NotLambchop
|
 |
March 06, 2015, 11:26:23 PM |
|
And here it is, gentlemen. More gnashing of teeth, more seething, bilious anger aimed squarely at ...who? The one who ran away with ur BTCeanie BTCabies Bitcoins? No. At your mentor, the one who gave so much of himself to stop your aspy faggotry, whose wise warnings went unheeded because you (again!) thought you knew better... Look at yourselves, gentlemen. Look and be ashamed. 
|
|
|
|
hdbuck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
|
 |
March 07, 2015, 12:12:38 AM Last edit: March 07, 2015, 12:49:18 AM by hdbuck |
|
i rather 'invest' in AM and lose money than have the meaningless life of a lonely permatroll.
|
|
|
|
|
L
|
 |
March 07, 2015, 12:20:45 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
|
 |
March 07, 2015, 03:50:30 AM |
|
And here it is, gentlemen. More gnashing of teeth, more seething, bilious anger aimed squarely at ...who? The one who ran away with ur BTCeanie BTCabies Bitcoins? No. At your mentor, the one who gave so much of himself to stop your aspy faggotry, whose wise warnings went unheeded because you (again!) thought you knew better... Look at yourselves, gentlemen. Look and be ashamed.   Genius 
|
Forgive my petulance and oft-times, I fear, ill-founded criticisms, and forgive me that I have, by this time, made your eyes and head ache with my long letter. But I cannot forgo hastily the pleasure and pride of thus conversing with you.
|
|
|
Franki3
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
 |
March 07, 2015, 02:50:40 PM |
|
This thread is so full of trolls. Why don't you just close it?
|
|
|
|
NotLambchop
|
 |
March 07, 2015, 03:34:42 PM |
|
This thread is so full of trolls. Why don't you just close it?
Welcome to Bitcointalk, newfriend! This thread was started by friedcat, who was kidnapped by enemies. He's the one who could lock it, but he's got better things to do loving the lel temporarily indisposed 
|
|
|
|
|
|
FUR11
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
FURring bitcoin up since 1762
|
 |
March 07, 2015, 07:46:06 PM |
|
He could have easily made a lot more money by e.g. announcing BE300 miners with <0.2W/GH/s performance and taking mass pre-orders (resellers would have bought them).
|
|
|
|
lucasjkr
|
 |
March 07, 2015, 08:27:38 PM |
|
It should be less likely in the non-darkner realm of people did due diligence and refused to send their money if a minimum of information was not provided, such as real proof of someone's IRL identity. Darknet, that's understandable, you're dealing with drug dealers whose qctions are illegal by their very nature, and as such there'll always be a level of scams happening over there But over here, on the clearnet? The line "don't invest more than you can afford to lose" comes to mind, doubly or triply if you're handing your money over to some that you only know by pseudonym. Its one thing to scam people when they have next to no idea about who you are, another thing when they know who you are, and therefore who to file a complaint about to the authorities. But yeah, if you make sure you know who you're sending your money to, that would cut down on 90% of the scams. But right now, supposing the speculation about friedcat is true, all he really seems poised to lose is the reputation of an Internet pseudonym.
|
|
|
|
NotLambchop
|
 |
March 07, 2015, 08:41:44 PM |
|
... Exactly, if Friedcat wanted to disappear with a scam, he could have done a lot better. Still not sure what is going on....
Isn't this the same reasoning that was used to defend all the rest of the scams? Active Mining, NeoBee, Labcoin, etc., etc. Each and every one of them had a bunch of defenders saying that if they wanted to scam, they could'a done much better. Everyone's a critic. I think they all did pretty well. You think you can do better? Prove it.
|
|
|
|
Mabsark
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
|
 |
March 07, 2015, 08:54:17 PM |
|
Isn't this the same reasoning that was used to defend all the rest of the scams? Active Mining, NeoBee, Labcoin, etc., etc. Each and every one of them had a bunch of defenders saying that if they wanted to scam, they could'a done much better.
Everyone's a critic. I think they all did pretty well. You think you can do better? Prove it.
Did any of those have a history of producing ASICs and miners?
|
|
|
|
Chris_Sabian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1001
|
 |
March 07, 2015, 09:02:29 PM |
|
He could have easily made a lot more money by e.g. announcing BE300 miners with <0.2W/GH/s performance and taking mass pre-orders (resellers would have bought them). Exactly, if Friedcat wanted to disappear with a scam, he could have done a lot better. Still not sure what is going on.... +1
|
|
|
|
L
|
 |
March 07, 2015, 09:16:46 PM |
|
This starts to look like the plausible scenario.
|
|
|
|
NotLambchop
|
 |
March 07, 2015, 09:18:00 PM |
|
Isn't this the same reasoning that was used to defend all the rest of the scams? Active Mining, NeoBee, Labcoin, etc., etc. Each and every one of them had a bunch of defenders saying that if they wanted to scam, they could'a done much better.
Everyone's a critic. I think they all did pretty well. You think you can do better? Prove it.
Did any of those have a history of producing ASICs and miners? Wait wat? After the original chip (success), there was just a long descent into failure & fibbin. Everyone knew it was only a matter of time. Made rather evident by lack of promised dividends and, well... Pictures work well for me:  *If the chart looks more pessimistic than it does on Havelock, it's because Havelock price goes down to -2, 'coz he knows how to make a funny & doesn't think much of his sucker's intelligence. 
|
|
|
|
jimmothy
|
 |
March 07, 2015, 09:21:39 PM |
|
He could have easily made a lot more money by e.g. announcing BE300 miners with <0.2W/GH/s performance and taking mass pre-orders (resellers would have bought them). Exactly, if Friedcat wanted to disappear with a scam, he could have done a lot better. Still not sure what is going on.... +1 +2 Seriously the amount of money FC "scammed" is a drop in the ocean for AM. AMhash raised ~4200 btc and ~60% has been paid back so far so at most he'd be making off with 1700 btc. Bitfountain holds at least 200k shares so they must have earned ~100k btc in dividends alone (0.5btc/share). Now why would the guy who earned tens of thousands of btc legitimately want to scam people for a measly 1700 btc?
|
|
|
|
Mabsark
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
|
 |
March 07, 2015, 09:22:34 PM |
|
BE100 - Major success BE200 - Failure BE300S - Better than anything currently available
|
|
|
|
Chris_Sabian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1001
|
 |
March 07, 2015, 09:25:35 PM |
|
BE100 - Major success BE200 - Failure BE300S - Better than anything currently available
You forgot to include 'gen2' from fall of 2013 which was never made into chips. Allegedly.
|
|
|
|
NotLambchop
|
 |
March 07, 2015, 09:27:10 PM |
|
BE100 - Major success BE200 - Failure BE300S - Better than anything currently available
ORLY? I'm a little confused now, if such success, why no divs? Why tanking "share" prices? I mean, if everything's coming up roses? Enemy saboteurs?
|
|
|
|
|