70s MH/s with my 1080tis. with the 2.2 version I get about 80 MH/s (same bat file).

Could it be that people are running a different bat file for 2.1?

Version        Count           ES   Percent   Hashrate*   AVG   Reject
ccminer/2.1   304   -   296   34.79%   11.2 GH/s   36.8 MH/s   -
ccminer/2.2   126   -   125   18.88%   6.1 GH/s   48.2 MH/s   -
yiimp

[Epsylon3]

2.2 was improved by 10% (like sgminer) with the midstate pre-computation

[Larz952002]

2.2 released yet? or is it still in development?

[Elder III]

2.2 released yet? or is it still in development?

2.2 has been out for awhile now; there should be a link on the first page of this thread. I can confirm that it does give ~10% boost when mining DNR.

[igotek]

is there alexis78 windows version ?

[greml]

2.2 released yet? or is it still in development?

2.2 has been out for awhile now; there should be a link on the first page of this thread. I can confirm that it does give ~10% boost when mining DNR.

There is no link in the first post.

[scryptr]

2.2 released yet? or is it still in development?

2.2 has been out for awhile now; there should be a link on the first page of this thread. I can confirm that it does give ~10% boost when mining DNR.

There is no link in the first post.

THE 2.2 CCMINER VERSION IS A DEVELOPER'S SNAPSHOT--

It is not yet a pre-release on GitHub.  You will find a few links to it in the BCT threads, at least one is on Signatum (SIGT) thread.  I believe that the link on the first page of the SIGT thread for the "nVidia GPU miner" is a contribution from Epsylon3, but it does not reside on his GitHub.  Epsylon3 has published links to his preview folder in at least one BCT thread.

Seek and Ye shall find.       --scryptr

[mauver_korea]

This miner has the pool fee? how much?

[the.vlado]

Hi all,

Is it possible to build ccminer with Visual Studio 2015 (Microsoft Visual Studio 14.0) and CUDA_8.0.61.2_windows?

I am getting errors:

Done Building Project "c:\...\ccminer\ccminer.vcxproj" (CudaBuildCore target(s)) -- FAILED.
c:/.../ccminer/neoscrypt/cuda_neoscrypt.cu(380): error : extra text after expected end of number [...\ccminer\ccminer.vcxproj]

c:/.../ccminer/neoscrypt/cuda_neoscrypt.cu(1292): error : extra text after expected end of number [...\ccminer\ccminer.vcxproj]

c:/.../ccminer/neoscrypt/cuda_neoscrypt.cu(1313): error : extra text after expected end of number [...\ccminer\ccminer.vcxproj]

3 errors detected in the compilation of "Release/cuda_neoscrypt.compute_20.cpp1.ii".
cuda_neoscrypt.cu

I am getting same error for cuda_blake256.cu
Only those 2 files are causing build failure.

This was maybe already answered on the forum, but I can't find it?
Should I downgrade Visual Studio or even maybe CUDA?

Thank you.

[scryptr]

This miner has the pool fee? how much?

TPRUVOT'S CCMINER IS FREE--

There is no fee for his miners, no fee is coded into the miner.  Most pools charge a fee.       --scryptr

[greml]

2.2 released yet? or is it still in development?

2.2 has been out for awhile now; there should be a link on the first page of this thread. I can confirm that it does give ~10% boost when mining DNR.

There is no link in the first post.

THE 2.2 CCMINER VERSION IS A DEVELOPER'S SNAPSHOT--

It is not yet a pre-release on GitHub.  You will find a few links to it in the BCT threads, at least one is on Signatum (SIGT) thread.  I believe that the link on the first page of the SIGT thread for the "nVidia GPU miner" is a contribution from Epsylon3, but it does not reside on his GitHub.  Epsylon3 has published links to his preview folder in at least one BCT thread.

Seek and Ye shall find.       --scryptr

Yes, found one on another board.

But:
It is 10 % faster indeed. It shows that in the miner itself, but my average hashrate on my pool is even a bit lower than before. Dunno why.

[igotek]

2.2 was improved by 10% (like sgminer) with the midstate pre-computation

Where could I download v2.2 ?

[scryptr]

2.2 released yet? or is it still in development?

2.2 has been out for awhile now; there should be a link on the first page of this thread. I can confirm that it does give ~10% boost when mining DNR.

There is no link in the first post.

THE 2.2 CCMINER VERSION IS A DEVELOPER'S SNAPSHOT--

It is not yet a pre-release on GitHub.  You will find a few links to it in the BCT threads, at least one is on Signatum (SIGT) thread.  I believe that the link on the first page of the SIGT thread for the "nVidia GPU miner" is a contribution from Epsylon3, but it does not reside on his GitHub.  Epsylon3 has published links to his preview folder in at least one BCT thread.

Seek and Ye shall find.       --scryptr

Yes, found one on another board.

But:
It is 10 % faster indeed. It shows that in the miner itself, but my average hashrate on my pool is even a bit lower than before. Dunno why.

THE COMPUTATION ALGORITHM IS DIFFERENT--

A miner calculates hash rate by counting the hash cycles that it performs.  The pool estimates hash rate by counting shares received.  There is also signal latency involved (ping time) in the error.

Are some pools crooked?  I think so, and avoid them.  To make your decision about any pool's hash rate accuracy, look at the reported rate over time.  At times my hash rate is reported 10% higher (on most pools) than my local rate.  So, error works both ways on an honest pool.        --scryptr

[Epsylon3]

only DNR was improved, not SIGT (cf the changelog) and no, this project is made for VS2013 and linux (not VS2015 nor 2017 even if its possible to migrate it)

[GoingAround]

I have 1.8.3 advise 2.1 what will be better?

[esfomeado]

--cpu-priority is not working on windows.

[Epsylon3]

because you want the max... i guess (that require admin rights)

[esfomeado]

because you want the max... i guess (that require admin rights)

Stays on normal always even with admin rights.