Bitcoin Forum
October 16, 2025, 05:39:10 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 30.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 [548] 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 ... 1348 »
  Print  
Author Topic: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It  (Read 3918481 times)
tinus42
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 510



View Profile
August 09, 2013, 11:55:29 PM
 #10941

after ASIC shifts to 28nm, 22nm, 18nm...1nm, what else could be done ? how hard would it be to make hundreds asic cores like the GPU but only do hashing ?

Learn more, young padawan!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Application-specific_integrated_circuit

Don't care for Star Wars anymore but am stuck with the avatar
romerun
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 1002


Bitcoin is new, makes sense to hodl.


View Profile
August 10, 2013, 12:22:29 AM
 #10942

how hard would it be to make hundreds asic cores like the GPU but only do hashing ?

What do you think current ASICs are?

Wink In my mind, the current ASICs look like this.
freedomno1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1848
Merit: 1096


Learning the troll avoidance button :)


View Profile
August 10, 2013, 12:28:45 AM
 #10943

One year ago, a small group of individuals with a grand vision came together and collaborated their efforts. They shared their idea with the community, allowing others to join in the project to come. Within 6 months, they started the largest collective mine and are now considered one of the most (if not the most) successful Bitcoin companies.

Happy Birthday/Anniversary, BitFountain/ASICMiner! May you have many more.



^this

This Happy Birthday +1 XD

Believing in Bitcoins and it's ability to change the world
bitman442
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 142
Merit: 100



View Profile
August 10, 2013, 12:36:30 AM
 #10944

Anyone else unable to access Havelock?
tinus42
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 510



View Profile
August 10, 2013, 12:40:36 AM
 #10945

Anyone else unable to access Havelock?

I can't access the site also. Sad

Don't care for Star Wars anymore but am stuck with the avatar
freedomno1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1848
Merit: 1096


Learning the troll avoidance button :)


View Profile
August 10, 2013, 12:50:22 AM
Last edit: August 10, 2013, 01:23:46 AM by freedomno1
 #10946

Its down for me as well
With lag on btct

Believing in Bitcoins and it's ability to change the world
gramma
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 194
Merit: 100



View Profile
August 10, 2013, 01:13:23 AM
 #10947

Heh.  I don't have enough coin for this, not by a long shot.  But with Friedcat, who knows about some day?   Grin




BTC: 1MrNRPo7p8DEyxn87c9BCGwrbatBQeCHc1
freedomno1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1848
Merit: 1096


Learning the troll avoidance button :)


View Profile
August 10, 2013, 01:19:25 AM
 #10948

Heh.  I don't have enough coin for this, not by a long shot.  But with Friedcat, who knows about some day?   Grin




In that case

Believing in Bitcoins and it's ability to change the world
VolanicEruptor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250



View Profile
August 10, 2013, 02:16:36 AM
 #10949

Friedcat, the chinese jew cat!

Franktank
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500



View Profile
August 10, 2013, 03:15:23 AM
 #10950

One year ago, a small group of individuals with a grand vision came together and collaborated their efforts. They shared their idea with the community, allowing others to join in the project to come. Within 6 months, they started the largest collective mine and are now considered one of the most (if not the most) successful Bitcoin companies.

Happy Birthday/Anniversary, BitFountain/ASICMiner! May you have many more.



Shameless repost but friedcat: "SPEECH! SPEECH! SPEECH"
stslimited
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


View Profile
August 10, 2013, 03:39:53 AM
 #10951

after ASIC shifts to 28nm, 22nm, 18nm...1nm, what else could be done ? how hard would it be to make hundreds asic cores like the GPU but only do hashing ?


currently a company like AMD is not interested because the entire bitcoin is only 1/3rd of that 1 company's market cap. But if bitcoin was maybe 20 times its market cap things would be more motivating
Transisto
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1731
Merit: 1008



View Profile WWW
August 10, 2013, 04:32:45 AM
 #10952

after ASIC shifts to 28nm, 22nm, 18nm...1nm, what else could be done ? how hard would it be to make hundreds asic cores like the GPU but only do hashing ?


currently a company like AMD is not interested because the entire bitcoin is only 1/3rd of that 1 company's market cap. But if bitcoin was maybe 20 times its market cap things would be more motivating
FYI, AMD is producing it's chips in the same foundry as BFL  ... GloFo

A well made 55nm chip could end up being much more profitable than a 28nm chip that cost more and is ,for example, 6 month late.
Vycid
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


♫ the AM bear who cares ♫


View Profile
August 10, 2013, 04:34:59 AM
 #10953

after ASIC shifts to 28nm, 22nm, 18nm...1nm, what else could be done ? how hard would it be to make hundreds asic cores like the GPU but only do hashing ?


currently a company like AMD is not interested because the entire bitcoin is only 1/3rd of that 1 company's market cap. But if bitcoin was maybe 20 times its market cap things would be more motivating

This is a ludicrous sentiment. Mining revenues are about $100M a year. AMD's yearly revenue, across all products, is only a little north of a billion. It would definitely be on their radar, since they could grab almost the whole market with little investment. By the way: companies don't ignore sectors just because they're only ~10% of their revenue. If that was true, GE and HP would never release new products. But we see them buying up little companies and launching products all the time.

However, the proposition is even BETTER for Intel, who, unlike AMD, already owns the fabs needed to crank out some chips and keep the cost of dominating mining extremely low (AMD has to contract out, so they've got an economy of scale issue that Intel doesn't).

The real reason that neither AMD or Intel has made a move is that they're both uncertain of the legality of Bitcoin mining, and the tax implications. Even $100M isn't worth taking a legal risk. That's all there is to it.

lano1106
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
August 10, 2013, 05:03:15 AM
 #10954

after ASIC shifts to 28nm, 22nm, 18nm...1nm, what else could be done ? how hard would it be to make hundreds asic cores like the GPU but only do hashing ?


currently a company like AMD is not interested because the entire bitcoin is only 1/3rd of that 1 company's market cap. But if bitcoin was maybe 20 times its market cap things would be more motivating

This is a ludicrous sentiment. Mining revenues are about $100M a year. AMD's yearly revenue, across all products, is only a little north of a billion. It would definitely be on their radar, since they could grab almost the whole market with little investment. By the way: companies don't ignore sectors just because they're only ~10% of their revenue. If that was true, GE and HP would never release new products. But we see them buying up little companies and launching products all the time.

However, the proposition is even BETTER for Intel, who, unlike AMD, already owns the fabs needed to crank out some chips and keep the cost of dominating mining extremely low (AMD has to contract out, so they've got an economy of scale issue that Intel doesn't).

The real reason that neither AMD or Intel has made a move is that they're both uncertain of the legality of Bitcoin mining, and the tax implications. Even $100M isn't worth taking a legal risk. That's all there is to it.

Also, these companies are certainly controlled by institutionnal investors that have a lot to lose by a fiat monetary system alternatives

BTC: 1ABewnrZgCds7w9RH43NwMHX5Px6ex5uNR
Vycid
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


♫ the AM bear who cares ♫


View Profile
August 10, 2013, 05:10:08 AM
 #10955

after ASIC shifts to 28nm, 22nm, 18nm...1nm, what else could be done ? how hard would it be to make hundreds asic cores like the GPU but only do hashing ?


currently a company like AMD is not interested because the entire bitcoin is only 1/3rd of that 1 company's market cap. But if bitcoin was maybe 20 times its market cap things would be more motivating

This is a ludicrous sentiment. Mining revenues are about $100M a year. AMD's yearly revenue, across all products, is only a little north of a billion. It would definitely be on their radar, since they could grab almost the whole market with little investment. By the way: companies don't ignore sectors just because they're only ~10% of their revenue. If that was true, GE and HP would never release new products. But we see them buying up little companies and launching products all the time.

However, the proposition is even BETTER for Intel, who, unlike AMD, already owns the fabs needed to crank out some chips and keep the cost of dominating mining extremely low (AMD has to contract out, so they've got an economy of scale issue that Intel doesn't).

The real reason that neither AMD or Intel has made a move is that they're both uncertain of the legality of Bitcoin mining, and the tax implications. Even $100M isn't worth taking a legal risk. That's all there is to it.

Also, these companies are certainly controlled by institutionnal investors that have a lot to lose by a fiat monetary system alternatives

That's got nothing to do with it. Bitcoin doesn't need Intel or AMD, so avoiding the bitcoin mining sector does nothing except cost potential profit.

And if institutional investors really considered Bitcoin a credible threat, it'd have been 51% attacked to death by now. Since they 'control those companies', remember?

ShroomsKit
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 500



View Profile
August 10, 2013, 09:51:24 AM
 #10956

after ASIC shifts to 28nm, 22nm, 18nm...1nm, what else could be done ? how hard would it be to make hundreds asic cores like the GPU but only do hashing ?


currently a company like AMD is not interested because the entire bitcoin is only 1/3rd of that 1 company's market cap. But if bitcoin was maybe 20 times its market cap things would be more motivating

Did you just pull that out of your ass?

Its price is not a very relevant factor in its adoption....
JordanL
Donator
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250



View Profile
August 10, 2013, 11:12:31 AM
 #10957

Gigahash Giveaway: Predict Next Week's ASICMINER Dividends and Win 3 Block Erupter USBs from 2ASIC.com


Good luck everyone!
Xendrios
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 212
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
August 10, 2013, 11:25:32 AM
 #10958


"three ASICMINER Block Erupter USBs that mine for Bitcoins at 334 GH/s each!"

Isn't it 334 MH/s each?

Sell or buy items at bitcoin247sales.com - flatrate fees - cheapest around!
Post feedback at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=328169.0
JordanL
Donator
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250



View Profile
August 10, 2013, 11:37:03 AM
 #10959


"three ASICMINER Block Erupter USBs that mine for Bitcoins at 334 GH/s each!"

Isn't it 334 MH/s each?

Thank you for pointing out this typo! Tip address?
Xendrios
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 212
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
August 10, 2013, 12:13:15 PM
 #10960


"three ASICMINER Block Erupter USBs that mine for Bitcoins at 334 GH/s each!"

Isn't it 334 MH/s each?

Thank you for pointing out this typo! Tip address?

You're welcome!

14ajMLiVuvh9xNcMXF1i9kYAPdvoLCSM1s

thanks alot!

Sell or buy items at bitcoin247sales.com - flatrate fees - cheapest around!
Post feedback at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=328169.0
Pages: « 1 ... 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 [548] 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 ... 1348 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!