doktor83,
Have you work any intensity numbers and oc for a vega frontier ?
i dont have vega frontier gpu
|
|
|
I have the problem on mining masari (masari.miner.rocks). the miner show normal but no hashrate submit to the pool.
well you have to check your wallet then
|
|
|
All these pools and none of them has 24 hour statistic, or what you call one day average speed. So i really want to know how did you measure your one day pool side average speed...
You, guest from the future, should examine more )) 2 doktor My apologies, after applying stale "fix" my pool-side results correspond well with miner speed. Nice, i need this pool for testing resaon, can you tell me what pool is it? bittube.miner.rocks
|
|
|
@doktor83 Hello. Could You do a Linux (Ubuntu 16.04 LTS) version of a miner (or a never Ubuntu LTS) and do a green lite for MSOS Linux distro to be implemented because i dont know how to mine wthout a SRB Miner TNX No, sorry. Linux version is not in plan.
|
|
|
same as 1.6.4 just use --sendallstales in bat i am waiting for reports on win7 bc drivers and 470 cards on which bittube pool do you have 24h stats? Ok, I will give it another try and write back ok im still curious about that 24h stat pool, i am testing on the official pool that has only 15 min average
|
|
|
2 dingdongtobias
You have miner version 1.6.5 on your screen. Did you come from the future to kill mining? ))
i have a few people i give out test versions before releasing officially he is one of them. its good to test on a lot of systems, but it looks like sometimes same cards, same drivers same all behave differently So, 1.6.5 version doesn't have pool-side problems with blockchain drivers? )) same as 1.6.4 just use --sendallstales in bat i am waiting for reports on win7 bc drivers and 470 cards on which bittube pool do you have 24h stats?
|
|
|
2 dingdongtobias
You have miner version 1.6.5 on your screen. Did you come from the future to kill mining? ))
i have a few people i give out test versions before releasing officially he is one of them. its good to test on a lot of systems, but it looks like sometimes same cards, same drivers same all behave differently
|
|
|
1.6.4 can produce compute errors on BC drivers, maybe you have a ton of those? That is why i recommend 18.3.4 or18.6.1 on the first page, it works a lot better on those drivers. Maybe if you can try it on one of those?
Everything has been rock solid on the blockchain drivers. I'm not going to turn these systems upside down ATM to 'test'. Whatever you have done to try to squeeze more hash out of the cards was not done in testing the Blockchain driver. After a long time SRBMiner user, I guess I'll switch to XMR-Stack if the blockchain drivers are suddenly not being supported? Like windows xp, old things get abandoned after some time in favor of newer. 18.3.4 are great drivers, stable (and not really new also). Ask livada, he also never wanted to stop using blockchain drivers, and finally when he gave up and tested these two drivers, he said he got more hash, more stable system and lower power consumption. So i will leave it to you, it's your choice.
|
|
|
1.6.4 can produce compute errors on BC drivers, maybe you have a ton of those? That is why i recommend 18.3.4 or18.6.1 on the first page, it works a lot better on those drivers. Maybe if you can try it on one of those?
|
|
|
I'm getting a significant share drop on nanopool since upgrading to 1.6.4 from 1.6.2. Both machines doing the exact same thing Everything appears normal within SRBMiner. Almost the exact hash numbers as 1.6.2. However, when I missed a payment, I went to investigate and I now realize my shares dropped by about 20-25% ---- Windows 10, blockchain with a bunch of Vega64's nah, not possible, it looks like you are not using a gpu or two, i couldnt know but its not the miners fault that is 100%
|
|
|
Hi Dok, Thank you for all the answers you have given me so for all my noob questions. Currently i am mining bittubev2 algo and my hashrates and overdrive settings are shown in the attached screen shot. Gpus according to order showing in screen shot:- 1 - Vega56 (sapphire reference card, samsung mem) 2 - Vega FE (sapphire reference card, samsung mem) 3 - Vega56 (sapphire reference card, samsung mem) 4 - Vega64 (sapphire reference card, samsung mem) 5 - Vega64 (sapphire reference card, samsung mem) 6 - Vega64 (sapphire reference card, samsung mem) I have not been able to achieve the hash rates you are showing, please adviseIntensity 5 You need to start miner with intensity 60, let it work for a few minutes , then start it with intensity 56. This should get you over 1500+ easily. Some call this foreplay. And of course use v1.6.4 I am using blockchain Aug 23 drivers.. is it fine or should i use latest ? Thanks 18.3.4 , not the latest. It will give you more hash than BC on bittubev2 algo
|
|
|
Hi Dok, Thank you for all the answers you have given me so for all my noob questions. Currently i am mining bittubev2 algo and my hashrates and overdrive settings are shown in the attached screen shot. Gpus according to order showing in screen shot:- 1 - Vega56 (sapphire reference card, samsung mem) 2 - Vega FE (sapphire reference card, samsung mem) 3 - Vega56 (sapphire reference card, samsung mem) 4 - Vega64 (sapphire reference card, samsung mem) 5 - Vega64 (sapphire reference card, samsung mem) 6 - Vega64 (sapphire reference card, samsung mem) I have not been able to achieve the hash rates you are showing, please adviseIntensity 5 You need to start miner with intensity 60, let it work for a few minutes , then start it with intensity 56. This should get you over 1500+ easily. Some call this foreplay. And of course use v1.6.4
|
|
|
what's the latest working on blockchain ?
Probably 1.6.1, but i don't see any reasons on staying on blockchain except sentimental reasons.
|
|
|
1.6.4 pours errors
[2018-07-19 09:58:16] stats: Average time to find share: 8 seconds [2018-07-19 09:58:16] stats: HW error: BUS_ID_16: 2 [2018-07-19 09:58:16] stats: HW error: BUS_ID_7: 1 [2018-07-19 09:58:16] stats: HW error: BUS_ID_10: 1 [2018-07-19 09:58:16] stats: HW error: BUS_ID_3: 2
1,6,4 ------------------------------------------------------- [2018-07-19 10:00:41] GPU0 : 1923 H/s [T: 62c, RPM: 3674, CC: 1212 MHz, MC: 905 MHz][BUS:19] [2018-07-19 10:00:41] GPU1 : 1925 H/s [T: 65c, RPM: 3678, CC: 1212 MHz, MC: 905 MHz][BUS:10] [2018-07-19 10:00:41] GPU2 : 1908 H/s [T: 60c, RPM: 3668, CC: 1212 MHz, MC: 905 MHz][BUS:13] [2018-07-19 10:00:41] GPU3 : 1936 H/s [T: 65c, RPM: 3677, CC: 1212 MHz, MC: 905 MHz][BUS:7] [2018-07-19 10:00:41] GPU4 : 1917 H/s [T: 64c, RPM: 3676, CC: 1212 MHz, MC: 905 MHz][BUS:16] [2018-07-19 10:00:41] GPU5 : 1919 H/s [T: 57c, RPM: 3547, CC: 1212 MHz, MC: 905 MHz][BUS:3] [2018-07-19 10:00:41] Total: 11528 H/s
1,4,9 [2018-07-19 10:03:12] GPU0: 1951.0 H/S [T: 56c, RPM: 4529, CC: 1212 MHz, MC: 905 MHz] [2018-07-19 10:03:12] GPU1: 1950.0 H/S [T: 58c, RPM: 4754, CC: 1212 MHz, MC: 905 MHz] [2018-07-19 10:03:12] GPU2: 1932.0 H/S [T: 56c, RPM: 4475, CC: 1212 MHz, MC: 905 MHz] [2018-07-19 10:03:12] GPU3: 1961.0 H/S [T: 59c, RPM: 4571, CC: 1212 MHz, MC: 905 MHz] [2018-07-19 10:03:12] GPU4: 1945.0 H/S [T: 59c, RPM: 4557, CC: 1212 MHz, MC: 905 MHz] [2018-07-19 10:03:12] GPU5: 1945.0 H/S [T: 53c, RPM: 4434, CC: 1212 MHz, MC: 905 MHz] [2018-07-19 10:03:12] Total: 11684.0 H/S
Its time to change the good old blockchain drivers to 18.3.4 or 18.6.1
|
|
|
Some results & settings on Vega56 8G Hynix mem Bittubev2Cnv7
|
|
|
I managed to get the 18.6.1 driver work on my Vega FE rig so SRB Miner 1.6.4 has become effective. getting a somewhat stable 11060 H/s now... I will post detailed information about this later.
18.6.1 or 18.3.4 work best on vegas, depending what algo you want to use Which one would you recommend for Vega 56 on CN Heavy? We have a few Vegas sitting in a box that are about to go into a rig soon and I'm trying to decide what we will be mining with them. if you want to mine Heavy algos, use Adrenaline 18.3.4
|
|
|
I managed to get the 18.6.1 driver work on my Vega FE rig so SRB Miner 1.6.4 has become effective. getting a somewhat stable 11060 H/s now... I will post detailed information about this later.
18.6.1 or 18.3.4 work best on vegas, depending what algo you want to use
|
|
|
Can someone show their bittube pool.txt file and config file with vega setup
Thanks
Config.txt : { "min_rig_speed" : 1850 }In .bat put: SRBMiner-CN.exe --ccryptonighttype bittubev2 --cgpuid 0 --cgpuintensity 56 --cgputhreads 2 --cpool mining.bit.tube:13333 --cwallet your-wallet-hereThis is for 1 Vega gpu
|
|
|
doktor83
v7 algo 505 H/s 1215/1945 Gygabyte Rx550 (Hynix) Video driver version: 24.20.11001.5003 505 H/s 1215/1900 Asus Rx550 (Elpida) Video driver version: 24.20.11001.5003 495 H/s 1215-1230/1900-1935 MSI Low Profile Rx550 (Hynix ) Video driver version: 23.20.16.4944
"intensity" : 26.7, "worksize" : 12, "threads" : 2
If i add fragments=338033747 in config when speed up about +10 H/s
with new srb version 1.6.4 have you try mix rx550 with other series like rx460 or rx560 can it run properly ? No, i'm not try. ok thx for your attention, i just want to know why my rig error since use srb v1.6.1-1.6.4 just for miner old algo like cnv7, cnltv7, cnh with manual gpu_config 😂 What is the error you get?
|
|
|
plz support HYCON mining,THX! I missed your previous post, sorry. I will look into it. edit : it's cryptonight v7, so you can use 'normalv7' to mine it. It's V7 fork, something modified,normal V7 miner can not work,the modified xmrig miner work fine,but...i like SRBminer more +1 I checked it its not just the algo, it has a lot custom modifications. So sorry, but you will have to use their miner
|
|
|
|