Bitcoin Forum
April 26, 2024, 01:58:23 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][LTC][Pool][PPLNS][STRATUM] - ltc.kattare.com - burnside's Mining Pool  (Read 118816 times)
c0ldfusi0nz
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 52
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 07, 2013, 08:03:23 PM
 #341

Hm, Reaper's output shows: GPU 956.7MH/s, shares: 0|0, stale 0%, ~0 kH/s, 906s

I bumped up the aggression and threads per GPU which really helped the initial number shoot up, but the actual process rate is still showing 0 kH/s.

FYI, I'm running Ubuntu 12.10 on a NVS 4200M that tells me it has 48 CUDA cores, with the official Nvidia drivers  from http://www.nvidia.com/object/unix.html

I'm not having much luck finding Nvidia-related Reaper discussions :-/
1714139903
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714139903

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714139903
Reply with quote  #2

1714139903
Report to moderator
1714139903
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714139903

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714139903
Reply with quote  #2

1714139903
Report to moderator
I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES I HA(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ TABLES I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
msm595
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 185
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 07, 2013, 08:13:26 PM
 #342

Hm, Reaper's output shows: GPU 956.7MH/s, shares: 0|0, stale 0%, ~0 kH/s, 906s

Once again, this is not your GPU hashrate, this is the rate at which your GPU is erroring.  drop down thread concurrency, work size, aggression, etc.

c0ldfusi0nz
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 52
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 07, 2013, 08:42:35 PM
 #343

Well, that is certainly nice to know! Sure would have saved me some time if it had been outlined in the manual or simply printed out as "GPU Error Rate"

After significantly lowering my config values, now I seem to actually be processing work!
Rawted
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 07, 2013, 09:36:31 PM
 #344

Ya, that's just errors. If a single nvidia could pull 1gh/s, we'd all be using them!  Wink Glad you got it fixed.
turvarya
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 07, 2013, 09:50:30 PM
 #345

 I tried Reaper and cgminer. cgminer nearly freezes my desktop and gives me 31 kH/s(that's the value burnside shows me), with this command

Code:
cgminer --scrypt -o http://ltc.kattare.com:9332/ -u turvarya.1 -p x --thread-concurrency 4800 -I 18 -g 1 -w 128

when I use Reaper i just get about 20 kH/s, but can do other stuff, with this configuration

litecoin.conf
Code:
protocol litecoin

worksize 256
aggression 10
threads_per_gpu 2
sharethreads 18
lookup_gap 2
gpu_thread_concurrency 4800
long_polling yes

reaper.conf
Code:
kernel reaper.cl
save_binaries yes
enable_graceful_shutdown no
long_polling yes
platform 0
device 0

mine litecoin

Is that even near of what I should get? Any suggestions?
(I have a 6870)

https://forum.bitcoin.com/
New censorship-free forum by Roger Ver. Try it out.
reb73
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 37
Merit: 0



View Profile
March 07, 2013, 10:24:17 PM
 #346

Well, that is certainly nice to know! Sure would have saved me some time if it had been outlined in the manual or simply printed out as "GPU Error Rate"

After significantly lowering my config values, now I seem to actually be processing work!

Had a similar issue myself when getting started with gpu mining on my NVidia GT555M, had to bring down the GPU thread concurrency down from 6144 down to 2048 initially to get it hashing properly and then steadily got up to 4096 where its at now, though the stale share count is pretty high on gpu mining (between 40-50%)..

This is apparently linked to the number of shaders and the thread queue depth for each shader - the shader count is woefully low on NVidia GPUs - mine is 192. Wondering if the magic number is 192 shaders multiplied by sharethreads 18 = 3456? Will have a stab at this to see if it helps..
Rawted
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 07, 2013, 10:50:31 PM
 #347

Well, that is certainly nice to know! Sure would have saved me some time if it had been outlined in the manual or simply printed out as "GPU Error Rate"

After significantly lowering my config values, now I seem to actually be processing work!

Had a similar issue myself when getting started with gpu mining on my NVidia GT555M, had to bring down the GPU thread concurrency down from 6144 down to 2048 initially to get it hashing properly and then steadily got up to 4096 where its at now, though the stale share count is pretty high on gpu mining (between 40-50%)..

This is apparently linked to the number of shaders and the thread queue depth for each shader - the shader count is woefully low on NVidia GPUs - mine is 192. Wondering if the magic number is 192 shaders multiplied by sharethreads 18 = 3456? Will have a stab at this to see if it helps..
i have a pair of sli'd 560ti's in an old gaming rig that i mine on for one pool. i know sli slows it down a bit, but with each having 384 shaders, i sit around 150mh/s combined.
Rawted
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 07, 2013, 10:53:01 PM
 #348

turvarya, maybe these two threads will help. both have multiple posts from people mining with cgminer or reaper on 6870s. looks to me your concurrency and a few other settings might be off.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=102376.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4114.0
turvarya
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 08, 2013, 12:17:42 PM
 #349

turvarya, maybe these two threads will help. both have multiple posts from people mining with cgminer or reaper on 6870s. looks to me your concurrency and a few other settings might be off.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=102376.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4114.0
ok, thanks, helped me a lot
still it's a pain in the ass to try stuff out, since it often nearly freezes my desktop.
I got about 360kh/h top and avg of about 300kh/h over night, when i am afk, but haven't found a configuration, yet, that gives me good kh/h and let me still work on it. But I guess it#s a matter of more tries. Never hat real problems with btc-mining

setting for my best result, if anyone needs it(the worksize of 64 is strange, but it works)

Code:
cgminer --scrypt ^
-o http://ltc.kattare.com:9332/ ^
-u turvarya.1 -p x ^
--thread-concurrency 6720 ^
-I 16 ^
-g 1 ^
-w 64

https://forum.bitcoin.com/
New censorship-free forum by Roger Ver. Try it out.
thepwnorbpwnd
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 08, 2013, 01:29:00 PM
 #350

turvarya, maybe these two threads will help. both have multiple posts from people mining with cgminer or reaper on 6870s. looks to me your concurrency and a few other settings might be off.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=102376.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4114.0
ok, thanks, helped me a lot
still it's a pain in the ass to try stuff out, since it often nearly freezes my desktop.
I got about 360kh/h top and avg of about 300kh/h over night, when i am afk, but haven't found a configuration, yet, that gives me good kh/h and let me still work on it. But I guess it#s a matter of more tries. Never hat real problems with btc-mining

setting for my best result, if anyone needs it(the worksize of 64 is strange, but it works)

Code:
cgminer --scrypt ^
-o http://ltc.kattare.com:9332/ ^
-u turvarya.1 -p x ^
--thread-concurrency 6720 ^
-I 16 ^
-g 1 ^
-w 64

Lower the internsity
-I 9
Arachnid
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 38
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 08, 2013, 03:23:17 PM
 #351

I'm gettting a high rate of stales according to the web page- Round Shares: 200 (47.5% stale)

I'm using the latest cgminer with this readout when stopping it:

 [2013-03-08 08:22:40] Started at [2013-03-08 00:01:02]
 [2013-03-08 08:22:40] Runtime: 8 hrs : 21 mins : 38 secs
 [2013-03-08 08:22:40] Average hashrate: 337.4 Kilohash/s
 [2013-03-08 08:22:40] Solved blocks: 0
 [2013-03-08 08:22:40] Best share difficulty: 63.2K
 [2013-03-08 08:22:40] Queued work requests: 545
 [2013-03-08 08:22:40] Share submissions: 4926
 [2013-03-08 08:22:40] Accepted shares: 4133
 [2013-03-08 08:22:40] Rejected shares: 793
 [2013-03-08 08:22:40] Accepted difficulty shares: 128123
 [2013-03-08 08:22:40] Rejected difficulty shares: 24583
 [2013-03-08 08:22:40] Reject ratio: 16.1%
 [2013-03-08 08:22:40] Hardware errors: 0
 [2013-03-08 08:22:40] Efficiency (accepted / queued): 758%
 [2013-03-08 08:22:40] Utility (accepted shares / min): 8.24/min
 [2013-03-08 08:22:40] Work Utility (diff1 shares solved / min): 9.82/min

16% is really high, I think. Help?
pentix
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 76
Merit: 0



View Profile
March 08, 2013, 08:28:44 PM
 #352

why is this so hard!!!!  tl:dr, i broke litecoin-qt trying to get the miner to work

i got the bitcoin miner to work somehow... i've been trying to get the litecoin miner to run for hours now.  every place i've seen that has direction, i dont know what they're talking about.  i'm not bad with computers but i've never used cmd or .conf or .bat and i dont know what i'm doing.  i somehow even made it so litcoin-qt didnt work so now i'm re-downloading the blocks.  i probably wont be able to get on until tomorrow.
420
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 08, 2013, 11:52:22 PM
 #353

im also getting high rate of rejects/stales

on burnside shows 15%

i have 2x6950

also not sure if its even ticking up my balance correctly.

Donations: 1JVhKjUKSjBd7fPXQJsBs5P3Yphk38AqPr - TIPS
the hacks, the hacks, secure your bits!
Rawted
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 09, 2013, 02:37:36 AM
 #354

Same here, 15.76% rejection rate all of a sudden today. Using reaper, normally have around 5-6% stale.
420
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 09, 2013, 03:03:17 AM
 #355

Same here, 15.76% rejection rate all of a sudden today. Using reaper, normally have around 5-6% stale.

i have cgminer and im newly mining again so i dont have something to compare to Sad

Donations: 1JVhKjUKSjBd7fPXQJsBs5P3Yphk38AqPr - TIPS
the hacks, the hacks, secure your bits!
Rawted
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 09, 2013, 03:21:21 AM
 #356

Reaper is only showing 7.1%, pool showing 16% now. The stale stats might just be off.
420
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 09, 2013, 03:23:02 AM
 #357

Reaper is only showing 7.1%, pool showing 16% now. The stale stats might just be off.

my rewards were also off equivalent to the stales they reported. not good for me

Donations: 1JVhKjUKSjBd7fPXQJsBs5P3Yphk38AqPr - TIPS
the hacks, the hacks, secure your bits!
Rawted
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 09, 2013, 05:51:53 AM
 #358

Reaper is only showing 7.1%, pool showing 16% now. The stale stats might just be off.

my rewards were also off equivalent to the stales they reported. not good for me
Yea, my rewards seem to be askew from the stales too.
Arachnid
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 38
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 09, 2013, 06:46:46 AM
 #359

Well, I guess I'm not the only one. My rewards are off, too. I wonder if he's having a DOS attack again. I quit mining a while back b/c it was so bad.

Burnside, any news?
burnside (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1004


Lead Blockchain Developer


View Profile WWW
March 09, 2013, 03:18:08 PM
 #360

I haven't received any notices from the DoS provider.

I have higher than normal stales too.  Can't wait to get the new server online.

In the meantime I have tweaked the RAM allotment for MySQL a little bit.  Gave it a bigger table_cache and bigger key_buffer_size.  (based on recommendations from an analysis tool I have.)  Hopefully that'll help.

Cheers.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!