GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :)

[zurg]

Well, per Justice Dept. conference call they said that the likelihood of recovering any $ is very low.
But they also said that Homero is going to be monitored in case he stashed some BTC even after he gets out they will drag him back in.

He has so many family members and "friends" I wonder how they will prevent all that?  I just wonder if uncle Stu and him have broke it off now?  It would be interesting to know if they have had any communication lately?  I say they should reduce his sentence from 20 years for every million dollars he is able to come up with.  It would be pretty easy to check his bank records and determine if he really did spend it all or held any back.  He didn't ever pay any bills right? 

I am sure not many people would be willing to help after all they will be on the hook if anything comes out. Not sure anyone would want to join him in the slammer for his 2nd go around. lol
Haven't followed much on the rest though so no idea.

[RoomBot]

Here's a major recap with a bunch of image blasts-from-the-past --- if you can stomach it:


Garza Owes $9.9M Civil Fines & Criminal Sentencing in January

[owlcatz]

Here's a major recap with a bunch of image blasts-from-the-past --- if you can stomach it:


Garza Owes $9.9M Civil Fines & Criminal Sentencing in January

LMFAO... BitJane lives!!

[Gleb Gamow]

Here's a major recap with a bunch of image blasts-from-the-past --- if you can stomach it:


Garza Owes $9.9M Civil Fines & Criminal Sentencing in January

LMFAO... BitJane lives!!

[RoomBot]

Here's a major recap with a bunch of image blasts-from-the-past --- if you can stomach it:


Garza Owes $9.9M Civil Fines & Criminal Sentencing in January

LMFAO... BitJane lives!!

And she's pissed.

[maildir]

Some activity 

Still at a complete loss as to what is going on with Uncle Stu's case. Even if the last order was saying to the plaintiffs 'take your time' this is a bit much...

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Garza et al

Wednesday, October 04, 2017
45       7 pgs order Order on Motion for Settlement  Wed 3:26 PM 
 JUDGMENT/ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SETTLEMENT APPROVAL. The Court GRANTS the Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement and Entry of Final Judgment (Doc. #44 ) in accordance with the attached signed order as proposed by the parties. The Clerk of Court shall enter final judgment and close this case. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 10/4/2017. (Black, R.) Modified on 10/4/2017 (Gutierrez, Y.)

 
 notice Judicial Evaluation Program Survey  Wed 4:39 PM 
 JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS SURVEY: The following link to the confidential survey requires you to log into CM/ECF for SECURITY purposes. Once in CM/ECF you will be prompted for the case number. Although you are receiving this survey through CM/ECF, it is hosted on an independent website called SurveyMonkey. Once in SurveyMonkey, the survey is located in a secure account. The survey is not docketed and it is not sent directly to the judge. To ensure anonymity, completed surveys are held up to 90 days before they are sent to the judge for review. We hope you will take this opportunity to participate, please click on this link: https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?survey (Gutierrez, Y.)

 

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Garza et al

Tuesday, October 03, 2017
44       2 pgs motion Settlement  Tue 4:01 PM 
 Joint MOTION for Settlement Approval as to Defendant Garza by Securities and Exchange Commission.(Shields, Kathleen)

 
  Att: 1   Text of Proposed Order Proposed Final Judgment, 
  Att: 2   6 pgs Consent 

Curious what that text is exactly. Don't know what that survey monkey shit is though.

[Gleb Gamow]

hahaha... It feels like our current president's last 8 months in office here in the USA... All fail and no jail yet...

Clearly Homero was aiming too low with this piddly $10m scam... with so much bluster he should've run for president. Then fuck the SEC, the FBI, and the whole alphabet  

Garza 2020! Unless he gets more than 2 years in the clink, in which case - Garza 2024!

Yep... Trump is gonna squeeze every dollar he can squeeze out of the US Presidency.  

Bigly.

#estate_tax-repeal

Eliminating or reducing taxes? And that's a bad thing? Trump is the best thing to happen to the US of A since the Boston Tea Party. I hope he continues to piss off the establishment and Libtards that dominate politics, media, and entertainment. They can all go fuck themselves.

Bannon has a multi-billionaire funder in his corner now who wants the entire political elite class destroyed. He is going to single handily ensure Trump is reelected and that his agenda is carried forth, just like the voters wanted when they elected him to drain that miserable and corrupt swamp.

This Bannon?: https://www.wired.com/2016/09/trumps-campaign-ceos-little-known-world-warcraft-career/

This multi-billionaire funder in his corner?: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-04-25/renaissance-mints-another-billionaire-with-two-more-on-the-cusp

[RoomBot]

Back on topic, plz:

[sirazimuth]

LMFAO... BitJane lives!!

And she's pissed.

I'll say!

Back on topic, plz:

yeah..that could've gotten outa hand very easily...nuff said...

[RoomBot]

Sweet.  Stuart Fraser's Motion to Dismiss DENIED!

The GAWSuit Lives!

https://www.pacerpro.com/cases/2922067

Have to give Allen Shinners props for his work helping the Feds nail Garza & Fraser & for getting this far in his GAWsuit.

He's going to collect victim statements for the judge.  I forget how big, but I think the number of plaintiffs his GAWsuit represents is in the hundreds, at least. 

[o0o0]

Sweet.  Stuart Fraser's Motion to Dismiss DENIED!

The GAWSuit Lives!

https://www.pacerpro.com/cases/2922067

Have to give Allen Shinners props for his work helping the Feds nail Garza & Fraser & for getting this far in his GAWsuit.

He's going to collect victim statements for the judge.  I forget how big, but I think the number of plaintiffs his GAWsuit represents is in the hundreds, at least. 

remember shinners email to work for gaw and his pay demands? he wasnt that clever overal. just persistent.

[zurg]

Sweet.  Stuart Fraser's Motion to Dismiss DENIED!

The GAWSuit Lives!

https://www.pacerpro.com/cases/2922067

Have to give Allen Shinners props for his work helping the Feds nail Garza & Fraser & for getting this far in his GAWsuit.

He's going to collect victim statements for the judge.  I forget how big, but I think the number of plaintiffs his GAWsuit represents is in the hundreds, at least. 

Well, he hasn't updated his site for a while or let people in GAWsuit know about this either. Wasn't sure he was still actively pursuing anything.

[sirazimuth]

Sweet.  Stuart Fraser's Motion to Dismiss DENIED!

The GAWSuit Lives!

https://www.pacerpro.com/cases/2922067

Have to give Allen Shinners props for his work helping the Feds nail Garza & Fraser & for getting this far in his GAWsuit.

He's going to collect victim statements for the judge.  I forget how big, but I think the number of plaintiffs his GAWsuit represents is in the hundreds, at least. 

So perusing that link(thanx roomb) I scrolled down to the October entries
to check out. I was like "huh! So where's this motion denied business,wtf?
Can't understand this legalese speak for the life of me...hmmm.."
Then I realized I was looking at October 2016!! Duhhhhh...brain fart,lol
Oh yeah, a reminder that this thing has been draggin on for what seems
like frikkin eons.....

[truckinusa44]

Sweet.  Stuart Fraser's Motion to Dismiss DENIED!

The GAWSuit Lives!

https://www.pacerpro.com/cases/2922067

Have to give Allen Shinners props for his work helping the Feds nail Garza & Fraser & for getting this far in his GAWsuit.

He's going to collect victim statements for the judge.  I forget how big, but I think the number of plaintiffs his GAWsuit represents is in the hundreds, at least. 

I wonder what the denied motion says?  Too lazy to remember my pacer account password.

[truckinusa44]

Anyways, heres a link if anyone is curious.  From what I am reading Fraser is SOOOOO Fucked!

Here are a few nice quotes:

"The test of whether an individual is a controlling person for the purposes of § 20(a) is not a categorical one that turns solely on the individual’s status as an officer or director. Rather, the inquiry is a functional one, as SEC regulations indicate.”

"Thus, control is adequately pled when there are factual allegations that “support a reasonable inference that defendants had the potential power to influence and direct the activities of the primary violator.”

Here is the biggest quote so far: The amended complaint plausibly pleads that Fraser controlled the Companies and Garza. It does so first by alleging that Fraser owned half of the equity in each of the Companies a well recognized indicator of control.

In other words Fraser was absolutely in control.

https://nofile.io/f/CRE68Dd9Nbj/October+garza.pdf

[zurg]

Anyways, heres a link if anyone is curious.  From what I am reading Fraser is SOOOOO Fucked!

Here are a few nice quotes:

"The test of whether an individual is a controlling person for the purposes of § 20(a) is not a categorical one that turns solely on the individual’s status as an officer or director. Rather, the inquiry is a functional one, as SEC regulations indicate.”

"Thus, control is adequately pled when there are factual allegations that “support a reasonable inference that defendants had the potential power to influence and direct the activities of the primary violator.”

Here is the biggest quote so far: The amended complaint plausibly pleads that Fraser controlled the Companies and Garza. It does so first by alleging that Fraser owned half of the equity in each of the Companies a well recognized indicator of control.

In other words Fraser was absolutely in control.

https://file.io/moutPF

Ohh, yeah, that is some serious stuff that will get him on the hook. He is going to get his..,in time.

[favdesu]

Anyways, heres a link if anyone is curious.  From what I am reading Fraser is SOOOOO Fucked!

Here are a few nice quotes:

"The test of whether an individual is a controlling person for the purposes of § 20(a) is not a categorical one that turns solely on the individual’s status as an officer or director. Rather, the inquiry is a functional one, as SEC regulations indicate.”

"Thus, control is adequately pled when there are factual allegations that “support a reasonable inference that defendants had the potential power to influence and direct the activities of the primary violator.”

Here is the biggest quote so far: The amended complaint plausibly pleads that Fraser controlled the Companies and Garza. It does so first by alleging that Fraser owned half of the equity in each of the Companies a well recognized indicator of control.

In other words Fraser was absolutely in control.

https://file.io/moutPF

Ohh, yeah, that is some serious stuff that will get him on the hook. He is going to get his..,in time.

holy shit what a nice twist. shouldn't have run the charity 9/11 scam

[Gleb Gamow]

Anyways, heres a link if anyone is curious.  From what I am reading Fraser is SOOOOO Fucked!

Here are a few nice quotes:

"The test of whether an individual is a controlling person for the purposes of § 20(a) is not a categorical one that turns solely on the individual’s status as an officer or director. Rather, the inquiry is a functional one, as SEC regulations indicate.”

"Thus, control is adequately pled when there are factual allegations that “support a reasonable inference that defendants had the potential power to influence and direct the activities of the primary violator.”

Here is the biggest quote so far: The amended complaint plausibly pleads that Fraser controlled the Companies and Garza. It does so first by alleging that Fraser owned half of the equity in each of the Companies a well recognized indicator of control.

In other words Fraser was absolutely in control.

https://file.io/moutPF

Ohh, yeah, that is some serious stuff that will get him on the hook. He is going to get his..,in time.

holy shit what a nice twist. shouldn't have run the charity 9/11 scam

Less than an hour ago I got up to speed on the 9/11 scam.

Does anybody know if Garza and Fraser are directly related, e.g., cousins? I can't get over the notion that Fraser pulled Garza in on his small nefarious entities oppose to being the other way around.

[PeaMine]

Latest: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/10/bitcoin-fraudster-hit-with-9-1m-civil-judgment-on-top-of-criminal-guilty-plea/

damn josh garza is the fcking scamer, my friend lost arround 5bitcoin invested on the cloud mining . i read this document and find 9.1m so fcking this guy.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4067154-Gov-Uscourts-Ctd-Null-Null-0.html#document/p4/a380281

No jail sentence? only fine? Wow
From the case blow up and until now, the btc held by Gaw already enough to pay for it

No Prison for Garza ??
I've been waiting years.

[suchmoon]

Does anybody know if Garza and Fraser are directly related, e.g., cousins? I can't get over the notion that Fraser pulled Garza in on his small nefarious entities oppose to being the other way around.

The official story is that Garza installed computers or some shit like for Fraser and that's how they got acquainted. I don't think they're related. Fraser seems to be a bit slow and Garza is a sociopath, perfect combination.