ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It

[John (John K.)]

Received my divs on my direct shares as well as on havelock.

Can you forward me the 'sending' address so that I might add them to the spreadsheet?  We are still missing proof of **edit** 178 shares.

btw. I've updated the spreadsheet with payments from a third address.

Known payment addresses for 11/24/2014 dividend
138F71yG3gqzhcYowSHw7Qmqos6X2GrRWt *new
115tTroRo3B9ZDQ6ATJGDCHcNEVbjJoZnF
1H7FpBV8huVmPvt5eRzszAkgnERH2FaWvq

PS: Here's another new address - 1D3kmPrQo9H2dJRNB94yiMfVBSHErRiwmB .
It's the address that sent my divs.

[bones]

I just loaded up Bitcoin Qt for the first time in weeks to see if I got a dividend and it is killing my macbook. I have some direct shares, any way for me to verify those without having to download the whole blockchain?
I had problems with Bitcoin Qt before but now it's even worse. Everything else on my computer works fine but when I use Bitcoin Qt my macbook gets way too hot (much hotter than when I do anything else) and doing anything is obnoxiously slow.

Yes, you can copy the public address that the divs are registered to in bitcoin-qt, and paste it into the blockchain.info search bar. It should give you the current balance and all transactions of that address, including your div payouts.


Unrelated note: I still haven't received any divs on my single share. I'm 100% sure I'm checking the right address--I cross referenced it to the verification I received from friedcat when I exported from havelock.  

Someone did mention over the last few pages that anyone with one share would probably not receive a div , as the payment was too small, something to do with the tx fee I believe, but I only skim read it as it was not relevant to me, but maybe that is why.

[webbrowser]

I've been promoting AMHash for the past few weeks and Rockminer have pretty much ensured that Havelock and Rockminer are the only companies that profit from it.

Well, Havelock profits from all activity on their platform, of course. But, without knowing details of how AMHash is structured, how do you know who profits from it? E.g., maybe RM had underwritten the 5PH and it's not our business whether they want to continue selling fresh shares.

[Nancarrow]

I'm glad to see FC hasn't completely forgotten about shareholders. Does anyone know if he still reads/accepts PM requests here to change dividend payment addresses? I have two addresses I'd like to consolidate into one.

[fhh]

actually hashie also profits...

[Mabsark]

I've been promoting AMHash for the past few weeks and Rockminer have pretty much ensured that Havelock and Rockminer are the only companies that profit from it.

Well, Havelock profits from all activity on their platform, of course. But, without knowing details of how AMHash is structured, how do you know who profits from it? E.g., maybe RM had underwritten the 5PH and it's not our business whether they want to continue selling fresh shares.

We have details of how AMHash is structured:

In this contract, the hashrate is provided by ASICMiner, the management is provided by
RockMiner, and the platform is provided by HavelockInvestments.
...
Risk control
1. Before IPO closes, ASICMiner has the right to buy back at the price of IPO price * 100.5%.

Now, given that the Prisma brand is completely toxic due to the total lack of support and the number of complaints about units busting into flames, you'd have to pretty mad to purchase a Prisma. That leaves AMHash as the most realistic option to make a profit but it's deliberately not being sold at the moment.

[drasted]

That leaves AMHash as the most realistic option to make a profit but it's deliberately not being sold at the moment.

It is being sold on hashie. There's just very little (none?) advertisement about it.

[nycgoat]

I haven't received anything yet. Direct shares.

[hashie]

That leaves AMHash as the most realistic option to make a profit but it's deliberately not being sold at the moment.

It is being sold on hashie. There's just very little (none?) advertisement about it.

Yep, we're still selling primary market AMHash ghs.

-Sahra

[novusordo]

Hashie... essentially a direct competitor to ghash.io?

[Mabsark]

That leaves AMHash as the most realistic option to make a profit but it's deliberately not being sold at the moment.

It is being sold on hashie. There's just very little (none?) advertisement about it.

Yeah, but it's not being sold on Havelock, which is what we're paying Rockminer to do. Also, the link to Havelock in the official thread leads to AMHash1 so anyone following that link to purchase AMHash is going to be buying from existing customers and not us. That was true when AMHash2 was briefly available too. How many sales did that cost us?

Rockminer have made no effort whatsoever to actually sell AMHash, beginning with their announcement of the service in the "securities" section on this forum - the worst possible place to pitch cloud mining. Do you see any of the other cloud mining companies advertising here? No, because they're not idiots. They may be ponzis but they're still selling contracts because they promote their services in the right place.

We're currently paying Rockminer to allow Havelock to make a profit from the trading of AMHash shares. How does this make any sense from an AM shareholder's perspective?

Yep, we're still selling primary market AMHash ghs.

-Sahra

It's a shame you force people to login to gain basic information. I'd redirect my sig link to your page if that wasn't the case. That way Hashie and AM would both profit instead of Havelock.

[elasticband]

perhaps they have had a temporary change of plan again, with the current lower difficulty rises they see it better to hold and mine for now.

[dnaleor]

Unless payments were made out of more than one address, only 74,685/400,000 shares received divs.

Still waiting for a dividend on my direct shares - anyone else?

yes. missing div on my direct share :/

[lucasjkr]

\
The only thing remotely true about your post is the fact that AM is completely lacking communication. (which I agree is unacceptable but it doesn't make them scammers )

There's nobody here who would defend FC/AM if they decided to start scamming.

They have a very competitive chip (possibly the best) and 60PH completely paid for. That's at least ~$10m in assets.

Overall I'd rate the FUD 4/10.

So they retained 60PH of hardware rather than resell it? Why in the world for? Whenever they have a product for sale, buyers line up to pay them more in BTC than than the hardware would ever hope to generate. Sure, it feels good to AM shareholders who can say "our hash rate is X and we'll earn Y BTC over the next 9 moths", which is nice, but had FC put those units up for sale, he could have earned Y * 1.1 BTC for his shareholders as soon as the hardware was sold out, rather than by the time it reaches the end of its useful life.

i should probably shut up... I haven't owned AM shares since BTCT.co shutdown...

[lucasjkr]

damn, so apparently, FC (and boardmembers) prolonged absence could partly be explained by the fact that china has indeed restricted access to bitcointalk:

bitcointalk has been totally blocked by china interenet so i cannot login very often

are there anymore chinese people in here

If FC can't figure out how to obtain a VPN connection, that really doesn't bode well for AM shareholders

/s

[xhomerx10]

damn, so apparently, FC (and boardmembers) prolonged absence could partly be explained by the fact that china has indeed restricted access to bitcointalk:

bitcointalk has been totally blocked by china interenet so i cannot login very often

are there anymore chinese people in here

If FC can't figure out how to obtain a VPN connection, that really doesn't bode well for AM shareholders

/s

  VPN cost money.  Friedcat frugal

[armedmilitia]

Just going to re-confirm that my divs haven't been received on my address. I wonder if its because I only have a single share--is the div big enough to be accepted by the network?

[John (John K.)]

Just going to re-confirm that my divs haven't been received on my address. I wonder if its because I only have a single share--is the div big enough to be accepted by the network?

What address is your share at? You might want to check if there's unconfirmed coins on it - the div should be big enough to be accepted though.

[gogxmagog]

Just going to re-confirm that my divs haven't been received on my address. I wonder if its because I only have a single share--is the div big enough to be accepted by the network?

Yes, this has been stated before. Divs on one single share are less than tx fee. Earlier someone said you can plug your receiving address into block chain io and see that you are accounted for. Did you try that?

[armedmilitia]

Just going to re-confirm that my divs haven't been received on my address. I wonder if its because I only have a single share--is the div big enough to be accepted by the network?

Yes, this has been stated before. Divs on one single share are less than tx fee. Earlier someone said you can plug your receiving address into block chain io and see that you are accounted for. Did you try that?

Double checked on blockchain.info, triple checked the confirmation email that transferred my havelock share to direct share. The address checks out--but there's no unconfirmed/confirmed dividends received. I only have one transaction on the address (cold storage transfer in), so I'm sure I didn't miss it. Spooky!