Bitcoin Forum
March 29, 2024, 06:10:23 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 [597] 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 ... 1348 »
  Print  
Author Topic: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It  (Read 3916266 times)
overc
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 263
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 27, 2013, 02:50:23 AM
 #11921



Agreed with www.bitminer.com, stable and fair pool!




Hm. Parked at GoDaddy?

missprint: www.bitminter.com
1711692623
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711692623

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711692623
Reply with quote  #2

1711692623
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1711692623
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711692623

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711692623
Reply with quote  #2

1711692623
Report to moderator
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4074
Merit: 7591


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
August 27, 2013, 04:21:10 AM
 #11922


 am should go to  www.bitminer.com .

 now that am has finally started selling usb sticks at a decent price . I have decide to buy back some stock.   A lot of people are afraid of knc and the fact that bfl has built and shipped a lot of hashpower


Agreed with www.bitminer.com, stable and fair pool!

What is the "decent price" now? I can't see any of price information in the latest friedcat's post.
What minimal order and where can I buy it now by "decent price" ?



 a decent price is .33 btc a stick while some would argue that is not low enough  it is good enough to buy some for mining and some to sell on ebay.


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=277332.0   

  I buy 20 sticks for 6.6 btc .

 I buy a label from the post office for 7.40 usd. I email the label to the seller.

 I get 20 sticks in about 2-3 days.  this works for me and a lot of other sellers on ebay.   

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
binaryFate
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1003


Still wild and free


View Profile
August 27, 2013, 02:26:32 PM
 #11923

POOL MINE AGAIN

when Asicminer was 25-30% of the network, it made sense to hop off and solo mine, but now it doesn't

cheers

You're grossly wrong on this.
You only get dividends once a week, and the variance on a week time-frame is very small (even with 5% of the total hash rate).

  • The variance of blocks found over a week is by far overcome by the variance of the AM hashrate itself (glitches etc.), and this would still be the same when using a pool.
  • If you want dividends that are that much stable, AM is not for you anyway.

There is absolutely no reason to pool mine, appart from giving away some fees.

Monero's privacy and therefore fungibility are MUCH stronger than Bitcoin's. 
This makes Monero a better candidate to deserve the term "digital cash".
canth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 1001



View Profile
August 27, 2013, 02:38:46 PM
 #11924

POOL MINE AGAIN

when Asicminer was 25-30% of the network, it made sense to hop off and solo mine, but now it doesn't

cheers

You're grossly wrong on this.
You only get dividends once a week, and the variance on a week time-frame is very small (even with 5% of the total hash rate).

  • The variance of blocks found over a week is by far overcome by the variance of the AM hashrate itself (glitches etc.), and this would still be the same when using a pool.
  • If you want dividends that are that much stable, AM is not for you anyway.

There is absolutely no reason to pool mine, appart from giving away some fees.


Not necessarily true. If for example, AM has a better network connection to a pool than to various nodes available in China, then the pool fees might be worth the savings in lost blocks blocks or in mining tx fees. We know that this has been a problem for AM and many firms doing business in China.

ThickAsThieves
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile
August 27, 2013, 02:41:22 PM
 #11925

POOL MINE AGAIN

when Asicminer was 25-30% of the network, it made sense to hop off and solo mine, but now it doesn't

cheers

You're grossly wrong on this.
You only get dividends once a week, and the variance on a week time-frame is very small (even with 5% of the total hash rate).

  • The variance of blocks found over a week is by far overcome by the variance of the AM hashrate itself (glitches etc.), and this would still be the same when using a pool.
  • If you want dividends that are that much stable, AM is not for you anyway.

There is absolutely no reason to pool mine, appart from giving away some fees.


Not necessarily true. If for example, AM has a better network connection to a pool than to various nodes available in China, then the pool fees might be worth the savings in lost blocks blocks or in mining tx fees. We know that this has been a problem for AM and many firms doing business in China.

Admitting some ignorance here, but how could the net connection between AM and a pool be any better than the one they use to solo mine?
hcburger
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 27, 2013, 02:48:50 PM
 #11926

Regarding variance in general:

Since blocks are randomly discovered, the number of blocks discovered over a given period of time is Poisson distributed.
The expected number of blocks discovered by ASICMINER in a week is: 6*24*7*network_fraction.
Since in a Poisson distribution, the mean is equal to the variance, and the standard deviation is equal to the square root of the variance, we have a standard deviation of
sqrt(6*24*7*0.1), or approximately 10 blocks, assuming ASICMINER controls 10% of the network, or
sqrt(6*24*7*0.05), or approximately 7 blocks, assuming ASICMINER controls 5% of the network.

This means that the standard deviation is approximately 10% the expected number of discovered blocks if ASICMINER controls 10% of the nework, or 14% if ASICMINER controls 5% of the network.
If this is a lot or not is up for debate, but it is not insignificant.

Using the same math, we get a standard deviation of 53% (assuming 10% of network) for a six hour window and 37% for a 12 hour windows. That's quite a lot.
binaryFate
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1003


Still wild and free


View Profile
August 27, 2013, 02:59:13 PM
 #11927

POOL MINE AGAIN

when Asicminer was 25-30% of the network, it made sense to hop off and solo mine, but now it doesn't

cheers

You're grossly wrong on this.
You only get dividends once a week, and the variance on a week time-frame is very small (even with 5% of the total hash rate).

  • The variance of blocks found over a week is by far overcome by the variance of the AM hashrate itself (glitches etc.), and this would still be the same when using a pool.
  • If you want dividends that are that much stable, AM is not for you anyway.

There is absolutely no reason to pool mine, appart from giving away some fees.


Not necessarily true. If for example, AM has a better network connection to a pool than to various nodes available in China, then the pool fees might be worth the savings in lost blocks blocks or in mining tx fees. We know that this has been a problem for AM and many firms doing business in China.

If it had such a good connection with a pool, it could just broadcast its solo-mined blocks to this pool node.

Monero's privacy and therefore fungibility are MUCH stronger than Bitcoin's. 
This makes Monero a better candidate to deserve the term "digital cash".
binaryFate
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1003


Still wild and free


View Profile
August 27, 2013, 03:04:25 PM
 #11928

Regarding variance in general:

Since blocks are randomly discovered, the number of blocks discovered over a given period of time is Poisson distributed.
The expected number of blocks discovered by ASICMINER in a week is: 6*24*7*network_fraction.
Since in a Poisson distribution, the mean is equal to the variance, and the standard deviation is equal to the square root of the variance, we have a standard deviation of
sqrt(6*24*7*0.1), or approximately 10 blocks, assuming ASICMINER controls 10% of the network, or
sqrt(6*24*7*0.05), or approximately 7 blocks, assuming ASICMINER controls 5% of the network.

This means that the standard deviation is approximately 10% the expected number of discovered blocks if ASICMINER controls 10% of the nework, or 14% if ASICMINER controls 5% of the network.
If this is a lot or not is up for debate, but it is not insignificant.

Using the same math, we get a standard deviation of 53% (assuming 10% of network) for a six hour window and 37% for a 12 hour windows. That's quite a lot.


Thanks for the maths  Smiley
Not insignificant, but as I wrote, most of the weeks it would be hidden by the variation of the actual hash rate (glitches, problems, tests, etc).

Add on this that hardware sells also adds up to dividends in a variable way... it would be ridiculous to complain about a potential 14% variance, when the actual variance of dividends is much higher for different reasons.

Monero's privacy and therefore fungibility are MUCH stronger than Bitcoin's. 
This makes Monero a better candidate to deserve the term "digital cash".
hcburger
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 27, 2013, 03:15:52 PM
 #11929

Quote
Not insignificant, but as I wrote, most of the weeks it would be hidden by the variation of the actual hash rate (glitches, problems, tests, etc).

Add on this that hardware sells also adds up to dividends in a variable way... it would be ridiculous to complain about a potential 14% variance, when the actual variance of dividends is much higher for different reasons.

Yes, over a week it is indeed not too important.
However, it would seem that it makes little sense to display 6 hour and 12 hour hash rate estimates on, e.g. http://www.asicminercharts.com/live/ . Even 24 hour estimates are quite unreliable: stddev of 26% assuming 10% network control, 37% assuming 5% control.

Or maybe the charts could be modified to include this standard deviation, so that the level of uncertainty can also be visualized?
keystroke
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 900
Merit: 1014


advocate of a cryptographic attack on the globe


View Profile
August 27, 2013, 03:48:06 PM
 #11930

Didn't you see friedcat's post about exponential new equipment being manufactured in September and October?

Yes.  Which has nothing to do with why the existing 50 TH/s network hasn't been able to operate consistently at 50 TH/s. 
Yes, good point. It would be nice to get an explanation for this.

"The difference between a castle and a prison is only a question of who holds the keys."
Rival
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 502



View Profile
August 27, 2013, 04:00:11 PM
 #11931

Quote
Not insignificant, but as I wrote, most of the weeks it would be hidden by the variation of the actual hash rate (glitches, problems, tests, etc).

Add on this that hardware sells also adds up to dividends in a variable way... it would be ridiculous to complain about a potential 14% variance, when the actual variance of dividends is much higher for different reasons.

Yes, over a week it is indeed not too important.
However, it would seem that it makes little sense to display 6 hour and 12 hour hash rate estimates on, e.g. http://www.asicminercharts.com/live/ . Even 24 hour estimates are quite unreliable: stddev of 26% assuming 10% network control, 37% assuming 5% control.

Or maybe the charts could be modified to include this standard deviation, so that the level of uncertainty can also be visualized?

I would think it would be trivial to include a standard deviation to the charts. A bar graph of 30Ths might benefit from a "+/- 2.43 Thz" disclaimer. If poll takers can do that, why can't we?
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1063


Gerald Davis


View Profile
August 27, 2013, 04:15:16 PM
 #11932

Quote
Not insignificant, but as I wrote, most of the weeks it would be hidden by the variation of the actual hash rate (glitches, problems, tests, etc).

Add on this that hardware sells also adds up to dividends in a variable way... it would be ridiculous to complain about a potential 14% variance, when the actual variance of dividends is much higher for different reasons.

Yes, over a week it is indeed not too important.
However, it would seem that it makes little sense to display 6 hour and 12 hour hash rate estimates on, e.g. http://www.asicminercharts.com/live/ . Even 24 hour estimates are quite unreliable: stddev of 26% assuming 10% network control, 37% assuming 5% control.

Or maybe the charts could be modified to include this standard deviation, so that the level of uncertainty can also be visualized?

I would think it would be trivial to include a standard deviation to the charts. A bar graph of 30Ths might benefit from a "+/- 2.43 Thz" disclaimer. If poll takers can do that, why can't we?

It would be trivial but then again you don't see a poll which says "52% +/- 45% approve (with 95% confidence interval)".  That is essentially the equivalent of the 6 hour stat.
Jayjay04
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1364
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 27, 2013, 04:17:19 PM
 #11933

Why the officcial site '' www.asicminer.co '' isn't just up to date.
Just put the live hashrate, stats on block found and revenues there dammit !

More transparency is getting essential please !!

                    ▄▄▄
                   █████
             ▄▄▄    ▀▀▀       ▄▄████╕
            █████          ▄▄███████▌
     ▄▄▄     ▀▀▀        ╓████████▀▀
    █████               ██████▀▀       ▄███▄
     ▀▀▀        ▄███▄    ▀▀▀           ▀███▀
                ▀███▀        ▄▄████╕
       ▁▄▄███▄           ▄▄████████▌
   ▁▄▆████████       ▄▄█████████▀▀       ▄███▄
 ▄█████████▀▔    ▄▄█████████▀▀           ▀███▀
▐██████▀▀▔   ,▄█████████▀▀        ▄▄▄
 ▔▀▀▀▔    ▄▄████████▀▀           █████
      ▄▄████████▀▀       ▄▄██▄    ▀▀▀
   ▄█████████▀       ▄▄███████▌       ▄▄▄
  ▐██████▀▀      ▄▄█████████▀▔       █████
   `▀▀▀      ▂▄█████████▀▀    ,▄▄µ    ▀▀▀
          ▂▆████████▀▀    ,▄██████▌
          ██████▀▀     ▄█████████▀
           ▔▀▀        ███████▀"
                      "▀▀▀╙
Hello!
STAKER
.The Next Proof-of-Stake.
KSmart Contract Tokene.














eastpk
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 120
Merit: 10

WINSTARS - We are changing the face of gambling


View Profile
August 27, 2013, 04:23:16 PM
 #11934

Why the officcial site '' www.asicminer.co '' isn't just up to date.
Just put the live hashrate, stats on block found and revenues there dammit !

More transparency is getting essential please !!

lol that isnt the official site....

▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
WINSTARS -   We are changing the face of gamblingWHITEPAPERANN THREADTELEGRAMFACEBOOK ● Twitter
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
hcburger
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 27, 2013, 04:25:30 PM
 #11935

Quote
It would be trivial but then again you don't see a poll which says "52% +/- 45% approve (with 95% confidence interval)".  That is essentially the equivalent of the 6 hour stat.

Agreed: The 6 and 12 hour estimates are essentially useless.
But maybe we could have the estimated stddevs for the longer-term (maybe 24 hour and above) hash-rate estimates?
Jayjay04
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1364
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 27, 2013, 04:33:02 PM
 #11936

Why the officcial site '' www.asicminer.co '' isn't just up to date.
Just put the live hashrate, stats on block found and revenues there dammit !

More transparency is getting essential please !!

lol that isnt the official site....

Well is there one ?!?!

                    ▄▄▄
                   █████
             ▄▄▄    ▀▀▀       ▄▄████╕
            █████          ▄▄███████▌
     ▄▄▄     ▀▀▀        ╓████████▀▀
    █████               ██████▀▀       ▄███▄
     ▀▀▀        ▄███▄    ▀▀▀           ▀███▀
                ▀███▀        ▄▄████╕
       ▁▄▄███▄           ▄▄████████▌
   ▁▄▆████████       ▄▄█████████▀▀       ▄███▄
 ▄█████████▀▔    ▄▄█████████▀▀           ▀███▀
▐██████▀▀▔   ,▄█████████▀▀        ▄▄▄
 ▔▀▀▀▔    ▄▄████████▀▀           █████
      ▄▄████████▀▀       ▄▄██▄    ▀▀▀
   ▄█████████▀       ▄▄███████▌       ▄▄▄
  ▐██████▀▀      ▄▄█████████▀▔       █████
   `▀▀▀      ▂▄█████████▀▀    ,▄▄µ    ▀▀▀
          ▂▆████████▀▀    ,▄██████▌
          ██████▀▀     ▄█████████▀
           ▔▀▀        ███████▀"
                      "▀▀▀╙
Hello!
STAKER
.The Next Proof-of-Stake.
KSmart Contract Tokene.














eastpk
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 120
Merit: 10

WINSTARS - We are changing the face of gambling


View Profile
August 27, 2013, 04:34:16 PM
 #11937

Why the officcial site '' www.asicminer.co '' isn't just up to date.
Just put the live hashrate, stats on block found and revenues there dammit !

More transparency is getting essential please !!

lol that isnt the official site....

Well is there one ?!?!

Yup, this is the official website.....

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=49840;sa=showPosts

▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
WINSTARS -   We are changing the face of gamblingWHITEPAPERANN THREADTELEGRAMFACEBOOK ● Twitter
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
ianp
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 27, 2013, 06:29:41 PM
 #11938

Quote
Not insignificant, but as I wrote, most of the weeks it would be hidden by the variation of the actual hash rate (glitches, problems, tests, etc).

Add on this that hardware sells also adds up to dividends in a variable way... it would be ridiculous to complain about a potential 14% variance, when the actual variance of dividends is much higher for different reasons.

Yes, over a week it is indeed not too important.
However, it would seem that it makes little sense to display 6 hour and 12 hour hash rate estimates on, e.g. http://www.asicminercharts.com/live/ . Even 24 hour estimates are quite unreliable: stddev of 26% assuming 10% network control, 37% assuming 5% control.

Or maybe the charts could be modified to include this standard deviation, so that the level of uncertainty can also be visualized?

I would think it would be trivial to include a standard deviation to the charts. A bar graph of 30Ths might benefit from a "+/- 2.43 Thz" disclaimer. If poll takers can do that, why can't we?

It would be trivial but then again you don't see a poll which says "52% +/- 45% approve (with 95% confidence interval)".  That is essentially the equivalent of the 6 hour stat.


I just want to add that I believe an accurate prediction of our current hashrate is about 63.5 th/s.

I do not have any reason to believe that they have sold off any hashing power, nor do I have any reason to believe they have increased power over the last four weeks.

http://www.dpcapital.net/blockchain/?hours=672
runeks
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1008



View Profile WWW
August 27, 2013, 06:37:45 PM
 #11939

Quote
Not insignificant, but as I wrote, most of the weeks it would be hidden by the variation of the actual hash rate (glitches, problems, tests, etc).

Add on this that hardware sells also adds up to dividends in a variable way... it would be ridiculous to complain about a potential 14% variance, when the actual variance of dividends is much higher for different reasons.

Yes, over a week it is indeed not too important.
However, it would seem that it makes little sense to display 6 hour and 12 hour hash rate estimates on, e.g. http://www.asicminercharts.com/live/ . Even 24 hour estimates are quite unreliable: stddev of 26% assuming 10% network control, 37% assuming 5% control.

Or maybe the charts could be modified to include this standard deviation, so that the level of uncertainty can also be visualized?

I would think it would be trivial to include a standard deviation to the charts. A bar graph of 30Ths might benefit from a "+/- 2.43 Thz" disclaimer. If poll takers can do that, why can't we?

It would be trivial but then again you don't see a poll which says "52% +/- 45% approve (with 95% confidence interval)".  That is essentially the equivalent of the 6 hour stat.


I just want to add that I believe an accurate prediction of our current hashrate is about 63.5 th/s.

I do not have any reason to believe that they have sold off any hashing power, nor do I have any reason to believe they have increased power over the last four weeks.

http://www.dpcapital.net/blockchain/?hours=672
How do you calculate that? I don't think that's accurate. My calculations don't indicate 63.5 TH, not even on the highest spikes of the 24-hour average (which is almost certainly an inaccurate estimate).
ianp
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 27, 2013, 07:01:26 PM
 #11940

Quote
Not insignificant, but as I wrote, most of the weeks it would be hidden by the variation of the actual hash rate (glitches, problems, tests, etc).

Add on this that hardware sells also adds up to dividends in a variable way... it would be ridiculous to complain about a potential 14% variance, when the actual variance of dividends is much higher for different reasons.

Yes, over a week it is indeed not too important.
However, it would seem that it makes little sense to display 6 hour and 12 hour hash rate estimates on, e.g. http://www.asicminercharts.com/live/ . Even 24 hour estimates are quite unreliable: stddev of 26% assuming 10% network control, 37% assuming 5% control.

Or maybe the charts could be modified to include this standard deviation, so that the level of uncertainty can also be visualized?

I would think it would be trivial to include a standard deviation to the charts. A bar graph of 30Ths might benefit from a "+/- 2.43 Thz" disclaimer. If poll takers can do that, why can't we?

It would be trivial but then again you don't see a poll which says "52% +/- 45% approve (with 95% confidence interval)".  That is essentially the equivalent of the 6 hour stat.


I just want to add that I believe an accurate prediction of our current hashrate is about 63.5 th/s.

I do not have any reason to believe that they have sold off any hashing power, nor do I have any reason to believe they have increased power over the last four weeks.

http://www.dpcapital.net/blockchain/?hours=672
How do you calculate that? I don't think that's accurate. My calculations don't indicate 63.5 TH, not even on the highest spikes of the 24-hour average (which is almost certainly an inaccurate estimate).

Well -- it is a bit skewed. It only calculates based on the current difficulty, not the past difficulty.

That is to say -- that if difficulty were to rise ten fold right now, the historical hashrate would rise as well because it's basing everything off of current difficulty.

The link I posted produces the average hashrate of the previous 28 days.
Pages: « 1 ... 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 [597] 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 ... 1348 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!