Bitcoin Forum
April 26, 2024, 01:32:19 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 [113] 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 ... 172 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] ccminer 2.3 - opensource - GPL (tpruvot)  (Read 499988 times)
relayd
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 81
Merit: 12


View Profile
August 14, 2017, 02:33:24 AM
 #2241

Nice, nearly 19 MH/s on a GTX 1060 6GB with intensity at 18 with -202 memory clock ccminer-x86-2.2: https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases

Was getting 17 MH/s with just about every miner before that on exact same settings.

Power has some drops however, any idea why it keeps happening? Have same thing with krnlx. Goes from 91-89 to 34-35 every minute or so, seem to utilize more power as well compared to others which are 83-86. Would this cause any issues long term?

ccminer-x86-2.2:


3 other miners compared earlier:


1714095139
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714095139

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714095139
Reply with quote  #2

1714095139
Report to moderator
1714095139
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714095139

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714095139
Reply with quote  #2

1714095139
Report to moderator
Every time a block is mined, a certain amount of BTC (called the subsidy) is created out of thin air and given to the miner. The subsidy halves every four years and will reach 0 in about 130 years.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714095139
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714095139

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714095139
Reply with quote  #2

1714095139
Report to moderator
1714095139
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714095139

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714095139
Reply with quote  #2

1714095139
Report to moderator
1714095139
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714095139

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714095139
Reply with quote  #2

1714095139
Report to moderator
Epsylon3 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082


ccminer/cpuminer developer


View Profile WWW
August 14, 2017, 02:36:57 AM
 #2242

The diff change can trigger a small pause (500ms) that generally doesnt hurt Wink

BTC: 1FhDPLPpw18X4srecguG3MxJYe4a1JsZnd - My Projects: ccminer - cpuminer-multi - yiimp - Forum threads : ccminer - cpuminer-multi - yiimp
damniatx
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 109
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 14, 2017, 02:47:36 AM
 #2243

The diff change can trigger a small pause (500ms) that generally doesnt hurt Wink

are you looking to add NEXUS (SHA3) algo in the future ?
relayd
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 81
Merit: 12


View Profile
August 14, 2017, 02:48:40 AM
 #2244

Intensity 17 for ccminer 2.2 seems to lower power draw and temps nicely, 83-84% power, 66-67C with 67% Fan Speed.

Hash is still above others @ 17.7-17.8 MH/s or so.

Thanks for your work btw, too bad so many violate the GPL3 licensing with the private builds.
Epsylon3 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082


ccminer/cpuminer developer


View Profile WWW
August 14, 2017, 02:51:11 AM
 #2245

yep :/ ZEC bounty empoisoned the opensource work... new devs gave ideas to sp

even nicehash stopped publishing their work

damniatx: no... i already tried, their wallet is weird and not compatible with bitcoin style protocols

BTC: 1FhDPLPpw18X4srecguG3MxJYe4a1JsZnd - My Projects: ccminer - cpuminer-multi - yiimp - Forum threads : ccminer - cpuminer-multi - yiimp
relayd
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 81
Merit: 12


View Profile
August 14, 2017, 02:56:56 AM
 #2246

Not a single miner I have tried is reported accurately on suprnova.cc, so I am guessing it has to be supernova. I see reported hash from 11 MH/s to 45 MH/s and I keep at 17MH/s in reality.

SIGT has been a very hard coin to predict in general no calculators are right either, only way to track is by how much you get paid in the end.
Epsylon3 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082


ccminer/cpuminer developer


View Profile WWW
August 14, 2017, 02:59:09 AM
 #2247

yes, i guess ocminer tweaked it on a 1060. A message about that in its channel generaly fix it Wink

BTC: 1FhDPLPpw18X4srecguG3MxJYe4a1JsZnd - My Projects: ccminer - cpuminer-multi - yiimp - Forum threads : ccminer - cpuminer-multi - yiimp
car1999
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 14, 2017, 06:29:11 AM
 #2248

I built 2.2 with cuda 8.0 on ubuntu 16.04 64, the rig has 9 cards, but I always run in to below error.
if I use -d 0.1.2.3.4.5.6.7 or -d 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, it works well.:
Code:
*** ccminer 2.2 for nVidia GPUs by tpruvot@github ***^M
    Built with the nVidia CUDA Toolkit 8.0 64-bits^M
^M
  Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project^M
  Include some algos from alexis78, djm34, sp, tsiv and klausT.^M
^M
BTC donation address: 1AJdfCpLWPNoAMDfHF1wD5y8VgKSSTHxPo (tpruvot)^M
^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:29]^[[36m Starting on stratum+tcp://sigt.suprnova.cc:7106^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:29] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:29] 9 miner threads started, using 'skunk' algorithm.^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31]^[[33m Stratum difficulty set to 1^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #3: Intensity set to 20, 1048576 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #5: Intensity set to 18, 262144 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #1: Intensity set to 21, 2097152 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #4: Intensity set to 20, 1048576 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #6: Intensity set to 18, 262144 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #2: Intensity set to 18, 262144 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #8: Intensity set to 18, 262144 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #0: Intensity set to 21, 2097152 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #7: Intensity set to 18, 262144 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1080, 713.70 kH/s^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 1070, 708.17 kH/s^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 1070, 708.17 kH/s^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: unspecified launch failure^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: skunk_setBlock_80:693 unspecified launch failure^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[/code/
car1999
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 14, 2017, 06:30:29 AM
 #2249

I built 2.2 with cuda 8.0 on ubuntu 16.04 64, the rig has 9 cards, but I always run in to below error.
if I use -d 0.1.2.3.4.5.6.7 or -d 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 to run 8 cards only, it works well.:
Code:
*** ccminer 2.2 for nVidia GPUs by tpruvot@github ***^M
    Built with the nVidia CUDA Toolkit 8.0 64-bits^M
^M
  Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project^M
  Include some algos from alexis78, djm34, sp, tsiv and klausT.^M
^M
BTC donation address: 1AJdfCpLWPNoAMDfHF1wD5y8VgKSSTHxPo (tpruvot)^M
^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:29]^[[36m Starting on stratum+tcp://sigt.suprnova.cc:7106^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:29] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:29] 9 miner threads started, using 'skunk' algorithm.^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31]^[[33m Stratum difficulty set to 1^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #3: Intensity set to 20, 1048576 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #5: Intensity set to 18, 262144 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #1: Intensity set to 21, 2097152 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #4: Intensity set to 20, 1048576 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #6: Intensity set to 18, 262144 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #2: Intensity set to 18, 262144 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #8: Intensity set to 18, 262144 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #0: Intensity set to 21, 2097152 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #7: Intensity set to 18, 262144 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1080, 713.70 kH/s^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 1070, 708.17 kH/s^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 1070, 708.17 kH/s^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: unspecified launch failure^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: skunk_setBlock_80:693 unspecified launch failure^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[/code/
yunihuni
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 14, 2017, 06:35:42 AM
 #2250

skunk algo

spmod5 228mh
cc 2.2 244mh

SATILIK MSI Geforce GTX1080 GAMING X 8GB [2 AYLIK]
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2140881
Nokia555
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 266

EthMonitoring.com


View Profile WWW
August 14, 2017, 06:39:50 AM
 #2251

Latest ccminer 2.2 works like a charm with https://ethmonitoring.com (supported)

Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069



View Profile
August 14, 2017, 08:06:33 AM
 #2252

skunk algo

spmod5 228mh
cc 2.2 244mh

what about the reported speed on pool side? ok i see it's suprnova fault...
yunihuni
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 14, 2017, 09:39:03 AM
 #2253

skunk algo

spmod5 228mh
cc 2.2 244mh

what about the reported speed on pool side? ok i see it's suprnova fault...

Might be. I hope @ocminer fix that.

SATILIK MSI Geforce GTX1080 GAMING X 8GB [2 AYLIK]
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2140881
fr4nkthetank
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2294
Merit: 1182


Now the money is free, and so the people will be


View Profile
August 14, 2017, 01:02:31 PM
 #2254

Just wanted to say thanks for all the hard work.  works smooth and all seems good pool side for me.
the.vlado
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 271
Merit: 101


View Profile
August 15, 2017, 09:21:56 PM
 #2255

Is it possible to build ccminer with Visual Studio 2015 (Microsoft Visual Studio 14.0) and CUDA_8.0.61.2_windows?
Yes, it's possible. But you'll need to do some additional work, such as make changes in Algo256/cuda_blake256.cu and neoscrypt/cuda_neoscrypt.cu to make it compatible with VS2015. Also you'll need to rebuild  libcurl.x64.lib and openssl.x64.lib from sources for VS2015 compatible. For libcurl you can follow this guide - How to Build and Use Libcurl with VS2015 on Windows and openssl.lib you could try to build by yourself, or download it precompiled.

Hi Decker,

Thank you for reply. Maybe I will try that one day.
For now I gave up from VS 2015.

I'he installed VS 2013. Now I can compile and run ccminer, it will connect to the pool and receive blocks. But card is at 0% and mining is not happening.

Any reason why is that happening?

tnx

   ⚡⚡ PRiVCY ⚡⚡   ▂▃▅▆█ PRiVCY (PRIV) is a new PoW/PoS revolutionary privacy project  ☞ Best privacy crypto-market! █▆▅▃▂
    Own Your Privacy! ───────────────── WebsiteGithub  |  Bitcointalk  |  Twitter  |  Discord  |  Explorer ─────────────────
   ✯✯✯✯✯                 ✈✈✈[Free Airdrop - Starts 9th June][Tor]✈✈✈ ║───────────║ Wallet ➢ Windows  |  macOS  |  Linux
daberti
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 15, 2017, 10:13:23 PM
 #2256

First things first. Did you try to compile Cuda Samples (vs2013 ones) against VS2013?
Wyse
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 16, 2017, 12:08:37 PM
 #2257

I believe the intensity flag (-i) is not working properly when using the cryptonight algorithm. No matter what value I set the GPU usage always stays at 99-100%, while when mining with the skunk algorithm it works great and progressively reduces its GPU usage the lower I go.
nizzuu
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 187
Merit: 100

Cryptocurrency enthusiast


View Profile
August 16, 2017, 02:59:03 PM
 #2258

I believe the intensity flag (-i) is not working properly when using the cryptonight algorithm. No matter what value I set the GPU usage always stays at 99-100%, while when mining with the skunk algorithm it works great and progressively reduces its GPU usage the lower I go.

You should use --bfactor and --launch-config keys to tune miner on this algo. See algo section in readme.
the.vlado
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 271
Merit: 101


View Profile
August 16, 2017, 09:56:12 PM
 #2259

First things first. Did you try to compile Cuda Samples (vs2013 ones) against VS2013?

Hi, that is good start. Yes, I just did that now.
Exe files are created.

I can also create ccminer.exe file and when I use it, it is mining.

But it is not working when I execute it from VS. I tried in CUDA debug mode and in normal mode without debug. GPU is at 0% all the time.

   ⚡⚡ PRiVCY ⚡⚡   ▂▃▅▆█ PRiVCY (PRIV) is a new PoW/PoS revolutionary privacy project  ☞ Best privacy crypto-market! █▆▅▃▂
    Own Your Privacy! ───────────────── WebsiteGithub  |  Bitcointalk  |  Twitter  |  Discord  |  Explorer ─────────────────
   ✯✯✯✯✯                 ✈✈✈[Free Airdrop - Starts 9th June][Tor]✈✈✈ ║───────────║ Wallet ➢ Windows  |  macOS  |  Linux
daberti
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 16, 2017, 11:31:39 PM
Last edit: August 16, 2017, 11:43:21 PM by daberti
 #2260

First things first. Did you try to compile Cuda Samples (vs2013 ones) against VS2013?

Hi, that is good start. Yes, I just did that now.
Exe files are created.

I can also create ccminer.exe file and when I use it, it is mining.

But it is not working when I execute it from VS. I tried in CUDA debug mode and in normal mode without debug. GPU is at 0% all the time.

You have to pick the .exe from the source tree and put in a directory of your choice and NOT execute it from VS. Also bear in mind that antivirus software(or Win's own firewall) may somehow prevent you from actually mining.
Bottom line: did you choose the Release and x64 compiling asset?
Pages: « 1 ... 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 [113] 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 ... 172 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!