BitBay OFFICIAL BITBAY Thread Smart Contracts Decentralized Markets Rolling Peg

[dzimbeck]

8th most volume on trex again.

Only top 10 MC coins above it.

Polo are crazy not listing this coin on there you can say the volume would be 10x that daily and that's before bay gets recognised as a top 10 coin itself. I think top 2-3 but then of course perhaps I am biased. But no way should it be outside of the top 10.

I completely agree. We have all filled in their 'add a coin' form multiple times but to no avail . . .

Do you know if he hangs out on any slacks or private chats? Maybe I can reach out to him personally.

[1715093741]

1715093741

[1715093741]

1715093741

[stereotype]

8th most volume on trex again.

Only top 10 MC coins above it.

Polo are crazy not listing this coin on there you can say the volume would be 10x that daily and that's before bay gets recognised as a top 10 coin itself. I think top 2-3 but then of course perhaps I am biased. But no way should it be outside of the top 10.

I completely agree. We have all filled in their 'add a coin' form multiple times but to no avail . . .

Do you know if he hangs out on any slacks or private chats? Maybe I can reach out to him personally.

Tristian is a dark horse. Ive even reached out and tried to get him on chat channels. Alas.
He does check-in to BCT now and again, so you might be lucky.....
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=139578

[Johnny00]

8th most volume on trex again.

Only top 10 MC coins above it.

Polo are crazy not listing this coin on there you can say the volume would be 10x that daily and that's before bay gets recognised as a top 10 coin itself. I think top 2-3 but then of course perhaps I am biased. But no way should it be outside of the top 10.

I completely agree. We have all filled in their 'add a coin' form multiple times but to no avail . . .

Can someone post the details again for those that didn't do it

[Munti]

8th most volume on trex again.

Only top 10 MC coins above it.

Polo are crazy not listing this coin on there you can say the volume would be 10x that daily and that's before bay gets recognised as a top 10 coin itself. I think top 2-3 but then of course perhaps I am biased. But no way should it be outside of the top 10.

I completely agree. We have all filled in their 'add a coin' form multiple times but to no avail . . .

Can someone post the details again for those that didn't do it

Just use the form

https://poloniex.com/coinRequest

[dzimbeck]

8th most volume on trex again.

Only top 10 MC coins above it.

Polo are crazy not listing this coin on there you can say the volume would be 10x that daily and that's before bay gets recognised as a top 10 coin itself. I think top 2-3 but then of course perhaps I am biased. But no way should it be outside of the top 10.

I completely agree. We have all filled in their 'add a coin' form multiple times but to no avail . . .

Do you know if he hangs out on any slacks or private chats? Maybe I can reach out to him personally.

Tristian is a dark horse. Ive even reached out and tried to get him on chat channels. Alas.
He does check-in to BCT now and again, so you might be lucky.....
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=139578

Hmm last comment in 2015 though

[cryptohunter]

bringing it up often in troll box could get some attention.... of course some bans too

someone here will have his skype just have to find out who.

[jjacob]

Post the rejection of ETF, bay seems to have jumped up in price.
I presume those who had sold bay to buy bitcoins are coming back. 

[dzimbeck]

Post the rejection of ETF, bay seems to have jumped up in price.
I presume those who had sold bay to buy bitcoins are coming back.  

Seems that way... crypto is bullish. Who needs their crazy regulation and bureaucracy. That is for the dinosaurs, the old way of doing thing. Takes them years to make a boring decision.

And their premises were a tad hypocritical the entire PDF was a rant. Varying opinions of the subject were balanced. And still they complain of overseas exchanges but forget that many corporations they support are not registered in the states. Also they are questionably subject to more manipulation because nothing they do is transparent and favors sharks. Many companies hold more than 51% premium stock. Then of course they claim to want to protect consumers but forget about Enron, Bernie Madoff and Facebooks obviously manipulated nonsense IPO.

Who needs them? And I've also heard that it would be too much trading of paper as opposed to moving a real commodity so it can harm the price temporarily. The thing I thought was bullish was the arbitrage (which the SEC complained about ironically) and the injection of billions of dollars to the market of fresh money.

But perhaps those investors will get frustrated with the old way of doing things and simply buy BTC directly. Or better yet, ALTCOINS!

To be honest I was almost certain they would accept it due to political positioning. But perhaps that was an oversight as the powers that be might have other plans bank related or delayed timing.

[cr197]

Interesting read!
Would be great for crypto

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/03/170309120521.htm

[cr197]

Just to try to put it in perspective

Roughly 5 million atoms could fit on a sharpened pencil head.

5,000,000 bits = 5 terabytes

that means about 1000 movies on a pencil head

[dzimbeck]

Just to try to put it in perspective

Roughly 5 million atoms could fit on a sharpened pencil head.

5,000,000 bits = 5 terabytes

that means about 1000 movies on a pencil head

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GY9lfO-tVfE

Its not proof of atoms, simply proof that deflected energy can be used to compose an image. Thus very high powered magnification is possible.

If they are able to manipulate the charge of the surface area, they can thus make a hard drive. However that doesn't mean we will see this type of miniaturization anytime soon. Mostly because it was just an experiment to see if they could change the charge of an extremely small area of a surface.

Interesting though. Regardless its nice to see new technology getting to the public.

[Karartma1]

Post the rejection of ETF, bay seems to have jumped up in price.
I presume those who had sold bay to buy bitcoins are coming back.  

Seems that way... crypto is bullish. Who needs their crazy regulation and bureaucracy. That is for the dinosaurs, the old way of doing thing. Takes them years to make a boring decision.

And their premises were a tad hypocritical the entire PDF was a rant. Varying opinions of the subject were balanced. And still they complain of overseas exchanges but forget that many corporations they support are not registered in the states. Also they are questionably subject to more manipulation because nothing they do is transparent and favors sharks. Many companies hold more than 51% premium stock. Then of course they claim to want to protect consumers but forget about Enron, Bernie Madoff and Facebooks obviously manipulated nonsense IPO.

Who needs them? And I've also heard that it would be too much trading of paper as opposed to moving a real commodity so it can harm the price temporarily. The thing I thought was bullish was the arbitrage (which the SEC complained about ironically) and the injection of billions of dollars to the market of fresh money.

But perhaps those investors will get frustrated with the old way of doing things and simply buy BTC directly. Or better yet, ALTCOINS!

To be honest I was almost certain they would accept it due to political positioning. But perhaps that was an oversight as the powers that be might have other plans bank related or delayed timing.

Pretty much the best answer to give to anybody who is whining for missed ETF approval. I totally agree. F+++ that we don't need no corporate/gov etf crap. We are already able to build our own decentralized markets to trade our own wealth.

[R-J-F]

Post the rejection of ETF, bay seems to have jumped up in price.
I presume those who had sold bay to buy bitcoins are coming back.  

Seems that way... crypto is bullish. Who needs their crazy regulation and bureaucracy. That is for the dinosaurs, the old way of doing thing. Takes them years to make a boring decision.

And their premises were a tad hypocritical the entire PDF was a rant. Varying opinions of the subject were balanced. And still they complain of overseas exchanges but forget that many corporations they support are not registered in the states. Also they are questionably subject to more manipulation because nothing they do is transparent and favors sharks. Many companies hold more than 51% premium stock. Then of course they claim to want to protect consumers but forget about Enron, Bernie Madoff and Facebooks obviously manipulated nonsense IPO.

Who needs them? And I've also heard that it would be too much trading of paper as opposed to moving a real commodity so it can harm the price temporarily. The thing I thought was bullish was the arbitrage (which the SEC complained about ironically) and the injection of billions of dollars to the market of fresh money.

But perhaps those investors will get frustrated with the old way of doing things and simply buy BTC directly. Or better yet, ALTCOINS!

To be honest I was almost certain they would accept it due to political positioning. But perhaps that was an oversight as the powers that be might have other plans bank related or delayed timing.

Pretty much the best answer to give to anybody who is whining for missed ETF approval. I totally agree. F+++ that we don't need no corporate/gov etf crap. We are already able to build our own decentralized markets to trade our own wealth.

It's kinda like trying to power a 1957 Chevy with a Lithium battery, ain't going to happen. We need new financial vehicles if we are to continue to offer them at all. Modern crypto currency does not need funds and trusts, it's all built in really. Why subject high tech money to low tech methods of investing? I see all this ETF grief as wasted time and energy that could go into other projects. The winklevosses want to get richer? let them buy up a 10 million Bay and hold it for 6 months. Let's move on shall we?

[gjsteele71]

BitBay Release 1.26 Feature Focus – Client Staking

Though Client Staking does not have to do with security or privacy like most of the other updates in v1.26, I personally appreciate the convenience Client Staking offers BitBay users.

If you are familiar with BitBay, you know it is a Proof of Stake 3.0 (PoS 3.0) digital currency, and you can earn BAY simply by leaving your Wallet open for staking with your coins in it. The Smart Client Marketplace is a separate piece of software, and if you wanted to monitor the market while staking, both the Wallet and Client had to be installed and open at the same time.

With this update you no longer need to have both the Wallet and Client running together. The marketplace has PoS 3.0 integrated, and whether you are using the Client to create contracts or browse for your next purchase, your BAY coins are working for you in the background and earning interest. All you have to do is unlock your wallet for staking.

This might lead you to ask the question, “Why do I need the wallet then?” The obvious answer is, you don’t. The only thing it was still required for was staking. The BitBay Wallet will still continue to work as it does today, but won’t be a major part of BitBay’s future. I would recommend transferring your BAY from your wallet to the more secure client when you get a chance.

I do not know of any other cryptocurrency project out there where the staking wallet is built directly into a fully functional decentralized platform. Add this kind of convenience to the unprecedented account security measures being added, and you can see there is a lot of hard work going into BitBay on a continual basis to deliver a finished product people can use and trust.

What enhancements with real-world use have you seen delivered lately from the other digital currencies?

[BitBay Slack - http://bitbay.market/wp-login.php?action=slack-invitation

[BitBay Marketplace Site - http://bitbay.market

[BitBay Bitcointalk Thread - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=890531.0

[cryptohunter]

Post the rejection of ETF, bay seems to have jumped up in price.
I presume those who had sold bay to buy bitcoins are coming back.  

Seems that way... crypto is bullish. Who needs their crazy regulation and bureaucracy. That is for the dinosaurs, the old way of doing thing. Takes them years to make a boring decision.

And their premises were a tad hypocritical the entire PDF was a rant. Varying opinions of the subject were balanced. And still they complain of overseas exchanges but forget that many corporations they support are not registered in the states. Also they are questionably subject to more manipulation because nothing they do is transparent and favors sharks. Many companies hold more than 51% premium stock. Then of course they claim to want to protect consumers but forget about Enron, Bernie Madoff and Facebooks obviously manipulated nonsense IPO.

Who needs them? And I've also heard that it would be too much trading of paper as opposed to moving a real commodity so it can harm the price temporarily. The thing I thought was bullish was the arbitrage (which the SEC complained about ironically) and the injection of billions of dollars to the market of fresh money.

But perhaps those investors will get frustrated with the old way of doing things and simply buy BTC directly. Or better yet, ALTCOINS!

To be honest I was almost certain they would accept it due to political positioning. But perhaps that was an oversight as the powers that be might have other plans bank related or delayed timing.

Pretty much the best answer to give to anybody who is whining for missed ETF approval. I totally agree. F+++ that we don't need no corporate/gov etf crap. We are already able to build our own decentralized markets to trade our own wealth.

It's kinda like trying to power a 1957 Chevy with a Lithium battery, ain't going to happen. We need new financial vehicles if we are to continue to offer them at all. Modern crypto currency does not need funds and trusts, it's all built in really. Why subject high tech money to low tech methods of investing? I see all this ETF grief as wasted time and energy that could go into other projects. The winklevosses want to get richer? let them buy up a 10 million Bay and hold it for 6 months. Let's move on shall we?

We should be reaching out to those types really and any and all other investment advisers. To me bay looks something many would be very interested in when they see the tech working for themselves.

10M these guys could be serious and accumulate 250M at least.

[Karartma1]

We really need to start promoting real-world use of double deposit escrow, smart contracts and so forth. We could come up with a cool idea, develop it on BitBay and tell it to the world out there.
I mean, they want working stuff out there  We shall give it to them 

[cr197]

We really need to start promoting real-world use of double deposit escrow, smart contracts and so forth. We could come up with a cool idea, develop it on BitBay and tell it to the world out there.
I mean, they want working stuff out there   We shall give it to them  

Yeah I think we are getting very close to that stage of development. Heck... just look at your signature advertising ^^^

BitBay will be perfect for creating peer to peer trustless gaming contracts similar to your V-Dice Dapp. And there is no need to dilute your investment capital in "tokens" required to use any sort of Dapp (in general). With BitBay you will be able to use BitBay to transact with the python contract game or app. That way you won't have to 'ethertize' your investment capital through exchange slippage and spread losses, just so you can try out a new Dapp by first buying their tokens.

I'm sure if a creator of a python custom programmed peer to peer contract might want to earn some money for his coding, he could add it into the program as a BitBay service fee - or not.
But the point is these custom python contracts won't create reason to spawn countless, various tokens in the process, keeping a strong focal point for demand in BitBay and nothing else.

[stereotype]

8th most volume on trex again.

Only top 10 MC coins above it.

Polo are crazy not listing this coin on there you can say the volume would be 10x that daily and that's before bay gets recognised as a top 10 coin itself. I think top 2-3 but then of course perhaps I am biased. But no way should it be outside of the top 10.

I completely agree. We have all filled in their 'add a coin' form multiple times but to no avail . . .

Do you know if he hangs out on any slacks or private chats? Maybe I can reach out to him personally.

Tristian is a dark horse. Ive even reached out and tried to get him on chat channels. Alas.
He does check-in to BCT now and again, so you might be lucky.....
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=139578

Hmm last comment in 2015 though

Very low chance he will respond, but i sent an enquiring message and your profile link, nonetheless.

[cryptohunter]

Ha did someone just dump 3.1M bay? and look the price already back to 127. This is a bad move from them unless were dumping to themselves .
Annoyed I just bought before that happened. Never mind they may have some more.

Who would dump before a major release?

[R-J-F]

Ha did someone just dump 3.1M bay? and look the price already back to 127. This is a bad move from them unless were dumping to themselves .
Annoyed I just bought before that happened. Never mind they may have some more.

Who would dump before a major release?

Someone who is only interested in keeping the price down?