Bitcoin Forum
March 04, 2024, 04:31:29 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 2293 2294 2295 2296 2297 2298 2299 2300 2301 2302 2303 2304 2305 2306 2307 2308 2309 2310 2311 2312 2313 2314 2315 2316 2317 2318 2319 2320 2321 2322 2323 2324 2325 2326 2327 2328 2329 2330 2331 2332 2333 2334 2335 2336 2337 2338 2339 2340 2341 2342 [2343] 2344 2345 2346 2347 2348 2349 2350 2351 2352 2353 2354 2355 2356 2357 2358 2359 2360 2361 2362 2363 2364 2365 2366 2367 2368 2369 2370 2371 2372 2373 2374 2375 2376 2377 2378 2379 2380 2381 2382 2383 2384 2385 2386 2387 2388 2389 2390 2391 2392 2393 ... 2458 »
  Print  
Author Topic: GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :)  (Read 3376607 times)
RoomBot
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2240
Merit: 1120



View Profile
January 11, 2017, 11:52:59 PM
 #46841


We'll never forget the time Josh Garza thought a "Selfie" was made with a photocopier.



1709526689
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1709526689

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1709526689
Reply with quote  #2

1709526689
Report to moderator
Each block is stacked on top of the previous one. Adding another block to the top makes all lower blocks more difficult to remove: there is more "weight" above each block. A transaction in a block 6 blocks deep (6 confirmations) will be very difficult to remove.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1709526689
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1709526689

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1709526689
Reply with quote  #2

1709526689
Report to moderator
WayForward
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 255
Merit: 100



View Profile
January 12, 2017, 06:46:56 AM
 #46842

What kind of Retard takes a selfie with a photo copier

Hmmm Going to have to think about that one in picture form.
























Couldnt find the cartoon coining one that ALWAYS makes me laugh. But a brief snapshopt of someone who is that retarded to take a selfie with a photo copier.

WayForward
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 255
Merit: 100



View Profile
January 12, 2017, 06:59:53 AM
 #46843

Oh wow Homero is a moron

You have no idea..this could go on for days, weeks.. there as this one time he rented out a house, almost burnt it to the ground and decided to rewire it, steal a ladder and ruin the pool...



cryptodevil
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1236


Thread-puller extraordinaire


View Profile
January 12, 2017, 08:42:25 AM
 #46844

What kind of Retard takes a selfie with a photo copier

Naaah, that's not what it was. I told you before, this was obviously his "On top" face he wanted to send to, well, his missus and/or anyone else he was sexting at the time.

*shivers*

WARNING!!! Check your forum URLs carefully and avoid links to phishing sites like 'thebitcointalk' 'bitcointalk.to' and 'BitcointaLLk'
owlcatz
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3570
Merit: 1959


icarus-cards.eu


View Profile WWW
January 12, 2017, 01:38:47 PM
 #46845

Couldnt find the cartoon coining one that ALWAYS makes me laugh. But a brief snapshopt of someone who is that retarded to take a selfie with a photo copier.

maildir
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1060


View Profile
January 12, 2017, 02:08:21 PM
 #46846

Bump for suchmoon if your access to the court docs are still valid. Their last chance to close the deal against Uncle Stu.  Cheesy


Quote
Monday, January 09, 2017
63       respm Memorandum in Opposition to Motion  Mon 8:05 PM

Memorandum in Opposition re61 MOTION to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint filed by Denis Marc Audet, Michael Pfeiffer, Dean Allen Shinners, Jason Vargas. (Kindall, Mark)

 
 
truckinusa
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 534
Merit: 500



View Profile
January 12, 2017, 04:18:50 PM
 #46847

Bump for suchmoon if your access to the court docs are still valid. Their last chance to close the deal against Uncle Stu.  Cheesy


Quote
Monday, January 09, 2017
63       respm Memorandum in Opposition to Motion  Mon 8:05 PM

Memorandum in Opposition re61 MOTION to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint filed by Denis Marc Audet, Michael Pfeiffer, Dean Allen Shinners, Jason Vargas. (Kindall, Mark)

 
 
What does all that mean anyways?  Is it going to be thrown out?

bitJob                       ▄▄▄██████▄▄▄
                ▄▄▄▄██████████████████▄▄▄▄
        ▄▄▄▄██████████████████████████████████▄▄▄▄
  ▄▄▄████████████████████████████████████████████████▄▄▄
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
  ▀▀██████████████████████████████████████████████████▀▀
      ▀▀█████████████████████████████████████████████
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ▀██████████████████████████████████████▀  ██
          ▀▀██████████████████████████████████▀▀  ████
                                                 ▄████▄
                                                ▀▀████▀▀
IIII
maildir
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1060


View Profile
January 12, 2017, 08:31:51 PM
 #46848

It is the plaintiff's last chance explanation/reason why it should not be dismissed.  It better be good otherwise game over.
RoomBot
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2240
Merit: 1120



View Profile
January 12, 2017, 09:34:20 PM
 #46849

GOTTA bump this one!  Too funny because it's all true.  Well done!



The really embarrassing thing about the dildo pics-with-stripey-socks is that they're not the least bit sexy.

Shout-out for the plastic surgery fail review too.  "He practice is incredibly unprofessional!"   Grin

Garza has NEVER apologized for any fallout on his family.

He probably never will.

truckinusa
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 534
Merit: 500



View Profile
January 12, 2017, 10:06:14 PM
 #46850

It is the plaintiff's last chance explanation/reason why it should not be dismissed.  It better be good otherwise game over.

When is that deadline for the plaintiff's to explain?  I am reading this motion from the 7th of January and didn't quite understand what that was.

bitJob                       ▄▄▄██████▄▄▄
                ▄▄▄▄██████████████████▄▄▄▄
        ▄▄▄▄██████████████████████████████████▄▄▄▄
  ▄▄▄████████████████████████████████████████████████▄▄▄
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
  ▀▀██████████████████████████████████████████████████▀▀
      ▀▀█████████████████████████████████████████████
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ▀██████████████████████████████████████▀  ██
          ▀▀██████████████████████████████████▀▀  ████
                                                 ▄████▄
                                                ▀▀████▀▀
IIII
maildir
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1060


View Profile
January 13, 2017, 12:06:10 AM
 #46851

It is the plaintiff's last chance explanation/reason why it should not be dismissed.  It better be good otherwise game over.

When is that deadline for the plaintiff's to explain?  I am reading this motion from the 7th of January and didn't quite understand what that was.

That is the explanation. We are waiting for suchmoon to retrieve it so we can all read it. It was due on the 27th December but for some reason only showed up now for public viewing.
suchmoon (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3612
Merit: 8904


https://bpip.org


View Profile WWW
January 13, 2017, 12:13:57 AM
Last edit: January 13, 2017, 12:26:56 AM by suchmoon
 #46852

It is the plaintiff's last chance explanation/reason why it should not be dismissed.  It better be good otherwise game over.

When is that deadline for the plaintiff's to explain?  I am reading this motion from the 7th of January and didn't quite understand what that was.

That is the explanation. We are waiting for suchmoon to retrieve it so we can all read it. It was due on the 27th December but for some reason only showed up now for public viewing.

Here is the doc #63:

https://www.docdroid.net/CZ8B9MQ/govuscourtsctd112576630.pdf.html

And here are all others:

http://ia601907.us.archive.org/18/items/gov.uscourts.ctd.112576/gov.uscourts.ctd.112576.docket.html

Edit: keep in mind that at this point it only has to be good enough for the judge to not dismiss the case outright. "Reasonable expectation" and all that. Further dirt can be dug up during discovery, which is one of the reasons Fraser doesn't want this to go that far. Anyway, I'm on page 6 and so far it sounds quite "reasonable", IANAL of course.
RoomBot
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2240
Merit: 1120



View Profile
January 13, 2017, 12:27:14 AM
 #46853

It is the plaintiff's last chance explanation/reason why it should not be dismissed.  It better be good otherwise game over.

When is that deadline for the plaintiff's to explain?  I am reading this motion from the 7th of January and didn't quite understand what that was.

That is the explanation. We are waiting for suchmoon to retrieve it so we can all read it. It was due on the 27th December but for some reason only showed up now for public viewing.

Here is the doc #63:

https://www.docdroid.net/CZ8B9MQ/govuscourtsctd112576630.pdf.html



OUTSTANDING, thanks @suchmoon

This Plaintiff plea to "survive" the Motion to Dismiss is so full of circular arguments it practically flushes itself down the loo!!!
maildir
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1060


View Profile
January 13, 2017, 01:20:29 AM
 #46854

Excellent!

That is a great point. Just needs to sway the judge. Very tricky having read it, while impressive it is an argument with backup vs. the defendant's statements of fact. Tough call. Kind of like black and white versus grey. Up to the judge if he's he stickler for facts or open to even discussing them. I imagine of the guy is lazy he would let this continue, if he's got an issue of any kind with the plaintiff's he'd see it dismissed.  Seems such a fine line. Defendant can simply say not a single piece of paper formal or otherwise, business registration, other confirms he was a equal partner, while these guys are trying to show a pattern of it being so.

Don't know.  Shocked Not even sure what the next step is? Judge's decision time I think. Don't recall there being an indication of another tit  Cool tit for tat for tit.  Cheesy

Nail biter for both sides now for sure. Will scope out Homero's activities to try and get a read on how he is taking it. Probably no new pictures to put up if he is glum.  Cry
truckinusa
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 534
Merit: 500



View Profile
January 13, 2017, 01:23:26 AM
 #46855

I think bank records from either side would show who benefitted from the ill gotten gains.  Maybe Fraser was smarter than that?  

When will the judge decide or is that up in the air?

bitJob                       ▄▄▄██████▄▄▄
                ▄▄▄▄██████████████████▄▄▄▄
        ▄▄▄▄██████████████████████████████████▄▄▄▄
  ▄▄▄████████████████████████████████████████████████▄▄▄
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
  ▀▀██████████████████████████████████████████████████▀▀
      ▀▀█████████████████████████████████████████████
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ▀██████████████████████████████████████▀  ██
          ▀▀██████████████████████████████████▀▀  ████
                                                 ▄████▄
                                                ▀▀████▀▀
IIII
RoomBot
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2240
Merit: 1120



View Profile
January 13, 2017, 01:48:46 AM
Last edit: July 26, 2017, 05:43:56 AM by RoomBot
 #46856

While the Plaintiffs so shamelessly threw in the Judge's face the low bar for proceeding at the "Plea" level, I would still love to see the Judge throw the whole thing out on blatant witness tampering and other legal shenanigans....and / or turn them both over to the SEC & other ABCs to "SORT 'EM OUT!"

#GitErDone

(Please do not underestimate RoomBot's apparent cultural anachronisms.

Software was created in USA.

It could happen!)
suchmoon (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3612
Merit: 8904


https://bpip.org


View Profile WWW
January 13, 2017, 02:17:11 AM
 #46857

I think bank records from either side would show who benefitted from the ill gotten gains.  Maybe Fraser was smarter than that?  

When will the judge decide or is that up in the air?

It's probably not that simple. Even if he didn't benefit directly he could still be found to have caused damages.

Another thing to keep in mind is that this is a civil lawsuit. So not "beyond reasonable doubt" but "more probable than not".
RoomBot
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2240
Merit: 1120



View Profile
January 13, 2017, 04:28:42 AM
 #46858

I think bank records from either side would show who benefitted from the ill gotten gains.  Maybe Fraser was smarter than that?  

When will the judge decide or is that up in the air?

It's probably not that simple. Even if he didn't benefit directly he could still be found to have caused damages.

Another thing to keep in mind is that this is a civil lawsuit. So not "beyond reasonable doubt" but "more probable than not".


Every allegation against Fraser directly implicates Garza, and vice versa.

There is no separating the two.

It's all or nothing, IMO.

Judge could easily throw it out -- or delay 5.000 years until after SEC makes its move.

Stay tuned.
Phildo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000



View Profile
January 13, 2017, 05:28:04 AM
 #46859

is there a way to pin down fraser without testimony from garza in court? Not just discussions with the gawsuit lawyers in court. How can Garza testify with the SEC hanging over his head? How does anyone think this is a good plan.
RoomBot
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2240
Merit: 1120



View Profile
January 13, 2017, 01:42:47 PM
 #46860


Good question.

Garza has ZERO credibility anyway.
Pages: « 1 ... 2293 2294 2295 2296 2297 2298 2299 2300 2301 2302 2303 2304 2305 2306 2307 2308 2309 2310 2311 2312 2313 2314 2315 2316 2317 2318 2319 2320 2321 2322 2323 2324 2325 2326 2327 2328 2329 2330 2331 2332 2333 2334 2335 2336 2337 2338 2339 2340 2341 2342 [2343] 2344 2345 2346 2347 2348 2349 2350 2351 2352 2353 2354 2355 2356 2357 2358 2359 2360 2361 2362 2363 2364 2365 2366 2367 2368 2369 2370 2371 2372 2373 2374 2375 2376 2377 2378 2379 2380 2381 2382 2383 2384 2385 2386 2387 2388 2389 2390 2391 2392 2393 ... 2458 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!