tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3192
Merit: 1003
|
|
January 24, 2016, 05:34:01 PM |
|
This is the same rig running djm34's version: This is not a joke. This is djm34's exe runing on one of my rigs. 680KHASH on the gtx 980. My private kernal is doing 680 on the gtx 970.. ok but why are mine doing this? GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 209 GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 988 GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 947 [2016-01-24 12:28:55] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 417 [2016-01-24 12:28:55] accepted: 29/29 (100.00%), 400.06 kH/s yes! Join https://i.imgur.com it's much better.
|
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
|
|
January 24, 2016, 05:35:06 PM Last edit: January 24, 2016, 05:50:25 PM by scryptr |
|
NEOSCRYPT HASH RATES FOR SP_ Private Miner 5-- Our favorite coder has made a substantial increase in the hash rate for Neoscrypt algo in his Private Miner #5. Below is an initial picture: EVGA GTX 960 SC miniing Neoscrypt at 420kh/s Earlier today, the rate was 335-350kh/s on the same card with Private Miner #4. I do notice some CPU validation errors. Further, this is an initial result, after less than 5 minutes of mining. I'll modify my auto-switch batch file in a few minutes with the new hash rate values and see which algo pops up as top paying. --scryptr EDIT: Currently Neoscrypt is top-paying on HashPower. --scryptr
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3192
Merit: 1003
|
|
January 24, 2016, 05:48:57 PM |
|
NEOSCRYPT HASH RATES FOR SP_ Private Miner 5-- Our favorite coder has made a substantial increase in the hash rate for Neoscrypt algo in his Private Miner #5. Below is an initial picture: EVGA GTX 960 SC miniing Neoscrypt at 420kh/s Earlier today, the rate was 335-350kh/s on the same card with Private Miner #4. I do notice some CPU validation errors. Further, this is an initial result, after less than 5 minutes of mining. I'll modify my auto-switch batch file in a few minutes with the new hash rate values and see which algo pops up as top paying. --scryptr scryptr how you going to do that with ccminerNeo as the exe along with ccminer.exe .... can I see your bat file when your done ? thx
|
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
|
|
January 24, 2016, 05:58:03 PM Last edit: January 24, 2016, 06:14:44 PM by scryptr |
|
NEOSCRYPT HASH RATES FOR SP_ Private Miner 5-- Our favorite coder has made a substantial increase in the hash rate for Neoscrypt algo in his Private Miner #5. Below is an initial picture: EVGA GTX 960 SC miniing Neoscrypt at 420kh/s Earlier today, the rate was 335-350kh/s on the same card with Private Miner #4. I do notice some CPU validation errors. Further, this is an initial result, after less than 5 minutes of mining. I'll modify my auto-switch batch file in a few minutes with the new hash rate values and see which algo pops up as top paying. --scryptr scryptr how you going to do that with Neoscrypt as the exe along with ccminer.exe .... can I see your bat file when your done ? thx BATCH FILE-- I modified my auto-switching batch file with the new hash rates for Neoscrypt. Simply copy and paste the lines between the "CUT LINE" notations into notepad and save the results as "switch.bat": ==========CUT LINE========== :loop C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a x11 -i 20.5 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:3533 -u Yourcoinaddy -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,neoscrypt=0.425,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35 -b 0.0.0.0:4068 timeout /t 3 C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a quark -i 23.9 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:4033 -u Yourcoinaddy -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,noscrypt=0.425,lyray2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35 -b 0.0.0.0:4068 timeout /t 3 C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a neoscrypt -i 15.5 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:4233 -u Yourcoinaddy -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,neoscrypt=0.425,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35 -b 0.0.0.0:4068 timeout /t 3 C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a lyra2v2 -i 19.1 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:5433 -u Yourcoinaddy -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,neoscrypt=0.425,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35 -b 0.0.0.0:4068 timeout /t 3 C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a qubit -i 19.7 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:4733 -u Yourcoinaddy -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,neoscrypt=0.425,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35 -b 0.0.0.0:4068 timeout /t 3 goto loop ==========CUT LINE========== The real difference is in the hash rate value for Neoscrypt in each launch line. Another difference, from my earlier posting of this batch file, is that x13 and x15 algos have been removed, as HashPower no longer mines them. Make sure to use the correct PATH for your personal copy of CCminer. --scryptr
|
|
|
|
s7icky
Member
Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
|
|
January 24, 2016, 06:04:10 PM |
|
Umm and after letting my 960 run for a bit ....
2016-01-24 13:02:44] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 430 2016-01-24 13:02:44] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 419 2016-01-24 13:02:45] accepted: 107/107 (100.00%), 427.48 kH/s yes! 2016-01-24 13:02:50] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 429 2016-01-24 13:02:50] accepted: 108/108 (100.00%), 427.33 kH/s yes! 2016-01-24 13:02:52] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 422 2016-01-24 13:02:53] accepted: 109/109 (100.00%), 427.18 kH/s yes! 2016-01-24 13:03:11] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 430 2016-01-24 13:03:12] accepted: 110/110 (100.00%), 427.37 kH/s yes! 2016-01-24 13:03:14] neoscrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060031 2016-01-24 13:03:14] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 432 2016-01-24 13:03:19] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 425 2016-01-24 13:03:19] accepted: 111/111 (100.00%), 427.50 kH/s yes! 2016-01-24 13:03:20] neoscrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060032 2016-01-24 13:03:20] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 431
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
January 24, 2016, 06:27:34 PM |
|
NEOSCRYPT HASH RATES FOR SP_ Private Miner 5-- Our favorite coder has made a substantial increase in the hash rate for Neoscrypt algo in his Private Miner #5. Below is an initial picture: EVGA GTX 960 SC miniing Neoscrypt at 420kh/s Earlier today, the rate was 335-350kh/s on the same card with Private Miner #4. I do notice some CPU validation errors. Further, this is an initial result, after less than 5 minutes of mining. I'll modify my auto-switch batch file in a few minutes with the new hash rate values and see which algo pops up as top paying. --scryptr EDIT: Currently Neoscrypt is top-paying on HashPower. --scryptr please stop spreading bullshits, real number regarding my miner are on my thread... you tested a "test" version for cuda 7.5 that you did compiled with cuda 6.5 hence giving you low perf. So at least report on the real version...
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3192
Merit: 1003
|
|
January 24, 2016, 06:35:15 PM |
|
NEOSCRYPT HASH RATES FOR SP_ Private Miner 5-- Our favorite coder has made a substantial increase in the hash rate for Neoscrypt algo in his Private Miner #5. Below is an initial picture: EVGA GTX 960 SC miniing Neoscrypt at 420kh/s Earlier today, the rate was 335-350kh/s on the same card with Private Miner #4. I do notice some CPU validation errors. Further, this is an initial result, after less than 5 minutes of mining. I'll modify my auto-switch batch file in a few minutes with the new hash rate values and see which algo pops up as top paying. --scryptr scryptr how you going to do that with Neoscrypt as the exe along with ccminer.exe .... can I see your bat file when your done ? thx BATCH FILE-- I modified my auto-switching batch file with the new hash rates for Neoscrypt. Simply copy and paste the lines between the "CUT LINE" notations into notepad and save the results as "switch.bat": ==========CUT LINE========== :loop C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a x11 -i 20.5 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:3533 -u Yourcoinaddy -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,neoscrypt=0.425,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35 -b 0.0.0.0:4068 timeout /t 3 C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a quark -i 23.9 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:4033 -u Yourcoinaddy -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,noscrypt=0.425,lyray2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35 -b 0.0.0.0:4068 timeout /t 3 C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a neoscrypt -i 15.5 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:4233 -u Yourcoinaddy -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,neoscrypt=0.425,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35 -b 0.0.0.0:4068 timeout /t 3 C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a lyra2v2 -i 19.1 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:5433 -u Yourcoinaddy -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,neoscrypt=0.425,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35 -b 0.0.0.0:4068 timeout /t 3 C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a qubit -i 19.7 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:4733 -u Yourcoinaddy -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,neoscrypt=0.425,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35 -b 0.0.0.0:4068 timeout /t 3 goto loop ==========CUT LINE========== The real difference is in the hash rate value for Neoscrypt in each launch line. Another difference, from my earlier posting of this batch file, is that x13 and x15 algos have been removed, as HashPower no longer mines them. Make sure to use the correct PATH for your personal copy of CCminer. --scryptr How are you using Neoscrypt.exe that is sp 5 neoscrypt miner in your bat file. When I unpacked it it came out as Neoscrypt not ccminer.exe ?
|
|
|
|
pokeytex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1504
Merit: 1002
|
|
January 24, 2016, 06:42:26 PM |
|
JUST DON'T DOWNLOAD THE ONE I DID FROM CRYPTO MINING BLOG - GAVE ME A TROJAN AND STOLE ALL OF MY COINS A COUPLE WEEKS AGO!
|
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
|
|
January 24, 2016, 08:11:05 PM |
|
NEOSCRYPT HASH RATES FOR SP_ Private Miner 5-- Our favorite coder has made a substantial increase in the hash rate for Neoscrypt algo in his Private Miner #5. Below is an initial picture: EVGA GTX 960 SC miniing Neoscrypt at 420kh/s Earlier today, the rate was 335-350kh/s on the same card with Private Miner #4. I do notice some CPU validation errors. Further, this is an initial result, after less than 5 minutes of mining. I'll modify my auto-switch batch file in a few minutes with the new hash rate values and see which algo pops up as top paying. --scryptr scryptr how you going to do that with Neoscrypt as the exe along with ccminer.exe .... can I see your bat file when your done ? thx BATCH FILE-- I modified my auto-switching batch file with the new hash rates for Neoscrypt. Simply copy and paste the lines between the "CUT LINE" notations into notepad and save the results as "switch.bat": ==========CUT LINE========== :loop C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a x11 -i 20.5 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:3533 -u Yourcoinaddy -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,neoscrypt=0.425,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35 -b 0.0.0.0:4068 timeout /t 3 C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a quark -i 23.9 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:4033 -u Yourcoinaddy -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,noscrypt=0.425,lyray2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35 -b 0.0.0.0:4068 timeout /t 3 C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a neoscrypt -i 15.5 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:4233 -u Yourcoinaddy -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,neoscrypt=0.425,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35 -b 0.0.0.0:4068 timeout /t 3 C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a lyra2v2 -i 19.1 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:5433 -u Yourcoinaddy -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,neoscrypt=0.425,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35 -b 0.0.0.0:4068 timeout /t 3 C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a qubit -i 19.7 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:4733 -u Yourcoinaddy -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,neoscrypt=0.425,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35 -b 0.0.0.0:4068 timeout /t 3 goto loop ==========CUT LINE========== The real difference is in the hash rate value for Neoscrypt in each launch line. Another difference, from my earlier posting of this batch file, is that x13 and x15 algos have been removed, as HashPower no longer mines them. Make sure to use the correct PATH for your personal copy of CCminer. --scryptr How are you using Neoscrypt.exe that is sp 5 neoscrypt miner in your bat file. When I unpacked it it came out as Neoscrypt not ccminer.exe ? I RENAMED IT-- I simply renamed sp_ 's zipped up file. It is sp_ 's version #5 of Private Miner, and a fully functional CCminer. It does not mine only Neoscrypt, it mines all the regular algos. Neoscrypt performance has been improved. Is that what you are asking? --scryptr
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
January 24, 2016, 08:15:22 PM |
|
I RENAMED IT--
I simply renamed sp_ 's zipped up file. It is sp_ 's version #5 of Private Miner, and a fully functional CCminer. It does not mine only Neoscrypt, it mines all the regular algos. Neoscrypt performance has been improved. Is that what you are asking? --scryptr
there is no difference in perf... hope he gives you some btc for your trolling
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
|
|
January 24, 2016, 08:21:35 PM |
|
NEOSCRYPT HASH RATES FOR SP_ Private Miner 5-- Our favorite coder has made a substantial increase in the hash rate for Neoscrypt algo in his Private Miner #5. Below is an initial picture: EVGA GTX 960 SC miniing Neoscrypt at 420kh/s Earlier today, the rate was 335-350kh/s on the same card with Private Miner #4. I do notice some CPU validation errors. Further, this is an initial result, after less than 5 minutes of mining. I'll modify my auto-switch batch file in a few minutes with the new hash rate values and see which algo pops up as top paying. --scryptr EDIT: Currently Neoscrypt is top-paying on HashPower. --scryptr please stop spreading bullshits, real number regarding my miner are on my thread... you tested a "test" version for cuda 7.5 that you did compiled with cuda 6.5 hence giving you low perf. So at least report on the real version... WHAT???-- I have not compared your version to his verrsion. Are you saying that sp_ has a test copy of your new CCminer that has improved Neoscrypt, and is packaging it? Sorry, I know that the existing Neoscrypt code was originally crafted by you, and tweaked by sp_. If he tweaked the older code this much, he did a good job. You still deserve credit. If sp_ has just released your NEW code, and tweaked it even a little, it SURE DOES A GOOD JOB!!! And, you still deserve credit. Maybe you even deserve to be pissed off, too. I didn't know that your new code had been released yet. --scryptr
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
January 24, 2016, 08:32:55 PM |
|
NEOSCRYPT HASH RATES FOR SP_ Private Miner 5-- Our favorite coder has made a substantial increase in the hash rate for Neoscrypt algo in his Private Miner #5. Below is an initial picture: EVGA GTX 960 SC miniing Neoscrypt at 420kh/s Earlier today, the rate was 335-350kh/s on the same card with Private Miner #4. I do notice some CPU validation errors. Further, this is an initial result, after less than 5 minutes of mining. I'll modify my auto-switch batch file in a few minutes with the new hash rate values and see which algo pops up as top paying. --scryptr EDIT: Currently Neoscrypt is top-paying on HashPower. --scryptr please stop spreading bullshits, real number regarding my miner are on my thread... you tested a "test" version for cuda 7.5 that you did compiled with cuda 6.5 hence giving you low perf. So at least report on the real version... WHAT???-- I have not compared your version to his verrsion. Are you saying that sp_ has a test copy of your new CCminer that has improved Neoscrypt, and is packaging it? Sorry, I know that the existing Neoscrypt code was originally crafted by you, and tweaked by sp_. If he tweaked the older code this much, he did a good job. You still deserve credit. If sp_ has just released your NEW code, and tweaked it even a little, it SURE DOES A GOOD JOB!!! And, you still deserve credit. Maybe you even deserve to be pissed off, too. I didn't know that your new code had been released yet. --scryptr sp reported all day long false number from my new release so he can sell his stuff, while picking up the new code I had put on github during the night (he didn't do anything at all except finding a problem on a card I don't own, so no he didn't do a hell of job, he just picked early my new release and bugged me all day with false report) sorry but right now, you are just supporting his scamming attempt to sell a miner which has just been released for free (except to those who participated in the pledge) "free" release here: https://github.com/djm34/ccminer-sp-neoscrypt/releases
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
|
|
January 24, 2016, 08:43:09 PM |
|
I SUPPORT CRYPTO-MINING, SHARING CODE, AND GOOD CODERS--
DJM34 deserves support, even if a miner can only afford a sliver of his daily take. THANKS!!! DJM34!!!
This back-and-forth rivalry does not do good for clarity of The State of the Code. It does make for better hash, though. A better line of communication would prevent confusion.
I'll look at your GitHub release, DJM34. I hope I can run it under Linux soon. My ZoombieMiner minions need the boost. --scryptr
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
January 24, 2016, 08:43:34 PM |
|
I did more. My version is faster.
|
|
|
|
kangjooe
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
|
January 24, 2016, 09:00:42 PM |
|
I did more. My version is faster.
even if your private miner is faster by a few percent or even 50% faster than djm34 release, i still using his miner instead for a simple reason... it's FREE (thank you for all the donator).
|
|
|
|
crsminer
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 64
Merit: 1
|
|
January 24, 2016, 09:08:35 PM |
|
I did more. My version is faster.
even if your private miner is faster by a few percent or even 50% faster than djm34 release, i still using his miner instead for a simple reason... it's FREE (thank you for all the donator). It's "free" because we donated 2.5 BTC in total For sp miner you have to donate yourself 0.1 BTC. It's a different approach, important thing is that devs should be paid for their work (by donation or buying private miners).
|
|
|
|
kangjooe
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
|
January 24, 2016, 09:16:38 PM |
|
I did more. My version is faster.
even if your private miner is faster by a few percent or even 50% faster than djm34 release, i still using his miner instead for a simple reason... it's FREE (thank you for all the donator). It's "free" because we donated 2.5 BTC in total For sp miner you have to donate yourself 0.1 BTC. It's a different approach, important thing is that devs should be paid for their work (by donation or buying private miners). yes, i know that. that's why i said (thank you for all the donator). i'm new to this mining community. and even $5 is big in here where i live. so i am saying thank you sincerely from my heart and hope that dev can see it and take it as me respecting their hard work.
|
|
|
|
crsminer
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 64
Merit: 1
|
|
January 24, 2016, 09:29:39 PM |
|
I did more. My version is faster.
even if your private miner is faster by a few percent or even 50% faster than djm34 release, i still using his miner instead for a simple reason... it's FREE (thank you for all the donator). It's "free" because we donated 2.5 BTC in total For sp miner you have to donate yourself 0.1 BTC. It's a different approach, important thing is that devs should be paid for their work (by donation or buying private miners). yes, i know that. that's why i said (thank you for all the donator). i'm new to this mining community. and even $5 is big in here where i live. so i am saying thank you sincerely from my heart and hope that dev can see it and take it as me respecting their hard work. Then you're on the right thread. Here you'll find the fastest free versions.
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
January 24, 2016, 09:40:29 PM |
|
I did more. My version is faster.
you reported false information regarding my stuff all day long to sell your crap (and removed two "//" for your private version ) For me you are just acting as a greedy jealous scammer...
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
January 24, 2016, 09:52:44 PM Last edit: January 24, 2016, 10:32:52 PM by sp_ |
|
I just tested again with your fastest and latest exefile .
2 gtx 960 1 gtx 970 2 gtx 750ti
Results after 200 accepts. My version is 1.48% faster and works on the gtx970 without cpu validation errors.
ccminer_cuda65_nosync.exe:
[2016-01-24 22:43:23] accepted: 196/196 (100.00%), 1687 kH/s (yes!!!) [2016-01-24 22:43:23] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 570 [2016-01-24 22:43:23] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 960, 401 [2016-01-24 22:43:24] accepted: 197/197 (100.00%), 1687 kH/s (yes!!!) [2016-01-24 22:43:24] accepted: 198/198 (100.00%), 1687 kH/s (yes!!!) [2016-01-24 22:43:24] neoscrypt.eu.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060241 [2016-01-24 22:43:24] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 960, 409 [2016-01-24 22:43:24] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 644 [2016-01-24 22:43:24] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 402 [2016-01-24 22:43:24] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 179 [2016-01-24 22:43:25] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 184 [2016-01-24 22:43:25] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 380 [2016-01-24 22:43:25] accepted: 199/199 (100.00%), 1691 kH/s (yes!!!) [2016-01-24 22:43:26] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 631 [2016-01-24 22:43:26] accepted: 200/200 (100.00%), 1690 kH/s (yes!!!) [2016-01-24 22:43:26] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 75 [2016-01-24 22:43:26] accepted: 201/201 (100.00%), 1679 kH/s (yes!!!) [2016-01-24 22:43:26] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 960, 400 [2016-01-24 22:43:26] accepted: 202/202 (100.00%), 1679 kH/s (yes!!!) [2016-01-24 22:43:28] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 395 [2016-01-24 22:43:28] accepted: 203/203 (100.00%), 1679 kH/s (yes!!!) [2016-01-24 22:43:28] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 960, 407 [2016-01-24 22:43:28] accepted: 204/204 (100.00%), 1680 kH/s (yes!!!)
CCminer private sp5:
[2016-01-24 22:47:08] accepted: 183/183 (100.00%), 1705 kH/s (yes!!!) [2016-01-24 22:47:09] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 469 [2016-01-24 22:47:09] accepted: 184/184 (100.00%), 1701 kH/s (yes!!!) [2016-01-24 22:47:09] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 960, 411 [2016-01-24 22:47:09] accepted: 185/185 (100.00%), 1703 kH/s (yes!!!) [2016-01-24 22:47:09] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 615 [2016-01-24 22:47:09] accepted: 186/186 (100.00%), 1702 kH/s (yes!!!) [2016-01-24 22:47:09] Stratum set nonce 0804ABB757 with extranonce2 size=3 [2016-01-24 22:47:09] neoscrypt.eu.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060246 [2016-01-24 22:47:09] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 406 [2016-01-24 22:47:09] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 960, 404 [2016-01-24 22:47:09] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 609 [2016-01-24 22:47:09] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 173 [2016-01-24 22:47:09] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 179 [2016-01-24 22:47:10] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 315 [2016-01-24 22:47:10] accepted: 187/187 (100.00%), 1702 kH/s (yes!!!) [2016-01-24 22:47:10] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 611 [2016-01-24 22:47:10] accepted: 188/188 (100.00%), 1702 kH/s (yes!!!) [2016-01-24 22:47:12] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 397 [2016-01-24 22:47:12] accepted: 189/189 (100.00%), 1702 kH/s (yes!!!) [2016-01-24 22:47:13] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 177 [2016-01-24 22:47:13] accepted: 190/190 (100.00%), 1702 kH/s (yes!!!) [2016-01-24 22:47:13] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 168 [2016-01-24 22:47:13] accepted: 191/191 (100.00%), 1702 kH/s (yes!!!) [2016-01-24 22:47:14] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 647 [2016-01-24 22:47:14] neoscrypt.eu.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060246 [2016-01-24 22:47:14] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 404 [2016-01-24 22:47:14] accepted: 192/192 (100.00%), 1705 kH/s (yes!!!) [2016-01-24 22:47:14] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 960, 415 [2016-01-24 22:47:14] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 172 [2016-01-24 22:47:14] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 178 [2016-01-24 22:47:14] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 397
|
|
|
|
|