|
y2kcamaross
|
 |
March 25, 2013, 06:43:03 PM |
|
Mtgox really needs to do something. Either lower their fees or fix their server, or preferably both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The grue lurks in the darkest places of the earth. Its favorite diet is adventurers, but its insatiable appetite is tempered by its fear of light. No grue has ever been seen by the light of day, and few have survived its fearsome jaws to tell the tale.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
rpietila
Donator
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1036
|
|
March 25, 2013, 06:51:53 PM |
|
Mtgox really needs to do something. Either lower their fees or fix their server, or preferably both
Upping their fees to 2% would help with the lags more than lowering them... |
HIM TVA Dragon, AOK-GM, Emperor of the Earth, Creator of the World, King of Crypto Kingdom, Lord of Malla, AOD-GEN, SA-GEN5, Ministry of Plenty (Join NOW!), Professor of Economics and Theology, Ph.D, AM, Chairman, Treasurer, Founder, CEO, 3*MG-2, 82*OHK, NKP, WTF, FFF, etc(x3)
|
|
|
|
y2kcamaross
|
|
March 25, 2013, 06:54:10 PM |
|
Only because it would drive people to other exchanges, nothing something they would want
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mccorvic
|
|
March 25, 2013, 06:55:05 PM |
|
I will admit though, this 71-76 range has been quite the slugfest
|
|
|
|
notme
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
|
|
March 25, 2013, 06:55:09 PM |
|
Mtgox really needs to do something. Either lower their fees or fix their server, or preferably both
Upping their fees to 2% would help with the lags more than lowering them... But would it be because they make more or because people quit trading there as much? |
|
|
|
|
ineededausername
|
|
March 25, 2013, 06:57:42 PM |
|
Currently waiting to transfer flights in Europe, this week should be fun.
Well, everyone, don't forget this  |
(BFL)^2 < 0
|
|
|
thezerg
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1010
|
|
March 25, 2013, 06:59:44 PM |
|
Mtgox really needs to do something. Either lower their fees or fix their server, or preferably both
Upping their fees to 2% would help with the lags more than lowering them...  a volume per bid/offer discount and small bid/offer volume penalty would do a much better job |
|
|
|
|
|
WikileaksDude
|
|
March 25, 2013, 07:04:24 PM |
|
Currently waiting to transfer flights in Europe, this week should be fun.
Well, everyone, don't forget this whats this about? |
|
|
|
|
|
zoinky
|
|
March 25, 2013, 07:07:23 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gatekeeper
|
|
March 25, 2013, 07:27:48 PM |
|
the battle up to $80 is a good fight, but 80-90 will be a lot faster. At the weekend there was 50k btc to $100, right now there is just under 32k btc to $100.
|
(1470) <KLYE> But I was far too drunk to fuck a midget
(1470) <KLYE> I will fuck a chicken for 250 btc
|
|
|
|
ineededausername
|
|
March 25, 2013, 07:37:22 PM |
|
Anyone notice that there's more depth to $70 than there is to $80?
|
(BFL)^2 < 0
|
|
|
rpietila
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1036
|
|
March 25, 2013, 07:39:22 PM |
|
Mtgox really needs to do something. Either lower their fees or fix their server, or preferably both
Upping their fees to 2% would help with the lags more than lowering them... a volume per bid/offer discount and small bid/offer volume penalty would do a much better job Oh yeah, a fixed fee per new order! That's the way to go.. If the lag is because of an influx of new orders, how about a fee  |
HIM TVA Dragon, AOK-GM, Emperor of the Earth, Creator of the World, King of Crypto Kingdom, Lord of Malla, AOD-GEN, SA-GEN5, Ministry of Plenty (Join NOW!), Professor of Economics and Theology, Ph.D, AM, Chairman, Treasurer, Founder, CEO, 3*MG-2, 82*OHK, NKP, WTF, FFF, etc(x3)
|
|
|
|
mccorvic
|
|
March 25, 2013, 07:44:05 PM |
|
the battle up to $80 is a good fight, but 80-90 will be a lot faster. At the weekend there was 50k btc to $100, right now there is just under 32k btc to $100.
blockchained.com shows the asks and bids having stayed around the same level. I'll be interesting to see which side can out last the other. (Spoiler: Bulls win) |
|
|
|
|
EnergyVampire
|
|
March 25, 2013, 07:45:36 PM |
|
Mtgox really needs to do something. Either lower their fees or fix their server, or preferably both
Upping their fees to 2% would help with the lags more than lowering them... a volume per bid/offer discount and small bid/offer volume penalty would do a much better job Oh yeah, a fixed fee per new order! That's the way to go.. If the lag is because of an influx of new orders, how about a fee I believe he means a fixed fee for the .01 dust orders. I'm not sure what purpose the .01 trades are for, any guesses? |
|
|
|
rpietila
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1036
|
|
March 25, 2013, 07:48:48 PM |
|
Mtgox really needs to do something. Either lower their fees or fix their server, or preferably both
Upping their fees to 2% would help with the lags more than lowering them... a volume per bid/offer discount and small bid/offer volume penalty would do a much better job Oh yeah, a fixed fee per new order! That's the way to go.. If the lag is because of an influx of new orders, how about a fee I believe he means a fixed fee for the .01 dust orders. I'm not sure what purpose the .01 trades are for, any guesses? Same fee for everybody! Legit traders couldn't care less about .01 fee.. The purpose of dust is to obfuscate the sight. |
HIM TVA Dragon, AOK-GM, Emperor of the Earth, Creator of the World, King of Crypto Kingdom, Lord of Malla, AOD-GEN, SA-GEN5, Ministry of Plenty (Join NOW!), Professor of Economics and Theology, Ph.D, AM, Chairman, Treasurer, Founder, CEO, 3*MG-2, 82*OHK, NKP, WTF, FFF, etc(x3)
|
|
|
ewibit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2955
Merit: 1049
|
|
March 25, 2013, 07:49:23 PM |
|
Mtgox really needs to do something. Either lower their fees or fix their server, or preferably both
+1 |
|
|
|
|
thezerg
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1010
|
|
March 25, 2013, 08:46:05 PM |
|
Mtgox really needs to do something. Either lower their fees or fix their server, or preferably both
Upping their fees to 2% would help with the lags more than lowering them... a volume per bid/offer discount and small bid/offer volume penalty would do a much better job Oh yeah, a fixed fee per new order! That's the way to go.. If the lag is because of an influx of new orders, how about a fee I believe he means a fixed fee for the .01 dust orders. I'm not sure what purpose the .01 trades are for, any guesses? Same fee for everybody! Legit traders couldn't care less about .01 fee.. The purpose of dust is to obfuscate the sight. Maybe not a hard limit... just have dust orders pay a higher %. High volume orders pay lower %. This would be to encourage order consolidation and stop people from putting 1000 tiny orders in front of their own wall to give their bot time to move it when approached. But at the same time a lucrative dust bot could still operate. |
|
|
|
|
|
Liquid
|
|
March 25, 2013, 08:54:51 PM |
|
|
Bitcoin will show the world what hard money really is.
|
|
|
giszmo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1105
WalletScrutiny.com
|
|
March 25, 2013, 09:23:05 PM |
|
Mtgox really needs to do something. Either lower their fees or fix their server, or preferably both
Upping their fees to 2% would help with the lags more than lowering them... a volume per bid/offer discount and small bid/offer volume penalty would do a much better job Oh yeah, a fixed fee per new order! That's the way to go.. If the lag is because of an influx of new orders, how about a fee I believe he means a fixed fee for the .01 dust orders. I'm not sure what purpose the .01 trades are for, any guesses? Same fee for everybody! Legit traders couldn't care less about .01 fee.. The purpose of dust is to obfuscate the sight. Maybe not a hard limit... just have dust orders pay a higher %. High volume orders pay lower %. This would be to encourage order consolidation and stop people from putting 1000 tiny orders in front of their own wall to give their bot time to move it when approached. But at the same time a lucrative dust bot could still operate. MtGox has a high incentive to allow small transactions as people making profit from them will reduce volatility, too. They have an incentive to provide a fast service as speed should be the most important factor after liquidity and trustworthiness. Arbitrarily small trades don't reduce volatility though, so it would definitely make sense to pass on the costs per trade as the minimum trade costs or to straight add them. Why not charge every trade with either $0.001+0.6% or max($0.001, 0.6%)? When MtGox doesn't make profit with a deal, why should the client? |
| ɃɃWalletScrutiny.com | Is your wallet secure?(Methodology)
WalletScrutiny checks if wallet builds are reproducible, a precondition for code audits to be of value. | ɃɃ |
|
|
|
|
