Bitcoin Forum
May 02, 2024, 04:48:59 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: You are in the Gambling section. You are likely to eventually lose any money that you gamble/"invest". Additionally, moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Do not gamble more than you can afford to lose.

Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 [92] 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 ... 185 »
  Print  
Author Topic: WeeklyPonzi.com 'v3' | 100% Automated | Secure | 130% Return | 700+ BTC Invested  (Read 115032 times)
rfcdejong
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 16, 2015, 11:33:59 PM
 #1821

Yeah I have been noticing a number of transactions being paid without deposits coming in.

I just received a payout from a deposit that was about 20+ BTC down the line. There are now about 10 other paid orders above me.

Got to hand it to the dev. Im sure that not many of the Multipayed people returned there coins, at least some of this has to be coming from his own pocket.

If i would had been gambling earlier then i would gamble a bit with the double paid coins and after that return the double paid coins. Anyway i didn't join in time.
1714668539
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714668539

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714668539
Reply with quote  #2

1714668539
Report to moderator
1714668539
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714668539

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714668539
Reply with quote  #2

1714668539
Report to moderator
1714668539
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714668539

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714668539
Reply with quote  #2

1714668539
Report to moderator
I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES I HA(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ TABLES I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714668539
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714668539

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714668539
Reply with quote  #2

1714668539
Report to moderator
1714668539
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714668539

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714668539
Reply with quote  #2

1714668539
Report to moderator
1714668539
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714668539

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714668539
Reply with quote  #2

1714668539
Report to moderator
onewiseguy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500



View Profile
January 16, 2015, 11:34:27 PM
 #1822

Woot lets get this babys started!!!
Clambooya
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 16, 2015, 11:36:05 PM
 #1823

I will send 10BTC in first 20 seconds of 24 hour ponzi.

Start is 25 Minutes from now.
dyask
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 510


View Profile
January 16, 2015, 11:36:14 PM
Last edit: January 17, 2015, 10:21:57 AM by dyask
 #1824

can some one write a unbiased review and process of weeklyponzi  I will pay .01 500 word  easy money.  

Not a review but here is my take this week.   (Keep your .01 BTC)

Game scripts mostly seem to work and the payout fee is reasonable.   It is nice that it is automatic.   Week 1 game was a huge success.

This is extremely risky game to play because the OP isn't committed to fixing his errors.   When the week 2 games started, the scripts for the site did not run correctly and there was an overpayment of more than 60 BTC to early players.   This crippled the game because the OP did not correct it.    It created a much longer queue for payments and killed the week 2 deposits.    Furthermore the OP collect more than 12 BTC in fees.   The OP did ask for people overpaid to return the overpayment and at least one person did but the majority of the overpayment has not been accounted for.  

UPDATE:  Owner added 20 BTC of his own money.   Another user returned 6.5 BTC of the overpayment.   This is a good if late start to repairing the damage.   However the site has been shutdown for lack of a working IPN service.  So things don't look that good for the week 2 game.  

UPDATE 2: First 24 game was shutdown by ipn service going down.  The Ponzi owner refunded most of the payments.  The ones not refunded yet were probably held because they were confirmed yet.  (See right below.)   I think it is likely they will be refunded too as the trust is trying to be built.   

There are other problems.   Unconfirmed payments are allowed into the payment queue.   This is a problem because some of these unconfirmed payments did not have transaction fees which makes them very unlikely to confirm.   This problem is compounded as these entries are used to make payments.   Those payments won't confirm until after the inputs confirm.   This is a major risk.  

Finally the OP is starting a new 24 hour game.   This pretty much ensures that the people that should have been paid in the week 2 game won't.   No one is going to put BTC in a stale game when there is a fresh game.   This is nothing but greed on the OP part.  

While the OP (WeeklyPonziv3) hasn't outright stole BTC, he hasn't put in the effort to make his game fair or safe.  

* Script problems have been fix but not rectified.  (UPDATE: Partially rectified)
* The game can payout unconfirmed BTC and it is difficult to know when it will confirm.
* New type of game just killing the old game starting today shows greed is the motivation, not fairness.

Example of a transaction using unconfirmed inputs.    https://blockchain.info/tx/24441d3187743729191c5f845beac8b3d0c33e840cbe4d7c8fc70d9629f80066
(These are hard to find because everything is buried in the 1Week8mnAJwgaW5xJoBZo1UfhE8LYVJYk address.   Each transaction has to be checked.  Click on the Medium priority to see why it is listed that way.   Anyway that person will probably have to wait sometime to get their 1 BTC, if ever.  

Summary
This appears to be a good concept but a poor implementation and a poor commitment to fairness by the owner make it very risky.    I wanted to believe there was a fairly run Ponzi like game, I have been disappointed so far.   However, that owner has not ran off when they could have with a lot of BTC.   I don't think this is a scam it is just still a rough draft of what it needs to be.  
tom14cat14
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 16, 2015, 11:38:54 PM
 #1825

can some one write a unbiased review and process of weeklyponzi  I will pay .01 500 word  easy money. 

Not a review but here is my take this week.   (Keep your .01 BTC)

This is extremely risky game to play because the OP isn't committed to fixing his errors.   When the week 2 games started, the scripts for the site did not run correctly and there was an overpayment of more than 60 BTC to early players.   This crippled the game because the OP did not correct it.    It created a much longer queue for payments and killed the week 2 deposits.    Furthermore the OP collect more than 12 BTC in fees.   The OP did ask for people overpaid to return the overpayment and at least one person did but the majority of the overpayment has not been accounted for.  

There are other problems.   Unconfirmed payments are allowed into the payment queue.   This is a problem because some of these unconfirmed payments did not have transaction fees which makes them very unlikely to confirm.   This problem is compounded as these entries are used to make payments.   Those payments won't confirm until after the inputs confirm.   This is a major risk.  

Finally the OP is starting a new 24 hour game.   This pretty much ensures that the people that should have been paid in the week 2 game won't.   No one is going to put BTC in a stale game when there is a fresh game.   This is nothing but greed on the OP part.  

While the OP (WeeklyPonziv3) hasn't outright stole BTC, he hasn't put in the effort to make his game fair or safe.  

* Script problems have been fix but not rectified.
* The game can payout unconfirmed BTC and it is difficult to know when it will confirm.
* New type of game just killing the old game starting today shows greed is the motivation, not fairness.

Example of a transaction using unconfirmed inputs.    https://blockchain.info/tx/24441d3187743729191c5f845beac8b3d0c33e840cbe4d7c8fc70d9629f80066
(These are hard to find because everything is buried in the 1Week8mnAJwgaW5xJoBZo1UfhE8LYVJYk address.   Each transaction has to be checked.  Click on the Medium priority to see why it is listed that way.   Anyway that person will probably have to wait sometime to get their 1 BTC, if ever.  

Summary
This appears to be a good concept but a poor implementation and a poor commitment to fairness by the owner make it very risky.    I wanted to believe there was a fairly run Ponzi like game, I have been disappointed.    

Not sure if you saw but 30 mins ago the OP sent 20 BTC to help catch up. Pluss the 6.5 that was given back.
onewiseguy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500



View Profile
January 16, 2015, 11:40:52 PM
 #1826

can some one write a unbiased review and process of weeklyponzi  I will pay .01 500 word  easy money. 

Not a review but here is my take this week.   (Keep your .01 BTC)

This is extremely risky game to play because the OP isn't committed to fixing his errors.   When the week 2 games started, the scripts for the site did not run correctly and there was an overpayment of more than 60 BTC to early players.   This crippled the game because the OP did not correct it.    It created a much longer queue for payments and killed the week 2 deposits.    Furthermore the OP collect more than 12 BTC in fees.   The OP did ask for people overpaid to return the overpayment and at least one person did but the majority of the overpayment has not been accounted for.  

There are other problems.   Unconfirmed payments are allowed into the payment queue.   This is a problem because some of these unconfirmed payments did not have transaction fees which makes them very unlikely to confirm.   This problem is compounded as these entries are used to make payments.   Those payments won't confirm until after the inputs confirm.   This is a major risk.  

Finally the OP is starting a new 24 hour game.   This pretty much ensures that the people that should have been paid in the week 2 game won't.   No one is going to put BTC in a stale game when there is a fresh game.   This is nothing but greed on the OP part.  

While the OP (WeeklyPonziv3) hasn't outright stole BTC, he hasn't put in the effort to make his game fair or safe.  

* Script problems have been fix but not rectified.
* The game can payout unconfirmed BTC and it is difficult to know when it will confirm.
* New type of game just killing the old game starting today shows greed is the motivation, not fairness.

Example of a transaction using unconfirmed inputs.    https://blockchain.info/tx/24441d3187743729191c5f845beac8b3d0c33e840cbe4d7c8fc70d9629f80066
(These are hard to find because everything is buried in the 1Week8mnAJwgaW5xJoBZo1UfhE8LYVJYk address.   Each transaction has to be checked.  Click on the Medium priority to see why it is listed that way.   Anyway that person will probably have to wait sometime to get their 1 BTC, if ever.  

Summary
This appears to be a good concept but a poor implementation and a poor commitment to fairness by the owner make it very risky.    I wanted to believe there was a fairly run Ponzi like game, I have been disappointed.    

thanks.



OP if you are reading this do somehitng about the unconfirmed ones folks that do not send with fee do not pay them out .


Like Dyask stated it messes up the whole game.  again if you guys do not send with proper fee you shouldn't get paid because you screw up the game.
dyask
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 510


View Profile
January 16, 2015, 11:47:11 PM
 #1827

did someone really just deposited 20 BTC ?

It's OP, he really did a nice thing. I'm glad all that talk was not for nothing.

It should have been like 56 BTC and it should have been done like 22 hours ago when it would have made a difference.   
bloodyboy
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 199
Merit: 100



View Profile
January 16, 2015, 11:50:21 PM
 #1828

volume seems rising
Ninjaku
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 16, 2015, 11:50:51 PM
 #1829

DAMN IT 24HPONZI DOWN!!! Sad
bloodyboy
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 199
Merit: 100



View Profile
January 16, 2015, 11:51:50 PM
 #1830

Quote
Perfect time for ipn service to go down. Looking at alternatives..

from web
tom14cat14
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 16, 2015, 11:51:57 PM
 #1831

did someone really just deposited 20 BTC ?

It's OP, he really did a nice thing. I'm glad all that talk was not for nothing.

It should have been like 56 BTC and it should have been done like 22 hours ago when it would have made a difference.   

Did you think he would do it? How about all the people that got double payments but sent nothing? At this point you have to give him credit for trying. How many of us would send 20 BTC to help fix something. Most people would have said it was a mistake and the people stole it from you by not returning it.
dyask
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 510


View Profile
January 16, 2015, 11:52:04 PM
 #1832

Not sure if you saw but 30 mins ago the OP sent 20 BTC to help catch up. Pluss the 6.5 that was given back.

I missed it because I had checked before that.   It is something but basically it is still too little too late.   I think the game would have really taken off of the problem had been addressed right away.   62 BTC - 6.5 BTC - 20 BTC is still a short fall of 35.5 BTC.   I'm surprised at myself but I fell sorry for those 35.5 BTC of players (I'm not one of them) that should have been paid.   Even though they were gambling in the first place.   I just want to see fairness.  
Shortblade
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 16, 2015, 11:52:42 PM
 #1833

I will send 10BTC in first 20 seconds of 24 hour ponzi.

Start is 25 Minutes from now.

give your btc address to prove it
tom14cat14
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 16, 2015, 11:54:48 PM
 #1834

I will send 10BTC in first 20 seconds of 24 hour ponzi.

Start is 25 Minutes from now.

give your btc address to prove it

More then that he should be waiting 10 mins. Or he should atleast put his ill-gotten gains back in the 2 week one.
dyask
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 510


View Profile
January 16, 2015, 11:55:11 PM
 #1835

did someone really just deposited 20 BTC ?

It's OP, he really did a nice thing. I'm glad all that talk was not for nothing.

It should have been like 56 BTC and it should have been done like 22 hours ago when it would have made a difference.   

Did you think he would do it? How about all the people that got double payments but sent nothing? At this point you have to give him credit for trying. How many of us would send 20 BTC to help fix something. Most people would have said it was a mistake and the people stole it from you by not returning it.
Maybe I'm wrong, I hope so but right now I don't have a positive impression.
bloodyboy
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 199
Merit: 100



View Profile
January 16, 2015, 11:55:15 PM
 #1836

what is point of sending without running site...
tom14cat14
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 16, 2015, 11:56:40 PM
 #1837

Not sure if you saw but 30 mins ago the OP sent 20 BTC to help catch up. Pluss the 6.5 that was given back.

I missed it because I had checked before that.   It is something but basically it is still too little too late.   I think the game would have really taken off of the problem had been addressed right away.   62 BTC - 6.5 BTC - 20 BTC is still a short fall of 35.5 BTC.   I'm surprised at myself but I fell sorry for those 35.5 BTC of players (I'm not one of them) that should have been paid.   Even though they were gambling in the first place.   I just want to see fairness.  


I agree it is late. But he was giving time hoping people would pay it back. He waited about 8 hours while he slept for people to return. 1 person did and that was it. So he gave 20 BTC to help correct it. It is not perfect but more than 99.9% of these operators would do and the players.
tom14cat14
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 16, 2015, 11:57:21 PM
 #1838

what is point of sending without running site...

People would be insane to do it when it isnt running.
bloodyboy
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 199
Merit: 100



View Profile
January 16, 2015, 11:57:56 PM
 #1839

what is point of sending without running site...

People would be insane to do it when it isnt running.
agreed
lolikop
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 500



View Profile
January 16, 2015, 11:58:04 PM
 #1840

24hponzi site is down dont deposit anything until its back up

Pages: « 1 ... 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 [92] 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 ... 185 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!