CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[bensam1231]

Look, I'd actually like to improve Spread (as well as X11 itself) for Nvidia, but that means I have to go over 5,375 lines of AMD GCN assembly by paw (yes, I just checked) and understand it perfectly in order to not only write it in OpenCL, but then port it to CUDA. You can't imagine what a pain in the ass this is.

why not do a pledge with escrow?

eg. 5 BTC for x11

if 5BTCs are reached you start doing your magic ...

I prefer not to promise something I dont have yet - especially because people are going to ask what the hashrate is going to be, and the answer is "fuck if I know" until I've done it.

therefore escrow ...

How does this help? People don't want to donate for a technique, they want to donate for a miner that gets x amount of hashes per second.

Hey this sounds like business! Bring product to market > people pay for product. Generally speaking it's not a good idea to pay for something that doesn't exist yet, especially in the case of cryptos as so many people never meet goals/deadlines and nothing happens (in addition to legitimate reasons poping up).

If it was % based miner fee you could just release it whenever and keep spitting out improvements on your fancy... Improved speed and updates keeps people using it, also makes 'hacked' copies less relevant. People probably aren't going to go out of their way for a 2%-less miner either as it's so low it doesn't really matter to anyone but the author.



Curiously is anyone having problems with Ethminer and Windows 10? It seems like my w10 970 rig produces 8Mh/s and my W8.1 rigs all produce 17Mh/s... Not sure what's going on here.

[sp_]

Same problem in the cryptonight algo. Doesn't work on widows 10

[sp_]

Private kernal for sale. 0.1BTC

Release 2 sp-mod private (750ti) (faster than release 78)

x11: +2.4%
x13: +5.4%
x15: +4.5%
lyra2v2: +6.45%
quark: +3.2%
qubit: +2.3%

I wish I could code cuda.

I have added 2-300khash in the quark algo on gtx 970. Now peaking at 19.45mhash with +155 on the core.(g1 gaming). Will be included in sp-mod private 3

Ppl want a linux version. I don't want to release the sourcecode. So no linux. Switch to windows, or loose hashrate:)

[antantti]

Same problem in the cryptonight algo. Doesn't work on widows 10

Cryptonight allready takes hit in windows 8.1. 7 is still best windows for mining.

[joblo]

Private kernal for sale. 0.1BTC

Release 2 sp-mod private (750ti) (faster than release 78)

x11: +2.4%
x13: +5.4%
x15: +4.5%
lyra2v2: +6.45%
quark: +3.2%
qubit: +2.3%

I wish I could code cuda.

I have added 2-300khash in the quark algo on gtx 970. Now peaking at 19.45mhash with +155 on the core.(g1 gaming). Will be included in sp-mod private 3

Ppl want a linux version. I don't want to release the sourcecode. So no linux. Switch to windows, or loose hashrate:)

You don't have to release it for a linux version -  don't pretend you do. You also are basing your work on CCMiner - you just infected your code with the GPL and as such, any of the people with the binary can legally request the full source.

Legally, you're obligated to provide it - obviously if you think no one will take you to court (and who the fuck will?) you can ignore this, but it's still a danger for you.

Yup, tainted code. It's possible to deliver a mix of open and closed source software but it has to be modularized and the open
code must be part of the deal. I believe the open source has to be able to run as-is without the closed source mods. The company
I worked for did this. They created an interface that formed a barrier between the Linux kernel and the closed source applications.
They released the interface under the GPL and continued to develop proprietary closed source on top of it and deliver hybrid solutions.

They eventually went bankrupt but that's another story, already told.

More motivation to learn cuda. It's very complex but my CPU work is a good learning environment for the other parts of
the skill set.

[scryptr]

AUTOSWITCH BATCH FILE FOR YAAMP CLONE--

Following is a copy of my autoswitching batch file for CCminer on a YAAMP Pool clone, like HashPower:


==========CUT LINE==========

:loop

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a x11  -i 20.5 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:3533 -u YOUR-COIN-ADDRESS-HERE -p x11=5.5,x13=4.4,x15=3.8,quark=11.4,neoscrypt=0.35,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.1  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a x13  -i 20.5 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:3633 -u YOUR-COIN-ADDRESS-HERE -p x11=5.5,x13=4.4,x15=3.8,quark=11.4,neoscrypt=0.35,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.1  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a x15 -i 20.5 -C --cpu-priority 5  -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:3733 -u YOUR-COIN-ADDRESS-HERE -p x11=5.5,x13=4.4,x15=3.8,quark=11.4,neoscrypt=0.35,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.1  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a quark -i 23.9 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:4033 -u YOUR-COIN-ADDRESS-HERE -p x11=5.5,x13=4.4,x15=3.8,quark=11.4,neoscrypt=0.35,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.1  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a neoscrypt -i 15.5 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:4233 -u YOUR-COIN-ADDRESS-HERE -p x11=5.5,x13=4.4,x15=3.8,quark=11.4,neoscrypt=0.35,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.1  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a lyra2v2 -i 19.1 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:5433 -u YOUR-COIN-ADDRESS-HERE  -p x11=5.5,x13=4.4,x15=3.8,quark=11.4,neoscrypt=0.35,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.1  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a qubit -i 19.7  -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:4733 -u YOUR-COIN-ADDRESS-HERE -p x11=5.5,x13=4.4,x15=3.8,quark=11.4,neoscrypt=0.35,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.1  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

goto loop

==========CUT LINE==========

Save the text above, minus the "==CUT LINE==" notations, as "switch bat", and run the batch file under Wndows.  The above hash rates are relevant for a GTX 960, but will work OK for any model nVidia card until personal hash rates are established for any CCminer build/card model combo.  The specified PATH should be modified for your personal miner's PATH environmental variable.  Also, these hash rates were attained with the  current Private Miner from sp_ (v2.7).       --scryptr

i'm using gtx 970. what should i change? never seen that many command before. i'm usually mine in nicehash with this simple command:


ccminer.exe --algo=neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://neoscrypt.hk.nicehash.com:3341 -u MY_WALLET -p x
pause



and also... what's this command do?

b 0.0.0.0:4068


i notice every time i start new mining the diff is high and the "accepted" is slow... after a while diff change and "accepted" is getting more frequent. any command that can be used to change the diff?

GTX 970 CHANGES--

The batch file allows for auto-switching beteween the top-paying algos.  A GTX 970 will run fine on the batch file.  It will hash at faster rates, but those rates will be in roughly the same proportion.  To be more accurate, you would need to benchmark your rig on all the algos in your personal batch file, and then insert the results for each algo into your batch file.  Same for a GTX 750ti, but the more accurate rate numbers would be smaller.

The "-b 0.0.0.0:4068" command allows for remote monitoring the rig on port 4068.  You could leave it off if you wish.

The batch file utilizes the "retries", or "-r" flag, to rotate to the next command line.  All YAAMP-clone pools can exploit this feature to allow auo-switching.  YAAMP-clone pools are CCminer friendly.  I haven't incorporated difficulty settings in this batch file, you would need more accurate hash rates to better set difficulty.       --scryptr

EDIT:  I have just modified my "qubit" algo settings from 8.1 to 8.35.  This represents the improvement in hash rate from Private Miner v1 to Private Miner v2.  All algos mined with the batch file are now hashing at rates equal to or better than former CUDA 6.5 CCminer builds.       --scryptr

[bensam1231]

Same problem in the cryptonight algo. Doesn't work on widows 10

Can this be fixed? Looking at the memory controller, on W8 it's maxed out... W10 it's at about 50% (which is definitely comparable to the performance I'm getting).

I prefer having a installation on w10 so I can see and report on changes/bugs comparable between algos and fix them

Curiously is anyone having problems with Ethminer and Windows 10? It seems like my w10 970 rig produces 8Mh/s and my W8.1 rigs all produce 17Mh/s... Not sure what's going on here.

Yesterday I upgraded ssd to one gaming rig which had gtx 970 and windows 10. Tested quickly ETH mining and yes, it was only hashing about 7-8MH. Thought I messed something during upgrade but after more testing realized that W10 kills hashrate.

[joblo]

AUTOSWITCH BATCH FILE FOR YAAMP CLONE--

Following is a copy of my autoswitching batch file for CCminer on a YAAMP Pool clone, like HashPower:


==========CUT LINE==========

:loop

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a x11  -i 20.5 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:3533 -u YOUR-COIN-ADDRESS-HERE -p x11=5.5,x13=4.4,x15=3.8,quark=11.4,neoscrypt=0.35,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.1  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a x13  -i 20.5 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:3633 -u YOUR-COIN-ADDRESS-HERE -p x11=5.5,x13=4.4,x15=3.8,quark=11.4,neoscrypt=0.35,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.1  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a x15 -i 20.5 -C --cpu-priority 5  -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:3733 -u YOUR-COIN-ADDRESS-HERE -p x11=5.5,x13=4.4,x15=3.8,quark=11.4,neoscrypt=0.35,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.1  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a quark -i 23.9 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:4033 -u YOUR-COIN-ADDRESS-HERE -p x11=5.5,x13=4.4,x15=3.8,quark=11.4,neoscrypt=0.35,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.1  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a neoscrypt -i 15.5 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:4233 -u YOUR-COIN-ADDRESS-HERE -p x11=5.5,x13=4.4,x15=3.8,quark=11.4,neoscrypt=0.35,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.1  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a lyra2v2 -i 19.1 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:5433 -u YOUR-COIN-ADDRESS-HERE  -p x11=5.5,x13=4.4,x15=3.8,quark=11.4,neoscrypt=0.35,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.1  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a qubit -i 19.7  -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:4733 -u YOUR-COIN-ADDRESS-HERE -p x11=5.5,x13=4.4,x15=3.8,quark=11.4,neoscrypt=0.35,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.1  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

goto loop

==========CUT LINE==========

Save the text above, minus the "==CUT LINE==" notations, as "switch bat", and run the batch file under Wndows.  The above hash rates are relevant for a GTX 960, but will work OK for any model nVidia card until personal hash rates are established for any CCminer build/card model combo.  The specified PATH should be modified for your personal miner's PATH environmental variable.  Also, these hash rates were attained with the  current Private Miner from sp_ (v2.7).       --scryptr

i'm using gtx 970. what should i change? never seen that many command before. i'm usually mine in nicehash with this simple command:


ccminer.exe --algo=neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://neoscrypt.hk.nicehash.com:3341 -u MY_WALLET -p x
pause



and also... what's this command do?

b 0.0.0.0:4068


i notice every time i start new mining the diff is high and the "accepted" is slow... after a while diff change and "accepted" is getting more frequent. any command that can be used to change the diff?

GTX 970 CHANGES--

The batch file allows for auto-switching beteween the top-paying algos.  A GTX 970 will run fine on the batch file.  It will hash at faster rates, but those rates will be in roughly the same proportion.  To be more accurate, you would need to benchmark your rig on all the algos in your personal batch file, and then insert the results for each algo into your batch file.  Same for a GTX 750ti, but the more accurate rate numbers would be smaller.

The "-b 0.0.0.0:4068" command allows for remote monitoring the rig on port 4068.  You could leave it off if you wish.

The batch file utilizes the "retries", or "-r" flag, to rotate to the next command line.  All YAAMP-clone pools can exploit this feature to allow auo-switching.  YAAMP-clone pools are CCminer friendly.  I haven't incorporated difficulty settings in this batch file, you would need more accurate hash rates to better set difficulty.       --scryptr

EDIT:  I have just modified my "qubit" algo settings from 8.1 to 8.35.  This represents the improvement in hash rate from Private Miner v1 to Private Miner v2.  All algos mined with the batch file are now hashing at rates equal to or better than former CUDA 6.5 CCminer builds.       --scryptr

Nice work, simple too. Will you publish the normalization factors for the opren source miner too?  I suppose anyone
could tune them for heir own particular setup.

[joblo]

Same problem in the cryptonight algo. Doesn't work on widows 10

Can this be fixed? Looking at the memory controller, on W8 it's maxed out... W10 it's at about 50% (which is definitely comparable to the performance I'm getting).

I prefer having a installation on w10 so I can see and report on changes/bugs comparable between algos and fix them

Curiously is anyone having problems with Ethminer and Windows 10? It seems like my w10 970 rig produces 8Mh/s and my W8.1 rigs all produce 17Mh/s... Not sure what's going on here.

Yesterday I upgraded ssd to one gaming rig which had gtx 970 and windows 10. Tested quickly ETH mining and yes, it was only hashing about 7-8MH. Thought I messed something during upgrade but after more testing realized that W10 kills hashrate.

My guess is MS has changed an API in W10 that requires all devs to modify their apps to comply.
They've done it before.

[GKar]

Private kernal for sale. 0.1BTC

Release 2 sp-mod private (750ti) (faster than release 78)

x11: +2.4%
x13: +5.4%
x15: +4.5%
lyra2v2: +6.45%
quark: +3.2%
qubit: +2.3%

I wish I could code cuda.

I have added 2-300khash in the quark algo on gtx 970. Now peaking at 19.45mhash with +155 on the core.(g1 gaming). Will be included in sp-mod private 3

Ppl want a linux version. I don't want to release the sourcecode. So no linux. Switch to windows, or loose hashrate:)

would the windows version run on Linux via wine? 

[scryptr]

AUTOSWITCH BATCH FILE FOR YAAMP CLONE--

Following is a copy of my autoswitching batch file for CCminer on a YAAMP Pool clone, like HashPower:


==========CUT LINE==========

:loop

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a x11  -i 20.5 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:3533 -u YOUR-COIN-ADDRESS-HERE -p x11=5.5,x13=4.4,x15=3.8,quark=11.4,neoscrypt=0.35,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.1  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a x13  -i 20.5 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:3633 -u YOUR-COIN-ADDRESS-HERE -p x11=5.5,x13=4.4,x15=3.8,quark=11.4,neoscrypt=0.35,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.1  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a x15 -i 20.5 -C --cpu-priority 5  -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:3733 -u YOUR-COIN-ADDRESS-HERE -p x11=5.5,x13=4.4,x15=3.8,quark=11.4,neoscrypt=0.35,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.1  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a quark -i 23.9 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:4033 -u YOUR-COIN-ADDRESS-HERE -p x11=5.5,x13=4.4,x15=3.8,quark=11.4,neoscrypt=0.35,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.1  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a neoscrypt -i 15.5 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:4233 -u YOUR-COIN-ADDRESS-HERE -p x11=5.5,x13=4.4,x15=3.8,quark=11.4,neoscrypt=0.35,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.1  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a lyra2v2 -i 19.1 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:5433 -u YOUR-COIN-ADDRESS-HERE  -p x11=5.5,x13=4.4,x15=3.8,quark=11.4,neoscrypt=0.35,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.1  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a qubit -i 19.7  -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:4733 -u YOUR-COIN-ADDRESS-HERE -p x11=5.5,x13=4.4,x15=3.8,quark=11.4,neoscrypt=0.35,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.1  -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3

goto loop

==========CUT LINE==========

Save the text above, minus the "==CUT LINE==" notations, as "switch bat", and run the batch file under Wndows.  The above hash rates are relevant for a GTX 960, but will work OK for any model nVidia card until personal hash rates are established for any CCminer build/card model combo.  The specified PATH should be modified for your personal miner's PATH environmental variable.  Also, these hash rates were attained with the  current Private Miner from sp_ (v2.7).       --scryptr

i'm using gtx 970. what should i change? never seen that many command before. i'm usually mine in nicehash with this simple command:


ccminer.exe --algo=neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://neoscrypt.hk.nicehash.com:3341 -u MY_WALLET -p x
pause



and also... what's this command do?

b 0.0.0.0:4068


i notice every time i start new mining the diff is high and the "accepted" is slow... after a while diff change and "accepted" is getting more frequent. any command that can be used to change the diff?

GTX 970 CHANGES--

The batch file allows for auto-switching beteween the top-paying algos.  A GTX 970 will run fine on the batch file.  It will hash at faster rates, but those rates will be in roughly the same proportion.  To be more accurate, you would need to benchmark your rig on all the algos in your personal batch file, and then insert the results for each algo into your batch file.  Same for a GTX 750ti, but the more accurate rate numbers would be smaller.

The "-b 0.0.0.0:4068" command allows for remote monitoring the rig on port 4068.  You could leave it off if you wish.

The batch file utilizes the "retries", or "-r" flag, to rotate to the next command line.  All YAAMP-clone pools can exploit this feature to allow auo-switching.  YAAMP-clone pools are CCminer friendly.  I haven't incorporated difficulty settings in this batch file, you would need more accurate hash rates to better set difficulty.       --scryptr

EDIT:  I have just modified my "qubit" algo settings from 8.1 to 8.35.  This represents the improvement in hash rate from Private Miner v1 to Private Miner v2.  All algos mined with the batch file are now hashing at rates equal to or better than former CUDA 6.5 CCminer builds.       --scryptr

Nice work, simple too. Will you publish the normalization factors for the opren source miner too?  I suppose anyone
could tune them for heir own particular setup.

CCMINER RELEASE dot 74--

The most recent password string that I have saved was used with release dot 74 of sp_ 's CCminer, the last release compiled with CUDA 6.5.  It follows:

Password string with hash rates--  "-p x11=5.5,x13=4.4,x15=3.8,quark=11,neoscrypt=0.34,lyra2v2=6.2,qubit=8.4"

I had rounded all factors to 2 digits of accuracy.

If you read the pool FAQ, you can mine without hash rates (generically, "normalization factors") by simply comma separating the algo flags.  The YAAMP-clone pools will then switch based on pool-scripted normalization factors, with "-scrypt" set equal to 1.  All other algos are weighted by their hash rates proportionally to the "-scrypt" algo, the founding alt-coin algo.  However, these rates are going to be less accurate, because they are not tuned to a miner's specific card/kernel setup.  Rigs with a mixture of card models may need some extra math.       --scryptr

[GKar]

sp   your private miner is giving me json error when I try mining spr.  Did I get the wrong file? I was wanting the 750ti spr miner.

I usually refer to a coin via it's trade symbol.

[joblo]

Nice work, simple too. Will you publish the normalization factors for the opren source miner too?  I suppose anyone
could tune them for heir own particular setup.

CCMINER RELEASE dot 74--

The most recent password string that I have saved was used with release dot 74 of sp_ 's CCminer, the last release compiled with CUDA 6.5.  It follows:

Password string with hash rates--  "-p x11=5.5,x13=4.4,x15=3.8,quark=11,neoscrypt=0.34,lyra2v2=6.2,qubit=8.4"

I had rounded all factors to 2 digits of accuracy.

If you read the pool FAQ, you can mine without hash rates (generically, "normalization factors") by simply comma separating the algo flags.  The YAAMP-clone pools will then switch based on pool-scripted normalization factors, with "-scrypt" set equal to 1.  All other algos are weighted by their hash rates proportionally to the "-scrypt" algo, the founding alt-coin algo.  However, these rates are going to be less accurate, because they are not tuned to a miner's specific card/kernel setup.  Rigs with a mixture of card models may need some extra math.       --scryptr

Most pools use AMD for their normalization, multipoollhub is the only one I know of that has Nvidia factors as well.
Unfortunately they don't have the API yamp clones or nicehash have.

I've calculated my own normalization using x11 as my baseline. I have two factors for lyra2v2 because the performance
of that algo is so much better on 750ti vs 9xx.

[joblo]

sp   your private miner is giving me json error when I try mining spr.  Did I get the wrong file? I was wanting the 750ti spr miner.

I usually refer to a coin via it's trade symbol.

ccminer --help will show you the expected name.

[grendel25]

I supported with a donation but did not receive release 2.
-grendel25

Pm sendt.

PM received.  Thank you for clearing it up for me.  

It might be a good idea to publish what you PM'd me to the first post.

[AliMan]

sp   your private miner is giving me json error when I try mining spr.  Did I get the wrong file? I was wanting the 750ti spr miner.

I usually refer to a coin via it's trade symbol.

Why bother?

You'll have better luck on nicehash.

[chrysophylax]

Private kernal for sale. 0.1BTC

Release 2 sp-mod private (750ti) (faster than release 78)

x11: +2.4%
x13: +5.4%
x15: +4.5%
lyra2v2: +6.45%
quark: +3.2%
qubit: +2.3%

I wish I could code cuda.

I have added 2-300khash in the quark algo on gtx 970. Now peaking at 19.45mhash with +155 on the core.(g1 gaming). Will be included in sp-mod private 3

Ppl want a linux version. I don't want to release the sourcecode. So no linux. Switch to windows, or loose hashrate:)

wow ...

so you are willing to 'lose' the support of linux miners to try and push them towards windows? ...

not likely sp ... and something i will NEVER do with the total costs and instability and the sheer work involved in such a stupid thing as that - especially with a farm ...

if farm owners WANT to do that - then fine ... but those who will stick to linux - like me - will research ( or commission ) another way ...

no tanx - ill just add a few more powerful cards - and find a better way ...

#crysx

[chrysophylax]

Private kernal for sale. 0.1BTC

Release 2 sp-mod private (750ti) (faster than release 78)

x11: +2.4%
x13: +5.4%
x15: +4.5%
lyra2v2: +6.45%
quark: +3.2%
qubit: +2.3%

I wish I could code cuda.

I have added 2-300khash in the quark algo on gtx 970. Now peaking at 19.45mhash with +155 on the core.(g1 gaming). Will be included in sp-mod private 3

Ppl want a linux version. I don't want to release the sourcecode. So no linux. Switch to windows, or loose hashrate:)

wow ...

so you are willing to 'lose' the support of linux miners to try and push them towards windows? ...

not likely sp ... and something i will NEVER do with the total costs and instability and the sheer work involved in such a stupid thing as that - especially with a farm ...

if farm owners WANT to do that - then fine ... but those who will stick to linux - like me - will research ( or commission ) another way ...

no tanx - ill just add a few more powerful cards - and find a better way ...

#crysx

Kinda shitty to try to hide it behind the "I dun wanna release source" lie (the lie being the insinuation that linux support requires source.)

there has to be a better way of doing 'all this' wolf ...

im actually getting disheartened by the whole crypto scene the way it is - and its driving me to think about whether its a good idea to stay in the open like this - or fall into the background and just 'watch' the workings of development and crypto - while utilizing the offers that come our way on occasion ...

is it any wonder why the HUGE farms only get bigger? ...

not releasing YOUR source is one thing - not releasing OUR source is another ... which is exactly what oss is all about - its OURS ( as in the community ) ...

im linux all the way - and i wont change ... stubbornly refuse to give in to the closed system ... paid miners and paid software and paid systems are one thing ...

but to do this that sp is saying he wants to do - that has now got my nose out of joint also ... i wont bend to such things - and agree that it is not right to state such things with the purpose of holding the source code for private use only ... im a supporter of both oss AND the devs ... you know this - sp knows this - the community who know what im about know this ...

but thats statement is ludicrous ...

i just need to find and settle in my new place - and rebuild the new farm ... only a few months away ...

then we can talk business ...

#crysx

[chrysophylax]

Private kernal for sale. 0.1BTC

Release 2 sp-mod private (750ti) (faster than release 78)

x11: +2.4%
x13: +5.4%
x15: +4.5%
lyra2v2: +6.45%
quark: +3.2%
qubit: +2.3%

I wish I could code cuda.

I have added 2-300khash in the quark algo on gtx 970. Now peaking at 19.45mhash with +155 on the core.(g1 gaming). Will be included in sp-mod private 3

Ppl want a linux version. I don't want to release the sourcecode. So no linux. Switch to windows, or loose hashrate:)

wow ...

so you are willing to 'lose' the support of linux miners to try and push them towards windows? ...

not likely sp ... and something i will NEVER do with the total costs and instability and the sheer work involved in such a stupid thing as that - especially with a farm ...

if farm owners WANT to do that - then fine ... but those who will stick to linux - like me - will research ( or commission ) another way ...

no tanx - ill just add a few more powerful cards - and find a better way ...

#crysx

Kinda shitty to try to hide it behind the "I dun wanna release source" lie (the lie being the insinuation that linux support requires source.)

there has to be a better way of doing 'all this' wolf ...

im actually getting disheartened by the whole crypto scene the way it is - and its driving me to think about whether its a good idea to stay in the open like this - or fall into the background and just 'watch' the workings of development and crypto - while utilizing the offers that come our way on occasion ...

is it any wonder why the HUGE farms only get bigger? ...

not releasing YOUR source is one thing - not releasing OUR source is another ... which is exactly what oss is all about - its OURS ( as in the community ) ...

im linux all the way - and i wont change ... stubbornly refuse to give in to the closed system ... paid miners and paid software and paid systems are one thing ...

but to do this that sp is saying he wants to do - that has now got my nose out of joint also ... i wont bend to such things - and agree that it is not right to state such things with the purpose of holding the source code for private use only ... im a supporter of both oss AND the devs ... you know this - sp knows this - the community who know what im about know this ...

but thats statement is ludicrous ...

i just need to find and settle in my new place - and rebuild the new farm ... only a few months away ...

then we can talk business ...

#crysx

I like my way of doing things - I don't give away answers, but I'm more than willing to help devs who are at least decently intelligent and truly want to learn - while I don't open source much of my code, I freely give people the ideas used in it the vast majority of times - as well as show people what is possible. The latter is also very much to my detriment, as it would be smarter to not let them know a certain hashrate is achievable; less people will try. But I do anyways.

understood ...

though we ALL understand devs need to earn and eat ... so this is NOT about a [particular dev or another - but more the actions of the dev ... which you have already stated above ...

if you decide to get back into cuda - we have something more to talk about than just amd ...

i know its probably a hell of a lot better with amd / opencl on a programming level than nvidia / cuda - but i if you are talented in BOTH - the your value automatically becomes more than two fold ... and we get the best of both worlds ... im not just directing this at you wolf - im saying this in general ...

respect is always there for the devs of this strange crypto world - so its not an attack on a personal level to any of the devs ... im just fed up with being forced into doing one thing or another at the whim of 'whoever' wants to impose the 'doing' ...

in future - i will not be working the way i have been with thefarm and farmamd ... both farms will be done in a much more streamlined manner - and in a much more productive manner ... which means there will only be one way of constructing and building the miners - and one way they will work ... the software will be built on that platform - and it will not include windows for the miners ... ever ...

im already in the first stages of the build - as ive specialized in hpc grids like this before - and am currently redesigning the two farms entirely ...

this time - both farms will determine what miner gets used - and not the other way around ...

#crysx

[joblo]

Private kernal for sale. 0.1BTC

Release 2 sp-mod private (750ti) (faster than release 78)

x11: +2.4%
x13: +5.4%
x15: +4.5%
lyra2v2: +6.45%
quark: +3.2%
qubit: +2.3%

I wish I could code cuda.

I have added 2-300khash in the quark algo on gtx 970. Now peaking at 19.45mhash with +155 on the core.(g1 gaming). Will be included in sp-mod private 3

Ppl want a linux version. I don't want to release the sourcecode. So no linux. Switch to windows, or loose hashrate:)

wow ...

so you are willing to 'lose' the support of linux miners to try and push them towards windows? ...

not likely sp ... and something i will NEVER do with the total costs and instability and the sheer work involved in such a stupid thing as that - especially with a farm ...

if farm owners WANT to do that - then fine ... but those who will stick to linux - like me - will research ( or commission ) another way ...

no tanx - ill just add a few more powerful cards - and find a better way ...

#crysx

Kinda shitty to try to hide it behind the "I dun wanna release source" lie (the lie being the insinuation that linux support requires source.)

there has to be a better way of doing 'all this' wolf ...

im actually getting disheartened by the whole crypto scene the way it is - and its driving me to think about whether its a good idea to stay in the open like this - or fall into the background and just 'watch' the workings of development and crypto - while utilizing the offers that come our way on occasion ...

is it any wonder why the HUGE farms only get bigger? ...

not releasing YOUR source is one thing - not releasing OUR source is another ... which is exactly what oss is all about - its OURS ( as in the community ) ...

im linux all the way - and i wont change ... stubbornly refuse to give in to the closed system ... paid miners and paid software and paid systems are one thing ...

but to do this that sp is saying he wants to do - that has now got my nose out of joint also ... i wont bend to such things - and agree that it is not right to state such things with the purpose of holding the source code for private use only ... im a supporter of both oss AND the devs ... you know this - sp knows this - the community who know what im about know this ...

but thats statement is ludicrous ...

i just need to find and settle in my new place - and rebuild the new farm ... only a few months away ...

then we can talk business ...

#crysx

You know you can run windows binaries, including ccminer, on linux using wine. Just install wine and run
wine ccminer ...

But then again, considering how much you've contributed you have a right to be a little demanding. In fact
your position is very similar to my opinion on the matter. The big guys are the early adopters and pay the
development costs of leading edge products. For that they get exclusive rights to the product for a period of
time. A win-win I'd say.