Bitcoin Forum
April 27, 2024, 04:01:16 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 [223] 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 ... 389 »
  Print  
Author Topic: BitBay OFFICIAL BITBAY Thread Smart Contracts Decentralized Markets Rolling Peg  (Read 541858 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (2 posts by 1+ user deleted.)
gjsteele71
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 109
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
April 25, 2017, 01:43:46 AM
 #4441


BitBay MAC QT Wallet Required Update


An issue with the MAC QT Wallet has been found and fixed. Please visit the BitBay Market Download page (http://bitbay.market/downloads) for the latest version. This was related to a security patch in the Wine Bottle build. It is recommended not to transfer BAY into or out of your QT Wallet until after you have updated.

This issue did not affect the BitBay Marketplace Client. You will only need to update if you are still using the MAC QT Wallet.

The QT Wallet is essentially obsolete now that the Marketplace Client allows staking. The core team recommends moving your BAY to the Marketplace Client after running the update. Please contact a member of the BitBay core team on Slack (http://bitbay.market/wp-login.php?action=slack-invitation) or here on Bitcointalk if you have any questions.

Micro Cap Crypto Reviews - http://www.MicroCapCrypto.com

Crypto Currency News Reddit - https://www.reddit.com/r/Crypto_Currency_News/
1714190476
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714190476

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714190476
Reply with quote  #2

1714190476
Report to moderator
Bitcoin addresses contain a checksum, so it is very unlikely that mistyping an address will cause you to lose money.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714190476
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714190476

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714190476
Reply with quote  #2

1714190476
Report to moderator
cryptohunter
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167

MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG


View Profile
April 25, 2017, 07:17:03 AM
 #4442

Wouldn't exchanges have to cooperate to a high degree here? The coins in each user's accounts usually just correlate to a percentage of some total supply owned by the exchange. If I transfer 100 coins to an exchange right before a 50% freeze, I'll still be able to trade all 100 of my coins, even though the exchange's wallets will have the funds tied up. The problem will be when I try to withdraw, or rather, when more than 50% of their stored funds are withdrawn. It would benefit those who withdrew earlier, and it seems possible that this could avalanche into a bank-run type scenario. In order to avoid this issue, all exchanges would have to artificially implement the coin's logic within their trade mechanics. Thoughts?

Astute observation! Well, first of all the miners enforce it so if exchanges don't pay attention they can become insolvent. With that said most exchanges are corrupt. So there is a few pages of my whitepaper listing multiple strategies for dealing with them. Ideally they run the API and query balance of frozen and liquid with it. The more data they supply about trades the less of a melting pot it becomes.

A user would have two balances frozen and liquid. We can then handle somewhat inaccurate API calls that mix liquidity or super accurate ones that check the trades. The worst case scenario we allow full withdraw with the one month time lock to move the partially frozen chunks but that is only if we get desperate because then like you said people with their money on the exchange early have the unfair edge. You might tempt them with arbitrage elsewhere but really we want co-operative exchanges. There are a few that will work with us I think. We may end up turning a small exchange into a big one.

The other way is rely on decentralized exchanges which literally move the funds like (hopefully) Blocknet or Komodo assuming either of them get popular.

Perhaps we could create our own centralised exchange with bitbay as the base currency which will be like the most stable vs usd exchange out there.
All fee's after costing taken out for running it used to buy back bay from the market place and provide constant upwards pressure.

also whats up with tether today> seems to be 10% down?

Maybe Bitfinex needs more money to stay afloat?


Yeah i've never seen it drop more than a couple of % then always bounce quickly back... something has damaged it

Munti
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 661
Merit: 504


View Profile
April 25, 2017, 12:48:23 PM
 #4443

Wouldn't exchanges have to cooperate to a high degree here? The coins in each user's accounts usually just correlate to a percentage of some total supply owned by the exchange. If I transfer 100 coins to an exchange right before a 50% freeze, I'll still be able to trade all 100 of my coins, even though the exchange's wallets will have the funds tied up. The problem will be when I try to withdraw, or rather, when more than 50% of their stored funds are withdrawn. It would benefit those who withdrew earlier, and it seems possible that this could avalanche into a bank-run type scenario. In order to avoid this issue, all exchanges would have to artificially implement the coin's logic within their trade mechanics. Thoughts?

Astute observation! Well, first of all the miners enforce it so if exchanges don't pay attention they can become insolvent. With that said most exchanges are corrupt. So there is a few pages of my whitepaper listing multiple strategies for dealing with them. Ideally they run the API and query balance of frozen and liquid with it. The more data they supply about trades the less of a melting pot it becomes.

A user would have two balances frozen and liquid. We can then handle somewhat inaccurate API calls that mix liquidity or super accurate ones that check the trades. The worst case scenario we allow full withdraw with the one month time lock to move the partially frozen chunks but that is only if we get desperate because then like you said people with their money on the exchange early have the unfair edge. You might tempt them with arbitrage elsewhere but really we want co-operative exchanges. There are a few that will work with us I think. We may end up turning a small exchange into a big one.

The other way is rely on decentralized exchanges which literally move the funds like (hopefully) Blocknet or Komodo assuming either of them get popular.

Perhaps we could create our own centralised exchange with bitbay as the base currency which will be like the most stable vs usd exchange out there.
All fee's after costing taken out for running it used to buy back bay from the market place and provide constant upwards pressure.

also whats up with tether today> seems to be 10% down?

Maybe Bitfinex needs more money to stay afloat?


Yeah i've never seen it drop more than a couple of % then always bounce quickly back... something has damaged it

Well, a centralized peg is extremly high risk. They can decide not to honor it whenever they choose.
dzimbeck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2412
Merit: 1044


View Profile
April 25, 2017, 07:28:09 PM
 #4444

Wouldn't exchanges have to cooperate to a high degree here? The coins in each user's accounts usually just correlate to a percentage of some total supply owned by the exchange. If I transfer 100 coins to an exchange right before a 50% freeze, I'll still be able to trade all 100 of my coins, even though the exchange's wallets will have the funds tied up. The problem will be when I try to withdraw, or rather, when more than 50% of their stored funds are withdrawn. It would benefit those who withdrew earlier, and it seems possible that this could avalanche into a bank-run type scenario. In order to avoid this issue, all exchanges would have to artificially implement the coin's logic within their trade mechanics. Thoughts?

Astute observation! Well, first of all the miners enforce it so if exchanges don't pay attention they can become insolvent. With that said most exchanges are corrupt. So there is a few pages of my whitepaper listing multiple strategies for dealing with them. Ideally they run the API and query balance of frozen and liquid with it. The more data they supply about trades the less of a melting pot it becomes.

A user would have two balances frozen and liquid. We can then handle somewhat inaccurate API calls that mix liquidity or super accurate ones that check the trades. The worst case scenario we allow full withdraw with the one month time lock to move the partially frozen chunks but that is only if we get desperate because then like you said people with their money on the exchange early have the unfair edge. You might tempt them with arbitrage elsewhere but really we want co-operative exchanges. There are a few that will work with us I think. We may end up turning a small exchange into a big one.

The other way is rely on decentralized exchanges which literally move the funds like (hopefully) Blocknet or Komodo assuming either of them get popular.

Perhaps we could create our own centralised exchange with bitbay as the base currency which will be like the most stable vs usd exchange out there.
All fee's after costing taken out for running it used to buy back bay from the market place and provide constant upwards pressure.

also whats up with tether today> seems to be 10% down?

Maybe Bitfinex needs more money to stay afloat?


Yeah i've never seen it drop more than a couple of % then always bounce quickly back... something has damaged it

Maybe the Bitfinex vs WellsFargo lawsuit?!
cryptohunter
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167

MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG


View Profile
April 25, 2017, 10:07:21 PM
 #4445

Wouldn't exchanges have to cooperate to a high degree here? The coins in each user's accounts usually just correlate to a percentage of some total supply owned by the exchange. If I transfer 100 coins to an exchange right before a 50% freeze, I'll still be able to trade all 100 of my coins, even though the exchange's wallets will have the funds tied up. The problem will be when I try to withdraw, or rather, when more than 50% of their stored funds are withdrawn. It would benefit those who withdrew earlier, and it seems possible that this could avalanche into a bank-run type scenario. In order to avoid this issue, all exchanges would have to artificially implement the coin's logic within their trade mechanics. Thoughts?

Astute observation! Well, first of all the miners enforce it so if exchanges don't pay attention they can become insolvent. With that said most exchanges are corrupt. So there is a few pages of my whitepaper listing multiple strategies for dealing with them. Ideally they run the API and query balance of frozen and liquid with it. The more data they supply about trades the less of a melting pot it becomes.

A user would have two balances frozen and liquid. We can then handle somewhat inaccurate API calls that mix liquidity or super accurate ones that check the trades. The worst case scenario we allow full withdraw with the one month time lock to move the partially frozen chunks but that is only if we get desperate because then like you said people with their money on the exchange early have the unfair edge. You might tempt them with arbitrage elsewhere but really we want co-operative exchanges. There are a few that will work with us I think. We may end up turning a small exchange into a big one.

The other way is rely on decentralized exchanges which literally move the funds like (hopefully) Blocknet or Komodo assuming either of them get popular.

Perhaps we could create our own centralised exchange with bitbay as the base currency which will be like the most stable vs usd exchange out there.
All fee's after costing taken out for running it used to buy back bay from the market place and provide constant upwards pressure.

also whats up with tether today> seems to be 10% down?

Maybe Bitfinex needs more money to stay afloat?


Yeah i've never seen it drop more than a couple of % then always bounce quickly back... something has damaged it

Maybe the Bitfinex vs WellsFargo lawsuit?!

Seems bays peg is more needed than ever Smiley

cr197
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 304
Merit: 109



View Profile
April 25, 2017, 10:59:49 PM
Last edit: April 25, 2017, 11:33:04 PM by cr197
 #4446

Wouldn't exchanges have to cooperate to a high degree here? The coins in each user's accounts usually just correlate to a percentage of some total supply owned by the exchange. If I transfer 100 coins to an exchange right before a 50% freeze, I'll still be able to trade all 100 of my coins, even though the exchange's wallets will have the funds tied up. The problem will be when I try to withdraw, or rather, when more than 50% of their stored funds are withdrawn. It would benefit those who withdrew earlier, and it seems possible that this could avalanche into a bank-run type scenario. In order to avoid this issue, all exchanges would have to artificially implement the coin's logic within their trade mechanics. Thoughts?

Astute observation! Well, first of all the miners enforce it so if exchanges don't pay attention they can become insolvent. With that said most exchanges are corrupt. So there is a few pages of my whitepaper listing multiple strategies for dealing with them. Ideally they run the API and query balance of frozen and liquid with it. The more data they supply about trades the less of a melting pot it becomes.

A user would have two balances frozen and liquid. We can then handle somewhat inaccurate API calls that mix liquidity or super accurate ones that check the trades. The worst case scenario we allow full withdraw with the one month time lock to move the partially frozen chunks but that is only if we get desperate because then like you said people with their money on the exchange early have the unfair edge. You might tempt them with arbitrage elsewhere but really we want co-operative exchanges. There are a few that will work with us I think. We may end up turning a small exchange into a big one.

The other way is rely on decentralized exchanges which literally move the funds like (hopefully) Blocknet or Komodo assuming either of them get popular.

Perhaps we could create our own centralised exchange with bitbay as the base currency which will be like the most stable vs usd exchange out there.
All fee's after costing taken out for running it used to buy back bay from the market place and provide constant upwards pressure.

also whats up with tether today> seems to be 10% down?

Maybe Bitfinex needs more money to stay afloat?


Yeah i've never seen it drop more than a couple of % then always bounce quickly back... something has damaged it

Maybe the Bitfinex vs WellsFargo lawsuit?!

Seems bays peg is more needed than ever Smiley

Ahh!!! Didn't know about the Wells Fargo lawsuit!
Seems they withdrew, but I wonder what's really going on behind the curtain, for them to waste the time and energy to even file?


http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-exchange-bitfinex-withdraws-lawsuit-wells-fargo/

Either way... point being is that Tether's stability shouldn't teeter on a centralized entity's actions. The whole scenario very well could be the other way around where someone files a lawsuit against Ifinex on a whims notice and causing its demise.
Heck Wells Fargo could possibly have drawn out that case in court for years - hence the withdrawal.


"Dishonour is like a scar on a tree, which time, instead of effacing, only helps to enlarge."
dzimbeck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2412
Merit: 1044


View Profile
April 26, 2017, 02:39:03 AM
 #4447

Is there a total amount on the coins? I cannot seem to find it

1 billion
www.coinmarketcap.com
R-J-F
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 310


AKA RJF - Member since '13


View Profile
April 26, 2017, 09:49:52 PM
 #4448

Is there a total amount on the coins? I cannot seem to find it

1 billion
www.coinmarketcap.com

Any reason for the current price drop?

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." Ben Franklin
dzimbeck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2412
Merit: 1044


View Profile
April 26, 2017, 10:04:44 PM
 #4449

Is there a total amount on the coins? I cannot seem to find it

1 billion
www.coinmarketcap.com

Any reason for the current price drop?


Not really, it's maybe someone trying something foolish.

I was saying I wish we could zoom out and show them the "one year in the future chart"

The core has pretty damn strong hands. So it won't last.

The train just went to pick a few new people up from the station.
cryptohunter
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167

MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG


View Profile
April 26, 2017, 10:42:53 PM
 #4450

Is there a total amount on the coins? I cannot seem to find it

1 billion
www.coinmarketcap.com

Any reason for the current price drop?


Strange time to dump isnt it but never mind perhaps just trying to get some panic sells and accumulating

did bittrex remove the distribution button? if so why?

Munti
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 661
Merit: 504


View Profile
April 26, 2017, 10:54:18 PM
 #4451

Is there a total amount on the coins? I cannot seem to find it

1 billion
www.coinmarketcap.com

Any reason for the current price drop?


Strange time to dump isnt it but never mind perhaps just trying to get some panic sells and accumulating

did bittrex remove the distribution button? if so why?

They did, and we all miss it  Cry I guess the whales didn't like it...
R-J-F
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 310


AKA RJF - Member since '13


View Profile
April 27, 2017, 02:08:14 AM
 #4452

Is there a total amount on the coins? I cannot seem to find it

1 billion
www.coinmarketcap.com

Any reason for the current price drop?


Strange time to dump isnt it but never mind perhaps just trying to get some panic sells and accumulating

did bittrex remove the distribution button? if so why?

They did, and we all miss it  Cry I guess the whales didn't like it...

I think I missed something here. "distribution" button?

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." Ben Franklin
cr197
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 304
Merit: 109



View Profile
April 27, 2017, 02:26:50 AM
 #4453

Is there a total amount on the coins? I cannot seem to find it

1 billion
www.coinmarketcap.com

Any reason for the current price drop?


Strange time to dump isnt it but never mind perhaps just trying to get some panic sells and accumulating

did bittrex remove the distribution button? if so why?

They did, and we all miss it  Cry I guess the whales didn't like it...

I think I missed something here. "distribution" button?


Yeah it use to be where you could click on a distro tab/button that would load up the top 50 accounts being held for a coin. C-cex still does it if you want to see what I'm talking about.
It was a great way to track what accounts were selling and accumulating, and add that along with a blockchain tracker, you had some valuable information in front of you if you spent the time to track it.
Sadly it's gone now.

"Dishonour is like a scar on a tree, which time, instead of effacing, only helps to enlarge."
dzimbeck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2412
Merit: 1044


View Profile
April 27, 2017, 07:03:39 AM
 #4454

Is there a total amount on the coins? I cannot seem to find it

1 billion
www.coinmarketcap.com

Any reason for the current price drop?


Strange time to dump isnt it but never mind perhaps just trying to get some panic sells and accumulating

did bittrex remove the distribution button? if so why?

They did, and we all miss it  Cry I guess the whales didn't like it...

Yeah why remove a feature?! Lol... so much for transparent ledgers.
cryptohunter
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167

MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG


View Profile
April 27, 2017, 08:05:51 AM
 #4455

removing that button could mean we are in for a new wave of big pumps there.

bay has been doing very well i hope we will build on this momentum and keep it going

nice to keep everything active including the thread even come up with some new brain pooled ideas etc.

the development funding is the next big step i think... it can be used for all kinds of things including marketing and bringing influential people in to contact with bitbay too.


zahra4577
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile
April 27, 2017, 09:46:58 AM
 #4456

Bitbay is falling rapidly.Who is dumping it?I hope not devs.Soon it will be 1 sat.Only dev will make profit with 1 billion coin.
I repent buying this trash at 1k Sad

Munti
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 661
Merit: 504


View Profile
April 27, 2017, 10:27:58 AM
 #4457

Bitbay is falling rapidly.Who is dumping it?I hope not devs.Soon it will be 1 sat.Only dev will make profit with 1 billion coin.
I repent buying this trash at 1k Sad

Neither dev nor the team is selling. Haven't you seen a shakeout before? If you are unhappy, just sell. I'm sure MM will be happy.
btvGainer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1000


View Profile WWW
April 27, 2017, 10:30:56 AM
 #4458

I hope price recovers soon though one has to hold really long if one wants to make some good profit.
sneakgeekzog
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
April 27, 2017, 12:18:01 PM
 #4459

I been in since the ico I just cant access my bitcointalk og account.

I been trying to ride the wave. It looks like its one person or group dumping. Everytime the price recovered they would dump. I think it will recover and now is probably a good time to accumulate.
R-J-F
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 310


AKA RJF - Member since '13


View Profile
April 27, 2017, 01:36:48 PM
 #4460

I been in since the ico I just cant access my bitcointalk og account.

I been trying to ride the wave. It looks like its one person or group dumping. Everytime the price recovered they would dump. I think it will recover and now is probably a good time to accumulate.

Since the ICO really? And this is your second post? Interesting. I agree with you though, it will recover and more, just have to be patient.

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." Ben Franklin
Pages: « 1 ... 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 [223] 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 ... 389 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!