Bitcoin Forum
February 23, 2019, 12:37:24 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.17.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 2317 2318 2319 2320 2321 2322 2323 2324 2325 2326 2327 2328 2329 2330 2331 2332 2333 2334 2335 2336 2337 2338 2339 2340 2341 2342 2343 2344 2345 2346 2347 2348 2349 2350 2351 2352 2353 2354 2355 2356 2357 2358 2359 2360 2361 2362 2363 2364 2365 2366 [2367] 2368 2369 2370 2371 2372 2373 2374 2375 2376 2377 2378 2379 2380 2381 2382 2383 2384 2385 2386 2387 2388 2389 2390 2391 2392 2393 2394 2395 2396 2397 2398 2399 2400 2401 2402 2403 2404 2405 2406 2407 2408 2409 2410 2411 2412 2413 2414 2415 2416 2417 ... 2459 »
  Print  
Author Topic: GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :)  (Read 3209434 times)
bitpop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2436
Merit: 1045


https://keybase.io/bitpop


View Profile WWW
January 12, 2017, 06:48:45 AM
 #47321

Oh wow Homero is a moron

Reputation  |  PGP  |  DigitalOcean  |  TorGuard  |  Ethereum Classic
Bitcoin: 3DSh6AnmvBpDJFUz2mnLirMLmTMcFs9nDm
Bitmessage: BM-2cXN9j8NFT2n1FxDVQ6HQq4D4MZuuaBFyb
Your Bitcoin transactions
The Ultimate Bitcoin mixer
made truly anonymous.
with an advanced technology.
Mix coins
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1550925444
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1550925444

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1550925444
Reply with quote  #2

1550925444
Report to moderator
1550925444
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1550925444

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1550925444
Reply with quote  #2

1550925444
Report to moderator
WayForward
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 254
Merit: 100


https://saturn.black


View Profile
January 12, 2017, 06:59:53 AM
 #47322

Oh wow Homero is a moron

You have no idea..this could go on for days, weeks.. there as this one time he rented out a house, almost burnt it to the ground and decided to rewire it, steal a ladder and ruin the pool...




SATURN
Liquidity providerfor crypto markets Cross-chain Exchange & OTC trading Platform
────────  Facebook Twitter ♦  Telegram ♦  Blog ♦  Bitcointalk   ────────
cryptodevil
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1638
Merit: 1095


Thread-puller extraordinaire


View Profile
January 12, 2017, 08:42:25 AM
 #47323

What kind of Retard takes a selfie with a photo copier

Naaah, that's not what it was. I told you before, this was obviously his "On top" face he wanted to send to, well, his missus and/or anyone else he was sexting at the time.

*shivers*

WARNING!!! Check your forum URLs carefully and avoid links to phishing sites like 'thebitcointalk' 'bitcointalk.to' and 'BitcointaLLk'
owlcatz
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1736
Merit: 1158


BTC, XMR & VIA FTW


View Profile WWW
January 12, 2017, 01:38:47 PM
 #47324

Couldnt find the cartoon coining one that ALWAYS makes me laugh. But a brief snapshopt of someone who is that retarded to take a selfie with a photo copier.

maildir
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 916
Merit: 1058


View Profile
January 12, 2017, 02:08:21 PM
 #47325

Bump for suchmoon if your access to the court docs are still valid. Their last chance to close the deal against Uncle Stu.  Cheesy


Quote
Monday, January 09, 2017
63       respm Memorandum in Opposition to Motion  Mon 8:05 PM

Memorandum in Opposition re61 MOTION to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint filed by Denis Marc Audet, Michael Pfeiffer, Dean Allen Shinners, Jason Vargas. (Kindall, Mark)

 
 
truckinusa
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 534
Merit: 500



View Profile
January 12, 2017, 04:18:50 PM
 #47326

Bump for suchmoon if your access to the court docs are still valid. Their last chance to close the deal against Uncle Stu.  Cheesy


Quote
Monday, January 09, 2017
63       respm Memorandum in Opposition to Motion  Mon 8:05 PM

Memorandum in Opposition re61 MOTION to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint filed by Denis Marc Audet, Michael Pfeiffer, Dean Allen Shinners, Jason Vargas. (Kindall, Mark)

 
 
What does all that mean anyways?  Is it going to be thrown out?

bitJob                       ▄▄▄██████▄▄▄
                ▄▄▄▄██████████████████▄▄▄▄
        ▄▄▄▄██████████████████████████████████▄▄▄▄
  ▄▄▄████████████████████████████████████████████████▄▄▄
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
  ▀▀██████████████████████████████████████████████████▀▀
      ▀▀█████████████████████████████████████████████
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ▀██████████████████████████████████████▀  ██
          ▀▀██████████████████████████████████▀▀  ████
                                                 ▄████▄
                                                ▀▀████▀▀
IIII
maildir
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 916
Merit: 1058


View Profile
January 12, 2017, 08:31:51 PM
 #47327

It is the plaintiff's last chance explanation/reason why it should not be dismissed.  It better be good otherwise game over.
RoomBot
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1091



View Profile
January 12, 2017, 09:34:20 PM
 #47328

GOTTA bump this one!  Too funny because it's all true.  Well done!



The really embarrassing thing about the dildo pics-with-stripey-socks is that they're not the least bit sexy.

Shout-out for the plastic surgery fail review too.  "He practice is incredibly unprofessional!"   Grin

Garza has NEVER apologized for any fallout on his family.

He probably never will.

truckinusa
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 534
Merit: 500



View Profile
January 12, 2017, 10:06:14 PM
 #47329

It is the plaintiff's last chance explanation/reason why it should not be dismissed.  It better be good otherwise game over.

When is that deadline for the plaintiff's to explain?  I am reading this motion from the 7th of January and didn't quite understand what that was.

bitJob                       ▄▄▄██████▄▄▄
                ▄▄▄▄██████████████████▄▄▄▄
        ▄▄▄▄██████████████████████████████████▄▄▄▄
  ▄▄▄████████████████████████████████████████████████▄▄▄
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
  ▀▀██████████████████████████████████████████████████▀▀
      ▀▀█████████████████████████████████████████████
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ▀██████████████████████████████████████▀  ██
          ▀▀██████████████████████████████████▀▀  ████
                                                 ▄████▄
                                                ▀▀████▀▀
IIII
maildir
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 916
Merit: 1058


View Profile
January 13, 2017, 12:06:10 AM
 #47330

It is the plaintiff's last chance explanation/reason why it should not be dismissed.  It better be good otherwise game over.

When is that deadline for the plaintiff's to explain?  I am reading this motion from the 7th of January and didn't quite understand what that was.

That is the explanation. We are waiting for suchmoon to retrieve it so we can all read it. It was due on the 27th December but for some reason only showed up now for public viewing.
suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862
Merit: 2639


takav mrak


View Profile
January 13, 2017, 12:13:57 AM
Last edit: January 13, 2017, 12:26:56 AM by suchmoon
 #47331

It is the plaintiff's last chance explanation/reason why it should not be dismissed.  It better be good otherwise game over.

When is that deadline for the plaintiff's to explain?  I am reading this motion from the 7th of January and didn't quite understand what that was.

That is the explanation. We are waiting for suchmoon to retrieve it so we can all read it. It was due on the 27th December but for some reason only showed up now for public viewing.

Here is the doc #63:

https://www.docdroid.net/CZ8B9MQ/govuscourtsctd112576630.pdf.html

And here are all others:

http://ia601907.us.archive.org/18/items/gov.uscourts.ctd.112576/gov.uscourts.ctd.112576.docket.html

Edit: keep in mind that at this point it only has to be good enough for the judge to not dismiss the case outright. "Reasonable expectation" and all that. Further dirt can be dug up during discovery, which is one of the reasons Fraser doesn't want this to go that far. Anyway, I'm on page 6 and so far it sounds quite "reasonable", IANAL of course.

RoomBot
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1091



View Profile
January 13, 2017, 12:27:14 AM
 #47332

It is the plaintiff's last chance explanation/reason why it should not be dismissed.  It better be good otherwise game over.

When is that deadline for the plaintiff's to explain?  I am reading this motion from the 7th of January and didn't quite understand what that was.

That is the explanation. We are waiting for suchmoon to retrieve it so we can all read it. It was due on the 27th December but for some reason only showed up now for public viewing.

Here is the doc #63:

https://www.docdroid.net/CZ8B9MQ/govuscourtsctd112576630.pdf.html



OUTSTANDING, thanks @suchmoon

This Plaintiff plea to "survive" the Motion to Dismiss is so full of circular arguments it practically flushes itself down the loo!!!
maildir
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 916
Merit: 1058


View Profile
January 13, 2017, 01:20:29 AM
 #47333

Excellent!

That is a great point. Just needs to sway the judge. Very tricky having read it, while impressive it is an argument with backup vs. the defendant's statements of fact. Tough call. Kind of like black and white versus grey. Up to the judge if he's he stickler for facts or open to even discussing them. I imagine of the guy is lazy he would let this continue, if he's got an issue of any kind with the plaintiff's he'd see it dismissed.  Seems such a fine line. Defendant can simply say not a single piece of paper formal or otherwise, business registration, other confirms he was a equal partner, while these guys are trying to show a pattern of it being so.

Don't know.  Shocked Not even sure what the next step is? Judge's decision time I think. Don't recall there being an indication of another tit  Cool tit for tat for tit.  Cheesy

Nail biter for both sides now for sure. Will scope out Homero's activities to try and get a read on how he is taking it. Probably no new pictures to put up if he is glum.  Cry
truckinusa
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 534
Merit: 500



View Profile
January 13, 2017, 01:23:26 AM
 #47334

I think bank records from either side would show who benefitted from the ill gotten gains.  Maybe Fraser was smarter than that?  

When will the judge decide or is that up in the air?

bitJob                       ▄▄▄██████▄▄▄
                ▄▄▄▄██████████████████▄▄▄▄
        ▄▄▄▄██████████████████████████████████▄▄▄▄
  ▄▄▄████████████████████████████████████████████████▄▄▄
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
  ▀▀██████████████████████████████████████████████████▀▀
      ▀▀█████████████████████████████████████████████
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ▀██████████████████████████████████████▀  ██
          ▀▀██████████████████████████████████▀▀  ████
                                                 ▄████▄
                                                ▀▀████▀▀
IIII
RoomBot
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1091



View Profile
January 13, 2017, 01:48:46 AM
Last edit: July 26, 2017, 05:43:56 AM by RoomBot
 #47335

While the Plaintiffs so shamelessly threw in the Judge's face the low bar for proceeding at the "Plea" level, I would still love to see the Judge throw the whole thing out on blatant witness tampering and other legal shenanigans....and / or turn them both over to the SEC & other ABCs to "SORT 'EM OUT!"

#GitErDone

(Please do not underestimate RoomBot's apparent cultural anachronisms.

Software was created in USA.

It could happen!)
suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862
Merit: 2639


takav mrak


View Profile
January 13, 2017, 02:17:11 AM
 #47336

I think bank records from either side would show who benefitted from the ill gotten gains.  Maybe Fraser was smarter than that?  

When will the judge decide or is that up in the air?

It's probably not that simple. Even if he didn't benefit directly he could still be found to have caused damages.

Another thing to keep in mind is that this is a civil lawsuit. So not "beyond reasonable doubt" but "more probable than not".

RoomBot
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1091



View Profile
January 13, 2017, 04:28:42 AM
 #47337

I think bank records from either side would show who benefitted from the ill gotten gains.  Maybe Fraser was smarter than that?  

When will the judge decide or is that up in the air?

It's probably not that simple. Even if he didn't benefit directly he could still be found to have caused damages.

Another thing to keep in mind is that this is a civil lawsuit. So not "beyond reasonable doubt" but "more probable than not".


Every allegation against Fraser directly implicates Garza, and vice versa.

There is no separating the two.

It's all or nothing, IMO.

Judge could easily throw it out -- or delay 5.000 years until after SEC makes its move.

Stay tuned.
Phildo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000



View Profile
January 13, 2017, 05:28:04 AM
 #47338

is there a way to pin down fraser without testimony from garza in court? Not just discussions with the gawsuit lawyers in court. How can Garza testify with the SEC hanging over his head? How does anyone think this is a good plan.
RoomBot
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1091



View Profile
January 13, 2017, 01:42:47 PM
 #47339


Good question.

Garza has ZERO credibility anyway.
suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862
Merit: 2639


takav mrak


View Profile
January 13, 2017, 03:27:20 PM
 #47340

is there a way to pin down fraser without testimony from garza in court? Not just discussions with the gawsuit lawyers in court. How can Garza testify with the SEC hanging over his head? How does anyone think this is a good plan.

He's the "star witness" so I don't see how this could go forward without his deposition and/or in-court testimony. Maybe Garza is hoping that throwing Fraser under the bus will drag him (Fraser) into the SEC case somehow. Whatever the reason behind this plan I'd like to think that plaintiffs' lawyers know what they're doing. They wouldn't be wasting their resources if this didn't have a reasonable chance of success.

Pages: « 1 ... 2317 2318 2319 2320 2321 2322 2323 2324 2325 2326 2327 2328 2329 2330 2331 2332 2333 2334 2335 2336 2337 2338 2339 2340 2341 2342 2343 2344 2345 2346 2347 2348 2349 2350 2351 2352 2353 2354 2355 2356 2357 2358 2359 2360 2361 2362 2363 2364 2365 2366 [2367] 2368 2369 2370 2371 2372 2373 2374 2375 2376 2377 2378 2379 2380 2381 2382 2383 2384 2385 2386 2387 2388 2389 2390 2391 2392 2393 2394 2395 2396 2397 2398 2399 2400 2401 2402 2403 2404 2405 2406 2407 2408 2409 2410 2411 2412 2413 2414 2415 2416 2417 ... 2459 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Bitcointalk.org is not available or authorized for sale. Do not believe any fake listings.
Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!