Anonymous site which complies with AML policy and doesn't enforce KYC? Nop, it does not exist. If someone deposit money and choose not to gamble I am pretty sure they should be allowed to withdraw their deposited money without any problem and without fees. If someone truly wanted to launder, then the rollover term wouldn't stop them.
Of course, it sounds like " this player wagered 1X their deposit amount therefore they are not laundering money and their money didn't come from illegal activities". Makes exactly 0 sense.
@Nitrogensport, other than you are forcing users to gamble, what is reason behind rollover and nonsensical fees?
|
|
|
~
Lets see, you asked "where is proof of threat", you have been pointed where to look and then you went 180 degrees. Do you agree that you are threatening h4ns with this defamation bullshit or not? It's not false or misleading. You did scam 210 euro, and you made up a defamation claim as an excuse to not pay it back. If you suffered any damage it's because of your scam and your subsequent trolling, not because someone asked you to return what's rightfully theirs.
For some strange reason I feel like this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EneFmy8h1wQ and new round has started!
|
|
|
As long as you are not able to quote it, I am logically not able to read it! I agree, I am trying to find where you have repaid 210€ to h4ns but I just can't find it and logically I am not able to quote it and you are not able to read it!? I asked you to quote How can I quote something what can't be found? So you suffer a serious schizophrenia? Do I suffer a serious schizophrenia because I can't find and quote where you repaid 210€ or do I suffer a serious schizophrenia because you can't read something I can't find? You publicly false and misleading claim that I threaten h4ns, but you are not able to find where and can not quote it? Memory loss again? No problem, here you go.
|
|
|
As long as you are not able to quote it, I am logically not able to read it! I agree, I am trying to find where you have repaid 210€ to h4ns but I just can't find it and logically I am not able to quote it and you are not able to read it!? Do you suffer a serious dementia? I asked you to quote How can I quote something what can't be found?
|
|
|
As long as you are not able to quote it, I am logically not able to read it! I agree, I am trying to find where you have repaid 210€ to h4ns but I just can't find it and logically I am not able to quote it and you are not able to read it!? At what date did the scam happen and how?
Try here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5183189.0
|
|
|
Please quote where I threatened h4ns?
I am not going to quote you anything, you have high enough IQ to browse through forum. You are not able to quote where I threatened h4ns? You are not able to read?
|
|
|
Seems you don't know how provably fair system work or you just don't believe in provably fairness (Research this https://cryptogambling.org) You need to prove that they changed result, if you can't do that this thread is nothing but a FUD created by someone who lost money in gambling site. Please verify your result and post details here (I suppose you saved server seed hash somewhere before you placed that one bet?).
|
|
|
OK... just switched in to my morvillz account. Oh shit, I meant nutildah! Yeah that's right, I'm nutildah. Almost forgot for a second.
Good that you didn't switch to your theymos account
|
|
|
What does this mean: "BitKong potentially scamming its users", they are either cheating users or they are not.
Have you (or any other user) manually verified result(s)? Have you verified result(s) in old system?
|
|
|
Ma da, kad bi mi netko rekao da moram platiti samo da bih nešto napisao na forumu a da sam još k tome "nov" i skeptičan, shvatio bih sve to kao jednu prevaru i siguran sam da se ne bih nikad više vratio ovdje. Stvarno te ne košta ništa da probaš u meti, evo, našao sam temu: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1901653.0 - samo, s obzirom da je IP "označen", bude interesantno kad moderator ili admin kaže da ti je frend već na forumu
|
|
|
Please quote where I threatened h4ns?
I am not going to quote you anything, you have high enough IQ to browse through forum. Your brain is not able to realise an extortion, but discovers a non-existing threat towards h4ns!
Your brain is not able to send signal to your hands, your hands should go to your wallet, copy/paste h4ns's address and refund him btc.
|
|
|
In the real world, offering to play with consumer protection service inclusive is not criminal! In the real world, you are doing exactly what I said you are doing, it just doesn't work like - "I will play with words and I am not doing that then". Your lawyer probably explained it to you. So stop threatening h4ns and send him his funds back.
|
|
|
The lawyer said publicly false and misleading claiming things towards entities is the criminal offense of defamation.
OK, Miss Criminal, then your lawyer probably told you that you should return 210€ to h4ns. I wonder what has your lawyer told you about you asking people to sign under your referral link and to gamble in sites you claim they operate illegally? You are either doing something illegal or you are defaming gambling sites?
|
|
|
Sjetio sam se jednog slučaja gdje je netko zatražio theymosa da odblokira jedan account za frenda (ima tema negdje u meti, ne mogu je naći) pa možeš probati tako ako hoćeš. Ako mu je IP "označen" neka otvori account sa mobitela, ne bi trebao imati problema s tim. Znam samo da je kod nas generalno problem sa tim dinamičnim IPovima pa se događa da jedan dan sve radi normalno a drugi dobijete IP koji je na nekakvoj crnoj listi i neki sajtovi vam neće dozvoliti da ih koristite, kod mene je recimo bilo slučaja sa blocktrail-om.
O kojoj se cifri radi ako se smije znati? Možda da mu uplatiš ako je nešto sitno, ili mu napravi account ako ti IP nije "označen"?
|
|
|
It's when all of the moderators checking the report aren't sure whether they should act on it
What do you think about zupdawg's case?
|
|
|
suchmoon claims that "likely" is a an opinion signal word
You are lying, suchmoon never said that. Your brain doesn't function properly, you are seeing things which are not there? ?? ? "Probably" is an opinion signal word.
I already explained that h4ns referred to opinions of others and this confirms that it is not his opinion, despite of the circumstance that the words "opinion" or "in my opinion" are missing! "Game-Protect is probably a scam, read the reviews in the Bitcointalk forum. He is the least trusted user in this forum"Looks like lonnie55's opinion about opinions?? ? ??
|
|
|
Telling the truth is not defaming in the real world! You are defaming me by telling lies that you are telling the truth. Now my compensation demand is currently 80,210€. Please quote the legal source where it says that "likely" is an opinion signal word?
Please quote the legal source where it says that likely is not an opinion signal word.
|
|
|
First you asked them 5btc then you asked them 2.5btc then you asked them how much they want to pay you for -ve removal. Trying to prove that OP is a scammer but you showed yourself as a criminal to everyone else, good job. That this topic here exists shows me that I did the right thing. Now more people know that you should not deal with nemgun again.
May I ask you why? hehe, now you are posting in PMs private messages.thats all anybody has to know about you. and good luck you scammer! i would have reported nemgun if he had paid me something. believe me or not.
So what makes difference between you two then? You are basically saying that you don't approve nemgun's action but you would have done the same thing.
|
|
|
Reports for account zupdawg are unhandled Monthly bump.
|
|
|
However, after given this claim to a lawyer in the country where h4ns is resident, the claim can easily rise to 40,000€ and more!
You publicly defamed me calling me "extremely mentally ill child abuser" which caused me damage, compensation demand is currently 40,210 €. September 3rd I reduced the 210€ from the compensation h4ns has to give to Game Protect for the damage caused by his defamation campaign.
So you reduced 210€ on September 3rd because scam accusation caused you damage on September 09?
|
|
|
|