Bitcoin Forum
April 27, 2024, 12:56:29 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: would you be interested in an next generation ASIC trade up program for your ModMiner Quad?
YES
NO

Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 [32] 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 ... 105 »
  Print  
Author Topic: High Efficiency FPGA & ASIC Bitcoin Mining Devices https://BTCFPGA.com  (Read 218400 times)
davecoin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 816
Merit: 1000


View Profile
September 29, 2012, 03:12:02 AM
 #621

I think a lot of potential ASIC buyers were put off by the long BFL order list, at least I know I was.  Hopefully cablepair sees an uptick in orders now.
1714179389
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714179389

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714179389
Reply with quote  #2

1714179389
Report to moderator
1714179389
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714179389

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714179389
Reply with quote  #2

1714179389
Report to moderator
Transactions must be included in a block to be properly completed. When you send a transaction, it is broadcast to miners. Miners can then optionally include it in their next blocks. Miners will be more inclined to include your transaction if it has a higher transaction fee.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714179389
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714179389

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714179389
Reply with quote  #2

1714179389
Report to moderator
1714179389
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714179389

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714179389
Reply with quote  #2

1714179389
Report to moderator
Sitarow
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1047



View Profile
September 29, 2012, 03:12:40 AM
 #622

This is amazing news. Faster and cheaper than bfl.

In all fairness, time will tell what Mh/s per watt will be on the different ASIC devices.

True. Assuming the cost of hardware per hash rate will vary by a factor of 2 across the various competition,  the power per hash still seems like it will be the arguably as important (if not more).

I really woud like to see the specs for this hardware.

||bit

If I were to speculate on power consumption based on past offering would be at 60 watt to 80 watt per 54GH/s device..

P.S. Carbon credits anyone?
squid
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 29, 2012, 03:24:53 AM
 #623

dayum looks like I will have to place a second order!
||bit
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 506


View Profile
September 29, 2012, 04:07:59 AM
 #624

This is amazing news. Faster and cheaper than bfl.

In all fairness, time will tell what Mh/s per watt will be on the different ASIC devices.

True. Assuming the cost of hardware per hash rate will vary by a factor of 2 across the various competition,  the power per hash still seems like it will be the arguably as important (if not more).

I really woud like to see the specs for this hardware.

||bit

If I were to speculate on power consumption based on past offering would be at 60 watt to 80 watt per 54GH/s device..

P.S. Carbon credits anyone?

oh no.... not the carbon credits scam...  Tongue

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtevF4B4RtQ


||bit
ChipGeek
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 198
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 29, 2012, 06:52:00 AM
 #625

Damnit.  Looks like Tom's web site is down at the moment.  Hopefully just a short term thing.

Tip jar: 1ChipGeeK7PDxaAWG4VgsTi31SfJ6peKHw
Berni
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 125
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 29, 2012, 07:46:51 AM
 #626

Damnit.  Looks like Tom's web site is down at the moment.  Hopefully just a short term thing.

Now everything Works fine
mezzomix
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2618
Merit: 1252


View Profile
September 29, 2012, 07:52:17 AM
 #627

Tom,

You came late with your announcement but with your information politic you beat your main competitor. If you are able to do the shipment as planed, I see chances that you are the first one shipping ASICs devices. Seems that I selected the right supplier. I ordered and paid 27GH. Getting twice as much is awesome.

Run Tom. Run!  Grin
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4466
Merit: 1800


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
September 29, 2012, 09:26:14 AM
 #628

bASIC units will be assembled at the same plant that the ModMiner Quad's are, they will be produced in batches of 30-50 every 5-10 days and shipped out on first come first served basis
Hi Tom,
if I were to place a bASIC order now, do you think it will still be shipped with the first batch?  Thanks.
yes.

I take it sales wern't exactly what you were hoping for? This new development def changes things! Expect a couple of sales from me in the near future.
Spend all the profits from your sig to buy bASIC Smiley

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
Graet
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1001



View Profile WWW
September 29, 2012, 09:27:48 AM
 #629

I was leaning toward the bASIC - have seen cablepair active and helpful around Bitcoin for a while
this sealed the deal. order placed
thanks Tom
Graet

| Ozcoin Pooled Mining Pty Ltd https://ozcoin.net Double Geometric Reward System https://lc.ozcoin.net for Litecoin mining DGM| https://crowncloud.net VPS and Dedicated Servers for the BTC community
grishnakh
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 49
Merit: 0



View Profile
September 29, 2012, 10:01:16 AM
 #630

Amazing news! Now let's just hope everything goes according to plan so that we will see shipments starting in Nov/Dec.
scomil
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 29, 2012, 02:13:56 PM
 #631

Great work!

Been hoping to get into ASIC mining, but was planning to wait for BFL to resolve its order log.

Ordered 2 *54GH/s.
yuhannl
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 33
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 29, 2012, 03:10:07 PM
 #632

Excellent, very happy to hear that my order for the original 27gh/s will get an upgrade Smiley
rocks
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1153
Merit: 1000


View Profile
September 29, 2012, 06:21:03 PM
Last edit: September 29, 2012, 07:56:33 PM by rocks
 #633

And 2-3 weeks after the deisgn is completed I will have a handful of production boards made (this takes about 5 days) - with pictures on the web site  and
these boards will be sent to the developers I mentioned before

Luke-JR
TheSeven
ckvoliasckolivas
Kano
Just had to correct it for you Wink

This is how to engage the community with good will, and since good hardware deserves and is dependant on good software, appreciating the value the free software developers provide is critical. Well done.

Agreed, this open engagement is why I finally pulled the trigger on ordering a bASIC. I'm not a fan of pre-orders but appreciate Tom's openess with the community and it goes a long way towards being comfortable with the project's status.



Shadow383
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 29, 2012, 07:05:16 PM
 #634

Order placed - waiting for more cash to hit my bank account so I can make a bigger order  Cheesy
Will I be able to combine orders to save on shipping?
tytus
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 250
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 29, 2012, 07:36:43 PM
 #635

If I were to speculate on power consumption based on past offering would be at 60 watt to 80 watt per 54GH/s device..

Tom, please give us at least the power dissipation estimated at ASIC design stage.
My guess is that the 54GH/s will consume 150-300 Watt, but this is something I can live with :-)
dust
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
September 29, 2012, 10:56:09 PM
 #636

I wonder if it will be more profitable to order the 27Gh/s model as there will be a longer line for the 54Gh/s one due to existing preorders.

Cryptocoin Mining Info | OTC | PGP | Twitter | freenode: dust-otc | BTC: 1F6fV4U2xnpAuKtmQD6BWpK3EuRosKzF8U
mdude77
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001



View Profile
September 29, 2012, 11:51:04 PM
 #637

I wonder if it will be more profitable to order the 27Gh/s model as there will be a longer line for the 54Gh/s one due to existing preorders.

<pure speculation>
I suspect they are composed of the same underlying components.  Tom indicated earlier it wasn't one chip driving it, there are multiples.  As in 27 would be 3x9, and 54 would be 3x18.  Therefore if there's a shortage of one, there's a shortage of the other.
</pure speculation>

M

I mine at Kano's Pool because it pays the best and is completely transparent!  Come join me!
Bogart
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1000


View Profile
September 30, 2012, 12:05:21 AM
 #638

I wonder if it will be more profitable to order the 27Gh/s model as there will be a longer line for the 54Gh/s one due to existing preorders.

<pure speculation>
I suspect they are composed of the same underlying components.  Tom indicated earlier it wasn't one chip driving it, there are multiples.  As in 27 would be 3x9, and 54 would be 3x18.  Therefore if there's a shortage of one, there's a shortage of the other.
</pure speculation>

M

The more expensive model was offered for sale for ~ a month before a lesser model was offered.

Are they really going to build and ship all of those orders without building or shipping any of the "lite" model in that time?

I suppose it's possible.

I wonder how long the order line is by now.  If I ordered one today, how many weeks after the first shipment went out would it be until it shipped?

I'd love to see an order tracking thread started like exists for a competing asic product.  I would start one myself, but I don't want to maintain it...

"All safe deposit boxes in banks or financial institutions have been sealed... and may only be opened in the presence of an agent of the I.R.S." - President F.D. Roosevelt, 1933
dust
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
September 30, 2012, 12:35:14 AM
 #639

I just ordered 8 of the 54Gh/s variety.  bit-pay has improved a lot since I used them for BFL.  I actually got confirmation that I paid!

Cryptocoin Mining Info | OTC | PGP | Twitter | freenode: dust-otc | BTC: 1F6fV4U2xnpAuKtmQD6BWpK3EuRosKzF8U
Cablez
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000


I owe my soul to the Bitcoin code...


View Profile
September 30, 2012, 12:39:46 AM
 #640

I just ordered 8 of the 54Gh/s variety.  bit-pay has improve a lot since I used them for BFL.  I actually got confirmation that I paid!

You should have went for the terahash trifecta, it would have cost you about 10000 less than BFL.

Tired of substandard power distribution in your ASIC setup???   Chris' Custom Cablez will get you sorted out right!  No job too hard so PM me for a quote
Check my products or ask a question here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=74397.0
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 [32] 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 ... 105 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!