|
rizzlarolla
|
 |
October 13, 2015, 07:34:50 PM
Last edit: October 13, 2015, 07:45:43 PM by rizzlarolla |
|
Hey, remember "bi-weekly updates?"
Remember Sandrine used to say stuff?
Remember Dank? Before your million dollars was in his pocket? Haven't heard from him in a while.
He must be sleeping from all the Coke he snorted off Sandrine's ass when he realized he got away with this.
Remember bitcoins that were supposed to go to foundations (albeit to tax free offshore money-laundering havens)?
Remember promises made? Remember when they used to say ALOT of shit every day, now, they don't say anything anymore, here, or on their own "forum"?
Remember? Now they've even outsourced spruking the list of names to poor third world bloggers.
Pepperidge Farm remembers.
Meme please. Not my talent.
 I remember Sandrine said, "After the launch, the communication floodgates will open again." But... Updates have gone the same way as the dinosaurs. I remember Dank. People got banned every time he rode into town. Bitcoin would go to foundations, that's right, I remember now. In a clear and verifiable way, hahaha. Promises. Yes I remember. Many, many promises. Transparency, decentralized, easy to get, verifiable, Foundation pay, founders pay, and on and on. I remember. Just lies and deflection. Now they say 1,000,000 users in a year. Just how stupid do they think the masses are? (big seller on bittrex. went straight through Dans 175,000 nokoin buywall @3005. All purchase now in #1 wallet) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
tempus
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1960
Merit: 1128
|
|
October 13, 2015, 07:42:10 PM |
|
Hey, remember "bi-weekly updates?"
Remember Sandrine used to say stuff?
Bi-weekly updates should be the least of nokoiners' concerns now. Didn't Sandrine confidently state that - Auctions for gift cards for NeuCoin - giving users a useful way to shop at brand name merchants
like Amazon, iTunes, Google Play and Zynga from day one.
seems that even spyware-pig owned Jango, a second-rate payola ripoff of Spotify, is not taking his own shitcoins Zero real world use Publicly visible addresses and verifiable transactions
Second, all NeuCoin tokens owned by the foundations, as well as all restricted NeuCoins (whether owned
by founders, angel investors or service providers) will be held and mined in published addresses
clearly visible and verifiable on the NeuCoin blockchain.
Another shameless lie So much for transparency huh?? What are they hiding?? Remember Dank? Before your million dollars was in his pocket? Haven't heard from him in a while.
Last time we heard from his official account was half year ago, now we just hear from his countless sock-puppet accounts (or not, if you hit Ignore like I do) Hiding behind socks is a good sign that all his previous hubris has withered away but there is zero chance you're going to be proven right that it was a scam.
For something that was supposedly "zero chance", I guess this thread has really been beating the odds  Plus: They need a lot of money... - 1079 BTC in 18 days. https://blockchain.info/address/3MrNuksZ1VePU3dGiSQFiouWerJUJgDkfHThere are some possible scenarios: 1. They need it to keep up the price, with other words they buy a lot below ICO-price 2. They need it for development and advertising 3. It goes into private Problem with 1) If they have to buy back so much, how will they every be able to sell it? At which price? How distribute it when they've already staked 135 Mio new Coins the last 18 days? (total supply today: 3,135,884,335) Problem with 2) If they really need that much money they will be broke in 2 months Problem with 3) .....obvious.... Wasn't there another transparency-promise regarding the ICO-BTC? If I would be invested I would be really pissed about that. Price goes down and they do little or nothing to show some progress but constantly transacting the ICO-BTC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AltcoinScamfinder
|
|
October 13, 2015, 08:40:10 PM |
|
Starting to look like it's actually just a scam and only reason for the release is to avoid lawsuits on the grounds of fraud. Now that they 'reached their goal' they are done with the development.
|
FOR RENT.
|
|
|
LiQio
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1181
Merit: 1002
|
|
October 14, 2015, 04:44:45 AM |
|
After several months and thousands of dollars, the "official" block-explorer has been put online. Unfortunately it is not only ugly and unhandy but it is also buggy.  Look at that foundation address: Why did it receive 15 billion neucons, when only 3 billions were available in total? Neucon: Where lies and incompetence go hand in hand. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
m3ndi3
|
|
October 14, 2015, 05:27:20 AM |
|
After several months and thousands of dollars, the "official" block-explorer has been put online. Unfortunately it is not only ugly and unhandy but it is also buggy. Look at that foundation address: Why did it receive 15 billion neucons, when only 3 billions were available in total? Neucon: Where lies and incompetence go hand in hand. Oh gosh.. they still haven't put commas on their numbers... Same thing with their web wallet... I called them out about that a week before the beta... like not one of their developer or designers caught that, or cared? And now we see it here again... it's funny how confusing long strings of numbers look without commas huh  |
|
|
|
|
|
m3ndi3
|
|
October 14, 2015, 05:50:54 AM |
|
I was trying to compare the official to the unofficial, and is it weird that you can't find staking numbers anywhere in the official one? The unofficial one is just so much more detailed and easy to understand. Official: 3 numbers:  Unofficial: 5 numbers:  Official transaction:  Unofficial transaction:  Nowhere in the official transaction does it state exactly what the Proof of Stake was. You would have to subtract it manually to figure out how much they earned. If that doesn't reek of something fishy, then that is just the worst idea anyone on the team could implement. All the numbers are there, they purposefully omitted showing staking numbers, call it suspicious, call it dumb- all in all it just doesn't look good for them. |
|
|
|
|
|
bitcoinbs
|
|
October 14, 2015, 08:09:32 AM |
|
I was trying to compare the official to the unofficial, and is it weird that you can't find staking numbers anywhere in the official one? The unofficial one is just so much more detailed and easy to understand. Official: 3 numbers: Unofficial: 5 numbers: Official transaction: Unofficial transaction: Nowhere in the official transaction does it state exactly what the Proof of Stake was. You would have to subtract it manually to figure out how much they earned. If that doesn't reek of something fishy, then that is just the worst idea anyone on the team could implement. All the numbers are there, they purposefully omitted showing staking numbers, call it suspicious, call it dumb- all in all it just doesn't look good for them. Anyway we have two Blockchain Explorer |
|
|
|
|
LiQio
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1181
Merit: 1002
|
|
October 14, 2015, 08:39:28 AM |
|
Anyway we have two Blockchain Explorer
It's always good two have two blockchain explorers showing different numbers  Neucon: Where lies and incompetence go hand in hand. |
|
|
|
|
tempus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1960
Merit: 1128
|
|
October 14, 2015, 09:16:00 AM |
|
After several months and thousands of dollars, the "official" block-explorer has been put online. Unfortunately it is not only ugly and unhandy but it is also buggy. Look at that foundation address: Why did it receive 15 billion neucons, when only 3 billions were available in total? Neucon: Where lies and incompetence go hand in hand. Wow, nice. There was a time they were rich. ;-) The new/official BE is very slow for me. The unofficial seems more practical. But, to be fair, they have one pro: Good design. Sadly there is no quality behind. |
|
|
|
|
|
thoth-Atlantian
|
|
October 14, 2015, 09:34:54 AM |
|
Your not supposed to use commas on numbers anyway, It seems to be an American thing. It is incorrect though Nice wallet eh  |
|
|
|
|
scam confirmed
|
|
October 14, 2015, 11:00:01 AM |
|
Finished development doesn't imply that a product is ready to be shipped mate !
 |
|
|
|
|
scam confirmed
|
|
October 14, 2015, 11:17:57 AM |
|
No. We developped it for internal purposes and we're keeping it private until we feel the UX is good enough to release it. We are under no obligation to release this project and if you really want one *now* you should just go make one yourself. Or maybe you can't. Because you don't understand a thing when it comes to development.
 |
|
|
|
Jayjay04
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1364
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 14, 2015, 01:44:53 PM |
|
Your not supposed to use commas on numbers anyway, It seems to be an American thing. It is incorrect though Nice wallet eh Ahah totally agree with you, spaces are way better and there is no confusion possible with it |
|
|
|
|
scam confirmed
|
|
October 14, 2015, 01:53:06 PM |
|
http://forum.neucoin.org/t/a-serious-question/1844Oct. 1 "A serious question"I have seen the numbers in terms of estimates raised in the pre sale and angel investors. I am not concerned about the coin as much as what is the neucoin team going to do with the million dollars fiat it received.
Is there somewhere we can see this? Would the foundations be willing to disclose their budgets?
Thanks in advance ... [...] About the allocation of the $ budget, I'm passing on your remarks to the rest of the team. ... Now... Where is the money?
|
|
|
|
|
rizzlarolla
|
|
October 14, 2015, 02:52:51 PM |
|
Your not supposed to use commas on numbers anyway, It seems to be an American thing. It is incorrect though Nice wallet eh Ahah totally agree with you, spaces are way better and there is no confusion possible with it Ahh, yeah.. spaces man. spaces are much better than commas, yeah. No confusion, much better. Oh wait, there are no spaces man... |
|
|
|
|
tempus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1960
Merit: 1128
|
|
October 14, 2015, 02:57:43 PM |
|
Your not supposed to use commas on numbers anyway, It seems to be an American thing. It is incorrect though Nice wallet eh Ahah totally agree with you, spaces are way better and there is no confusion possible with it Ahh, yeah.. spaces man. spaces are much better than commas, yeah. No confusion, much better. Oh wait, there are no spaces man... Until it doesn't work properly there should be questionmarks... +15 ?095 ?000 ?108.628988 NEU Would be a better WTF???-symbol ;-) |
|
|
|
|
|
