CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[sp_]

Here is a profit overview with the current prices.

Rates from Sp-Mod private #5 in a 5 card rig (2x 750ti, 2x 260 1x 970)

On my testrig Neoscrypt is currently the 4th best payed algo on nicehash. quark is 10% more profitable to mine..

[sp_]

I RENAMED IT--

I simply renamed sp_ 's zipped up file.  It is sp_ 's version #5 of Private Miner, and a fully functional CCminer.  It does not mine only Neoscrypt, it mines all the regular algos.  Neoscrypt performance has been improved.  Is that what you are asking?       --scryptr

Yes thx scryptr   I didn't know it would run all algo's.

But since you are using a compute 5.2 card. you should use the 52 exefile in sp-private release #4 for a boost x11,x13,x15 and qubit.

[scryptr]

I RENAMED IT--

I simply renamed sp_ 's zipped up file.  It is sp_ 's version #5 of Private Miner, and a fully functional CCminer.  It does not mine only Neoscrypt, it mines all the regular algos.  Neoscrypt performance has been improved.  Is that what you are asking?       --scryptr

Yes thx scryptr   I didn't know it would run all algo's.

But since you are using a compute 5.2 card. you should use the 52 exefile in sp-private release #4 for a boost x11,x13,x15 and qubit.

RELEASE #6--

Will release #6 of the Private Miner have a compute 5.2 edition?       --scryptr

[sp_]

Test run cuda65.exe, both 970 and 980 up 14% from 1.5.74, thanks djm!

[2016-01-24 21:14:19] neoscrypt.eu.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060087
[2016-01-24 21:14:19] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 874
[2016-01-24 21:14:19] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 714
[2016-01-24 21:14:22] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 879
[2016-01-24 21:14:22] accepted: 114/114 (100.00%), 1552 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 21:14:23] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 711

Great job DJM34.

But 14% is not the advertized +25-100%

Compiled with cuda 6.5 on Fedora 20.
EVGA 970 sc 640KH/s up from 580. Seven invalid nonces in 10 minutes.
Awsome work. Thanks to you SP and all the donators, especially crackfoo.

But 10.34% is not what we donated for. This kernal is not profitable. We need 25-50% to mine with a profit.

ASUS 750Ti 2Gb GPU overclocked to 1396 mgz  - 227mh cuda 7.5 , 231mh cuda 6.5

_sp release 69 get 200mh

thanks !

15.5% is still 10% less than the claimed hashrate. You need to add another 10% to mine with a profit
A pledge to scam people just for a few satoshis..

[djm34]

Test run cuda65.exe, both 970 and 980 up 14% from 1.5.74, thanks djm!

[2016-01-24 21:14:19] neoscrypt.eu.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060087
[2016-01-24 21:14:19] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 874
[2016-01-24 21:14:19] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 714
[2016-01-24 21:14:22] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 879
[2016-01-24 21:14:22] accepted: 114/114 (100.00%), 1552 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 21:14:23] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 711

Great job DJM34.

But 14% is not the advertized +25-100%

Compiled with cuda 6.5 on Fedora 20.
EVGA 970 sc 640KH/s up from 580. Seven invalid nonces in 10 minutes.
Awsome work. Thanks to you SP and all the donators, especially crackfoo.

But 10.34% is not what we donated for. This kernal is not profitable. We need 25-50% to mine with a profit.

ASUS 750Ti 2Gb GPU overclocked to 1396 mgz  - 227mh cuda 7.5 , 231mh cuda 6.5

_sp release 69 get 200mh

thanks !

15.5% is still 10% less than the claimed hashrate. You need to add another 10% to mine with a profit
A pledge to scam people just for a few satoshis..

yeah whatever... I am waiting for proper report too... I let you at your full retard thread aimed at scamming people with
software written by others...   (I advertised what I was getting on my cards, and I still stand by it... )
yes keep your noisy trolling to your own thread... and let real dev work...

... and consider making another donation to me  as your next speed increase will probably depends on me and other dev to write the code you can't... ( seriously, aren't you ashamed of yourself just a little )

the big differences between us:
 1/ I am not greedy, just want to get paid for the time I spend, but most of all I do that for fun & challenge
 2/ I am more interested in the challenge of getting a better and faster software (rather than in randomly tweaking the stuff out)
 3/ If something doesn't work, I won't hesitate to say it, rather than making people believe that there is a speed increase so I can sell it
 4/ when I make a claim it is a real one, not one I invented just to get donations 

[bensam1231]

I did more. My version is faster.

you reported false information regarding my stuff all day long to sell your crap
(and removed two "//" for your private version  )
For me you are just acting as a greedy jealous scammer...  

No I did more. I am not a scammer. My private bins are always the fastest. Your plegde is a scam. You promised us a 25-100% boost in the hashrate. But all we got was 10-15% A 10-15% neoscrypt kernal is not more profitable than my free opensource public kernals..

Dude, he's trolling pretty hard right now. DJM got his panties in a bunch because you were improving his fresh 'shiny' new miner he just released. Don't worry about it, I'm pretty sure most everyone in this thread believe you're improving the algos, Neo included I'm sure.

DJMs just a tool and doesn't like the idea of his work being obsoleted right away. Not that it really matters, Neoscrypt crapped out after FTC went out with Cryptsy.

1/ I am not greedy, just want to get paid for the time I spend, but most of all I do that for fun & challenge

So, uhh... How much did Nicehash pay you for your miner?

And in case you guys missed it in his thread, he had to release his miner regardless of the donation goal being reached, that's why he couldn't extend the deadline for the miner goal drive, it was already sold to Nicehash.

DJM you silly goose, you! Saying one thing and doing another!


In other news as I reported a week or so ago after Cryptsy exploded, all the algos are down right now except for Ethereum. You probably should be mining it. Unfortunately since you guys can't improve it either, there isn't that much to talk about at the moment. Perhaps work continue to work on x11? There is a lot of volume there...

[djm34]

I did more. My version is faster.

you reported false information regarding my stuff all day long to sell your crap
(and removed two "//" for your private version  )
For me you are just acting as a greedy jealous scammer...   

No I did more. I am not a scammer. My private bins are always the fastest. Your plegde is a scam. You promised us a 25-100% boost in the hashrate. But all we got was 10-15% A 10-15% neoscrypt kernal is not more profitable than my free opensource public kernals..

Dude, he's trolling pretty hard right now. DJM got his panties in a bunch because you were improving his fresh 'shiny' new miner he just released. Don't worry about it, I'm pretty sure most everyone in this thread believe you're improving the algos, Neo included I'm sure.

DJMs just a tool and doesn't like the idea of his work being obsoleted right away. Not that it really matters, Neoscrypt crapped out after FTC went out with Cryptsy.

1/ I am not greedy, just want to get paid for the time I spend, but most of all I do that for fun & challenge

So, uhh... How much did Nicehash pay you for your miner?

And in case you guys missed it in his thread, he had to release his miner regardless of the donation goal being reached, that's why he couldn't extend the deadline for the miner goal drive, it was already sold to Nicehash.

DJM you silly goose, you! Saying one thing and doing another!

ah ? where ? I said, I just want to get paid for the time I spend and was ok with a 2.5btc goal.
myself and Nicehash agreed on that goal as well as the time frame (which was the 24th...
I could send all the pm except it is private and none of your business  ).
And yes, if you want to reach your goal in time, you won't gonna say it is ok if no one send anything 
(I am not good in marketing, but I am not entirely stupid either... silly goose yourself  )

And if the donation pledge hadn't reached its goal (or close to it), the deal would have been off. Fair and square.
not sure what is all the drama you are making up again 
That was a deal, the deal reached its goal that's it, the rest is just speculation on your side... 

[sambiohazard]

Fleecing the noobs by comparing to ccminer1.2 in cudaminer thread lol

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=167229.msg13535824#msg13535824

sp_ cmon you can also do a fair crowdfund every time you have double digit improvements rather than selling 5% improvements for 0.1 BTC

[sp_]

If you buy a copy of my private miner you will see than some of the algos has been optimized more than 10%

Keccak (maxcoin) is up 20%. Nobody cares becaue Keccak is not profitable to mine.
DJM34's did +10-15%  Neoscrypt. Nobody cares becaue Neoscrypt is not profitable to mine.

I optimize the most profitable algos. My private bins are faster on all algos that can be mined on nicehash (750ti)
This is the only way to guarantee profit for the miner.

My buyers are happy.

[sp_]

Todays Nicehash prices.

Quark is 30% more profitable to mine than neoscrypt. (with my private bins)

[sp_]

sp_ cmon you can also do a fair crowdfund every time you have double digit improvements rather than selling 5% improvements for 0.1 BTC

I could also wait 6months and publish nothing. My work is mostly opensource. The numbers are real. If you compare my work to the old version of ccminer you will see that my kernals are 50-100% faster. I have done this in 1.5 year.. I have spendt 1000's of hours..

[rednoW]

Todays prices.
Quark is 30% more profitable to mine than neoscrypt. (with my private bins)

Speaking about profitability it is all about nothing )) I got more then your rig with single cheapy 7950 running ether

[sp_]

Todays prices.
Quark is 30% more profitable to mine than neoscrypt. (with my private bins)

Speaking about profitability it is all about nothing )) I got more then your rig with single cheapy 7950 running ether

Right now Ether is bether. However the dag file keeps growing, and your profit will decline rapidly the next months, and then they will go POS.

[rednoW]

Todays prices.
Quark is 30% more profitable to mine than neoscrypt. (with my private bins)

Speaking about profitability it is all about nothing )) I got more then your rig with single cheapy 7950 running ether

Right now Ether is bether. However the dag file keeps growing, and your profit will decline rapidly the next months, and then they will go POS.

When it becomes true then will speak. Now YOU start comparing Todays prices.

[sp_]

6 months ago Sharkcoin was worth ($3) and the mining revenue for quark was over 1BTC/GHASH (1000% higher than today)

http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/sharkcoin/

Today the sharkcoin is worth $ 0.08 with a 24hours turnover of 455 BTC / $ 181,009

When the etherum budget is used, and the coin goes POS the same thing could happen.
Etherum is a new coin.. You can only mine it for another 4 months.

[sp_]

When it becomes true then will speak. Now YOU start comparing Todays prices.

Nicehash haven't added the ether algo yet. I am talking about todays nicehash prices.

[djm34]

sp_ cmon you can also do a fair crowdfund every time you have double digit improvements rather than selling 5% improvements for 0.1 BTC

I could also wait 6months and publish nothing. My work is mostly opensource. The numbers are real. If you compare my work to the old version of ccminer you will see that my kernals are 50-100% faster. I have done this in 1.5 year.. I have spendt 1000's of hours..

Without waiting 6 months you could at least wait to have something you were able to test before releasing it (which is clearly not the case in half of your releases... cf the revert you apply to the other half)

The problem is that you are keeping comparing to that old version. However, things have evolved a lot since then (not only on your side).
If some of your kernel did get faster that's because me and other have developped new techniques (or recover some stuff from Christian which had been overlooked and for that I am thinking to keccak... since you were talking about it...).

I never denied that you did a great job on x11 and quark but that was year ago, since then what you have been doing, mostly, has just been waiting for other to release stuff, fiddling with it, and exploit it to your own benefit.
 

[bensam1231]

I did more. My version is faster.

you reported false information regarding my stuff all day long to sell your crap
(and removed two "//" for your private version  )
For me you are just acting as a greedy jealous scammer...  

No I did more. I am not a scammer. My private bins are always the fastest. Your plegde is a scam. You promised us a 25-100% boost in the hashrate. But all we got was 10-15% A 10-15% neoscrypt kernal is not more profitable than my free opensource public kernals..

Dude, he's trolling pretty hard right now. DJM got his panties in a bunch because you were improving his fresh 'shiny' new miner he just released. Don't worry about it, I'm pretty sure most everyone in this thread believe you're improving the algos, Neo included I'm sure.

DJMs just a tool and doesn't like the idea of his work being obsoleted right away. Not that it really matters, Neoscrypt crapped out after FTC went out with Cryptsy.

1/ I am not greedy, just want to get paid for the time I spend, but most of all I do that for fun & challenge

So, uhh... How much did Nicehash pay you for your miner?

And in case you guys missed it in his thread, he had to release his miner regardless of the donation goal being reached, that's why he couldn't extend the deadline for the miner goal drive, it was already sold to Nicehash.

DJM you silly goose, you! Saying one thing and doing another!

ah ? where ? I said, I just want to get paid for the time I spend and was ok with a 2.5btc goal.
myself and Nicehash agreed on that goal as well as the time frame (which was the 24th...
I could send all the pm except it is private and none of your business  ).
And yes, if you want to reach your goal in time, you won't gonna say it is ok if no one send anything  
(I am not good in marketing, but I am not entirely stupid either... silly goose yourself  )

And if the donation pledge hadn't reached its goal (or close to it), the deal would have been off. Fair and square.
not sure what is all the drama you are making up again  
That was a deal, the deal reached its goal that's it, the rest is just speculation on your side...  

Oh so how much you got paid from Nicehash in the first place isn't any of my business, but you can talk about how you aren't greedy and what a great guy you are? You know being greedy is subjective and just because you don't believe you're greedy does not mean that's what other people will think? I assume you already know that and that's why you wont disclose how much Nicehash paid you and why you never mentioned the miner would be released regardless of reaching your 'donation drive', which I assume probably was even matched by Nicehash.

So DJM got ~5BTC assumedly for a 20% boost in a algorithm for dead coins ...hmmm...

While a 20% boost is respectable, it isn't so much when it's work for a single coin (FTC), the market is dead, and it cost 5BTC. It's weird that people can keep praising you while you continually bash them.

Fleecing the noobs by comparing to ccminer1.2 in cudaminer thread lol

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=167229.msg13535824#msg13535824

sp_ cmon you can also do a fair crowdfund every time you have double digit improvements rather than selling 5% improvements for 0.1 BTC

Don't listen to DJMs shit dude, think for yourself. It's not every time. You're paying for a subscription to his miner, once. If we're going to starts comparing developers here, he constantly releases updates and it improves over time. Heck you might even get to mine a coin with it before the market falls out too.

I assume you're also taking into account the fact that you get to use his miner for six months before you'd even hear about the double digit increase you're talking about.


Honestly though I don't know why there is so much bickering, both business models work. There shouldn't be a problem with either of them. Only reason I have a problem with DJMs is due to the aforementioned reasons.

[djm34]

I did more. My version is faster.

you reported false information regarding my stuff all day long to sell your crap
(and removed two "//" for your private version  )
For me you are just acting as a greedy jealous scammer...  

No I did more. I am not a scammer. My private bins are always the fastest. Your plegde is a scam. You promised us a 25-100% boost in the hashrate. But all we got was 10-15% A 10-15% neoscrypt kernal is not more profitable than my free opensource public kernals..

Dude, he's trolling pretty hard right now. DJM got his panties in a bunch because you were improving his fresh 'shiny' new miner he just released. Don't worry about it, I'm pretty sure most everyone in this thread believe you're improving the algos, Neo included I'm sure.

DJMs just a tool and doesn't like the idea of his work being obsoleted right away. Not that it really matters, Neoscrypt crapped out after FTC went out with Cryptsy.

1/ I am not greedy, just want to get paid for the time I spend, but most of all I do that for fun & challenge

So, uhh... How much did Nicehash pay you for your miner?

And in case you guys missed it in his thread, he had to release his miner regardless of the donation goal being reached, that's why he couldn't extend the deadline for the miner goal drive, it was already sold to Nicehash.

DJM you silly goose, you! Saying one thing and doing another!

ah ? where ? I said, I just want to get paid for the time I spend and was ok with a 2.5btc goal.
myself and Nicehash agreed on that goal as well as the time frame (which was the 24th...
I could send all the pm except it is private and none of your business  ).
And yes, if you want to reach your goal in time, you won't gonna say it is ok if no one send anything  
(I am not good in marketing, but I am not entirely stupid either... silly goose yourself  )

And if the donation pledge hadn't reached its goal (or close to it), the deal would have been off. Fair and square.
not sure what is all the drama you are making up again  
That was a deal, the deal reached its goal that's it, the rest is just speculation on your side...  

Oh so how much you got paid from Nicehash in the first place isn't any of my business, but you can talk about how you aren't greedy and what a great guy you are? You know being greedy is subjective and just because you don't believe you're greedy does not mean that's what other people will think? I assume you already know that and that's why you wont disclose how much Nicehash paid you and why you never mentioned the miner would be released regardless of reaching your 'donation drive', which I assume probably was even matched by Nicehash.

So DJM got ~5BTC assumedly for a 20% boost in a algorithm for dead coins ...hmmm...

While a 20% boost is respectable, it isn't so much when it's work for a single coin (FTC), the market is dead, and it cost 5BTC. It's weird that people can keep praising you while you continually bash them.

Fleecing the noobs by comparing to ccminer1.2 in cudaminer thread lol

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=167229.msg13535824#msg13535824

sp_ cmon you can also do a fair crowdfund every time you have double digit improvements rather than selling 5% improvements for 0.1 BTC

Don't listen to DJMs shit dude, think for yourself. It's not every time. You're paying for a subscription to his miner, once. If we're going to starts comparing developers here, he constantly releases updates and it improves over time. Heck you might even get to mine a coin with it before the market falls out too.

I assume you're also taking into account the fact that you get to use his miner for six months before you'd even hear about the double digit increase you're talking about.


Honestly though I don't know why there is so much bickering, both business models work. There shouldn't be a problem with either of them. Only reason I have a problem with DJMs is due to the aforementioned reasons.

I must confess that each time, I am impressed by all the shit your are making up here.  
This is very impressive !!! If there were Oscar for that category you would probably got it...  

If you want to know how much paid nicehash, you just need to read the 14 pages on the pledge thread. you'll find your answer (and it is definitely not your business since you didn't even contributed. so you know that from time to time you should just shut the fuck up. I think it is one of those time.)

And if I had received 5btc for it, I wouldn't have done a pledge in the first place.

For the rest, I don't feel the need (nor that I have the time) to comment on it.
The level of stupidity and crapiness your comments have definitely reached its lowest level (congrats on that)  

You should register on a conspiracy theory forum, you'd have lots to contribute to it  


ps: the reason you have problem with me is because I don't give a shit of what you say here. (never did I as I always considered you (as well as many other devs  ) as totally irrelevant )

[sp_]

I have a unpublished 20% boost in the keccak algo. It is 40% faster than the cuda7.5 version and 20% faster than release 74 (cuda 7.5).
Should I make a pledge thread? 2.5BTC guys?

Nicehash is currently paying 0.0001 / GHASH of Keccak

[ANN]pledge for the release of 40% faster cuda 7.5 nvidia miner for keccak

If the pledge is met in 4 weeks I will publish the sourcecode with validation errors and wait for another coder to fix it.
If you don't get a 40% boost but only 10%. This is not my problem. I get 40% on my hardware.