Dan Metcalf has done more for crypto then these clowns will ever think of.
I will say I was impressed by the way Dan came out and let everyone know who he was from the start. This was a great improvement on developers being anonymous. |
|
|
|
Your post is spot on Spoetnik - and people who have been around know you are a legit person, one of the
But your own membership here started just over one month ago.  |
|
|
|
I hope it's obvious people should be cautious about that Blocknet project ....i heard more than enough to stay way  Yes..well people should be cautious about any crypto coin, shouldn't they? Or are there some that require no caution? scam
/skam/
noun
informal
noun: scam; plural noun: scams
1.
a dishonest scheme; a fraud.
"an insurance scam"
synonyms:
fraud, swindle, fraudulent scheme, racket, trick, diddle; More
informalcon, con trick, flimflam, gyp, kite;
" Here is the definition of the word "scam". can you tell us what evidence you have it is a scam. |
|
|
|
Some of the problems people are getting with invalid addresses have been solved by click on the xc symbol and also clicking on the BLOCKNET symbol , you need to select >>>>input and output coins<<<< click the blocknet logo
I tried that and got this. Invalid address2::Invalidaddress2::BMnA6f5SHGS93JJn3FhqfccmQADVQeDN5k:bitcoin:blocknetshares looks like you trying to buy with btc from coingateway there . did you click on the coin you wanted to trade for, cos weird it saying bitcoin in the invalid bit Yes..you're right but the same happened with block...but I did finally get some |
|
|
|
Some of the problems people are getting with invalid addresses have been solved by click on the xc symbol and also clicking on the BLOCKNET symbol , you need to select >>>>input and output coins<<<< click the blocknet logo
I tried that and got this. Invalid address2::Invalidaddress2::BMnA6f5SHGS93JJn3FhqfccmQADVQeDN5k:bitcoin:blocknetshares |
|
|
|
I'm getting "invalid address" both from the wallet I downloaded and the Bittrex wallet. Invalid address2::BMnA6f5SHGS93JJn3FhqfccmQADVQeDN5k:bitcoin |
|
|
|
|
I'm getting invalid address too
|
|
|
|
I was able to buy through coingateway without issues
How...is there a tab? |
|
|
|
|
I cant see the tab on coingateway...where is it?
|
|
|
|
3 mins by my clock.
Only 2 mins to go? |
|
|
|
|
Where does coingateway get the price and therefore exchange rate of the other coins from?
|
|
|
|
Does Bittrex or any other exchange have a BLOCKNET wallet?
I can't see one on Trex or Polo.
You will see them when time is right ? The thing is that I'm working and and have not downloaded a wallet. I can't download a wallet at work.So I want to buy through coingateway using Fibre or XST or XC and have coingateway deposit them in a wallet at an exchange. So when you say "time is right", do you mean before 05.00 EST 29th Oct? |
|
|
|
|
Does Bittrex or any other exchange have a BLOCKNET wallet?
I can't see one on Trex or Polo.
|
|
|
|
Hey guys, I've been innactive for a while (Haven't been keeping up with the thread).
What is the best way of getting my xc off mintpal? Am I fucked?
Also, reason for recent price decline? chances of it increasing again?
Thanks!
I was able to get my XC off Mintpal...but that must have been 2 weeks ago I guess. It was the day that Mintpal came back up |
|
|
|
(Also, we're not offering securities. We're offering digital tokens, which are the denomination in which service provider fees are paid.)
So you can confirm you weren't contacted by the SEC (or anyone else). I know that anyone copntacted has a gag order on them. It may be worthwhile posting a weekly confirmation that you have not been contacted. Or post a something on a website saying you have not been contacted. Then if it is removed we know you have been contacted.  |
|
|
|
It will trend downward as well after the ITO. It cannot hold its initial value with no product to support it.
Markets can do anything.  This project could possibly capture peoples imagination. We will see. |
|
|
|
Huge buy order at 70k on Bter, if some of you need liquidity in BTC.
Dang, 32 btc buy at 70k... What exchange? |
|
|
|
Conceivably, but the Donkey-blockchain must have been created with a higher-than-50% limit on what an attacker would need to steal.
It's a tradeoff against censorship risk: So, in one example, the attacker might need 90% to steal, but then he only needs 10% to censor return transactions.
Thanks for the replies. I guess I was thinking that for a blockchain to be part of the sidechain experiment, it would probably be helpful to have many active users and hopefully not be dominated by large mining ventures? |
|
|
|
I expect that preventing a 51% style attack on any alt coin used will be necessary?
So that would mean that any coin used in the sidechain would have to be a coin that is potential competition for BTC too?
51% attacks only affect blockchains, not assets/"coins". Ok so lest say "donkeycoin's" blockchain was being used, and there was a 51% attack on "donkeycoin". What are the possible implications? You mean a 51% attack on donkeycoin's blockchain? Yes, what else could it mean? Then assets within donkeycoin's blockchain are susceptible to reversal and/or oversight/control by the 51% attacker.
If the attacker achieves 66% (or whatever the configurable threshold is for the sidechain), then they can also begin to steal outside assets pegged into that blockchain.
The donkeycoin asset/coin itself is irrelevant to this, and may or may not exist.
So that could mean BTC could conceivably be stolen, as BTC could be pegged in the "Donkeycoin" blockchain? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
