|
ComputerGenie
|
 |
December 16, 2016, 09:33:50 PM |
|
..
Yep S9v1 has indeed lost a lot - the most on this pool - 23.7%
Almost at the point where it would be hard to argue that it's random ...
Or, it could just be that they were a pile of shit not ready for production...  |
If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer.
Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once a transaction has 6 confirmations, it is extremely unlikely that an attacker without at least 50% of the network's computation power would be able to reverse it.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
tournamentdan
Member
 Offline
Activity: 118
Merit: 10
|
|
December 16, 2016, 09:45:04 PM |
|
Is the pool being dragged down by sending shares to GPU miners? Wouldn't it be better to send those shares to faster miners?
|
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4494
Merit: 1808
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
December 16, 2016, 09:58:10 PM |
|
Is the pool being dragged down by sending shares to GPU miners? Wouldn't it be better to send those shares to faster miners?
I randomly go and ban CPU/GPU miners - but haven't for a while. They cause wasted bandwidth that will just about never produce a share. Not gonna affect the luck - just wasted bandwidth. |
|
|
|
tournamentdan
Member
Offline
Activity: 118
Merit: 10
|
|
December 16, 2016, 10:18:02 PM |
|
Is the pool being dragged down by sending shares to GPU miners? Wouldn't it be better to send those shares to faster miners?
I randomly go and ban CPU/GPU miners - but haven't for a while. They cause wasted bandwidth that will just about never produce a share. Not gonna affect the luck - just wasted bandwidth. With today's miners speed. What would be considered outdated equipment? I ask this because it just seems to me sending shares to equipment that is real slow pulls everything down. We have 87 users under 1th. Of those, 7 of them are under 10.gh. 13 range from 90.gh to 10.26gh. 18 range from 430.gh to 100gh. And 49 1th to 430gh. |
|
|
|
|
thedreamer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1694
Merit: 1002
Go Big or Go Home.....
|
|
December 16, 2016, 10:24:25 PM
Last edit: December 16, 2016, 11:18:39 PM by thedreamer |
|
I'd think anything under 300gh is a waste.
|
Go Big or Go Home.
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4494
Merit: 1808
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
December 16, 2016, 10:25:56 PM |
|
Is the pool being dragged down by sending shares to GPU miners? Wouldn't it be better to send those shares to faster miners?
I randomly go and ban CPU/GPU miners - but haven't for a while. They cause wasted bandwidth that will just about never produce a share. Not gonna affect the luck - just wasted bandwidth. With today's miners speed. What would be considered outdated equipment? I ask this because it just seems to me sending shares to equipment that is real slow pulls everything down. We have 87 users under 1th. Of those, 7 of them are under 10.gh. 13 range from 90.gh to 10.26gh. 18 range from 430.gh to 100gh. And 49 1th to 430gh. Well the pool doesn't send shares, it just sends 'random' work to 'miners'. Sending out more work has no effect on anything but bandwidth. At some point that does effect things if the pool is silly enough to support botnets of CPU/GPU mining - but I don't so it doesn't matter. Anything under a few hundred GHs is pretty much a waste of time, but that's not related to CPU/GPU mining, so I (usually) just let them alone. |
|
|
|
|
ComputerGenie
|
|
December 16, 2016, 10:28:16 PM |
|
I'd think anything under 3008gb is a waste.
yeah, cuz f@%k me and my 2.7 LNs, right?  |
If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer.
Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
|
|
|
tournamentdan
Member
Offline
Activity: 118
Merit: 10
|
|
December 16, 2016, 10:38:00 PM |
|
Is the pool being dragged down by sending shares to GPU miners? Wouldn't it be better to send those shares to faster miners?
I randomly go and ban CPU/GPU miners - but haven't for a while. They cause wasted bandwidth that will just about never produce a share. Not gonna affect the luck - just wasted bandwidth. With today's miners speed. What would be considered outdated equipment? I ask this because it just seems to me sending shares to equipment that is real slow pulls everything down. We have 87 users under 1th. Of those, 7 of them are under 10.gh. 13 range from 90.gh to 10.26gh. 18 range from 430.gh to 100gh. And 49 1th to 430gh. Well the pool doesn't send shares, it just sends 'random' work to 'miners'. Sending out more work has no effect on anything but bandwidth. At some point that does effect things if the pool is silly enough to support botnets of CPU/GPU mining - but I don't so it doesn't matter. Anything under a few hundred GHs is pretty much a waste of time, but that's not related to CPU/GPU mining, so I (usually) just let them alone. Okay. I guess I understand it a bit better now. Hopefully we can pull in some more hash power and maybe keep up with the diff increase. I think the only people that are making REAL money is the power companies. They must really love us. |
|
|
|
|
|
ComputerGenie
|
|
December 16, 2016, 10:40:48 PM |
|
...I think the only people that are making REAL money is the power companies. They must really love us.
LOL my monthly bill is that of 5-7 neighboring households combined.  |
If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer.
Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
|
|
|
|
elokk
|
|
December 16, 2016, 10:45:25 PM
Last edit: December 16, 2016, 11:11:14 PM by elokk |
|
Maybe everyone with s9 v1 should upgrade? Who has a good update to use?
|
t.me/bitcoinasic
|
|
|
|
ComputerGenie
|
|
December 16, 2016, 10:53:29 PM |
|
Maybe everyone with s9 v1 should upgrade? Who has a good update to use?
All mine have the Nov 29 update with no issues. |
If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer.
Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
|
|
|
thedreamer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1694
Merit: 1002
Go Big or Go Home.....
|
|
December 16, 2016, 11:22:13 PM |
|
I'd think anything under 3008gb is a waste.
yeah, cuz f@%k me and my 2.7 LNs, right? My bad stupid auto correct on my phone. I meant 300gh and under. I use an s7 modified to run like the s7-ln due to a bad board I took out and attached an to 900watt p.s. to the side. Runs at 2.8Th@ 770watts. Its my solo lottery ticket. I got rid of everything else right after the s9 Fu started. |
Go Big or Go Home.
|
|
|
firetreeactual
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1003
|
|
December 17, 2016, 12:37:19 AM |
|
One more time...I've got three S7s at Labrador that are still profitable; I've got one A6 and one A721 here at home that, with free power, are also obviously profitable. By my calcs, even an A6 at Labrador would be profitable (not enriching, but profitable). IMHO.
|
To infinity and beyond...on two 741s and one of only 3...nope, make that 4...full nodes in Hawaii...on <30A. (I have other gear on the Hoth ice planet)
|
|
|
|
ComputerGenie
|
|
December 17, 2016, 01:23:20 AM |
|
One more time...I've got three S7s at Labrador that are still profitable; I've got one A6 and one A721 here at home that, with free power, are also obviously profitable. By my calcs, even an A6 at Labrador would be profitable (not enriching, but profitable). IMHO.
That's the part that so hard to get through to so many hobbyists, even 1 BTC per year is profitable (albeit far less fun).  |
If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer.
Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
|
|
|
Biodom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3752
Merit: 3869
|
|
December 17, 2016, 01:32:44 AM |
|
One more time...I've got three S7s at Labrador that are still profitable; I've got one A6 and one A721 here at home that, with free power, are also obviously profitable. By my calcs, even an A6 at Labrador would be profitable (not enriching, but profitable). IMHO.
recheck your ##, please. If there was 73% luck last mo, you are probably close to breakeven on S7 later than B8 even with 65CAD/kw long term plan. I checked. it is around USD 70 for a mo in revenue and about the same in expenses. |
|
|
|
|
clgrissom3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1032
Carl, aka Sonny :)
|
|
December 17, 2016, 01:35:41 AM |
|
Block by schmokeandapancake! This is his 2nd Kano block and our 1st of the new day! Was that with an S9? |
|
|
|
|
|
-EOS-
|
|
December 17, 2016, 01:36:28 AM |
|
BOOM! Here we go...
|
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
 Online
Activity: 4116
Merit: 7863
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
December 17, 2016, 01:36:34 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
firetreeactual
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1003
|
|
December 17, 2016, 01:37:14 AM |
|
Now we're cookin'.
|
To infinity and beyond...on two 741s and one of only 3...nope, make that 4...full nodes in Hawaii...on <30A. (I have other gear on the Hoth ice planet)
|
|
|
|
wmabern
|
|
December 17, 2016, 02:17:58 AM |
|
|
BITMIXER.IO Gone Baby, Gone.. ;-)
Not any good sig campaigns out there that I want!
|
|
|
|
